1
|
Awali M, El Homsi M, Fraum TJ, Shetty AS, Ponisio MR, Gharzeddine K, Mhlanga J, Mallak N, Behr S, Itani M. PET/MRI: pictorial review of hepatobiliary and pancreatic applications. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2025; 50:875-901. [PMID: 39254711 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04548-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2024] [Revised: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 08/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]
Abstract
PET and MRI both play valuable roles in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HBP) malignancies. Simultaneous PET/MRI combines the excellent soft-tissue resolution and anatomic details from MRI with functional information from PET in a single comprehensive examination. MRI is the main imaging modality in evaluating HCC, playing important roles in screening, characterization, local extent, and evaluating tumor response, whereas 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET can help evaluate for lymph node involvement and metastatic disease. In cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic malignancies, both PET and MRI have excellent utility in initial staging as well as assessing treatment response. In all HBP malignancies, FDG-PET/MRI is a unique problem-solving tool in complex cases and diagnostic challenges, especially after locoregional therapy and when differentiating residual or recurrent viable disease from inflammatory and other benign processes. In this manuscript, we review the role of PET/MRI in the diagnosis, staging, assessing treatment response, and characterizing post-treatment processes. With the introduction of multiple new tracers, the value of PET/MRI has not yet been fully realized, and more studies are needed to demonstrate the utility and efficacy of PET/MRI in improving patient care in hepatobiliary and pancreatic oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Awali
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 510 South Kingshighway Blvd, Box 8131, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Maria El Homsi
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Tyler J Fraum
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 510 South Kingshighway Blvd, Box 8131, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Anup S Shetty
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 510 South Kingshighway Blvd, Box 8131, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Maria R Ponisio
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 510 South Kingshighway Blvd, Box 8131, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Karem Gharzeddine
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Joyce Mhlanga
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 510 South Kingshighway Blvd, Box 8131, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Nadine Mallak
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, 3181 Southwest Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Spencer Behr
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Room M 372, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Malak Itani
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 510 South Kingshighway Blvd, Box 8131, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meine TC, Ringe KI. [Ablation of liver tumors : From pre-interventional imaging to post-interventional assessment]. RADIOLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 64:503-514. [PMID: 38780657 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-024-01308-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
The aim of this article is to provide an overview on the most frequently applied image-guided, percutaneous, local ablative techniques for treatment of primary and secondary liver tumors. The technical procedures of microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are presented. The pre-interventional diagnostics, indications and feasibility are also discussed, taking the current national guidelines into consideration. Finally, treatment outcomes and recommendations on post-interventional imaging following local tumor ablation are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timo C Meine
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Kristina I Ringe
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kou XS, Li FF, Meng Y, Zhao JM, Liu SF, Zhang L. Multidisciplinary comprehensive treatment of massive hepatocellular carcinoma with hemorrhage: A case report and review of literature. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:2225-2232. [PMID: 38764847 PMCID: PMC11099427 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.2225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a major contributor to cancer-related deaths, is particularly prevalent in Asia, largely due to hepatitis B virus infection. Its prognosis is generally poor. This case report contributes to the medical literature by detailing a unique approach in treating a large HCC through multidisciplinary collaboration, particularly in patients with massive HCC complicated by ruptured bleeding, a scenario not extensively documented previously. CASE SUMMARY The patient presented with large HCC complicated by intratumoral bleeding. Treatment involved a multidisciplinary approach, providing individualized care. The strategy included drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization, sorafenib-targeted therapy, laparoscopic partial hepatectomy, and standardized sintilimab monoclonal antibody therapy. Six months after treatment, the patient achieved complete radiological remission, with significant symptom relief. Imaging studies showed no lesions or recurrence, and clinical assessments confirmed complete remission. This report is notable as possibly the first documented case of successfully treating such complex HCC conditions through integrated multidisciplinary efforts, offering new insights and a reference for future similar cases. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated effective multidisciplinary treatment for massive HCC with intratumoral bleeding, providing insights for future similar cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xian-Shuai Kou
- The First Clinical Medical College, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Fan-Fan Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Yun Meng
- Department of Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Jian-Ming Zhao
- The First Clinical Medical College, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Sheng-Fen Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Lan Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mendiratta-Lala M, Aslam A, Bai HX, Chapiro J, De Baere T, Miyayama S, Chernyak V, Matsui O, Vilgrain V, Fidelman N. Ethiodized oil as an imaging biomarker after conventional transarterial chemoembolization. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:3284-3297. [PMID: 37930412 PMCID: PMC11126446 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10326-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) utilizing ethiodized oil as a chemotherapy carrier has become a standard treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has been adopted as a bridging and downstaging therapy for liver transplantation. Water-in-oil emulsion made up of ethiodized oil and chemotherapy solution is retained in tumor vasculature resulting in high tissue drug concentration and low systemic chemotherapy doses. The density and distribution pattern of ethiodized oil within the tumor on post-treatment imaging are predictive of the extent of tumor necrosis and duration of response to treatment. This review describes the multiple roles of ethiodized oil, particularly in its role as a biomarker of tumor response to cTACE. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: With the increasing complexity of locoregional therapy options, including the use of combination therapies, treatment response assessment has become challenging; Ethiodized oil deposition patterns can serve as an imaging biomarker for the prediction of treatment response, and perhaps predict post-treatment prognosis. KEY POINTS: • Treatment response assessment after locoregional therapy to hepatocellular carcinoma is fraught with multiple challenges given the varied post-treatment imaging appearance. • Ethiodized oil is unique in that its' radiopacity can serve as an imaging biomarker to help predict treatment response. • The pattern of deposition of ethiodozed oil has served as a mechanism to detect portions of tumor that are undertreated and can serve as an adjunct to enhancement in order to improve management in patients treated with intraarterial embolization with ethiodized oil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mishal Mendiratta-Lala
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medicine, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., UH B2 A209R, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| | - Anum Aslam
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medicine, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., UH B2 A209R, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Harrison X Bai
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, John Hopkins University, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Julius Chapiro
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging Yale University School of Medicine, 300 Cedar Street - TAC N312A, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Thiery De Baere
- Gustave Roussy University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
- Département d'Anesthésie, Chirurgie et Imagerie Interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - Shiro Miyayama
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital 7-1, Funabashi, Wadanaka-cho, Fukui, 918-8503, Japan
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Osamu Matsui
- Department of Radiology, Kananzawa University, Japan, 2-21-9 Asahi-machi, Kanazawa, 920-0941, Japan
| | - Valerie Vilgrain
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Beaujon APHP.Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI INSERM 1149, Paris, France
| | - Nicholas Fidelman
