Impact of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines on Prevalence of Hypertension in Ghana

Prevalence of hypertension in a sample of community members in a low-income peri-urban setting in Gaborone, Botswana

Background: Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Hypertension is a primary risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease and affects more than a quarter of the global adult population. Africa is a continent where the prevalence of non-communicable diseases including cardiovas- cular disease and hypertension, is increasing rapidly. Botswana is a developing country in Sub-Saharan Africa. In such contexts the early identification of hypertension, through community screening initiatives, is an important tool for the management of cardiovas- cular disease in the population. Objective: To investigate and describe the prevalence of hypertension in a sample of community members residing in a low-income peri-urban setting in Gaborone, Botswana. Method: 364 adult participants had their blood pressures mea- sured during a community health screening exercise. The values were analysed and categorised using the American Heart Association classification scale as either being normal, elevated, hypertensive stage 1 or hypertensive stage 2. Results: 234/364 (64%) of participants were found to have blood pressures within normal limits. 53/364 (15%) had elevated blood pressures, 57/364 (16%) were in hypertensive stage 1 and 20/364 (5%) were in hypertensive stage 2. Conclusions: Hypertension in Africa is a growing concern. Botswana appears to be no exception with a 36% prevalence of abnormal blood pressures being recorded. However, the majority of these were classified as elevated or stage 1. Early identification and treatment of hypertension in these early stages can significant- ly decrease the risk of developing stage 2 hypertension and the related systemic complications.

Evidence for an expanded hypertension care cascade in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

Background

With nearly 90% of annual hypertension-related deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is an urgent need to measure the coverage of health services that effectively manage hypertension. However, there is little agreement on how to define effective coverage and the existing hypertension care cascade (hypertension prevalence, percent aware, percent treated, and percent controlled) does not account for the quality of care received by patients. This study reviews definitions of effective coverage and service quality for hypertension management services and proposes an expanded hypertension care cascade to improve measurement of health systems performance.

Methods

A systematic scoping review of literature published in six electronic databases between January 2000 and October 2020 identified studies that defined effective coverage of hypertension management services or integrated dimensions of service quality into population-based estimates of hypertension management in LMICs. Findings informed an expanded hypertension care cascade from which quality-adjusted service coverage can be calculated to approximate effective coverage.

Results

The review identified 18 relevant studies, including 6 that defined effective coverage for hypertension management services and 12 that reported a measure of service quality in a population-based study. Based on commonly reported barriers to hypertension management, new steps on the proposed expanded care cascade include (i) population screened, (ii) population linked to quality care, and (iii) population adhering to prescribed treatment.

Conclusion

There is little consensus on the definition of effective coverage of hypertension management services, and most studies do not describe the quality of hypertension management services provided to populations. Incorporating aspects of service quality to the hypertension care cascade allows for the calculation of quality-adjusted coverage of relevant services, enabling an appropriate measurement of health systems performance through effective coverage.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08190-0.