Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: The future is almost here

Physical and psychological symptoms and survey importance in celiac disease

Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition that affects approximately 1% of the worldwide community. Originally thought to be confined mostly to the small intestine, resulting in villous atrophy and nutrient malabsorption, it has more recently been implicated in systemic manifestations as well, particularly when undiagnosed or left untreated. Herein, the physical and psychological symptoms of celiac disease are described and explored. An emphasis is placed on efforts to query prospective and confirmed celiac disease patients via the use of surveys. Suggestions are made regarding the development of efficacious surveys for the purpose of screening for celiac disease in undiagnosed persons, and monitoring efficacy of the gluten-free diet in persons diagnosed with celiac disease. There are broad categories of physical and psychological symptoms associated with celiac disease. There is also an essential interaction between such physical and the psychological symptoms. It is important to capture the association between symptoms, via queries directed toward suspected and confirmed persons with celiac disease. The use of anonymous online surveys can be helpful to determine the qualities and characteristics which may be associated with this condition. It is suggested that personal surveys should be given a greater role in screening and to lessen the time for diagnosis. Querying the subject directly via a survey can provide clues as to the types of symptoms being experienced by those with celiac disease currently, as well as to determine the salient aspects of the symptomatology, which will be useful for rapid screening and monitoring in future work.

Interpretable deep learning architecture for gastrointestinal disease detection: A Tri-stage approach with PCA and XAI

GI abnormalities significantly increase mortality rates and impose considerable strain on healthcare systems, underscoring the essential requirement for rapid detection, precise diagnosis, and efficient strategic treatment. To develop a CAD system, this study aims to automatically classify GI disorders utilizing various deep learning methodologies. The proposed system features a three-stage lightweight architecture, consisting of a feature extractor using PSE-CNN, a feature selector employing PCA, and a classifier based on DELM. The framework, designed with only 24 layers and 1.25 million parameters, is employed on the largest dataset, GastroVision, containing 8000 images of 27 GI disorders. To improve visual clarity, a sequential preprocessing strategy is implemented. The model's robustness is evaluated through 5-fold cross-validation. Additionally, several XAI methods, namely Grad-CAM, heatmaps, saliency maps, SHAP, and activation feature maps, are used to explore the model's interpretability. Statistical significance is ensured by calculating the p-value, demonstrating the framework's reliability. The proposed model PSE-CNN-PCA-DELM has achieved outstanding results in the first stage, categorizing the diseases' positions into three primary classes, with average accuracy (97.24 %), precision (97.33 ± 0.01 %), recall (97.24 ± 0.01 %), F1-score (97.33 ± 0.01 %), ROC-AUC (99.38 %), and AUC-PR (98.94 %). In the second stage, the dataset is further divided into nine separate classes, considering the overall disease characteristics, and achieves excellent outcomes with average performance rates of 90.00 %, 89.71 ± 0.11 %, 89.59 ± 0.14 %, 89.51 ± 0.12 %, 98.49 %, and 94.63 %, respectively. The third stage involves a more detailed classification into twenty-seven classes, maintaining strong performance with scores of 93.00 %, 82.69 ± 0.37 %, 83.00 ± 0.38 %, 81.54 ± 0.35 %, 97.38 %, and 88.03 %, respectively. The framework's compact size of 14.88 megabytes and average testing time of 59.17 milliseconds make it highly efficient. Its effectiveness is further validated through comparisons with several TL approaches. Practically, the framework is extremely resilient for clinical implementation.

Capsule robots for the monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment of intestinal diseases

Current evidence suggests that the intestine as the new frontier for human health directly impacts both our physical and mental health. Therefore, it is highly desirable to develop the intelligent tool for the enhanced diagnosis and treatment of intestinal diseases. During the past 20 years, capsule robots have opened new avenues for research and clinical applications, potentially revolutionizing human health monitor, disease diagnosis and treatment. In this review, we summarize the research progress of edible multifunctional capsule robots in intestinal diseases. To begin, we introduce the correlation between the intestinal microbiome, intestinal gas and human diseases. After that, we focus on the technical structure of edible multifunctional robots. Subsequently, the biomedical applications in the monitoring, diagnosis and treatment of intestinal diseases are discussed in detail. Last but not least, the main challenges of multifunctional capsule robots during the development process are summarized, followed by a vision for future development opportunities.

Validation of Artificial Intelligence Computer-Aided Detection on Gastric Neoplasm in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Gastric cancer ranks fifth for incidence and fourth in the leading causes of mortality worldwide. In this study, we aimed to validate previously developed artificial intelligence (AI) computer-aided detection (CADe) algorithm, called ALPHAON® in detecting gastric neoplasm.

METHODS

We used the retrospective data of 500 still images, including 5 benign gastric ulcers, 95 with gastric cancer, and 400 normal images. Thereby we validated the CADe algorithm measuring accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity with the result of receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and area under curve (AUC) in addition to comparing the diagnostic performance status of four expert endoscopists, four trainees, and four beginners from two university-affiliated hospitals with CADe algorithm. After a washing-out period of over 2 weeks, endoscopists performed gastric detection on the same dataset of the 500 endoscopic images again marked by ALPHAON®.

