Risk factors associated with inpatient cardiac arrest during emergency endotracheal intubation at general wards

Patient Safety in Anesthesiology: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects

Anesthesiology is considered a complex medical specialty. Its history has been marked by radical advances and profound transformations, owing to technical and pharmacological developments and innovations in the field, enabling us over the years to improve patient outcomes and perform longer, more complex surgical procedures on more fragile patients. However, anesthesiology has never been safe and free of challenges. Despite the advances made, it still faces risks associated with the practice of anesthesia, for both patients and healthcare professionals, and with some of the specific challenges encountered in low and middle-income countries. In this context, certain actions and initiatives must be carried out collaboratively. In addition, recent technologies and innovations such as simulation, genomics, artificial intelligence, and robotics hold promise for further improving patient safety in anesthesiology and overcoming existing challenges, making it possible to offer safer, more effective, and personalized anesthesia. However, this requires rigorous monitoring of ethical aspects and the reliability of the studies to reap the full benefits of the new technology. This literature review presents the evolution of anesthesiology over time, its current challenges, and its promising future. It underlines the importance of the new technologies and the need to pursue efforts and strengthen research in anesthesiology to overcome the persistent challenges and benefit from the advantages of the latest technology to guarantee safe, high-quality anesthesia with universal access.

Risk factors for peri-intubation cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Peri-intubation cardiac arrest (PICA) is an uncommon yet serious complication of intubation. Although some associated risk factors have been identified, the results have been inconsistent. The aim of this study was to systematically review the relevant research and examine the associated risk factors of PICA through meta-analysis.

METHODS

Studies examining the risk factors for PICA before 1 Nov. 2022 were identified through searches in MEDLINE (OvidSP) and EMBASE. The reported adjusted or unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and risk ratios (RRs) were recorded. We calculated pooled ORs and created forest plots using a random-effects model to identify the statistically significant risk factors. We assessed the certainty of evidence for each risk factor.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pre-intubation hypotension, with a pooled OR of 4.96 (95% confidence interval [C.I.]: 3.75-6.57), pre-intubation hypoxemia, with a pooled OR of 4.43 (95% C.I.: 1.24-15.81), and two or more intubation attempts, with a pooled OR of 1.88 (95% C.I.: 1.09-3.23) were associated with a significantly higher risk of PICA. The pooled incidence of PICA was 2.1% (95% C.I.: 1.5%-3.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-intubation hypotension, hypoxemia, and more intubation attempts are significant risk factors for PICA. The findings could help physicians identify patients at risk under the acute setting.

Peri-Intubation Cardiorespiratory Arrest Risk in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review

Endotracheal intubation is associated with an increased risk of cardiorespiratory arrest. Various factors modulate the risk of peri-intubation cardiorespiratory arrest. The primary objective of this study was to determine the risk of peri-intubation cardiorespiratory arrest in pediatric patients in a hospital setting, and the secondary objective was to determine the effect of various factors on the peri-intubation cardiorespiratory arrest risk. A systematic review was performed to identify eligible manuscripts. Studies were deemed appropriate if they included pediatric patients in a hospital setting not exclusively intubated for an indication of cardiorespiratory arrest. Data were extracted from studies deemed eligible for inclusion. A pooled risk of cardiorespiratory arrest was determined. A Bayesian linear regression was conducted to model the risk of cardiorespiratory arrest. All data used in this were study-level data. A total of 11 studies with 14,424 intubations were included in the final analyses. The setting for six (54.5%) studies was the emergency department. The baseline adjusted risk for peri-intubation cardiorespiratory arrest in pediatric patients was 3.78%. The mean coefficient for a respiratory indication for intubation was −0.06, indicating that a respiratory indication for intubation reduced the per-intubation cardiorespiratory arrest risk by 0.06%. The mean coefficient for use of ketamine was 0.07, the mean coefficient for use of a benzodiazepine was −0.14, the mean coefficient for use of a vagolytic was −0.01, and the mean coefficient for use of neuromuscular blockade was −0.40. Pediatric patients during the peri-intubation period have the risk of developing cardiorespiratory arrest. The pooled findings demonstrate associations that seem to highlight the importance of maintaining adequate systemic oxygen delivery to limit this risk.

Comparison of video-stylet and conventional laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in adults with cervical spine immobilization: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although minimization of cervical spine motion by using a neck collar or manual in-line stabilization is recommended for urgent tracheal intubation (TI) in patients with known or suspected cervical spine injury (CSI), it may worsen glottic visualization. The overall performance of video-stylets during TI in patients with neck immobilization remains unclear. The current meta-analysis aimed at comparing the intubation outcomes of different video-stylets with those of conventional laryngoscopes in patients with cervical immobilization.

