Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II Score and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score as Predictors for Severe Trauma Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

Cell-free DNA as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for adult sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Although cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is an emerging sepsis biomarker, the use of cfDNA, especially as diagnostic and prognostic indicators, has surprisingly not been systemically analyzed. Data of adult patients with sepsis that conducted cfDNA measurement within 24 h of the admission was collected from PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Cochrane Library until October 2022. The Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) and Quality Assessment in Diagnostic Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tools were used to reduce the risk of biased assessment. The mean difference (MD) of cfDNA concentration and the standardized mean difference (SMD) between populations was calculated using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4.1 package software. Pooled analysis from 18 included studies demonstrated increased serum cfDNA levels in sepsis when compared with healthy control (SMD = 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-1.57) or non-sepsis patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) (SMD = 1.03; 95% CI 0.65-1.40), respectively. Meanwhile, a slight decrease in the statistical value was observed when compared with non-sepsis ICU patients with SIRS (SMD = 0.74; 95% 0.41-1.06). The lower cfDNA levels were also observed in sepsis survivors compared to the non-survivors (SMD at 1.43; 95%CI 0.69-2.17) with the pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.76 (95% CI 0.64-0.87) for the mortality prediction. Levels of cfDNA showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI 0.75-0.86) and specificity of 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.78) with pooled diagnostic odd ratio (DOR) at 25.03 (95% CI 5.48-114.43) for the identification of sepsis in critically ill conditions. The cfDNA levels were significantly higher in patients with sepsis and being a helpful indicator for the critically ill conditions of sepsis. Nevertheless, results of the test must be interpreted carefully with the context of all clinical situations.

Evaluation of the sequential organ failure assessment score and newly introduced criteria - Traumasis - in traffic collision patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and the newly introduced criteria, traumasis, defined as a SOFA score 2 or more among trauma patients.

METHODS

Consecutive adult traffic collision patients who were admitted to the study hospital emergency department (ED) from January 2017 to December 2018 were enrolled retrospectively in the study. The primary outcome was in-hospital death. The SOFA score was calculated using relevant initial ED data. Traditional risk scores for trauma patients, such as the injury severity score (ISS), the revised trauma score (RTS), and the trauma injury severity score (TRISS), were also calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 927 patients were available for analysis, of whom 46 died (5.0%). The median SOFA score was 1.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.0-3.0). A total of 417 patients (45.0%) were identified as having traumasis (SOFA score ≥ 2), of whom 44 died (10.6%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of the SOFA score (0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.95) was comparable with that of the TRISS (0.88; 95% CI, 0.84-0.93) and better than that of the ISS(0.81; 95% CI 0.75-0.86) and the RTS (0.82; 95% CI 0.75-0.90). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the traumasis criteria for the primary outcome were 95.7%, 63.0%, 11.9%, and 99.6%, respectively. The net reclassification improvement for the comparison between the traumasis criteria and major trauma criteria (ISS ≥ 15) was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.55-0.82; p < 0.001). The multivariate Cox regression model showed that the SOFA score (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.52; 95% CI 1.37-1.67) and traumasis (aHR 11.40; 95% CI 2.70-48.13), respectively, was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSION

The SOFA score can be used as a reliable tool for predicting in-hospital death among traffic collision patients. The newly introduced criteria, traumasis, may be used as a risk-stratification and quality-control criteria among patients with trauma, similar to the sepsis criteria among patients with infectious disease.

Risk factors for abdominal surgical site infection after exploratory laparotomy among combat casualties

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are well-recognized complications after exploratory laparotomy for abdominal trauma; however, little is known about SSI development after exploration for battlefield abdominal trauma. We examined SSI risk factors after exploratory laparotomy among combat casualties.

METHODS

Military personnel with combat injuries sustained in Iraq and Afghanistan (June 2009 to May 2014) who underwent laparotomy and were evacuated to participating US military hospitals were included. Log-binominal regression was used to identify SSI risk factors.

RESULTS

Of 4,304 combat casualties, 341 patients underwent a total of 1,053 laparotomies. Abdominal SSIs were diagnosed in 49 patients (14.4%): 8% with organ space SSI, 4% with deep incisional SSI, and 4% with superficial SSIs (4 patients had multiple SSIs). Patients with SSIs had more colorectal (p < 0.001), small bowel (p = 0.010), duodenum (p = 0.006), pancreas (p = 0.032), and abdominal vascular injuries (p = 0.040), as well as prolonged open abdomen (p = 0.004) and more infections diagnosed before the SSI (or final exploratory laparotomy) versus non-SSI patients (p < 0.001). Sustaining colorectal injuries (risk ratio [RR], 3.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-6.45), duodenum injuries (RR, 6.71; 95% CI, 1.73-25.58), and being diagnosed with prior infections (RR, 10.34; 95% CI, 5.05-21.10) were independently associated with any SSI development. For either organ space or deep incisional SSIs, non-intra-abdominal infections, fecal diversion, and duodenum injuries were independently associated, while being injured via an improvised explosive device was associated with reduced likelihood compared with penetrating nonblast (e.g., gunshot wounds) injuries. Non-intra-abdominal infections and hypotension were independently associated with organ space SSIs development alone, while sustaining blast injuries were associated with reduced likelihood.

CONCLUSION

Despite severity of injuries and the battlefield environment, the combat casualty laparotomy SSI rate is relatively low at 14%, with similar risk factors and rates reported following severe civilian trauma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Epidemiological, level III.

Predictive value of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and Revised Trauma Score (RTS) for the short-term prognosis of emergency trauma patients: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the predictive value of the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and Revised Trauma Score (RTS) for emergency trauma patients who died within 24 hours.

DESIGN

A retrospective, single-centred study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Southern China.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1739 patients with acute trauma, aged 16 years or older who presented to the emergency department from 1 November 2016 to 30 November 2019, were included.

INTERVENTIONS NONE

None.

OUTCOME

24-hour mortality was the primary outcome of trauma.

RESULTS

1739 patients were divided into the survival group (1709 patients,98.27%), and the non-survival group (30 patients,1.73%). Crude OR and adjusted OR of MEWS were 1.99, 95% CI (1.73 to 2.29), and 2.00, 95% CI (1.74 to 2.31), p<0.001, respectively. Crude OR and adjusted OR of RTS were 0.62, 95% CI (0.55 to 0.69) and 0.61, 95% CI (0.55 to 0.68), p<0.001, respectively. The area under the curve of MEWS was significantly higher than that of RTS (p=0.005): 0.927, 95% CI (0.914 to 0.939) vs 0.799, 95% CI (0.779 to 0.817).

CONCLUSIONS

Both MEWS and RTS were independent predictors of the short-term prognosis in emergency trauma patients, MEWS had better predictive efficacy.