RESULTS

The CADe algorithm presented high validity in detecting gastric neoplasm with accuracy (0.88, 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.91), sensitivity (0.93, 95% CI: 0.88 to 0.98), specificity (0.87, 95% CI: 0.84 to 0.90), and AUC (0.962). After a washing-out period of over 2 weeks, overall validity improved in the trainee and beginner groups with the assistance of ALPHAON®. Significant improvement was present, especially in the beginner group (accuracy 0.94 (0.93 to 0.96) p < 0.001, sensitivity 0.87 (0.82 to 0.92) p < 0.001, specificity 0.96 (0.95 to 0.97) p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The high validation performance state of the CADe algorithm system was verified. Also, ALPHAON® has demonstrated its potential to serve as an endoscopic educator for beginners improving and making progress in sensitivity and specificity.

A Review of Application of Deep Learning in Endoscopic Image Processing

Deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has revolutionized endoscopic image processing, significantly enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of disease diagnosis through its exceptional ability to extract features and classify complex patterns. This technology automates medical image analysis, alleviating the workload of physicians and enabling a more focused and personalized approach to patient care. However, despite these remarkable achievements, there are still opportunities to further optimize deep learning models for endoscopic image analysis, including addressing limitations such as the requirement for large annotated datasets and the challenge of achieving higher diagnostic precision, particularly for rare or subtle pathologies. This review comprehensively examines the profound impact of deep learning on endoscopic image processing, highlighting its current strengths and limitations. It also explores potential future directions for research and development, outlining strategies to overcome existing challenges and facilitate the integration of deep learning into clinical practice. Ultimately, the goal is to contribute to the ongoing advancement of medical imaging technologies, leading to more accurate, personalized, and optimized medical care for patients.

Using artificial intelligence to improve human performance: efficient retinal disease detection training with synthetic images

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging diagnostics has huge potential, but human judgement is still indispensable. We propose an AI-aided teaching method that leverages generative AI to train students on many images while preserving patient privacy.

METHODS

A web-based course was designed using 600 synthetic ultra-widefield (UWF) retinal images to teach students to detect disease in these images. The images were generated by stable diffusion, a large generative foundation model, which we fine-tuned with 6285 real UWF images from six categories: five retinal diseases (age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, retinal detachment and retinal vein occlusion) and normal. 161 trainee orthoptists took the course. They were evaluated with two tests: one consisting of UWF images and another of standard field (SF) images, which the students had not encountered in the course. Both tests contained 120 real patient images, 20 per category. The students took both tests once before and after training, with a cool-off period in between.

RESULTS

On average, students completed the course in 53 min, significantly improving their diagnostic accuracy. For UWF images, student accuracy increased from 43.6% to 74.1% (p<0.0001 by paired t-test), nearly matching the previously published state-of-the-art AI model's accuracy of 73.3%. For SF images, student accuracy rose from 42.7% to 68.7% (p<0.0001), surpassing the state-of-the-art AI model's 40%.

CONCLUSION

Synthetic images can be used effectively in medical education. We also found that humans are more robust to novel situations than AI models, thus showcasing human judgement's essential role in medical diagnosis.

Automatic assessment of bowel preparation by an artificial intelligence model and its clinical applicability

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Reliable bowel preparation assessment is important in colonoscopy. However, current scoring systems are limited by laborious and time-consuming tasks and interobserver variability. We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to assess bowel cleanliness and evaluate its clinical applicability.

METHODS

A still image-driven AI model to assess the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) was developed and validated using 2361 colonoscopy images. For evaluating real-world applicability, the model was validated using 113 10-s colonoscopy video clips and 30 full colonoscopy videos to identify "adequate (BBPS 2-3)" or "inadequate (BBPS 0-1)" preparation. The model was tested with an external dataset of 29 colonoscopy videos. The clinical applicability of the model was evaluated using 225 consecutive colonoscopies. Inter-rater variability was analyzed between the AI model and endoscopists.

RESULTS

The AI model achieved an accuracy of 94.0% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.939 with the still images. Model testing with an external dataset showed an accuracy of 95.3%, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.976, and a sensitivity of 100% for the detection of inadequate preparations. The clinical applicability study showed an overall agreement rate of 85.3% between endoscopists and the AI model, with Fleiss' kappa of 0.686. The agreement rate was lower for the right colon compared with the transverse and left colon, with Fleiss' kappa of 0.563, 0.575, and 0.789, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The AI model demonstrated accurate bowel preparation assessment and substantial agreement with endoscopists. Further refinement of the AI model is warranted for effective monitoring of qualified colonoscopy in large-scale screening programs.