- University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, Room M-361, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li HY, Zheng LL, Hu N, Wang ZH, Tao CC, Wang YR, Liu Y, Aizimuaji Z, Wang HW, Zheng RQ, Xiao T, Rong WQ. Telomerase-related advances in hepatocellular carcinoma: A bibliometric and visual analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:1224-1236. [PMID: 38577190 PMCID: PMC10989492 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i9.1224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As a critical early event in hepatocellular carcinogenesis, telomerase activation might be a promising and critical biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, and its function in the genesis and treatment of HCC has gained much attention over the past two decades. AIM To perform a bibliometric analysis to systematically assess the current state of research on HCC-related telomerase. METHODS The Web of Science Core Collection and PubMed were systematically searched to retrieve publications pertaining to HCC/telomerase limited to "articles" and "reviews" published in English. A total of 873 relevant publications related to HCC and telomerase were identified. We employed the Bibliometrix package in R to extract and analyze the fundamental information of the publications, such as the trends in the publications, citation counts, most prolific or influential writers, and most popular journals; to screen for keywords occurring at high frequency; and to draw collaboration and cluster analysis charts on the basis of coauthorship and co-occurrences. VOSviewer was utilized to compile and visualize the bibliometric data. RESULTS A surge of 51 publications on HCC/telomerase research occurred in 2016, the most productive year from 1996 to 2023, accompanied by the peak citation count recorded in 2016. Up to December 2023, 35226 citations were made to all publications, an average of 46.6 citations to each paper. The United States received the most citations (n = 13531), followed by China (n = 7427) and Japan (n = 5754). In terms of national cooperation, China presented the highest centrality, its strongest bonds being to the United States and Japan. Among the 20 academic institutions with the most publications, ten came from China and the rest of Asia, though the University of Paris Cité, Public Assistance-Hospitals of Paris, and the National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) were the most prolific. As for individual contributions, Hisatomi H, Kaneko S, and Ide T were the three most prolific authors. Kaneko S ranked first by H-index, G-index, and overall publication count, while Zucman-Rossi J ranked first in citation count. The five most popular journals were the World Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Journal of Hepatology, Oncotarget, and Oncogene, while Nature Genetics, Hepatology, and Nature Reviews Disease Primers had the most citations. We extracted 2293 keywords from the publications, 120 of which appeared more than ten times. The most frequent were HCC, telomerase and human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). Keywords such as mutational landscape, TERT promoter mutations, landscape, risk, and prognosis were among the most common issues in this field in the last three years and may be topics for research in the coming years. CONCLUSION Our bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of HCC/telomerase research and insights into promising upcoming research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai-Yang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Lin-Lin Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Nan Hu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Zhi-Hao Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Hernia Surgery, Liaocheng Dongcangfu People’s Hospital, Liaocheng 252000, Shandong Province, China
| | - Chang-Cheng Tao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Ya-Ru Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yue Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Zulihumaer Aizimuaji
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Hong-Wei Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Rui-Qi Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Ting Xiao
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Wei-Qi Rong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mena E, Shih J, Chung JY, Jones J, Rabiee A, Monge C, Turkbey B, Lindenberg L, Salerno KE, Kassin M, Wood B, Hernandez J, Maass-Moreno R, Saboury B, Jakhete N, Molitoris JK, Unger KR, Choyke PL, Escorcia FE. Functional Imaging of Liver Cancer (FLIC): Study protocol of a phase 2 trial of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0277407. [PMID: 36367894 PMCID: PMC9651549 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is overexpressed in high-grade prostate cancers, it is also expressed in tumor neovasculature and other malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Importantly, no functional imaging for HCC is clinically available, making diagnosis and surveillance following local therapies particularly challenging. 18F-DCFPyL binds with high affinity to PSMA yet clears rapidly from the blood pool. PET imaging with 18F-DCFPyL may represent a new tool for staging, surveillance and assessment of treatment response in HCC. The purpose of this Functional Imaging Liver Cancer (FLIC) trial is to assess the ability of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT to detect sites of HCC. METHODS This is a phase II multi-site prospective imaging trial with a plan to enroll 50 subjects with suspected HCC on standard of care CT or MRI and eligible for standard local treatment. Participants will undergo a baseline 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT, prior to therapy. Subjects will also be scanned with 18F-FDG-PET/CT within 2 weeks of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT. Participants will undergo histopathologic assessment and standard of care local treatment for HCC within a multidisciplinary team context. Participants with histopathologic confirmation of HCC and a positive baseline 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT will undergo a post-treatment 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT during the first routine follow-up, typically within 4-8 weeks. Subjects with negative baseline 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT will not be re-scanned after treatment but will remain in follow-up. Participants will be followed for 5-years to assess for progression-free-survival. The primary endpoint is the positive predictive value of 18F-DCFPyL-PET for HCC as confirmed by histopathology. Secondary endpoints include comparison of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT with CT, MRI, and 18F-FDG-PET/CT, and evaluation of the value of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT in assessing treatment response following local treatment. Exploratory endpoints include next generation sequencing of tumors, and analysis of extracellular vesicles to identify biomarkers associated with response to therapy. DISCUSSION This is a prospective imaging trial designed to evaluate whether PSMA-PET/CT imaging with 18F-DCFPyL can detect tumor sites, assess local treatment response in HCC patients, and to eventually determine whether PSMA-PET/CT could improve outcomes of patients with HCC receiving standard of care local therapy. Importantly, this trial may help determine whether PSMA-selective radiopharmaceutical therapies may be beneficial for patients with HCC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NIH IND#133631. Submission date: 04-07-2021. Safe-to-proceed letter issued by FDA: 05.07.2021. NIH IRB #00080. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05009979. Date of Registry: 08-18-2021. Protocol version date: 01-07-2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Mena
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Joanna Shih
- Biostatistics Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Joon-Yong Chung
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Jones
- Radiation Oncology Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Atoosa Rabiee
- Department of Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Cecilia Monge
- Thoracic and GI Malignancy Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
- Liver Cancer Program, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Liza Lindenberg
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Kilian E. Salerno
- Radiation Oncology Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Michael Kassin
- Liver Cancer Program, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
- Interventional Oncology Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Brad Wood
- Liver Cancer Program, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
- Interventional Oncology Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Jonathan Hernandez
- Surgical Oncology Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Roberto Maass-Moreno
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Babak Saboury
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Neha Jakhete
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Jason K. Molitoris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Keith R. Unger
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Peter L. Choyke
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Freddy E. Escorcia
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
- Radiation Oncology Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
- Liver Cancer Program, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Horvat N, de Oliveira AI, Clemente de Oliveira B, Araujo-Filho JAB, El Homsi M, Elsakka A, Bajwa R, Martins GLP, Elsayes KM, Menezes MR. Local-Regional Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Primer for Radiologists. Radiographics 2022; 42:1670-1689. [PMID: 36190854 PMCID: PMC9539394 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
The treatment planning for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) relies predominantly on tumor burden, clinical performance, and liver function test results. Curative treatments such as resection, liver transplantation, and ablative therapies of small lesions should be considered for all patients with HCC. However, many patients are ineligible for these treatments owing to advanced disease stage and comorbidities. Despite efforts to increase screening, early-stage HCC remains difficult to diagnose, which decreases the possibility of curative therapies. In this context, local-regional treatment of HCC is accepted as a form of curative therapy in selected patients with early-stage disease, as a therapeutic option in patients who are not eligible to undergo curative therapies, as a downstaging approach to decrease tumor size toward meeting the criteria for liver transplantation, and as a bridging therapy to avoid tumor growth while the patient is on the waiting list for liver transplantation. The authors review the indications, types, mechanism of action, and possible complications of local-regional treatment, as well as the expected postprocedural imaging features of HCC. Furthermore, they discuss the role of imaging in pre- and postprocedural settings, provide guidance on how to assess treatment response, and review the current limitations of imaging assessment. Finally, the authors summarize the potential future directions with imaging tools that may add value to contemporary practice at response assessment and imaging biomarkers for patient selection, treatment response, and prognosis. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Brunna Clemente de Oliveira
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (N.H., M.E.H., A.E., R.B.);
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo,
Brazil (A.I.d.O., B.C.d.O., J.A.B.A.F., G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); Department of
Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.I.d.O.,
G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); and Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic
Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
(K.M.E.)
