A Duplication Upstream of SOX9 Associated with SRY Negative 46,XX Ovotesticular Disorder of Sex Development: A Case Report

Cytogenomic Investigation of Syndromic Brazilian Patients with Differences of Sexual Development

BACKGROUND

Cytogenomic methods have gained space in the clinical investigation of patients with disorders/differences in sexual development (DSD). Here we evaluated the role of the SNP array in achieving a molecular diagnosis in Brazilian patients with syndromic DSD of unknown etiology.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with DSD and syndromic features were included in the study and underwent SNP-array analysis.

RESULTS

In two patients, the diagnosis of 46,XX SRY + DSD was established. Additionally, two deletions were revealed (3q29 and Xp22.33), justifying the syndromic phenotype in these patients. Two pathogenic CNVs, a 10q25.3-q26.2 and a 13q33.1 deletion encompassing the FGFR2 and the EFNB2 gene, were associated with genital atypia and syndromic characteristics in two patients with 46,XY DSD. In a third 46,XY DSD patient, we identified a duplication in the 14q11.2-q12 region of 6.5 Mb associated with a deletion in the 21p11.2-q21.3 region of 12.7 Mb. In a 46,XY DSD patient with delayed neuropsychomotor development and congenital cataracts, a 12 Kb deletion on chromosome 10 was found, partially clarifying the syndromic phenotype, but not the genital atypia.

CONCLUSIONS

The SNP array is a useful tool for DSD patients, identifying the molecular etiology in 40% (2/5) of patients with 46,XX DSD and 17.6% (3/17) of patients with 46,XY DSD.

Identification of an SRY-negative 46,XX infertility male with a heterozygous deletion downstream of SOX3 gene

Background

A male individual with a karyotype of 46,XX is very rare. We explored the genetic aetiology of an infertility male with a kayrotype of 46,XX and SRY negative.

Methods

The peripheral blood sample was collected from the patient and subjected to a few genetic testing, including chromosomal karyotyping, azoospermia factor (AZF) deletion, short tandem repeat (STR) analysis for AMELX, AMELY and SRY, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with specific probes for CSP 18/CSP X/CSP Y/SRY, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for genomic copy number variations(CNVs), whole-genome analysis(WGA) for genomic SNV&InDel mutation, and X chromosome inactivation (XCI) analysis.

Results

The patient had a karyotype of 46,XX. AZF analysis showed that he missed the AZF region (including a, b and c) and SRY gene. STR assay revealed he possessed the AMELX in the X chromosome, but he had no the AMELY and SRY in the Y chromosome. FISH analysis with CSP X/CSP Y/SRY showed only two X centromeric signals, but none Y chromosome and SRY. The above results of the karyotype, FISH and STR analysis did not suggest a Y chromosome chimerism existed in the patient's peripheral blood. The result of the CMA indicated a heterozygous deletion with an approximate size of 867 kb in Xq27.1 (hg19: chrX: 138,612,879–139,480,163 bp), located at 104 kb downstream of SOX3 gene, including F9, CXorf66, MCF2 and ATP11C. WGA also displayed the above deletion fragment but did not present known pathogenic or likely pathogenic SNV&InDel mutation responsible for sex determination and development. XCI assay showed that he had about 75% of the X chromosome inactivated.

Conclusions

Although the pathogenicity of 46,XX male patients with SRY negative remains unclear, SOX3 expression of the acquired function may be associated with partial testis differentiation of these patients. Therefore, the CNVs analysis of the SOX3 gene and its regulatory region should be performed routinely for these patients.

Cellular fate of intersex differentiation

Infertile ovotestis (mixture of ovary and testis) often occurs in intersex individuals under certain pathological and physiological conditions. However, how ovotestis is formed remains largely unknown. Here, we report the first comprehensive single-cell developmental atlas of the model ovotestis. We provide an overview of cell identities and a roadmap of germline, niche, and stem cell development in ovotestis by cell lineage reconstruction and a uniform manifold approximation and projection. We identify common progenitors of germline stem cells with two states, which reveal their bipotential nature to differentiate into both spermatogonial stem cells and female germline stem cells. Moreover, we found that ovotestis infertility was caused by degradation of female germline cells via liquid-liquid phase separation of the proteasomes in the nucleus, and impaired histone-to-protamine replacement in spermatid differentiation. Notably, signaling pathways in gonadal niche cells and their interaction with germlines synergistically determined distinct cell fate of both male and female germlines. Overall, we reveal a cellular fate map of germline and niche cell development that shapes cell differentiation direction of ovotestis, and provide novel insights into ovotestis development.