Performance comparison between two computer-aided detection colonoscopy models by trainees using different false positive thresholds: a cross-sectional study in Thailand

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This study aims to compare polyp detection performance of "Deep-GI," a newly developed artificial intelligence (AI) model, to a previously validated AI model computer-aided polyp detection (CADe) using various false positive (FP) thresholds and determining the best threshold for each model.

METHODS

Colonoscopy videos were collected prospectively and reviewed by three expert endoscopists (gold standard), trainees, CADe (CAD EYE; Fujifilm Corp.), and Deep-GI. Polyp detection sensitivity (PDS), polyp miss rates (PMR), and false-positive alarm rates (FPR) were compared among the three groups using different FP thresholds for the duration of bounding boxes appearing on the screen.

RESULTS

In total, 170 colonoscopy videos were used in this study. Deep-GI showed the highest PDS (99.4% vs. 85.4% vs. 66.7%, p<0.01) and the lowest PMR (0.6% vs. 14.6% vs. 33.3%, p<0.01) when compared to CADe and trainees, respectively. Compared to CADe, Deep-GI demonstrated lower FPR at FP thresholds of ≥0.5 (12.1 vs. 22.4) and ≥1 second (4.4 vs. 6.8) (both p<0.05). However, when the threshold was raised to ≥1.5 seconds, the FPR became comparable (2 vs. 2.4, p=0.3), while the PMR increased from 2% to 10%.

CONCLUSION

Compared to CADe, Deep-GI demonstrated a higher PDS with significantly lower FPR at ≥0.5- and ≥1-second thresholds. At the ≥1.5-second threshold, both systems showed comparable FPR with increased PMR.

Machine learning application in autoimmune diseases: State of art and future prospectives

Autoimmune diseases are a group of disorders resulting from an alteration of immune tolerance, characterized by the formation of autoantibodies and the consequent development of heterogeneous clinical manifestations. Diagnosing autoimmune diseases is often complicated, and the available prognostic tools are limited. Machine learning allows us to analyze large amounts of data and carry out complex calculations quickly and with minimal effort. In this work, we examine the literature focusing on the use of machine learning in the field of the main systemic (systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis) and organ-specific autoimmune diseases (type 1 diabetes mellitus, autoimmune thyroid, gastrointestinal, and skin diseases). From our analysis, interesting applications of machine learning emerged for developing algorithms useful in the early diagnosis of disease or prognostic models (risk of complications, therapeutic response). Subsequent studies and the creation of increasingly rich databases to be supplied to the algorithms will eventually guide the clinician in the diagnosis, allowing intervention when the pathology is still in an early stage and immediately directing towards a correct therapeutic approach.

Artificial Intelligence in endoscopy: A future poll

Artificial Intelligence [AI] has been a trendy topic in recent years, with many developed medical applications. In gastrointestinal endoscopy, AI systems include computer-assisted detection [CADe] for lesion detection as bleedings and polyps and computer-assisted diagnosis [CADx] for optical biopsy and lesion characterization. The technology behind these systems is based on a computer algorithm that is trained for a specific function. This function could be to recognize or characterize target lesions such as colonic polyps. Moreover, AI systems can offer technical assistance to improve endoscopic performance as scope insertion guidance. Currently, we believe that such technologies still lack legal and regulatory validations as a large sector of doctors and patients have concerns. However, there is no doubt that these technologies will bring significant improvement in the endoscopic management of patients as well as save money and time.

Exploring knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards artificial intelligence among health professions' students in Jordan

INTRODUCTION

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medical education and practice is a significant development. This study examined the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) of health professions' students in Jordan concerning AI, providing insights into their preparedness and perceptions.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was distributed to 483 Jordanian health professions' students via social media. Demographic data, AI-related KAP, and barriers were collected. Quantile regression models analyzed associations between variables and KAP scores.

RESULTS

Moderate AI knowledge was observed among participants, with specific understanding of data requirements and barriers. Attitudes varied, combining skepticism about AI replacing human teachers with recognition of its value. While AI tools were used for specific tasks, broader integration in medical education and practice was limited. Barriers included lack of knowledge, access, time constraints, and curriculum gaps.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the need to enhance medical education with AI topics and address barriers. Students need to be better prepared for AI integration, in order to enable medical education to harness AI's potential for improved patient care and training.

Artificial intelligence in rectal cancer: What is the future?

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer in both men and women, and it is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Around 60%-70% of CRC patients are diagnosed at advanced stages, with nearly 20% having liver metastases. It is noteworthy that the 5-year survival rates decline significantly from 80%-90% for localized disease to a mere 10%-15% for patients with metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Early diagnosis, appropriate therapeutic strategy, accurate assessment of treatment response, and prognostication is essential for better outcome. There has been significant technological development in the last couple of decades to improve the outcome of rectal cancer including Artificial intelligence (AI). AI is a broad term used to describe the study of machines that mimic human intelligence, such as perceiving the environment, drawing logical conclusions from observations, and performing complex tasks. At present AI has demonstrated a promising role in early diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment outcomes for patients with rectal cancer, a limited role in surgical decision making, and had a bright future.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Convolutional Neural Network in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps and Cancer