| | - Jose A. B. Araujo-Filho
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (N.H., M.E.H., A.E., R.B.);
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo,
Brazil (A.I.d.O., B.C.d.O., J.A.B.A.F., G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); Department of
Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.I.d.O.,
G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); and Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic
Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
(K.M.E.)
| | - Maria El Homsi
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (N.H., M.E.H., A.E., R.B.);
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo,
Brazil (A.I.d.O., B.C.d.O., J.A.B.A.F., G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); Department of
Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.I.d.O.,
G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); and Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic
Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
(K.M.E.)
| | - Ahmed Elsakka
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (N.H., M.E.H., A.E., R.B.);
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo,
Brazil (A.I.d.O., B.C.d.O., J.A.B.A.F., G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); Department of
Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.I.d.O.,
G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); and Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic
Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
(K.M.E.)
| | - Raazi Bajwa
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (N.H., M.E.H., A.E., R.B.);
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo,
Brazil (A.I.d.O., B.C.d.O., J.A.B.A.F., G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); Department of
Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.I.d.O.,
G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); and Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic
Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
(K.M.E.)
| | - Guilherme L. P. Martins
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (N.H., M.E.H., A.E., R.B.);
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo,
Brazil (A.I.d.O., B.C.d.O., J.A.B.A.F., G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); Department of
Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.I.d.O.,
G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); and Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic
Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
(K.M.E.)
| | - Khaled M. Elsayes
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (N.H., M.E.H., A.E., R.B.);
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo,
Brazil (A.I.d.O., B.C.d.O., J.A.B.A.F., G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); Department of
Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.I.d.O.,
G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); and Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic
Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
(K.M.E.)
| | - Marcos R. Menezes
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065 (N.H., M.E.H., A.E., R.B.);
Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo,
Brazil (A.I.d.O., B.C.d.O., J.A.B.A.F., G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); Department of
Radiology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (A.I.d.O.,
G.L.P.M., M.R.M.); and Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic
Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
(K.M.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chartampilas E, Rafailidis V, Georgopoulou V, Kalarakis G, Hatzidakis A, Prassopoulos P. Current Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14163997. [PMID: 36010991 PMCID: PMC9406360 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The role of imaging in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has significantly evolved and expanded beyond the plain radiological confirmation of the tumor based on the typical appearance in a multiphase contrast-enhanced CT or MRI examination. The introduction of hepatobiliary contrast agents has enabled the diagnosis of hepatocarcinogenesis at earlier stages, while the application of ultrasound contrast agents has drastically upgraded the role of ultrasound in the diagnostic algorithms. Newer quantitative techniques assessing blood perfusion on CT and MRI not only allow earlier diagnosis and confident differentiation from other lesions, but they also provide biomarkers for the evaluation of treatment response. As distinct HCC subtypes are identified, their correlation with specific imaging features holds great promise for estimating tumor aggressiveness and prognosis. This review presents the current role of imaging and underlines its critical role in the successful management of patients with HCC. Abstract Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer related death worldwide. Radiology has traditionally played a central role in HCC management, ranging from screening of high-risk patients to non-invasive diagnosis, as well as the evaluation of treatment response and post-treatment follow-up. From liver ultrasonography with or without contrast to dynamic multiple phased CT and dynamic MRI with diffusion protocols, great progress has been achieved in the last decade. Throughout the last few years, pathological, biological, genetic, and immune-chemical analyses have revealed several tumoral subtypes with diverse biological behavior, highlighting the need for the re-evaluation of established radiological methods. Considering these changes, novel methods that provide functional and quantitative parameters in addition to morphological information are increasingly incorporated into modern diagnostic protocols for HCC. In this way, differential diagnosis became even more challenging throughout the last few years. Use of liver specific contrast agents, as well as CT/MRI perfusion techniques, seem to not only allow earlier detection and more accurate characterization of HCC lesions, but also make it possible to predict response to treatment and survival. Nevertheless, several limitations and technical considerations still exist. This review will describe and discuss all these imaging modalities and their advances in the imaging of HCC lesions in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic livers. Sensitivity and specificity rates, method limitations, and technical considerations will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelos Chartampilas
- Radiology Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
- Correspondence:
| | - Vasileios Rafailidis
- Radiology Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Vivian Georgopoulou
- Radiology Department, Ippokratio General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios Kalarakis
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, 14152 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science, Division of Radiology, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, 14152 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Radiology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71500 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Adam Hatzidakis
- Radiology Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Panos Prassopoulos
