Endoscopic ultrasound-guided vascular interventions: An expanding paradigm

Endoscopic ultrasound guided liver biopsy and portal pressure gradient: when, why and how? Can it become the standard of care in endo-hepatology?

INTRODUCTION

The armamentarium of 'Endo-hepatology' is proliferating with the advancements in techniques and availability of new devices in the field of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). This has resulted in the merger of multitude of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, such as EUS-liver biopsy (LB), EUS-angioembolization of gastric varices, EUS-portal pressure gradient (PPG) measurement, and others into a 'one-stop-shop' for efficient patient management. Lack of standardization of these techniques forms a major hinderance in their widespread adoption.

AREAS COVERED

A comprehensive literature search was undertaken across various databases on EUS-LB and EUS-PPG till November 2024 for reviews, observational studies, and randomized trials on EUS-LB and EUS-PPG, describing its indications, technique, and data of safety and efficacy, detailing its role in day-to-day clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

EUS-LB and EUS-PPG have shown promise in the ever-growing field of endo-hepatology. EUS-LB has exhibited excellent safety profile and comparable tissue yield compared to its percutaneous counterpart. On the other hand, EUS-PPG seems to be a viable alternative although it needs to be standardized further. From a patient and hospital perspective, they might prove to be convenient and cost-effective. Nevertheless, more evidence is warranted before they can be labeled as the new standard of care.

Updates on therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multiple endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided therapeutic interventions have been developed for the management of benign and malignant pancreaticobiliary and gastrointestinal luminal pathology. Recent high-quality evidence is increasingly validating these interventions and positioning them within evidence-based therapeutic algorithms.

RECENT FINDINGS

Here we review therapeutic EUS-guided interventions including pancreatic fluid collection drainage, gastroenterostomy, biliary drainage, pancreatic duct drainage and gallbladder drainage. The most up-to-date high-quality evidence supporting these interventions is presented including comparative data with other conventional treatment options. Newer emerging interventions such as tumor ablation are also reviewed. Current controversies and future avenues for research are discussed. The key role of EUS-guided interventions in managing pancreaticobiliary pathology in patients with a surgically altered anatomy is highlighted.

SUMMARY

Multiple EUS therapeutic interventions have evolved from experimental or rescue options to now well established first- and second-line interventions over other endoscopic, percutaneous and surgical alternatives with the support of high-quality data. Further research is needed to better optimize patient selection and guide long term postintervention follow-up.

Causes, management, and prognosis of severe gastrointestinal bleedings in critically ill patients with pancreatic cancer: A retrospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a leading cause of intensive care unit (ICU) admission in pancreatic cancer patients.

AIMS

To analyze causes, ICU mortality and hemostatic treatment success rates of GI bleeding in pancreatic cancer patients requiring ICU admission.

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter cohort study between 2009 and 2021. Patients with a recent pancreatic resection surgery were excluded.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were included (62 % males, 67 years-old). Fifty-one percent presented hemorrhagic shock, 41 % required mechanical ventilation. Main GI bleeding causes were gastroduodenal tumor invasion (32 %), gastroesophageal varices (21 %) and arterial aneurysm (12 %). Arterial aneurysms were more frequent in patients with previous pancreatic resection (36 % vs 2 %, p < 0.001). Hemostatic procedures included gastroduodenal endoscopy in 81 % patients and arterial embolization in 28 % patients. ICU mortality was 19 %. Multivariate analysis identified four variables associated with mortality: performance status >2 (OR 9.34, p = 0.026), mechanical ventilation (OR 14.14, p = 0.003), treatment success (OR 0.09, p = 0.010), hemorrhagic shock (OR 11.24, p = 0.010). Treatment success was 46 % and was associated with aneurysmal bleeding (OR 29.89, p = 0.005), ongoing chemotherapy (OR 0.22, p = 0.016), and prothrombin time ratio (OR 1.05, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In pancreatic cancer patients with severe GI bleeding, early identification of aneurysmal bleeding (particularly in case of previous resection surgery) and coagulopathy management may increase the treatment success and reduce mortality.

Therapeutic endoscopy: Recent updates and future directions

The landscape of therapeutic endoscopy has undergone a remarkable evolution over the past few decades, carving out a niche that merges innovative technology with advanced clinical practice. As we venture further into the 21st century, the horizon of this field continues to expand, driven by rapid advancements in technology and a deeper understanding of gastrointestinal pathology. This review article aims to shed light on the recent advances and future trajectories of therapeutic endoscopy, focusing on pivotal areas such as third space endoscopy, endoscopic resection techniques, artificial endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), the integration of artificial intelligence (AI), and endoscopic anti-reflux therapies.