Convolutional neural networks are a class of deep neural networks used for different clinical purposes, including improving the detection rate of colorectal lesions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the performance of convolutional neural network-based models in the detection or classification of colorectal polyps and colorectal cancer. A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and other related databases. The performance measures of the convolutional neural network models in the detection of colorectal polyps and colorectal cancer were calculated in the 2 scenarios of the best and worst accuracy. Stata and R software were used for conducting the meta-analysis. From 3368 searched records, 24 primary studies were included. The sensitivity and specificity of convolutional neural network models in predicting colorectal polyps in worst and best scenarios ranged from 84.7% to 91.6% and from 86.0% to 93.8%, respectively. These values in predicting colorectal cancer varied between 93.2% and 94.1% and between 94.6% and 97.7%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios varied between 6.2 and 14.5 and 0.09 and 0.17 in these scenarios, respectively, in predicting colorectal polyps, and 17.1-41.2 and 0.07-0.06 in predicting colorectal polyps. The diagnostic odds ratio and accuracy measures of convolutional neural network models in predicting colorectal polyps in worst and best scenarios ranged between 36% and 162% and between 80.5% and 88.6%, respectively. These values in predicting colorectal cancer in the worst and the best scenarios varied between 239.63% and 677.47% and between 88.2% and 96.4%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic varied between 0.92 and 0.97 in the worst and the best scenarios in colorectal polyps, respectively, and between 0.98 and 0.99 in colorectal polyps prediction. Convolutional neural network-based models showed an acceptable accuracy in detecting colorectal polyps and colorectal cancer.

An artificial intelligence-based ecological index for prognostic evaluation of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In the tumor microenvironment (TME), the dynamic interaction between tumor cells and immune cells plays a critical role in predicting the prognosis of colorectal cancer. This study introduces a novel approach based on artificial intelligence (AI) and immunohistochemistry (IHC)-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients to quantitatively assess the spatial associations between tumor cells and immune cells. To achieve this, we employ the Morisita-Horn ecological index (Mor-index), which allows for a comprehensive analysis of the spatial distribution patterns between tumor cells and immune cells within the TME.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we employed a combination of deep learning technology and traditional computer segmentation methods to accurately segment the tumor nuclei, immune nuclei, and stroma nuclei within the tumor regions of IHC-stained WSIs. The Mor-index was used to assess the spatial association between tumor cells and immune cells in TME of CRC patients by obtaining the results of cell nuclei segmentation. A discovery cohort (N = 432) and validation cohort (N = 137) were used to evaluate the prognostic value of the Mor-index for overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The efficacy of our method was demonstrated through experiments conducted on two datasets comprising a total of 569 patients. Compared to other studies, our method is not only superior to the QuPath tool but also produces better segmentation results with an accuracy of 0.85. Mor-index was quantified automatically by our method. Survival analysis indicated that the higher Mor-index correlated with better OS in the discovery cohorts (HR for high vs. low 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.77, P = 0.0014) and validation cohort (0.21, 0.10-0.46, < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This study provided a novel AI-based approach to segmenting various nuclei in the TME. The Mor-index can reflect the immune status of CRC patients and is associated with favorable survival. Thus, Mor-index can potentially make a significant role in aiding clinical prognosis and decision-making.

Perception of Pathologists in Poland of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Medical Diagnosis-A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

In the past vicennium, several artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models have been developed to assist in medical diagnosis, decision making, and design of treatment protocols. The number of active pathologists in Poland is low, prolonging tumor patients' diagnosis and treatment journey. Hence, applying AI and ML may aid in this process. Therefore, our study aims to investigate the knowledge of using AI and ML methods in the clinical field in pathologists in Poland. To our knowledge, no similar study has been conducted.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study targeting pathologists in Poland from June to July 2022. The questionnaire included self-reported information on AI or ML knowledge, experience, specialization, personal thoughts, and level of agreement with different aspects of AI and ML in medical diagnosis. Data were analyzed using IBM^® SPSS^® Statistics v.26, PQStat Software v.1.8.2.238, and RStudio Build 351.

RESULTS

Overall, 68 pathologists in Poland participated in our study. Their average age and years of experience were 38.92 ± 8.88 and 12.78 ± 9.48 years, respectively. Approximately 42% used AI or ML methods, which showed a significant difference in the knowledge gap between those who never used it (OR = 17.9, 95% CI = 3.57-89.79, p < 0.001). Additionally, users of AI had higher odds of reporting satisfaction with the speed of AI in the medical diagnosis process (OR = 4.66, 95% CI = 1.05-20.78, p = 0.043). Finally, significant differences (p = 0.003) were observed in determining the liability for legal issues used by AI and ML methods.

CONCLUSION

Most pathologists in this study did not use AI or ML models, highlighting the importance of increasing awareness and educational programs regarding applying AI and ML in medical diagnosis.