- Radiology Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rim Enhancement after Technically Successful Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Potential Mimic of Incomplete Embolization or Reactive Hyperemia? Tomography 2022; 8:1148-1158. [PMID: 35448728 PMCID: PMC9028792 DOI: 10.3390/tomography8020094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Contrast enhancement at the margins/rim of embolization areas in hepatocellular-carcinoma (HCC) lesions treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) might be an early prognostic indicator for HCC recurrence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of rim perfusion for TACE recurrence as determined by perfusion CT (PCT). A total of 52 patients (65.6 ± 9.3 years) underwent PCT directly before, immediately after (within 48 h) and at follow-up (95.3 ± 12.5 days) after TACE. Arterial-liver perfusion (ALP), portal-venous perfusion (PVP) and hepatic-perfusion index (HPI) were evaluated in normal liver parenchyma, and on the embolization rim as well as the tumor bed. A total of 42 lesions were successfully treated, and PCT measurements showed no residually vascularized tumor areas. Embolization was not entirely successful in 10 patients with remaining arterialized focal nodular areas (ALP 34.7 ± 10.1 vs. 4.4 ± 5.3 mL/100 mL/min, p < 0.0001). Perfusion values at the TACE rim were lower in responders compared to normal adjacent liver parenchyma and edges of incompletely embolized tumors (ALP liver 16.3 ± 10.1 mL/100 mL/min, rim responder 8.8 ± 8.7 mL/100 mL/min, rim non-responder 23.4 ± 8.6 mL/100 mL/min, p = 0.005). At follow-up, local tumor relapse was observed in 17/42, and 15/42 showed no recurrence (ALP 39.1 ± 10.1 mL/100 mL/min vs. 10.0 ± 7.4 mL/100 mL/min, p = 0.0008); four patients had de novo disseminated disease and six patients were lost in follow-up. Rim perfusion was lower compared to adjacent recurring HCC and not different between groups. HCC lesions showed no rim perfusion after TACE, neither immediately after nor at follow-up at three months, both for mid-term responders and mid-term relapsing HCCs, indicating that rim enhancement is not a sign of reactive hyperemia and not predictive of early HCC recurrence.
Collapse
|
10
|
Agnello F, Rabiolo L, Midiri F, Lo Re G, Grassedonio E, La Grutta L, Buscemi S, Agrusa A, Galia M. Focal hepatic intrinsically hyperattenuating lesions at unenhanced CT: Not always calcifications. Clin Imaging 2021; 80:304-314. [PMID: 34482241 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Due to the growing use of CT, there has been an increase in the frequency of detecting focal liver lesions. Intrinsically hyperattenuating hepatic lesions or pseudolesions are not uncommon at unenhanced CT. Hyperattenuating hepatic lesions can be divided into non-calcified and calcified. Causes of intrinsic hyperattenuation include hemorrhage, thrombosis, and calcifications. Focal liver lesions can show hyperattenuation on unenhanced CT in case of severe liver steatosis. Recognition of etiologies associated with hyperattenuation on unenhanced CT can help the radiologist in characterizing focal liver lesions and pseudolesions. In this paper, we describe the spectrum of intrinsically hyperattenuating focal liver lesions and pseudolesions at unenhanced CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Agnello
- Section of Radiological Sciences, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Lidia Rabiolo
- Section of Radiological Sciences, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Federico Midiri
- Section of Radiological Sciences, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lo Re
- Section of Radiological Sciences, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Emanuele Grassedonio
- Section of Radiological Sciences, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Ludovico La Grutta
- Section of Radiological Sciences, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Salvatore Buscemi
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Antonino Agrusa
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Massimo Galia
- Section of Radiological Sciences, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Choe MJ, Hinkel T, Berggruen SM. Imaging of Benign Hepatic lesions. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2021; 42:347-365. [PMID: 34130848 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
As abdominal imaging volumes have increased, the incidence of incidentally identified benign hepatic lesions has substantially increased. Familiarity with imaging appearances of benign hepatic tumors, both common and less commonly encountered, allows the radiologist to give an informed differential diagnosis. In addition to clinical history, awareness of imaging findings of benign hepatic lesions on ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging is useful in evaluating these lesions and avoiding unnecessary diagnostic interventions or imaging surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Choe
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL
| | - Tyler Hinkel
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL
| | - Senta M Berggruen
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL..
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bajaj G, Sundaram K, Jambhekar K, Ram R. Imaging After Locoregional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Emphasis on LIRADS Treatment Response Assessment Criteria. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2021; 42:318-331. [PMID: 34130846 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2021.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Radiologists play an essential role in assessing hepatocellular carcinoma treatment response and help guide further clinical management of patients. Interpretation of treatment response after locoregional therapy is challenging. The post-treatment imaging findings vary and depend on the type of treatment, the degree of treatment response, time interval after treatment and several other factors. Given the widespread use of local-regional therapies, understanding the appearance of treated lesions has become crucial to allow for a more accurate interpretation of post-treatment imaging. Several response criteria including the recently introduced Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA) are currently used to assess treatment response. This review article describes the imaging assessment of HCC treatment response after several locoregional therapies using various response assessment criteria, emphasizing the LI-RADS treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gitanjali Bajaj
- Associate professor of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
| | - Karthik Sundaram
- Assistant Professor of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kedar Jambhekar
- Professor of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, AR
| | - Roopa Ram
- Associate professor of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mendiratta-Lala M, Masch WR, Shampain K, Zhang A, Jo AS, Moorman S, Aslam A, Maturen KE, Davenport MS. MRI Assessment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Local-Regional Therapy: A Comprehensive Review. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2020; 2:e190024. [PMID: 33778692 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2020190024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Revised: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Nearly 80% of cirrhotic patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are not eligible for surgical resection and instead undergo local-regional treatment. After therapy for HCC, patients undergo imaging surveillance to assess treatment efficacy and identify potential sites of progressive tumor elsewhere within the liver. Accurate interpretation of posttreatment imaging is essential for guiding further management decisions, and radiologists must understand expected treatment-specific imaging findings for each of the local-regional therapies. Of interest, expected imaging findings seen after radiation-based therapies (transarterial radioembolization and stereotactic body radiation therapy) are different than those seen after thermal ablation and transarterial chemoembolization. Given differences in expected posttreatment imaging findings, the current radiologic treatment response assessment algorithms used for HCC (modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors classification, European Association for the Study of Liver Diseases criteria, and Liver Imaging and Reporting Data System Treatment Response Algorithm) must be applied cautiously for radiation-based therapies in which persistent arterial phase hyperenhancement in the early posttreatment period is common and expected. This article will review the concept of tumor response assessment for HCC, the forms of local-regional therapy for HCC, and the expected posttreatment findings for each form of therapy. Keywords: Abdomen/GI, Liver, MR-Imaging, Treatment Effects, Tumor Response © RSNA, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mishal Mendiratta-Lala
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, UH B2A209R, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5030
| | - William R Masch
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, UH B2A209R, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5030
| | - Kimberly Shampain
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, UH B2A209R, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5030
