Comparison of Two Intraocular Lens Implantation Techniques in Pediatric Cataract Surgery in Terms of Postoperative Complications

Incidence Rate of Secondary Glaucoma Following Congenital Cataract Surgery: An In-Depth Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence of secondary glaucoma in children following congenital cataract surgery.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception through March 16, 2023. Studies reporting congenital cataract surgery and glaucoma were enrolled. The quality of the selected studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale, and data analysis was executed utilizing R software.

RESULTS

A total of 36 published studies with 3151 patients (4717 eyes) were included in the analysis. The incidence rate of glaucoma following congenital cataract surgery was 6.6% (95% CI: 3.9%, 9.9%). The incidence of secondary glaucoma in the primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation group (3.3% [95% CI: 1.5%, 5.8%]) and the secondary IOL implantation group (3.5% [95% CI: 0%, 11.4%]) were lower compared to the aphakia group (13.5% [95% CI: 7.7%, 20.6%]). The incidence rate among children with congenital cataracts from Asia (6.9% [95% CI: 4.1%, 10.4%]) was higher than that in European children (0.9% [95% CI: 0%, 3.0%]; P < .01). A correlation was identified between the age at cataract surgery and the incidence of secondary glaucoma (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis found that the incidence of secondary glaucoma following congenital cataract surgery is approximately 6.6%. Children with IOL implantation exhibit a lower incidence of secondary glaucoma, with a lower incidence noted in European children compared to their Asian counterparts. The age at cataract surgery is an important risk factor to consider.

Optic Capture Without Anterior Vitrectomy in Pediatric Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of 2 surgical techniques in children undergoing cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation: optic capture of IOL without anterior vitrectomy (AV) or in-the-bag IOL with AV.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to 2 groups: optic capture without AV (group 1) or in-the-bag implantation with AV (group 2). The following variables were compared: visual axis opacification (VAO), inflammatory deposits on IOL surface, anteroposterior synechia, IOL tilt and decentration, lenticular astigmatism, refractive prediction error, and posterior segment complications.

RESULTS

Fifty-one eyes of 37 children were investigated with a mean follow-up of 20.1±8.5 months. Group 1 and group 2 had mean ages of 59.2±32.6 and 46.5±21.9 months, respectively (P = .104). Three eyes in group 1 and 2 eyes in group 2 developed VAO (P = .656). Two eyes in group 1 and 5 eyes in group 2 developed anteroposterior synechia (P = .291). Six eyes in group 1 and 11 eyes in group 2 had inflammatory deposits on the IOL (P = .233). Both groups had similar IOL tilt and decentralization (for all meridians, P > .05). The absolute refractive prediction error was 0.55±0.34 diopter (D) and 0.53±0.3 D, respectively (P = .294). Each group had 1 eye with intraocular hypertension (P = .932).

CONCLUSION

The optic capture method was similar to the conventional technique in the quantitative evaluation of comprehensive data such as visual axis opacification, inflammatory sequelae, refractive outcomes, and IOL stability. The optic capture technique is an appealing option for pediatric cataract surgery because it eliminates the requirement for vitrectomy.

Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Patients With Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation With Optic Capture in Berger Space for Pediatric Cataract

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas in pediatric patients with multifocal IOL implantation with optic capture in Berger space.

METHODS

This prospective observational study enrolled 68 children (101 eyes), aged 3 to 14 years, who received multifocal IOL (Tecnis ZMB00; Abbott Medical Optics) implantation with optic capture in Berger space from June 2019 to June 2020 in Qingdao Eye Hospital. Ocular biometry was performed using the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec). The IOL power and intended postoperative refraction were calculated using the Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Holladay, Holladay2, SRK/T, Haigis, and SRKII formulas. The refractive state of patients, prediction error, and absolute prediction error were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean absolute error of the formulas was significantly different (0.49 diopters [D], Hoffer Q; 0.52 D, Barrett Universal II; 0.47 D, Holladay; 0.54 D, Holladay2; 0.52 D, SRK/T; 0.67 D, Haigis; 0.99 D, SRKII; P < .001). However, the Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Holladay, Holladay2, and SRK/T formulas had a similar accuracy in predicting refractive error within ±0.50 D (62.4%, 59.4%, 62.4%, 62.4%, and 58.4%). There was a trend toward a greater prediction error in eyes with a shorter axial length (≤ 22 mm) or a steeper cornea (> 43.50 D), for which the Hoffer Q and Holladay2 formulas were more accurate. When the axial length was greater than 22 mm or the corneal curvature was 43.50 D or less, the Holladay, Hoffer Q, and Barrett Universal II formulas were more accurate.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with pediatric cataract treated with multifocal IOL implantation with optic capture in Berger space, the Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Holladay, Holladay2, and SRK/T formulas performed better than the other formulas. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 20XX;X(X):XX-XX.].

Posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis with anterior vitrectomy versus optic capture buttonholing without anterior vitrectomy in pediatric cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To investigate long-term complications following pediatric cataract surgery with implantation of a heparin-coated PMMA IOL and posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (PCCC) with anterior vitrectomy versus PCCC without anterior vitrectomy with optic capture buttonholing.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

Eyes with unilateral or bilateral congenital cataract without further pathologies or former surgeries were randomly assigned in two groups: cataract removal, IOL implantation and PCCC with anterior vitrectomy (AV; group A) or posterior optic buttonholing without anterior vitrectomy (optic capture, OC; group B). The main outcome measures were posterior capsule opacification (PCO), complication rates and refractive development.

RESULTS

58 eyes of 41 pediatric cataract surgery patients were included. The mean age at time of operation was 66.05 months (± 29.39). In group A (n=26), two eyes required treatment for posterior capsule opacification, whereas the optic axis remained clear in all eyes in group B (n=30), which was not statistically significant. Additionally, group B had a slightly lower rate of complications. Mean SE after a mean postoperative follow-up of 6.5 years was -0.11 ± 2.51 D (-5.0 to +4.0 D) in group A and -0.08 ± 2.14 D (-5.0 to +4.0 D) in group B, which was not statistically significant either.

CONCLUSION

Optic capture with a heparin-coated PMMA IOL proved to be a safe technique in the prevention of secondary cataract formation without a higher rate of complications and the necessity of vitrectomy.

Comparison of posterior optic capture of intraocular lens without vitrectomy vs endocapsular implantation with anterior vitrectomy in congenital cataract surgery: A randomized prospective study

Purpose:

To compare surgical outcome of two procedures in pediatric cataract surgery.

Methods:

Prospective randomised interventional study. Consecutive patients with bilateral congenital cataract who were operated during January 2016 to October 2016 at a tertiary care referral institute were included. One eye of all patients underwent Intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with optic capture through a primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (PPC) without vitrectomy while in the other eye endocapsular IOL implantation was performed along with PPC and anterior vitrectomy. Intraoperative challenges and postoperative complications were noted.

Results:

15/18 children who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included for follow up analysis. Mean age at the time of surgery was 21 ± 14.7 months. At a mean follow up of 25.69 ± 1.06 months; all eyes in both groups maintained a clinically centred IOL with clear visual axis. One patient with endocapsular IOL implantation developed anterior capsular phimosis. The rate of fibrinous complications (IOL deposits and synechiae) were more in the eyes with IOL in the bag (6 eyes) vs eyes where posterior optic capture was done (1 eye); P = 0.039.

Conclusion:

Posterior optic capture is a safer alternative to conventional pediatric cataract surgery in terms of inflammatory sequelae and lens epithelial cell proliferation. However the two methods work equally well in preventing visual axis obscuration over a long follow-up.

Intraocular lens optic capture in pediatric cataract surgery

Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) remains the most common complication of pediatric cataract surgery despite continuous efforts to reduce its incidence. For this reason, pediatric cataract surgeons have expended considerable effort into preventing and mitigating PCO. The intraocular lens (IOL) optic capture technique has been used for the prevention of PCO after pediatric cataract surgery for more than 20y, but there is still no professional consensus. However, recent research has shown encouraging results. The IOL optic capture technique can be performed without anterior vitrectomy to prevent PCO, even in younger children. The type and characteristics of IOLs used for optic capture technique, the location of IOL and the complications of IOL optic capture in children are here reviewed.