One-year review of real-time artificial intelligence (AI)-aided endoscopy performance

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopies have long been the gold standard for detection of pre-malignant neoplastic lesions of the colon. Our previous study tried real-time artificial intelligence (AI)-aided colonoscopy over a three-month period and found significant improvements in collective and individual endoscopist's adenoma detection rates compared to baseline. As an expansion, this study evaluates the 1-year performance of AI-aided colonoscopy in the same institution.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted in a single institution in Singapore. The AI software used was GI Genius™ Intelligent Endoscopy Module, US-DG-2000309 © 2021 Medtronic. Between July 2021 and June 2022, polypectomy rates in non-AI-aided colonoscopies and AI-aided colonoscopies were calculated and compared. Some of the AI-aided colonoscopies were recorded and video reviewed. A "hit" was defined as a sustained detection of an area by the AI. If a polypectomy was performed for a "hit," its histology was reviewed. Additional calculations for polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and adenoma detection per colonoscopy (ADPC) were performed. Cost analysis was performed to determine cost effectiveness of subscription to the AI program.

RESULTS

2433 AI-aided colonoscopies were performed between July 2021 and June 2022 and compared against 1770 non-AI-aided colonoscopies. AI-aided colonoscopies yielded significantly higher rates of polypectomies (33.6%) as compared with non-AI-aided colonoscopies (28.4%) (p < 0.001). Among the AI-aided colonoscopies, 1050 were reviewed and a final 843 were included for additional analysis. The polypectomy to "hit" ratio was 57.4%, PDR = 45.6%, ADR = 32.4%, and ADPC = 2.08. Histological review showed that 25 polyps (3.13%) were sessile-serrated adenomas. Cost analysis found that the increased polypectomy rates in AI-aided colonoscopes led to an increase in revenue, which covered the subscription cost with an excess of USD 20,000.

CONCLUSION

AI-aided colonoscopy is a cost effective means of improving colonoscopy quality and may help advance colorectal cancer screening in Singapore.

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Monitoring Inflammatory Bowel Disease-The Future Is Now

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis remain debilitating disorders, characterized by progressive bowel damage and possible lethal complications. The growing number of applications for artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy has already shown great potential, especially in the field of neoplastic and pre-neoplastic lesion detection and characterization, and is currently under evaluation in the field of inflammatory bowel disease management. The application of artificial intelligence in inflammatory bowel diseases can range from genomic dataset analysis and risk prediction model construction to the disease grading severity and assessment of the response to treatment using machine learning. We aimed to assess the current and future role of artificial intelligence in assessing the key outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease patients: endoscopic activity, mucosal healing, response to treatment, and neoplasia surveillance.

The Role of an Artificial Intelligence Method of Improving the Diagnosis of Neoplasms by Colonoscopy

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. Colonoscopy is the gold standard examination that reduces the morbidity and mortality of CRC. Artificial intelligence (AI) could be useful in reducing the errors of the specialist and in drawing attention to the suspicious area.

METHODS

A prospective single-center randomized controlled study was conducted in an outpatient endoscopy unit with the aim of evaluating the usefulness of AI-assisted colonoscopy in PDR and ADR during the day time. It is important to understand how already available CADe systems improve the detection of polyps and adenomas in order to make a decision about their routine use in practice. In the period from October 2021 to February 2022, 400 examinations (patients) were included in the study. One hundred and ninety-four patients were examined using the ENDO-AID CADe artificial intelligence device (study group), and 206 patients were examined without the artificial intelligence (control group).

RESULTS

None of the analyzed indicators (PDR and ADR during morning and afternoon colonoscopies) showed differences between the study and control groups. There was an increase in PDR during afternoon colonoscopies, as well as ADR during morning and afternoon colonoscopies.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, the use of AI systems in colonoscopies is recommended, especially in circumstances of an increase of examinations. Additional studies with larger groups of patients at night are needed to confirm the already available data.

Role of artificial intelligence-guided esophagogastroduodenoscopy in assessing the procedural completeness and quality

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The quality of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) can have great impact on the detection of esophageal and gastric lesions, including malignancies. The aim of the study is to investigate the use of artificial intelligence (AI) during EGD by the  endoscopists-in-training so that a real-time feedback can be provided, ensuring compliance to a pre-decided protocol for examination.

METHODS

This is an observational pilot study. The videos of the EGD procedure performed between August 1, 2021, and September 30, 2021, were prospectively analyzed using AI system. The assessment of completeness of the procedure was done based on the visualizsation of pre-defined 29 locations. Endoscopists were divided into two categories - whether they are in the training period (category A) or have competed their endoscopy training (category B).

RESULTS

A total of 277 procedures, which included 114 category-A and 163 category-B endoscopists, respectively, were included. Most commonly covered areas by the endoscopists were greater curvature of antrum (97.47%), second part of duodenum (96.75%), other parts of antrum such as the anterior, lesser curvature and the posterior aspect (96.75%, 94.95%, and 94.22%, respectively). Commonly missed or inadequately seen areas were vocal cords (99.28%), epiglottis (93.14%) and posterior, anterior, and lateral aspect of incisura (78.70%, 73.65%, and 73.53%, respectively). The good quality procedures were done predominantly by categoryB endoscopists (88.68% vs. 11.32%, p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

AI can play an important role in assessing the quality and completeness of EGD and can be a part of training of endoscopy in future.

