Current status of endoscopic biliary drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary strictures

The evaluation of bilateral stenting using braided or laser-cut self-expandable metallic stent for malignant hilar biliary obstruction

OBJECTIVES

Bilateral self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO) is an effective option for biliary drainage with long-term stent patency. Laser-cut and braided SEMS can be used for bilateral SEMS placement. This study aimed to clarify any differences in the clinical features and proper use of the laser-cut and braided SEMS placement using the stent-in-stent method for UMHBO.

METHODS

In this study, 78 patients who underwent bilateral stent-in-stent SEMS placement for UMHBO were included. The patients were divided into the laser-cut (n = 33) and braided groups (n = 45). Both groups were compared for technical and clinical success, adverse events (AEs), time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO), overall survival, and endoscopic reintervention (ERI).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in technical and clinical success rates (laser-cut vs. braided group, 97% vs. 95.6%, P = 1.0), AEs (21.2% vs. 15.6%. P = 0.56), median TRBO (242 days vs. 140 days, P = 0.36), and median overall survival (654 days vs. 675 days, P = 0.58). ERI was required in 15 patients in the laser-cut group and in 20 patients in the braided group. The technical and clinical success rates of ERI (60% vs. 85%) were not significantly different (P = 0.13); however, the median ERI procedure time was significantly longer in the laser-cut group (38 min) than in the braided group (22 min; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference in initial SEMS placement was noted between the laser-cut and braided groups; however, the laser-cut group required a longer ERI procedure time than that required by the braided group. The use of braided SEMS may be a convenient option for ERI.

Characterization and preliminary in vivo evaluation of a self-expandable hydrogel stent with anisotropic swelling behavior and endoscopic deliverability for use in biliary drainage

We demonstrate the potential of a novel self-expandable biliary stent comprised of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) hydrogel with anisotropic swelling behavior and endoscopic deliverability in vivo, using a porcine stent model. The mechanism underlying the anisotropic swelling behavior and endoscopic deliverability (i.e., flexibility) was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), evaluation of the water content and swelling ratio, and three-point bending tests. The in vivo experiment using a porcine stent model indicated that the tube-shaped PVA hydrogel could effectively expand the biliary tract, without disturbing bile flow. SEM and SAXS showed that PVA hydrogels prepared by drying under extension showed structural orientation along the extension axis, leading to anisotropic swelling. The water content of the PVA hydrogel was found to be crucial for maintaining flexibility as well as endoscopic deliverability. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the novel concept of using a hydrogel stent as a self-expandable biliary stent.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiologic Management of Biliary Obstruction

Biliary obstruction is a serious condition that can occur in the setting of both benign and malignant pathologies. In the setting of acute cholangitis, biliary decompression can be lifesaving; for patients with cancer who are receiving chemotherapy, untreated obstructive jaundice may lead to biochemical derangements that often preclude continuation of therapy unless biliary decompression is performed (see the ACR Appropriateness Criteria® topic on "Jaundice"). Recommended therapy including percutaneous decompression, endoscopic decompression, and/or surgical decompression is based on the etiology of the obstruction and patient factors including the individual's anatomy. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Novel endoscopic technique for trisegment drainage in patients with unresectable hilar malignant biliary strictures (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Three or more stents may be needed in patients with extensive stricturing in Bismuth type IIIa/IV hilar malignant strictures. Partial stent-in-stent (PSIS) deployment has been the primary intervention for hilar malignant biliary stricture (MBS). However, simultaneous side-by-side (SBS) stent placement has become feasible with the development of the <6F diameter stent delivery system. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of a new hybrid method combining PSIS and SBS stent placement for trisegment biliary drainage.

METHODS

This study included 17 consecutive patients with Bismuth IIIa or IV malignant strictures who underwent endoscopic drainage using the hybrid method. Diameters of the delivery stents were 5.4F (n = 10) and 5.7F (n = 7).

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 82% (14/17), and the median length of procedures was 54 minutes. Two patients required predilatation for deployment of the third self-expandable metallic stent through the mesh of the first deployed stent. Two patients (12%) developed cholecystitis as early adverse events, and 1 patient (6%) developed liver abscess as a late adverse event. The time to recurrent biliary obstruction among those with successful initial trisegmental drainage was 189 days (95% confidence interval, 124-254).