METHOD

The databases of Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to June 2021 to identify trials comparing intubation outcomes between video-stylets and conventional laryngoscopes. The primary outcome was first-pass success rate, while secondary outcomes included overall success rate, time to intubation, the risk of intubation-associated sore throat, or tissue damage.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials published between 2007 and 2013 involving 487 participants, all in an operating room setting, were analyzed. The video-stylets investigated included Bonfils intubation fiberscope, Levitan FPS Scope, and Shikani optical stylet. There was no difference in first-pass success rate (risk ratio [RR] =1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-1.31, P = .46], overall success rate (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.93-1.22, P = .4), intubation time [mean difference = 4.53 seconds, 95% CI: -8.45 to 17.51, P = .49), and risk of tissue damage (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.16-1.3, P = .14) between the 2 groups. The risk of sore throat was lower with video-stylets compared to that with laryngoscopes (RR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.23-0.9, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Our results did not support the use of video-stylets as the first choice for patients with neck immobilization. Further studies are required to verify the efficacy of video-stylets in the nonoperating room setting.

Risk factors associated with peri-intubation cardiac arrest in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Peri-intubation cardiac arrest is an uncommon, serious complication following endotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Although several risk factors have been previously identified, this study aimed to comprehensively identify risk factors associated with peri-intubation cardiac arrest.

METHODS

This retrospective, nested case-control study conducted from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020 analyzed variables including demographic characteristics, triage, and pre-intubation vital signs, medications, and laboratory data. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression models were used to compare clinical factors between the patients with peri-intubation cardiac arrest and patients without cardiac arrest.

RESULTS

Of the 6983 patients intubated during the study period, 5130 patients met the inclusion criteria; 92 (1.8%) patients met the criteria for peri-intubation cardiac arrest and 276 were age- and sex-matched to the control group. Before intubation, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were lower (104 vs. 136.5 mmHg, p < 0.01; 59.5 vs. 78 mmHg, p < 0.01 respectively) and the shock index was higher in the patients with peri-intubation cardiac arrest than the control group (0.97 vs. 0.83, p < 0.0001). Cardiogenic pulmonary edema as an indication for intubation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 5.921, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.044-33.57, p = 0.04), systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg before intubation (aOR: 5.217, 95% CI: 1.484-18.34, p = 0.01), and elevated lactate levels (aOR: 1.012, 95% CI: 1.002-1.022, p = 0.01) were independent risk factors of peri-intubation cardiac arrest.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with hypotension before intubation have a higher risk of peri-intubation cardiac arrest in the emergency department. Future studies are needed to evaluate the influence of resuscitation before intubation and establish airway management strategies to avoid serious complications.

Incidence and factors associated with out-of-hospital peri-intubation cardiac arrest: a secondary analysis of the CURASMUR trial

The Incidence of peri-intubation cardiac arrest (PICA) has been rarely assessed in the out-of-hospital setting. The objectives of this study were to assess the incidence and factors associated with PICA (cardiac arrest occurring within 15 min of intubation) in an out-of-hospital emergency setting, wherein emergency physicians perform standardized airway management using a rapid sequence intubation technique in adult patients. This was a secondary analysis of the "Succinylcholine versus Rocuronium for out-of-hospital emergency intubation" (CURASMUR) trial, which compared the first attempt intubation success rate between succinylcholine and rocuronium in adult patients requiring emergency tracheal intubation for any vital distress except cardiac arrest. Enrollment occurred from January 2014 to August 2016 in 17 French out-of-hospital emergency medical units. All operators were emergency physicians. The PICA incidence was recorded and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with its occurrence. A total of 1226 patients were included with a mean age of 55.9 ± 19 years. PICA was recorded in 35 (2.8%) patients. Multivariable analysis indicated that the occurrence of PICA was independently associated with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg m² [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.82-12.90, p = 0.02], oxygen saturation (SpO₂) before intubation < 90% (aOR 3.4; 95% CI 1.50-7.60, p = 0.003), difficult intubation (defined by an Intubation Difficulty Score [IDS] > 5, [aOR 3.59; 95% CI 1.82-8.08, p = 0.02], the use of rocuronium instead of succinylcholine (aOR 2.47; 95% CI 1.08-5.64, p = 0.03), post intubation hypoxaemia (aOR 2.70; 95% CI 1.05-6.95, p = 0.04), post-intubation hypotension (aOR 4.07; 95% CI 1.62-10.22, p = 0.003), and pulmonary aspiration(aOR 4.78; 95% CI 1.48-15.36, p = 0.009). Early PICA occurred in approximately 3% of cases in the out-of-hospital setting. We identified several independent risk factors for PICA, including obesity, hypoxaemia before intubation and difficult intubation.