Artificial intelligence empowers the second-observer strategy for colonoscopy: a randomized clinical trial

Background

In colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer, human vision limitations may lead to higher miss rate of lesions; artificial intelligence (AI) assistance has been demonstrated to improve polyp detection. However, there still lacks direct evidence to demonstrate whether AI is superior to trainees or experienced nurses as a second observer to increase adenoma detection during colonoscopy. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of assistance from AI and human observer during colonoscopy.

Methods

A prospective multicenter randomized study was conducted from 2 September 2019 to 29 May 2020 at four endoscopy centers in China. Eligible patients were randomized to either computer-aided detection (CADe)-assisted group or observer-assisted group. The primary outcome was adenoma per colonoscopy (APC). Secondary outcomes included polyp per colonoscopy (PPC), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and polyp detection rate (PDR). We compared continuous variables and categorical variables by using R studio (version 3.4.4).

Results

A total of 1,261 (636 in the CADe-assisted group and 625 in the observer-assisted group) eligible patients were analysed. APC (0.42 vs 0.35, P = 0.034), PPC (1.13 vs 0.81, P < 0.001), PDR (47.5% vs 37.4%, P < 0.001), ADR (25.8% vs 24.0%, P = 0.464), the number of detected sessile polyps (683 vs 464, P < 0.001), and sessile adenomas (244 vs 182, P = 0.005) were significantly higher in the CADe-assisted group than in the observer-assisted group. False detections of the CADe system were lower than those of the human observer (122 vs 191, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Compared with the human observer, the CADe system may improve the clinical outcome of colonoscopy and reduce disturbance to routine practice (Chictr.org.cn No.: ChiCTR1900025235).

Real-time artificial intelligence (AI)-aided endoscopy improves adenoma detection rates even in experienced endoscopists: a cohort study in Singapore

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy is a mainstay to detect premalignant neoplastic lesions in the colon. Real-time Artificial Intelligence (AI)-aided colonoscopy purportedly improves the polyp detection rate, especially for small flat lesions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of real-time AI-aided colonoscopy in the detection of colonic polyps.

METHODS

A prospective single institution cohort study was conducted in Singapore. All real-time AI-aided colonoscopies, regardless of indication, performed by specialist-grade endoscopists were anonymously recorded from July to September 2021 and reviewed by 2 independent authors (FHK, JL). Sustained detection of an area by the program was regarded as a "hit". Histology for the polypectomies were reviewed to determine adenoma detection rate (ADR). Individual endoscopist's performance with AI were compared against their baseline performance without AI endoscopy.

RESULTS

A total of 24 (82.8%) endoscopists participated with 18 (62.1%) performing ≥ 5 AI-aided colonoscopies. Of the 18, 72.2% (n = 13) were general surgeons. During that 3-months period, 487 "hits" encountered in 298 colonoscopies. Polypectomies were performed for 51.3% and 68.4% of these polypectomies were adenomas on histology. The post-intervention median ADR was 30.4% was higher than the median baseline polypectomy rate of 24.3% (p = 0.02). Of the adenomas excised, 14 (5.6%) were sessile serrated adenomas. Of those who performed ≥ 5 AI-aided colonoscopies, 13 (72.2%) had an improvement of ADR compared to their polypectomy rate before the introduction of AI, of which 2 of them had significant improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-time AI-aided colonoscopy have the potential to improved ADR even for experienced endoscopists and would therefore, improve the quality of colonoscopy.

Performance and comparison of artificial intelligence and human experts in the detection and classification of colonic polyps

OBJECTIVE

The main aim of this study was to analyze the performance of different artificial intelligence (AI) models in endoscopic colonic polyp detection and classification and compare them with doctors with different experience.

METHODS

We searched the studies on Colonoscopy, Colonic Polyps, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning published before May 2020 in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and the citation index of the conference proceedings. The quality of studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 table of diagnostic test quality evaluation criteria. The random-effects model was calculated using Meta-DISC 1.4 and RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies were included for meta-analysis. Only one study (1/16) presented externally validated results. The area under the curve (AUC) of AI group, expert group and non-expert group for detection and classification of colonic polyps were 0.940, 0.918, and 0.871, respectively. AI group had slightly lower pooled specificity than the expert group (79% vs. 86%, P < 0.05), but the pooled sensitivity was higher than the expert group (88% vs. 80%, P < 0.05). While the non-experts had less pooled specificity in polyp recognition than the experts (81% vs. 86%, P < 0.05), and higher pooled sensitivity than the experts (85% vs. 80%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The performance of AI in polyp detection and classification is similar to that of human experts, with high sensitivity and moderate specificity. Different tasks may have an impact on the performance of deep learning models and human experts, especially in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

Efficacy of a computer-aided detection system in a fecal immunochemical test-based organized colorectal cancer screening program: a randomized controlled trial (AIFIT study)

BACKGROUND

Computer-aided detection (CADe) increases adenoma detection in primary screening colonoscopy. The potential benefit of CADe in a fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program is unknown. This study assessed whether use of CADe increases the adenoma detection rate (ADR) in a FIT-based CRC screening program.