CONCLUSIONS

The hybrid method for unresectable hilar MBS is an effective endoscopic drainage method, and the ease of these procedures is partly attributed to the thinner stent delivery system.

Unilateral versus bilateral endoscopic stenting in patients with unresectable malignant hilar obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and study aims  Endoscopic stent placement is used for palliative management of unresectable malignant hilar obstruction, which could be achieved by either unilateral or bilateral stent insertion. Materials and methods  A literature search was performed to identify studies that reported outcomes of metallic biliary stent placement in patients with malignant hilar obstruction. Weighted pooled rates (WPR) along with 95 % confidence intervals (95 %CI) were calculated to determine and compare outcomes including technical and functional success, early and late adverse events, post procedure cholangitis, and stent occlusion between two groups. Results  A total of 21 studies with 1292 patients were included. WPR of technical success was significantly higher in the unilateral group (97 %, 95 %CI: 93 -98 %) vs. bilateral group (89 %, 95 %CI: 84 -92 %) ( P  = 0.0.003). WPR for functional success in the unilateral and bilateral groups were 96 % (95 %CI: 91 -98 %) and 94 % (95 %CI: 91 -97 %), respectively ( P  = 0.48). The rate of early and late complications was comparable between the two groups. Conclusion  In patients with unresectable malignant hilar obstruction, unilateral and bilateral metallic stenting techniques are comparable in terms of efficacy and safety.

Primary Clinical Application of Y-Shaped Jogged Stent Implantation in Patients with Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of Y-shaped jogged stent in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

METHODS

A total of 196 patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction treated by biliary tract stent implantation from August 2010 to August 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Seventeen consecutive patients who were treated with Y-shaped jogged stent implantation were identified as the Y-shaped jogged stent implantation group. Seventeen matched patients undergoing unilateral stent placement combined with percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) were enrolled as the control group. Baseline characteristics of patients, stent patency time, and survival time were compared.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the age, gender, tumor type and stage, biliary obstruction classification, bilirubin level at diagnosis, presence of metastasis, or chemotherapy between the Y-stent group and the control group (P > 0.05). One week after surgery, the reduction rate of bilirubin was significantly higher in the Y-stent group (88.2% vs 53.0%, P < 0.05). The mean stent patency time was longer in the Y-stent group (7.3 ± 1.0 months vs 5.7 ± 0.9 months, P < 0.05). The mean survival time of the Y-stent group (9.1 ± 1.5 months) was longer than the control group (7.2 ± 1.1 months, P > 0.05). There was no severe complication occurred in both two groups.

CONCLUSION

Y-shaped jogged stent implantation was a safe, feasible, and effective approach in the treatment of patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction, with the significantly prolonged stent patency time and survival time.

Clinical Outcomes of Bilateral Stent-in-Stent Placement Using Self-Expandable Metallic Stent for High-Grade Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

PURPOSE

Endoscopic bile duct decompression using bilateral self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) deployed via a stent-in-stent (SIS) method is considered a preferred procedure for malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). However, occlusion thereof occurs frequently. Here, we investigated stent patency duration and risk factors related to stent obstruction with bilateral SIS placement for MHBO at two large centers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study reviewed data on patients with MHBO who underwent endoscopic biliary drainage using the SIS method. Clinical outcomes, including stent patency duration and patient overall survival, were analyzed. Factors associated with stent patency were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Seventy patients with MHBO underwent endoscopic biliary drainage using the SIS method. Median age was 68 years old, and median follow-up duration was 140 days (interquartile range, 57-329). The proportion of high-grade MHBOs (Bismuth type IV) was 57.1%. Median stent patency duration with the SIS method was 108 days according to Kaplan-Meier curves. Median patient survival analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method was 181 days. Multivariate analysis indicated that higher baseline bilirubin (> 6.1 mg/dL) as an independent risk factor related to stent patency (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In endoscopic biliary decompression using SEMS placed with the SIS method, obstructive jaundice was a risk factor for stent patency. The SIS method for high-grade MHBO showed short stent patency.