| | - Andrew Zhang
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, UH B2A209R, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5030
| | - Alexandria S Jo
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, UH B2A209R, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5030
| | - Sarah Moorman
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, UH B2A209R, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5030
| | - Anum Aslam
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, UH B2A209R, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5030
| | - Katherine E Maturen
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, UH B2A209R, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5030
| | - Matthew S Davenport
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, UH B2A209R, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5030
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dual Modality Radiation With External Beam Radiation Therapy and Transarterial Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Gross Vascular Invasion. Am J Clin Oncol 2019; 42:367-374. [PMID: 30724782 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and gross vascular invasion (GVI) have poor outcomes with systemic therapy such as sorafenib. Both external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) have been utilized for this patient population. We sought to compare outcomes using dual modality radiation (EBRT+TARE) versus EBRT alone in patients with HCC and GVI. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2011 and 2017, 45 patients with HCC and GVI were treated with EBRT±TARE at our institution. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed and compared using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the impact of the variables stage, etiology of cirrhosis, Child-Pugh (CP) score, and Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) on PFS and OS. RESULTS Patient characteristics were well-balanced except for KPS (80 vs. 90) and CP score. Median OS for patients receiving EBRT+TARE was 263 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 167, -) versus 193 days (95% CI: 51, 262) for EBRT alone (P=0.049). However, this did not hold up on MVA. When EBRT and TARE were delivered within 2 months as planned (n=12), median PFS was 218 days (95% CI: 44, -) for dual modality radiation versus 63 days (95% CI: 38, 137) for EBRT alone (P=0.048). When EBRT and TARE were delivered within 6 months, the difference in PFS was no longer seen (P=NS), because some patients received TARE as a salvage therapy. CONCLUSIONS Dual modality radiation with EBRT and TARE may be associated with improved OS in patients with HCC and GVI. Dual modality radiation may be associated with improved PFS in patients with HCC and GVI compared with EBRT alone when EBRT and TARE are delivered within 2 months of each other as part of a planned dual modality treatment strategy. However, since this is a retrospective study with inherent selection bias, these findings need further validation in a prospective clinical trial for patients with HCC and GVI.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hussein RS, Tantawy W, Abbas YA. MRI assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional therapy. Insights Imaging 2019; 10:8. [PMID: 30694398 PMCID: PMC6352610 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-019-0690-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Accepted: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) constitute one of the major causes of morbidity, mortality, and high health care costs worldwide. Multiple treatment options are available for HCC depending on the clinical status of the patient, size and location of the tumor, and available techniques and expertise. Locoregional treatment options are multiple. The most challenging part is how to assess the treatment response by different imaging modalities, but our scope will be assessing the response to locoregional therapy for HCC by MRI. This will be addressed by conventional MR methods using LI-RADS v2018 and by functional MR using diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion, and highlighting the value of the novel intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasha S Hussein
- Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University and MR Unit of Misr Radiology Center, Cairo, Egypt.
| | - Wahid Tantawy
- Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University and MR Unit of Misr Radiology Center, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Yasser A Abbas
- Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University and MR Unit of Misr Radiology Center, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kesler M, Levine C, Hershkovitz D, Mishani E, Menachem Y, Lerman H, Zohar Y, Shibolet O, Even-Sapir E. 68Ga-PSMA is a novel PET-CT tracer for imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective pilot study. J Nucl Med 2018; 60:185-191. [PMID: 30002112 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.214833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2018] [Accepted: 06/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background:68Ga-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (68Ga-PSMA), a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer that was recently introduce for imaging of prostate cancer, may accumulate in other solid tumors including Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). The aim of the study was to assess the potential role of 68Ga-PSMA PET-Computed Tomography (CT) for imaging of HCC. Material and Methods: A prospective pilot study in seven patients with HCC with 41 liver lesions: 37 suspected malignant lesions (tumor lesions) and 4 regenerative nodules. For each liver lesion, uptake of 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG uptake were measured [standard uptake value (SUV) and lesion-to-liver background ratios (TBR-SUV)], and correlated with dynamic characteristics (HU and TBR-HU) obtained on contrast enhanced CT data. Immunohistochemistry staining of PSMA in the tumor tissue was analyzed in samples obtained from 5 patients with HCC and compared to control samples from 3 patients with prostate cancer. Results: Thirty-six of the 37 tumor lesions and none of the regenerative nodules showed increased 68Ga-PSMA uptake while only 10 lesions were 18F-FDG avid. Based on contrast enhancement, tumor lesions were categorized into 27 homogeneously enhancing lesions, nine lesions with "mosaic" enhancement composed of enhancing and non-enhancing regions in the same lesion and a single non-enhancing lesion, the latter being the only non-68Ga-PSMA avid lesion. Using the Mann-Whitney test, 68Ga-PSMA uptake was found significantly higher in enhancing tumor areas compared to non-enhancing areas and in contrast, 18F-FDG uptake was higher in non-enhancing areas, P<0.001 for both. 68Ga-PSMA uptake (TBR SUVmax) was found to correlate with vascularity (TBR-HU) (Spearman r=0.866, p<0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed intense intra-tumoral microvessel staining for PSMA in HCC, in contrast with cytoplasmic and membranous staining, mainly in the luminal border, in prostate cancer samples. In two of the study patients 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT identified unexpected extrahepatic metastases. Four regenerative liver nodules showed no increased uptake of either of the PET tracers. Conclusion:68Ga-PSMA PET-CT is superior to 18F-FDG PET-CT in imaging patients with HCC. HCC lesions are more commonly hypervascular taking up 68Ga-PSMA in tumoral micro-vessels. 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT is a potential novel modality for imaging patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Dov Hershkovitz
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center; Sackler school of Medicine Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | - Oren Shibolet
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center; Sackler school of Medicine Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Einat Even-Sapir