METHODS

In a multicenter, randomized trial, FIT-positive individuals aged 50-74 years undergoing colonoscopy, were randomized (1:1) to receive high definition white-light (HDWL) colonoscopy, with or without a real-time deep-learning CADe by endoscopists with baseline ADR > 25 %. The primary outcome was ADR. Secondary outcomes were mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) and advanced adenoma detection rate (advanced-ADR). Subgroup analysis according to baseline endoscopists' ADR (≤ 40 %, 41 %-45 %, ≥ 46 %) was also performed.

RESULTS

800 individuals (median age 61.0 years [interquartile range 55-67]; 409 men) were included: 405 underwent CADe-assisted colonoscopy and 395 underwent HDWL colonoscopy alone. ADR and APC were significantly higher in the CADe group than in the HDWL arm: ADR 53.6 % (95 %CI 48.6 %-58.5 %) vs. 45.3 % (95 %CI 40.3 %-50.45 %; RR 1.18; 95 %CI 1.03-1.36); APC 1.13 (SD 1.54) vs. 0.90 (SD 1.32; P  = 0.03). No significant difference in advanced-ADR was found (18.5 % [95 %CI 14.8 %-22.6 %] vs. 15.9 % [95 %CI 12.5 %-19.9 %], respectively). An increase in ADR was observed in all endoscopist groups regardless of baseline ADR.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating CADe significantly increased ADR and APC in the framework of a FIT-based CRC screening program. The impact of CADe appeared to be consistent regardless of endoscopist baseline ADR.

Knowledge and attitudes of medical students in Lebanon toward artificial intelligence: A national survey study

Purpose

This study assesses the knowledge and attitudes of medical students in Lebanon toward Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medical education. It also explores the students' perspectives regarding the role of AI in medical education as a subject in the curriculum and a teaching tool.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study using an online survey consisting of close-ended questions. The survey targets medical students at all medical levels across the 7 medical schools in Lebanon.

Results

A total of 206 medical students responded. When assessing AI knowledge sources (81.1%) got their information from the media as compared to (9.7%) from medical school curriculum. However, Students who learned the basics of AI as part of the medical school curriculum were more knowledge about AI than their peers who did not. Students in their clinical years appear to be more knowledgeable about AI in medicine. The advancements in AI affected the choice of specialty of around a quarter of the students (26.8%). Finally, only a quarter of students (26.5%) want to be assessed by AI, even though the majority (57.7%) reported that assessment by AI is more objective.

Conclusions

Education about AI should be incorporated in the medical school curriculum to improve the knowledge and attitudes of medical students. Improving AI knowledge in medical students will in turn increase acceptance of AI as a tool in medical education, thus unlocking its potential in revolutionizing medical education.

An artificial intelligence algorithm is highly accurate for detecting endoscopic features of eosinophilic esophagitis

The endoscopic features associated with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) may be missed during routine endoscopy. We aimed to develop and evaluate an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm for detecting and quantifying the endoscopic features of EoE in white light images, supplemented by the EoE Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS). An AI algorithm (AI-EoE) was constructed and trained to differentiate between EoE and normal esophagus using endoscopic white light images extracted from the database of the University Hospital Augsburg. In addition to binary classification, a second algorithm was trained with specific auxiliary branches for each EREFS feature (AI-EoE-EREFS). The AI algorithms were evaluated on an external data set from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (UNC), and compared with the performance of human endoscopists with varying levels of experience. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of AI-EoE were 0.93 for all measures, while the AUC was 0.986. With additional auxiliary branches for the EREFS categories, the AI algorithm (AI-EoE-EREFS) performance improved to 0.96, 0.94, 0.95, and 0.992 for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC, respectively. AI-EoE and AI-EoE-EREFS performed significantly better than endoscopy beginners and senior fellows on the same set of images. An AI algorithm can be trained to detect and quantify endoscopic features of EoE with excellent performance scores. The addition of the EREFS criteria improved the performance of the AI algorithm, which performed significantly better than endoscopists with a lower or medium experience level.

Polyp detection and false-positive rates by computer-aided analysis of withdrawal-phase videos of colonoscopy of the right-sided colon segment in a randomized controlled trial comparing water exchange and air insufflation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Water exchange (WE) improves lesion detection but misses polyps because of human limitations. Computer-aided detection (CADe) identifies additional polyps overlooked by the colonoscopist. Additional polyp detection rate (APDR) is the proportion of patients with at least 1 additional polyp detected by CADe. The number of false positives (because of feces and air bubble) per colonoscopy (FPPC) is a major CADe limitation, which might be reduced by salvage cleaning with WE. We compared the APDR and FPPC by CADe between videos of WE and air insufflation in the right-sided colon.

