Impact of psychosocial comorbidities on clinical outcomes after liver transplantation: Stratification of a high-risk population

Impact of Sarcopenia on Post-Liver Transplant Hospitalization: Insights From a South Asian Cohort

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia's impact on post-liver transplant outcomes remains a subject of debate, with limited data from South Asia on its association with post-liver transplant hospital stays. This study aims to investigate sarcopenia's influence on post-transplant hospitalization duration in South Asians.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) at Shifa International Hospital in Islamabad, Pakistan, between January 2022 and January 2023 were included. Computed tomography (CT) images were used to assess the skeletal muscle index (SMI). The areas of the psoas, erector spinae, multifidus, quadratus lumborum, rectus abdominis, transverse abdominis, and internal/external oblique muscles were quantified at the level of L3. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 29.0 (IBM).

RESULTS

There was a total of 84 patients. Mean age was 47.4 ± 12.0 years. There were 62 (73.8%) male patients and 22 (26.2%) female patients. Hepatitis C was noted in 36 (42.9%) patients. Twenty-two (26.2%) patients had hepatocellular carcinoma. Sarcopenia was identified in 58 (69.0%) patients. No significant association was observed between sarcopenia and intensive care unit (ICU) or general floor stays. Regression analysis identified pre-transplant model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) score as the sole significant factor associated with both ICU and total length of stay (P value .002; P value .009).

CONCLUSION

In our population, sarcopenia did not correlate with post-transplant ICU or overall hospital stay. The pre-transplant MELD-Na score emerged as the most influential predictor of length of stay. Therefore, delaying liver transplant procedures based on muscle mass estimations may not be a practical clinical approach for South Asian patients.

Multicenter study of racial and ethnic inequities in liver transplantation evaluation: Understanding mechanisms and identifying solutions

Racial and ethnic disparities persist in access to the liver transplantation (LT) waiting list; however, there is limited knowledge about underlying system-level factors that may be responsible for these disparities. Given the complex nature of LT candidate evaluation, a human factors and systems engineering approach may provide insights. We recruited participants from the LT teams (coordinators, advanced practice providers, physicians, social workers, dieticians, pharmacists, leadership) at two major LT centers. From December 2020 to July 2021, we performed ethnographic observations (participant-patient appointments, committee meetings) and semistructured interviews (N = 54 interviews, 49 observation hours). Based on findings from this multicenter, multimethod qualitative study combined with the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety 2.0 (a human factors and systems engineering model for health care), we created a conceptual framework describing how transplant work system characteristics and other external factors may improve equity in the LT evaluation process. Participant perceptions about listing disparities described external factors (e.g., structural racism, ambiguous national guidelines, national quality metrics) that permeate the LT evaluation process. Mechanisms identified included minimal transplant team diversity, implicit bias, and interpersonal racism. A lack of resources was a common theme, such as social workers, transportation assistance, non-English-language materials, and time (e.g., more time for education for patients with health literacy concerns). Because of the minimal data collection or center feedback about disparities, participants felt uncomfortable with and unadaptable to unwanted outcomes, which perpetuate disparities. We proposed transplant center-level solutions (i.e., including but not limited to training of staff on health equity) to modifiable barriers in the clinical work system that could help patient navigation, reduce disparities, and improve access to care. Our findings call for an urgent need for transplant centers, national societies, and policy makers to focus efforts on improving equity (tailored, patient-centered resources) using the science of human factors and systems engineering.