Future directions of noninvasive prediction of esophageal variceal bleeding: No worry about the present computed tomography inefficiency

Comprehensive approach to esophageal variceal bleeding: From prevention to treatment

Esophageal variceal bleeding is a severe complication often associated with portal hypertension, commonly due to liver cirrhosis. Prevention and treatment of this condition are critical for patient outcomes. Preventive strategies focus on reducing portal hypertension to prevent varices from developing or enlarging. Primary prophylaxis involves the use of non-selective beta-blockers, such as propranolol or nadolol, which lower portal pressure by decreasing cardiac output and thereby reducing blood flow to the varices. Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) may also be employed as primary prophylaxis to prevent initial bleeding episodes. Once bleeding occurs, immediate treatment is essential. Initial management includes hemodynamic stabilization followed by pharmacological therapy with vasoactive drugs such as octreotide or terlipressin to control bleeding. Endoscopic intervention is the cornerstone of treatment, with techniques such as EVL or sclerotherapy applied to directly manage the bleeding varices. In cases where bleeding is refractory to endoscopic treatment, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt may be considered to effectively reduce portal pressure. Long-term management after an acute bleeding episode involves secondary prophylaxis using beta-blockers and repeated EVL sessions to prevent rebleeding, complemented by monitoring and managing liver function to address the underlying disease. In light of new scientific evidence, including the findings of the study by Peng et al, this editorial aims to review available strategies for the prevention and treatment of esophageal varices.

Risk factors and predictors of recurrent variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients awaiting transplantation

Objective: to identify the risk factors and predictors of recurrent variceal hemorrhage in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT).

Materials and methods. A comparative retrospective study was conducted in 51 patients with decompensated cirrhosis, who were on the waiting list for LT. Demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters, MELD-Na score, Child–Turcotte–Pugh score, hepatic encephalopathy grade, ascites grade, class of varicose veins, number of consecutive variceal ligations, as well as manometric study with calculation of intrahe- patic venous pressure gradient index in groups of patients with (n = 39) and without recurrent bleeding (n = 12) were analyzed. The proportions of patients in different groups were compared by the Kaplan–Meier method with determination of the logarithmic test (Log-Rank). The accumulated risks in the compared groups were estimated using the mathematical model of proportional hazards (Cox regression) in univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results. Within 60 months from the beginning of follow-up and simultaneous prophylaxis by combination of non-selective beta-blockers and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL), 39 out of 51 patients (75.6%) developed recurrent bleeding. Analysis revealed significant differences (risk factors for recurrent bleeding): creatinine le- vels, MELD-Na score, hepatic encephalopathy grade, mean hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and its level >14 mmHg. By the Kaplan–Meier method with the Log-Rank test, it was established that the proportion of patients without recurrent bleeding was significantly higher in the group of patients with HVPG ≤14 mmHg than in the group with HVPG >14 mmHg (p = 0.027).

Conclusion. The main independent predictor of variceal rebleeding is HVPG >14 mm Hg, which increases the risk by 3.837 times if the gradient value is changed by 1 mm. The second independent predictor is higher hepatic encephalopathy grade: if the grade increases by one, the risk of recurrent hemorrhage increases 1.8 times.