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center; Sackler school of Medicine Tel Aviv University, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Li G, Liang Y, Sun C, Peng X, Hao N, Liu M, Gao W, Wu H, He B. Effective combination therapy of percutaneous ethanol injection and chemotherapy based on injectable low molecular weight gels. ARTIFICIAL CELLS NANOMEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY 2018; 46:683-693. [PMID: 29741394 DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2018.1468766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) therapy was used in liver cancer treatment, however, the therapeutic ethanol in PEI easily flew away from injected solid tumours and hinder the treatment effect. In this paper, injectable supramolecular gels formed by self-assembly of low molecular weight gelators (LMWGs) based on glycylglycine modified phenylboronic acid were prepared to localize ethanol and load chemotherapeutic drug for in situ synergistic therapy. The mechanism, morphology and rheological property of supramolecular gels were characterized by NMR, UV, SEM, etc. The rheological study revealed that the gels were formed in situ rapidly and recovered promptly once damaged. The gels were non-toxicity to both normal 3T3 fibroblasts cells and 4T1 breast cancer cells. Doxorubicin (DOX) hydrochloride and ethanol were encapsulated in the gels for the combination of chemotherapy and PEI therapy. The in vivo anticancer activity of the DOX-loaded gels was carried out in tumour bearing mice. The injected gels were coated around tumour tissues to lock ethanol, and DOX was released sustainingly from the gels to maintain effective concentration to induce the apoptosis of tumour cells. DOX-loaded gels and the ethanol exhibited excellent therapeutic efficacy and low side effects in local cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guotao Li
- a College of Chemistry and Materials Engineering , Wenzhou University , Wenzhou , China
| | - Yan Liang
- b Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy , Qingdao University , Qingdao , China
| | - Changzhen Sun
- c National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials , Sichuan University , Chengdu , China
| | - Xinyu Peng
- c National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials , Sichuan University , Chengdu , China
| | - Na Hao
- c National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials , Sichuan University , Chengdu , China
| | - Miaochang Liu
- a College of Chemistry and Materials Engineering , Wenzhou University , Wenzhou , China
| | - Wenxia Gao
- a College of Chemistry and Materials Engineering , Wenzhou University , Wenzhou , China
| | - Huayue Wu
- a College of Chemistry and Materials Engineering , Wenzhou University , Wenzhou , China
| | - Bin He
- c National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials , Sichuan University , Chengdu , China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Elsayes KM, Hooker JC, Agrons MM, Kielar AZ, Tang A, Fowler KJ, Chernyak V, Bashir MR, Kono Y, Do RK, Mitchell DG, Kamaya A, Hecht EM, Sirlin CB. 2017 Version of LI-RADS for CT and MR Imaging: An Update. Radiographics 2018; 37:1994-2017. [PMID: 29131761 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2017170098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a reporting system created for the standardized interpretation of liver imaging findings in patients who are at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This system was developed with the cooperative and ongoing efforts of an American College of Radiology-supported committee of diagnostic radiologists with expertise in liver imaging and valuable input from hepatobiliary surgeons, hepatologists, hepatopathologists, and interventional radiologists. In this article, the 2017 version of LI-RADS for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging is reviewed. Specific topics include the appropriate population for application of LI-RADS; technical recommendations for image optimization, including definitions of dynamic enhancement phases; diagnostic and treatment response categories; definitions of major and ancillary imaging features; criteria for distinguishing definite HCC from a malignancy that might be non-HCC; management options following LI-RADS categorization; and reporting. ©RSNA, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled M Elsayes
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Jonathan C Hooker
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Michelle M Agrons
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Ania Z Kielar
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - An Tang
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Yuko Kono
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Richard K Do
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Donald G Mitchell
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Aya Kamaya
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Elizabeth M Hecht
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 (K.M.E.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.C.H., C.B.S.), and Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Y.K.), University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (M.M.A.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A.Z.K.); Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (K.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (R.K.D.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (A.K.); and Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (E.M.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zheng H, Ke X, Li D, Wang Q, Wang J, Liu X, Deng M, Deng X, Xue Y, Zhu Y, Wang Q. NEDD4 promotes cell growth and motility in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Cycle 2018; 17:728-738. [PMID: 29480061 DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2018.1440879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. In China, the situation is even worse as cancer incidence and mortality continue to increase rapidly. Although tremendous progress has been made toward HCC treatments, the benefits for liver cancer patients are still limited. Therefore, it is necessary to identify and develop novel therapeutic methods. Neuronally expressed developmentally downregulated 4 (NEDD4), an E3 ubiquitin ligase, plays a critical role in the development and progression of various types of human cancers. In our study, NEDD4 acts as an oncoprotein in both QGY7703 and SMMC7721 liver cancer cell lines. We found that depletion of NEDD4 by siRNA transfection led to inhibition of cell growth, invasion and migration, and promotion of apoptosis. In contrast, overexpression of NEDD4 via plasmid transfection resulted in facilitated cell proliferation, invasion and migration, and decreased apoptosis. Importantly, we observed that tumor suppressor LATS1, also a core component of Hippo pathway, was negatively regulated by NEDD4 in liver cancer cells. Our findings suggested that NEDD4 may be involved in the HCC progression via regulating LATS1 associated signaling pathway. Therefore, targeting NEDD4-LATS1 signaling could be a potential therapeutic option for HCC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailun Zheng
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Xiquan Ke
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Dapeng Li
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Qiangwu Wang
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Jianchao Wang
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Xiaoyang Liu
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Min Deng
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Xiaojing Deng
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Yongju Xue
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Yu Zhu
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Qizhi Wang