METHODS

CADe used a convolutional neural network with transfer learning. We edited and coded withdrawal-phase videos in a randomized controlled trial that compared right-sided colon findings between air insufflation and WE. Two experienced blinded endoscopists analyzed the CADe-overlaid videos and identified additional polyps by consensus. An artifact triggered by CADe but not considered a polyp by the reviewers was defined as a false positive. The primary outcome was APDR.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-five coded videos of colonoscopies inserted with WE (n = 123) and air insufflation (n = 122) methods were analyzed. The APDR in the WE group was significantly higher (37 [30.1%] vs 15 [12.3%], P = .001). The mean [standard deviation] FPPC related to feces (1.78 [1.67] vs 2.09 [2.09], P = .007) and bubbles (.53 [.89] vs 1.25 [2.45], P = .001) in the WE group were significantly lower.

CONCLUSIONS

CADe showed significantly higher APDR and lower number of FPPC related to feces and bubbles in the WE group. The results support the hypothesis that the strengths of CADe and WE complement the weaknesses of each other in optimizing polyp detection.

Current advancements in application of artificial intelligence in clinical decision-making by gastroenterologists in gastrointestinal bleeding

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a type of intelligence that comes from machines or computer systems that mimics human cognitive function. Recently, AI has been utilized in medicine and helped clinicians make clinical decisions. In gastroenterology, AI has assisted colon polyp detection, optical biopsy, and diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. AI also has a broad role in the clinical prediction and management of gastrointestinal bleeding. Machine learning can determine the clinical risk of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. AI can assist the management of gastrointestinal bleeding by identifying high-risk patients who might need urgent endoscopic treatment or blood transfusion, determining bleeding stigmata during endoscopy, and predicting recurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding. The present review will discuss the role of AI in the clinical prediction and management of gastrointestinal bleeding, primarily on how it could assist gastroenterologists in their clinical decision-making compared to conventional methods. This review will also discuss challenges in implementing AI in routine practice.

Artificial intelligence for segmentation of bladder tumor cystoscopic images performed by U-Net with dilated convolution

BACKGROUND

Early intravesical recurrence after transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) is often caused by overlooking of tumors during TURBT. Although narrow-band imaging and photodynamic diagnosis were developed to detect more tumors than conventional white-light imaging, the accuracy of these systems has been subjective, along with poor reproducibility due to their dependence on the physician's experience and skills. To create an objective and reproducible diagnosing system, we aimed to assess the utility of artificial intelligence (AI) with Dilated U-Net to reduce the risk of overlooked bladder tumors when compared with the conventional AI system, termed U-Net.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively obtained cystoscopic images by converting videos obtained from 120 patients who underwent TURBT into 1,790 cystoscopic images. The Dilated U-Net, which is an extension of the conventional U-Net, analyzed these image datasets. The diagnostic accuracy of the Dilated U-Net and conventional U-Net were compared using the following four measurements: pixel-wise sensitivity (PWSe); pixel-wise specificity (PWSp); pixel-wise positive predictive value (PWPPV), representing the AI diagnostic accuracy per pixel; and dice similarity coefficient (DSC), representing the overlap area between the bladder tumors in the ground truth images and segmentation maps.

RESULTS

The cystoscopic images were divided as follows, according to the pathological T-stage: 944, Ta; 412, T1; 329, T2; and 116, carcinoma in-situ. The PWSe, PWSp, PWPPV, and DSC of the Dilated U-Net were 84.9%, 88.5%, 86.7%, and 83.0%, respectively, which had improved when compared to that with the conventional U-Net by 1.7%, 1.3%, 2.1%, and 2.3%, respectively. The DSC values were high for elevated lesions and low for flat lesions for both Dilated and conventional U-Net.

CONCLUSIONS

Dilated U-Net, with higher DSC values than conventional U-Net, might reduce the risk of overlooking bladder tumors during cystoscopy and TURBT.

Charting a path forward for clinical research in artificial intelligence and gastroenterology

Gastroenterology has been an early leader in bridging the gap between artificial intelligence (AI) model development and clinical trial validation, and in recent years we have seen the publication of several randomized clinical trials examining the role of AI in gastroenterology. As AI applications for clinical medicine advance rapidly, there is a clear need for guidance surrounding AI-specific study design, evaluation, comparison, analysis and reporting of results. Several initiatives are in the publication or pre-publication phase including AI-specific amendments to minimum reporting guidelines for clinical trials, society task force initiatives aimed at priority use cases and research priorities, and minimum reporting guidelines that guide the reporting of clinical prediction models. In this paper, we examine applications of AI in clinical trials and discuss elements of newly published AI-specific extensions to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials statements that guide clinical trial reporting and development. We then review AI applications at the pre-trial level in both endoscopy and other subfields of gastroenterology and explore areas where further guidance is needed to supplement the current guidance available at the pre-trial level.