EUS-Guided Vascular Interventions: Recent Advances

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided vascular interventions were first reported in 2000 in a study that evaluated the utility of EUS in sclerotherapy of esophageal varices. Currently, gastric variceal therapy and portosystemic pressure gradient (PPG) measurements are the most widely utilized applications. Ectopic variceal obliteration, splenic artery embolization, aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm treatment, portal venous sampling, and portosystemic shunt creation using EUS are some of the other emerging interventions. Since the release of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA)'s commentary in 2023, which primarily endorses EUS-guided gastric variceal therapy and EUS-PPG measurement, several new studies have been published supporting the use of EUS for various vascular conditions. In this review, we present the recent advances in this field, critically appraising new studies and trials.

Venous Thrombosis in Acute Pancreatitis: What to and Not to Do?

Acute pancreatitis is an acute inflammatory condition of the pancreas that has not only local but systemic effects as well. Venous thrombosis is one such complication which can give rise to thrombosis of the peripheral vasculature in the form of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and splanchnic vein thrombosis. The prevalence of these complications increases with the severity of the disease and adds to the adverse outcomes profile. With better imaging and awareness, more cases are being detected, although many at times it can be an incidental finding. However, it remains understudied and strangely, most of the guidelines on the management of acute pancreatitis are silent on this aspect. This review offers an overview of the incidence, pathophysiology, symptomatology, diagnostic work-up, and management of venous thrombosis that develops in AP.

Technical tips for EUS-guided embolization of varices and pseudoaneurysms

Backgrounds and Aims

EUS-guided vascular intervention has expanded the horizons of diagnostic as well as therapeutic interventions for vascular pathology. EUS-guided embolization is a commonly performed technique for the treatment of gastric varices. However, there is a lack of data on the standardization of the technique. Here, we review the techniques and difficulties encountered during EUS-guided embolization of varices and pseudoaneurysms.

Methods

This article and accompanying video describe the EUS-guided embolization techniques for various vascular lesions. EUS-guided embolization was achieved by combination therapy using coils and cyanoacrylate. Complete obliteration of the lesions was documented on follow-up. The existing literature of EUS-guided embolization therapy is also reviewed.

Results

Patients with various vascular lesions, including gastric varices, ectopic duodenal varices, and splenic artery pseudoaneurysms, were successfully treated with EUS-guided coil plus cyanoacrylate injection. Patients with gastric varices underwent treatment with 2 EUS-guided techniques: (1) direct puncture of the varix and embolization and (2) feeder vessel embolization. Following embolization, the absence of Doppler flow within the varix and pseudoaneurysm was documented.

Conclusions

Techniques of EUS-guided embolization of varices and pseudoaneurysms are demonstrated. Understanding the techniques and the challenges encountered during therapy is crucial to optimize outcomes and reduce adverse events.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic insulinoma: a state of the art review

INTRODUCTION

Insulinomas are the most common functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) that lead to incapacitating hypoglycemia. Guidelines recommend surgical resection as the mainstay of management. However, surgery is fraught with complications, causing significant peri/post-operative morbidity. Since insulinomas are usually benign, solitary, small (<2 cm), and do not need lymphadenectomy, hence, in this regard, endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is now being increasingly performed, to circumvent these adverse events and impairment of pancreatic function.

AREAS COVERED

A comprehensive literature search was undertaken across various databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus), with no language restriction, for relevant articles (case series, reviews, case reports) pertaining to EUS-RFA for insulinoma and PNETs, till October 2023. In this review, we have explicated the role of EUS-RFA for insulinoma management, detailing thoroughly its mechanism of action, EUS-RFA devices with data on its safety and efficacy, and an algorithmic approach for its management.

EXPERT OPINION

EUS-RFA is being advocated as a 'mini-invasive' option with the potential to replace surgery as a first-line approach for benign, sporadic, solitary, and small (<2 cm) insulinomas. Under real-time guidance, EUS-RFA has immense precision, is safe, predictable, with acceptable safety profile. Presently, it is being frequently performed for high-risk or inoperable candidates. Current need-of-the-hour is a randomized controlled trial to substantiate its role in the therapeutic algorithm for insulinoma management.

Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreatology: Focus on Inflammatory Diseases and Interventions

Background

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a main tool in pancreatology for both diagnosis and therapy. It allows minimally invasive differentiation of various diseases, with a minimal degree of inflammation or anatomic variations. EUS also enables interventional direct access to the pancreatic parenchyma and the retroperitoneal space, the pancreatic duct, the pancreatic masses, cysts, vascular structures for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.

Summary

This review aimed to summarize the new developments of EUS in the field of pancreatology, with special interest on inflammation and interventions. EUS enables way to perform pseudocyst drainage, necrosectomy, transenteral drainage and transenteric access of the main pancreatic duct, or the direct visualization or therapy of vascular structures adjacent to the pancreas.

Key Messages

EUS has a deep impact on pancreatology, and the development of new diagnostic and interventional approaches to the retroperitoneal space and the pancreas has increased in the last years exponentially, allowing minimal invasive diagnostics and therapy and avoiding surgery and percutaneous therapy.