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zheng H, Ke X, Li D, Wang Q, Wang J, Liu X, Deng M, Deng X, Xue Y, Zhu Y, Wang Q. NEDD4 promotes cell growth and motility in hepatocellular carcinoma. CELL CYCLE (GEORGETOWN, TEX.) 2018. [PMID: 29480061 DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2018.1440879.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. In China, the situation is even worse as cancer incidence and mortality continue to increase rapidly. Although tremendous progress has been made toward HCC treatments, the benefits for liver cancer patients are still limited. Therefore, it is necessary to identify and develop novel therapeutic methods. Neuronally expressed developmentally downregulated 4 (NEDD4), an E3 ubiquitin ligase, plays a critical role in the development and progression of various types of human cancers. In our study, NEDD4 acts as an oncoprotein in both QGY7703 and SMMC7721 liver cancer cell lines. We found that depletion of NEDD4 by siRNA transfection led to inhibition of cell growth, invasion and migration, and promotion of apoptosis. In contrast, overexpression of NEDD4 via plasmid transfection resulted in facilitated cell proliferation, invasion and migration, and decreased apoptosis. Importantly, we observed that tumor suppressor LATS1, also a core component of Hippo pathway, was negatively regulated by NEDD4 in liver cancer cells. Our findings suggested that NEDD4 may be involved in the HCC progression via regulating LATS1 associated signaling pathway. Therefore, targeting NEDD4-LATS1 signaling could be a potential therapeutic option for HCC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailun Zheng
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Xiquan Ke
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Dapeng Li
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Qiangwu Wang
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Jianchao Wang
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Xiaoyang Liu
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Min Deng
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Xiaojing Deng
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Yongju Xue
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Yu Zhu
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| | - Qizhi Wang
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College , Bengbu , Anhui 233004 , P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Najmi Varzaneh F, Pandey A, Aliyari Ghasabeh M, Shao N, Khoshpouri P, Pandey P, Zarghampour M, Fouladi D, Liddell R, Anders RA, Kamel IR. Prediction of post-TACE necrosis of hepatocellular carcinoma usingvolumetric enhancement on MRI and volumetric oil deposition on CT, with pathological correlation. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:3032-3040. [PMID: 29383518 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5198-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Revised: 11/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether volumetric enhancement on baseline MRI and volumetric oil deposition on unenhanced CT would predict HCC necrosis and response post-TACE. METHOD Of 115 retrospective HCC patients (173 lesions) who underwent cTACE, a subset of 53 HCC patients underwent liver transplant (LT). Semiautomatic volumetric segmentation of target lesions was performed on dual imaging to assess the accuracy of predicting tumour necrosis after TACE in the whole cohort and at pathology in the LT group. Predicted percentage tumour necrosis is defined as 100 % - (%baseline MRI enhancement - %CT oil deposition). RESULTS Mean predicted tumour necrosis by dual imaging modalities was 61.5 % ± 31.6%; mean percentage tumour necrosis on follow-up MRI was 63.8 % ± 31.5 %. In the LT group, mean predicted tumour necrosis by dual imaging modalities was 77.6 % ± 27.2 %; mean percentage necrosis at pathology was 78.7 % ± 31.5 %. There was a strong significant correlation between predicted tumour necrosis and volumetric necrosis on MRI follow-up (r = 0.889, p<0.001) and between predicted tumour necrosis and pathological necrosis (r = 0.871, p<0.001). CONCLUSION Volumetric pre-TACE enhancement on MRI and post-TACE oil deposition in CT may accurately predict necrosis in treated HCC lesions. KEY POINTS • Imaging-based tumour response can assist in therapeutic decisions. • Lipiodol retention as carrier agent in cTACE is a tumour necrosis biomarker. • Predicting tumour necrosis with dual imaging potentially obviates immediate post-treatment MRI. • Predicting tumour necrosis would facilitate further therapeutic decisions in HCC post-cTACE. • Pre-TACE MRI and post-TACE CT predict necrosis in treated HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farnaz Najmi Varzaneh
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Ankur Pandey
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Nannan Shao
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Pegah Khoshpouri
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Pallavi Pandey
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Manijeh Zarghampour
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Daniel Fouladi
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Robert Liddell
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Robert Albert Anders
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Ihab R Kamel
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
PURPOSE To discuss guidelines and salient imaging findings of solid tumors treated with common intra-arterial procedures used in interventional oncology. METHODS A meticulous literature search of PubMed-indexed articles was conducted. Key words included "imaging + embolization," "imaging + TACE," "imaging + radioembolization," "imaging + Y90," "mRECIST," and "EASL." Representative post-treatment cross-sectional images were obtained from past cases in this institution. RESULTS Intra-arterial therapy (IAT) in interventional oncology includes bland embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization. Solid tumors of the liver are the primary focus of these procedures. Cross-sectional CT and/or MR are the main modalities used to image tumors after treatment. Traditional size-based response criteria (WHO and RECIST) alone are of limited utility in determining response to IAT; tumoral necrosis and enhancement must be considered. Specifically for HCC, the EASL and mRECIST guidelines are becoming widely adopted response criteria to assess these factors. DWI, FDG-PET, and CEUS are modalities that play an adjunctive but controversial role. CONCLUSIONS Radiologists must be aware that the different forms of intra-arterial therapy yield characteristic findings on cross-sectional imaging. Knowledge of these findings is integral to accurate assessment of tumor response and progression.
Collapse
|
23
|
Cancer therapy related complications in the liver, pancreas, and biliary system: an imaging perspective. Insights Imaging 2015; 6:665-77. [PMID: 26443452 PMCID: PMC4656242 DOI: 10.1007/s13244-015-0436-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2015] [Revised: 09/14/2015] [Accepted: 09/18/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Awareness of cancer therapy-induced toxicities is important for all clinicians treating patients with cancer. Cancer therapy has evolved to include classic cytotoxic agents in addition to newer options such as targeted agents and catheter-directed chemoembolisation. Several adverse affects can result from the wide array of treatments including effects on the liver, pancreas, and biliary system that can be visualised on imaging. These complications include sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, fatty liver, pseudocirrhosis, acute hepatitis, pancreatitis, pancreatic atrophy, cholecystitis, biliary sclerosis, and biliary stasis. Many of these toxicities are manageable and reversible with supportive therapies and/or cessation of cancer therapy. The objective of this review is to discuss the imaging findings associated with cancer therapy-induced toxicity of the liver, biliary system, and pancreas. TEACHING POINTS • Cancer therapy can have adverse effects on the hepatobiliary system and pancreas. • Cancer therapy-induced toxicities can be visualised on imaging. • Knowledge of imaging changes associated with cancer therapy complications can improve treatment.
Collapse
|
24
|
Rodríguez-Fraile M, Iñarrairaegui M. Radioembolization with 90Y-microspheres for liver tumors. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2015.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
25
|
Rodríguez-Fraile M, Iñarrairaegui M. [Radioembolization with (90)Y-microspheres for liver tumors]. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2015; 34:244-57. [PMID: 25911062 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2015.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2015] [Revised: 03/12/2015] [Accepted: 03/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Rodríguez-Fraile
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra; Área de Oncología Hepatobiliopancreática, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, España; Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra (IDISNA), España.