EUS-guided Biliary Drainage for Malignant Perihilar Biliary Strictures after Further Transpapillary Intervention Has Been Judged to Be Impossible or Ineffective

Objective Patients with perihilar malignancy often develop recurrence of infectious cholangitis, which makes further transpapillary intervention extremely difficult. As endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) of an intrahepatic bile duct is a possible option for additional intervention, the aim of this study was to estimate the feasibility of such intervention. Methods and Patients Patients who had undergone EUS-BD after further transpapillary intervention was deemed impossible or ineffective were investigated in this study. Those who had not received previous interventions via the papilla were excluded. Procedure-related adverse events, clinical efficacy, and time to recurrence of jaundice or infectious cholangitis transthyretin (TTR) were evaluated. Results Seven patients were eligible for the study between 2007 and 2016 (7 men; mean age, 77 years; 4 with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and 3 with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma). No procedure-related adverse events were observed. EUS-BD was clinically effective and enabled hospital discharge in 4 patients (57%). The TTR in these 4 clinically effective patients was 43, 105, 118, and 147 days after the procedure (median, 112 days). Conclusion EUS-BD was found to be safe and often effective in patients in whom additional transpapillary intervention had become difficult, although its efficacy was limited to a short period.

Simultaneous Versus Sequential Side-by-Side Bilateral Metal Stent Placement for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstructions

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic bilateral self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for malignant hilar biliary obstructions (MHBOs) is technically demanding, and a second SEMS insertion is particularly challenging. A simultaneous side-by-side (SBS) placement technique using a thinner delivery system may mitigate these issues.

AIMS

We aimed to examine the feasibility and efficacy of simultaneous SBS SEMS placement for treating MHBOs using a novel SEMS that has a 5.7-Fr ultra-thin delivery system.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with MHBOs underwent SBS SEMS placement between 2010 and 2016. We divided the patient cohort into those who underwent sequential (conventional) SBS placement between 2010 and 2014 (sequential group) and those who underwent simultaneous SBS placement between 2015 and 2016 (simultaneous group), and compared the groups with respect to the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The technical success rates were 71% (12/17) and 100% (17/17) in the sequential and simultaneous groups, respectively, a difference that was significant (P = .045). The median procedure time was significantly shorter in the simultaneous group (22 min) than in the sequential group (52 min) (P = .017). There were no significant group differences in the time to recurrent biliary obstruction (sequential group: 113 days; simultaneous group: 140 days) or other adverse event rates (sequential group: 12%; simultaneous group: 12%).

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous SBS placement using the novel 5.7-Fr SEMS delivery system may be more straightforward and have a higher success rate compared to that with sequential SBS placement. This new method may be useful for bilateral stenting to treat MHBOs.

Rescue EUS-guided intrahepatic biliary drainage for malignant hilar biliary stricture after failed transpapillary re-intervention

BACKGROUND

Treatment of unresectable malignant hilar biliary stricture (UMHBS) is challenging, especially after failure of repeated transpapillary endoscopic stenting. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided intrahepatic biliary drainage (EUS-IBD) is a recent technique for intrahepatic biliary decompression, but indications for its use for complex hilar strictures have not been well studied. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of EUS-IBD for UMHBS after failed transpapillary re-intervention.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with UMHBS of Bismuth II grade or higher who, between December 2008 and May 2016, underwent EUS-IBD after failed repeated transpapillary interventions. The technical success, clinical success, and complication rates were evaluated. Factors associated with clinical ineffectiveness of EUS-IBD were explored.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients (19 women, median age 66 years [range 52-87]) underwent EUS-IBD for UMHBS during the study period. Hilar biliary stricture morphology was classified as Bismuth II, III, or IV in 5, 13, and 12 patients, respectively. The median number of preceding endoscopic interventions was 4 (range 2-14). EUS-IBD was required because the following procedures failed: duodenal scope insertion (n = 4), accessing the papilla after duodenal stent insertion (n = 5), or achieving desired intrahepatic biliary drainage (n = 21). Technical success with EUS-IBD was achieved in 29 of 30 patients (96.7%) and clinical success was attained in 22 of these 29 (75.9%). Mild peritonitis occurred in three of 30 (10%) and was managed conservatively. Stent dysfunction occurred in 23.3% (7/30). There was no procedure-related mortality. On multivariable analysis, Bismuth IV stricture predicted clinical ineffectiveness (odds ratio = 12.7, 95% CI 1.18-135.4, P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-IBD may be a feasible and effective rescue alternative with few major complications after failed transpapillary endoscopic re-intervention in patients with UMHBS, particularly for Bismuth II or III strictures.

Clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage as a rescue of re-intervention procedure for high-grade hilar stricture

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Re-intervention after stent placement for malignant hepatic hilum obstruction (HBO) is challenging. endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been developed as an alternative method for failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In this retrospective study, the clinical utility of EUS-BD as a rescue drainage technique for HBO patients who failed re-intervention under ERCP guidance was evaluated.

METHODS

Between April 2012 and August 2015, patients with HBO were enrolled. Patients' characteristics, kinds of metallic stents, configuration of stent placement, overall survival, stent patency, and results of re-intervention were reviewed, along with the re-intervention technical success rate.

RESULTS

The biliary stricture type was Bismuth type IV in 59% (23/39) and types IIIa and b in 20.5% (8/39) each. Biliary metallic stent placement was bilateral in 38.5% (15/39), and unilateral in 61.5% (24/39). Primary stent dysfunction was observed in 71.8% (28/39) of cases. Planned re-intervention under ERCP guidance was attempted in 26 patients. The technical success rate was 62% (16/26). For the 10 patients who failed re-intervention under ERCP guidance, EUS-BD was planned. The technical success rate was 100% (10/10). The procedure time was 25.8 min. Adverse events were not seen in any patients. Stent patency after re-intervention was not significantly different between ERCP (165 days) guidance and EUS-BD (152 days) guidance (P = 0.463) CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, EUS-BD as a re-intervention method for metallic stent obstruction was safe and feasible. If ERCP was failed, EUS-BD may be one of option as re-intervention method for high-grade hilar stricture.

Feasibility of the placement of a novel 6-mm diameter threaded fully covered self-expandable metal stent for malignant hilar biliary obstructions (with videos)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Uncovered self-expandable metal stents (USEMSs) are used to treat unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstructions (MHBOs). However, ingrowth is not prevented, and reintervention is often troublesome. A novel 6-mm threaded fully covered self-expandable metal stent (T-FCSEMS) is available that may mitigate these issues. We aimed to clarify the safety and efficacy of T-FCSEMS placement for MHBO.

METHODS

Thirty patients underwent T-FCSEMS placements for MHBOs between 2014 and 2015. T-FCSEMSs were used for initial stenting in 17 patients (initial group) and for reinterventions for USEMS occlusions caused by ingrowth in 13 patients (reintervention group). The technical success rates, times to recurrent biliary obstruction, and the reintervention success rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

The technical success rates were 94% (16/17) and 92% (12/13) in the initial group and reintervention group, respectively. Intrahepatic bile duct occlusions caused liver abscesses 8 days and 22 days after T-FCSEMS placements in 2 cases (7%) in the initial group, in which T-FCSEMSs were placed across the intrahepatic bile duct bifurcation. The median times to recurrent biliary obstruction were 210 days in the initial group after bilateral placement and 112 days and 152 days in the reintervention group after bilateral and unilateral placements, respectively. During reintervention, T-FCSEMS removal was successful in all patients in whom it was attempted, and the success rate of endoscopic reintervention was 100% in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

T-FCSEMS placement is a promising option for both initial stenting and reintervention for MHBO. However, we should consider the possibility of intrahepatic bile duct occlusion.

Stent-in-Stent Technique for the Treatment of Proximal Bronchial Restenosis after Insertion of Metallic Stents: A Report of Two Cases

Endoscopic treatment of a bronchial restenosis previously treated by insertion of a partially covered self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) can be difficult. Classically, after recanalization of the bronchus, the stent is removed and replaced by a more adapted one. We report on two cases of proximal bronchial restenosis treated by insertion of an additional stent inside the lumen of the previously inserted stent using the stent-in-stent (SIS) technique. The indications for the initial stent were malignancy in Patient 1 and posttransplant bronchial stenosis in Patient 2. Restenosis occurred at the proximal end of the stent within months in both cases. Stent removal and insertion of a new stent were considered, but this option was discarded because of an excessive risk of bronchial perforation and preference towards an alternative approach. In both cases, a second customized SEMS was placed using the SIS technique after ablation of the proximal end stenosis of the stent by argon plasma coagulation and/or dilation with a balloon. Recanalization of the bronchus was achieved in both cases without complications. The SIS technique is a valuable alternative to removal of SEMS in case of proximal bronchial restenosis.