Emergency Airway Management Outside the Operating Room: Current Evidence and Management Strategies

Emergency airway management outside the operating room (OR) is often associated with an increased risk of airway related, as well as cardiopulmonary, complications which can impact morbidity and mortality. These emergent airways may take place in the intensive care unit (ICU), where patients are critically ill with minimal physiological reserve, or other areas of the hospital where advanced equipment and personnel are often unavailable. As such, emergency airway management outside the OR requires expertise at manipulation of not only the anatomically difficult airway but also the physiologically and situationally difficult airway. Adequate preparation and appropriate use of airway management techniques are important to prevent complications. Judicious utilization of pre- and apneic oxygenation is important as is the choice of medications to facilitate intubation in this at-risk population. Recent study in critically ill patients has shown that postintubation hemodynamic and respiratory compromise is common, independently associated with poor outcomes and can be impacted by the choice of drugs and techniques used. In addition to adequately preparing for a physiologically difficult airway, enhancing the ability to predict an anatomically difficult airway is essential in reducing complication rates. The use of artificial intelligence in the identification of difficult airways has shown promising results and could be of significant advantage in uncooperative patients as well as those with a questionable airway examination. Incorporating this technology and understanding the physiological, anatomical, and logistical challenges may help providers better prepare for managing such precarious airways and lead to successful outcomes. This review discusses the various challenges associated with airway management outside the OR, provides guidance on appropriate preparation, airway management skills, medication use, and highlights the role of a coordinated multidisciplinary approach to out-of-OR airway management.

Comparison of Suction Rates Between a Standard Yankauer, a Commercial Large-Bore Suction Device, and a Makeshift Large-Bore Suction Device

BACKGROUND

Commercial large-bore suction catheters and makeshift large-bore suction catheters with an endotracheal tube (ETT) attached to a meconium aspirator have been shown to have superior suction rates compared with a standard Yankauer.

OBJECTIVES

To compare suction rates between a commercial large-bore suction catheter and a makeshift endotracheal tube-meconium aspirator (ETTMA) combination.

METHODS

We measured suction rates between a standard bulb-tip Yankauer catheter (Model: K86; Cardinal Health, Waukegan, IL), a commercial large-bore catheter (Part: 43200; The Big Stick®, SSCOR, Inc., Sun Valley, CA), and an 8.0-mm standard ETT connected to a meconium aspirator (NeotechTM Products, Inc., Valencia, CA; Ref: N0101 Clear) with high-, medium-, and low-viscosity fluids. Median suction rates were calculated with interquartile ranges. The relative differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) between the Yankauer and both the large-bore catheter and the ETTMA combination were calculated using a linear mixed-effects model.

RESULTS

Each device was trialed five times with each of the three different viscosity fluids for a total of 45 trials. Overall, suction rates were faster for the large-bore suction catheter compared with the Yankauer (relative difference 22 mL/s; 95% CI 17-28) and ETTMA (8 mL/s; 95% CI 5-10). The large-bore catheter had consistently faster suction rates compared with the Yankauer and ETTMA combination across all fluid viscosities.

CONCLUSIONS

The commercial large-bore suction catheter had faster suction rates than the makeshift ETTMA combination when compared with the standard Yankauer.

Further Validation of a Novel Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification (nARS) System for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Recently, we developed a novel acute myocardial infarction (AMI) risk stratification system (nARS), which stratifies AMI patients into low- (L), intermediate- (I), and high- (H) risk groups. We have shown that the nARS shortened the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay as well as that of hospitalization. However, the incidence of AMI-related adverse outcomes has not been fully investigated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of severe complications requiring ICU care among the 3 risk groups stratified by nARS. We retrospectively reviewed AMI patients between October 2016 and December 2018. A total of 592 patients were divided into the L- (n = 285), I- (n = 124), and H- (n = 183) risk groups. The primary endpoint was in-hospital complications requiring ICU care defined as death/cardiopulmonary arrest, shock, stroke, atrioventricular block, and respiratory failure. Among 592 patients, 239 (40.4%) developed at least 1 complication requiring ICU care, but only 28 (11.7%) developed complications in general wards. Complications requiring ICU care were most frequently observed in the H-risk group (68.9%), followed by the I-risk group (50.8%), and least in the L-risk group (17.5%) (P < 0.001). Complications requiring ICU care that occurred in the general wards were more frequently observed in the H-risk group (8.7%) compared to the I-risk (3.2%) and L-risk (2.8%) groups (P = 0.009). In conclusion, complications requiring ICU care rarely happened in the general wards, and were less in the I- and L-risk groups than in the H-risk group. These results validated the nARS, and might support the widespread use of nARS.