| | - M Iñarrairaegui
- Unidad de Hepatología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, España; Área de Oncología Hepatobiliopancreática, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, España; Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra (IDISNA), España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Pamplona, España
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lei JY, Wang WT, Yan LN, Wen TF, Li B. Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for small unifocal hepatocellular carcinomas. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014; 93:e271. [PMID: 25546668 PMCID: PMC4602596 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000000271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) less than 5 cm in diameter. A total of 289 patients were diagnosed with a small HCC (a single tumor no larger than 5 cm). Among these patients, 133 underwent hepatic resection, and 156 received RFA. Demographic data, intraoperative data, post-operative recovery data, and the baseline characteristics of the 2 groups of patients were compared. The incidence of post-operative complications; 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates; and tumor recurrence were determined. No statistically significant differences in the baseline characteristics were noted between the 2 groups. By contrast, operation time (P = 0.003), intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.000), and the length of post-operative hospital stay (P = 0.000) were significantly lower in the RFA group compared with the surgical resection group. The 2 groups displayed similar post-operative complication rates (12% or 16/133 in the liver resection group vs. 8.3% or 13/156 in the RFA group, P = 0.395). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of the patients in the liver resection group were 88.7%, 78.2%, and 66.2%, respectively, whereas the rates in the RFA group were 90.4%, 76.3%, and 66.0%, respectively (P = 0.722). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year tumor-free survival rates of patients in the resection group were 87.2%, 69.9%, and 58.6%, respectively, whereas the rates in the RFA group were 85.9%, 66.0%, and 54.5%, respectively (P = 0.327). In addition, among HCC patients receiving RFA, patients with tumors no greater than 3 cm in diameter exhibited no significant differences regarding overall survival and tumor-free survival rates compared with patients with tumors 3 to 5 cm in diameter (all P > 0.05). RFA is an effective and safe treatment option for small HCCs and may be a preferred choice for HCC patients with small lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Y Lei
- From the Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wang N, Lv YZ, Xu AH, Huang YR, Peng L, Li JR. Application of lobaplatin in trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization for primary hepatic carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014; 15:647-50. [PMID: 24568472 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.2.647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the efficiency of single application of lobaplatin in tran-scatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with a primary hepatic carcinoma who were unable or unwilling to undergo surgery. METHODS 173 patients with primary hepatic carcinoma diagnosed by imaging or pathology were randomly divided into experimental and control groups and respectively treated with lobaplatin and pirarubicin hydrochloride as chemotherapeutic drugs for TACE. The amount of iodipin was regulated according to the tumor number and size, and then gelatin sponge or polyvinyl alcohol particles were applied for embolisms. The efficiency of treatment in the two groups was compared with reference to survival time and therapeutic response. RESULTS The experimental group (single lobaplatin as chemotherapy drug) was superior to control group (single pirarubicin hydrochloride as chemotherapy drug) in the aspects of survival time and therapeutic response, with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS Single lobaplatin can be as a chemotherapy drug in TACE and has better efficiency in the aspects of mean survival time and therapeutic response, deserving to be popularized in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Wang
- Invasive Technology Department, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Techonology, Wuhan, China E-mail :
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Knockdown of PPP5C inhibits growth of hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2014; 175:526-34. [PMID: 25326185 DOI: 10.1007/s12010-014-1281-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2014] [Accepted: 09/30/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Ser/Thr protein phosphatase 5 (PPP5C) has been reported to participate in tumor progression. However, its functional role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unknown yet. In this study, we firstly evaluated the expression levels of PPP5C in six HCC cell lines by real-time PCR and found that PPP5C was widely expressed in HCC cells. To explore the role of PPP5C in HCC cell growth, lentivirus-mediated short hairpin RNA (shRNA) was employed to silence PPP5C expression in HepG2 and Bel-7404 cells. The expression of PPP5C was significantly downregulated in PPP5C knockdown cells. Knockdown of PPP5C markedly suppressed the proliferation and colony formation ability of HCC cells. Moreover, cell cycle analysis showed that PPP5C depletion in HepG2 cells led to G0/G1 phase and G2/M phase arrest. We demonstrate for the first time that PPP5C is essential for growth of HCC cells, which suggests that inhibition of PPP5C by RNAi may be a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of HCC.
Collapse
|
29
|
Martens MH, Lambregts DMJ, Kluza E, Beets-Tan RGH. Tumor Response to Treatment: Prediction and Assessment. CURRENT RADIOLOGY REPORTS 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s40134-014-0062-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
30
|
Peng HS, Liao MB, Zhang MY, Xie Y, Xu L, Zhang YJ, Zheng XFS, Wang HY, Chen YF. Synergistic inhibitory effect of hyperbaric oxygen combined with sorafenib on hepatoma cells. PLoS One 2014; 9:e100814. [PMID: 24956259 PMCID: PMC4067386 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2014] [Accepted: 05/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Hypoxia is a common phenomenon in solid tumors, associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy resistance, recurrence and metastasis. Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy can increase tissue oxygen pressure and content to prevent the resistance, recurrence and metastasis of cancer. Presently, Sorafenib is a first-line drug, targeted for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but effective in only a small portion of patients and can induce hypoxia. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of HBO in combination with sorafenib on hepatoma cells. METHODS Hepatoma cell lines (BEL-7402 and SK-Hep1) were treated with HBO at 2 atmosphere absolute pressure for 80 min per day or combined with sorafenib or cisplatin. At different time points, cells were tested for cell growth, colony formation, apoptosis, cell cycle and migration. Finally, miRNA from the hepatoma cells was detected by microRNA array and validated by qRT-PCR. RESULTS Although HBO, sorafenib or cisplatin alone could inhibit growth of hepatoma cells, HBO combined with sorafenib or cisplatin resulted in much greater synergistic growth inhibition (cell proliferation and colony formation) in hepatoma cells. Similarly, the synergistic effect of HBO and sorafenib on induction of apoptosis was also observed in hepatoma cells. HBO induced G1 arrest in SK-Hep1 not in BEL-7402 cells, but enhanced cell cycle arrest induced by sorafenib in BEL-7402 treated cells. However, HBO had no obvious effect on the migration of hepatoma cells, and microRNA array analysis showed that hepatoma cells with HBO treatment had significantly different microRNA expression profiles from those with blank control. CONCLUSIONS We show for the first time that HBO combined with sorafenib results in synergistic growth inhibition and apoptosis in hepatoma cells, suggesting a potential application of HBO combined with sorafenib in HCC patients. Additionally, we also show that HBO significantly altered microRNA expression in hepatoma cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai-Shan Peng
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming-Bin Liao
- Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Center, Affiliated Guangzhou First People's Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mei-Yin Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yin Xie
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yao-Jun Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - X. F. Steven Zheng
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Hui-Yun Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- * E-mail: (YFC); (HYW)
| | - Yi-Fei Chen
- Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Center, Affiliated Guangzhou First People's Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- * E-mail: (YFC); (HYW)
| |
Collapse
|