Clinical Significance of Lymphoscintigraphy Findings in the Evaluation of Lower Extremity Lymphedema

Lymphedema self-assessment among endometrial cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL), which causes ankle, leg, and feet swelling, poses a significant challenge for endometrial cancer survivors, impacting physical functioning and psychological well-being. Inconsistent LEL diagnostic methods result in wide-ranging LEL incidence estimates.

METHODS

We calculated the cumulative incidence of LEL based on survivor-reported Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) responses in addition to survivor- and nurse-reported leg circumference measurements among a pilot sample of 50 endometrial cancer survivors (27 White, 23 Black) enrolled in the ongoing population-based Carolina Endometrial Cancer Study.

RESULTS

Self-leg circumference measurements were perceived to be difficult and were completed by only 17 survivors. Diagnostic accuracy testing measures (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value) compared the standard nurse-measured ≥ 10% difference in leg circumference measurements to GCLQ responses. At a mean of ~11 months post-diagnosis, 54% of survivors met established criteria for LEL based on ≥ 4 GCLQ cutpoint while 24% had LEL based on nurse-measurement. Percent agreement, sensitivity, and specificity approximated 60% at a threshold of ≥ 5 GCLQ symptoms. However, Cohen's kappa, a measure of reliability that corrects for agreement by chance, was highest at ≥ 4 GCLQ symptoms (κ = 0.27).

CONCLUSION

Our findings emphasize the need for high quality measurements of LEL that are feasible for epidemiologic study designs among endometrial cancer survivors. Future studies should use patient-reported survey measures to assess lymphedema burden and quality of life outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors.

Assessment Modalities for Lower Extremity Edema, Lymphedema, and Lipedema: A Scoping Review

Lower extremity swelling may be broadly characterized as due to edema, lymphedema, or lipedema. Differentiation between these three conditions is important for providing appropriate treatment. This review analyzes and compares different clinical diagnostic modalities for these conditions, with the aim of assisting in the process of choosing the most appropriate diagnostic modality by highlighting the advantages and limitations of each. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for a systematic search of peer-reviewed literature, the following diagnostic methods for lower extremity swelling were investigated: (1) ultrasound (US), (2) lymphoscintigraphy (LSG), (3) computed tomography (CT), (4) bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), (5) tissue dielectric constant (TDC), and (6) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL). The databases used in the search were PubMed, ProQuest, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science, Embase, and Biomedical Reference Collection. After retrieving 115 studies based on predetermined inclusion criteria, a total of 31 studies were critically evaluated. The main results indicate the following: duplex US is the modality of choice to initially identify lower extremity edema such as deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and venous reflux due to its high sensitivity and specificity. CT venography of the lower extremity appears to bethe preferred option for gynecologic cancer patients with lower extremity swelling post-treatment, as it measures subcutaneous tissue volumes to look for DVTs, lymphoceles, and cancer recurrence. TDC is a recommended modality for a variety of conditions, including edema and lymphedema, in part, due to its noninvasive localized assessment capabilities and ease of use. LSG emerges as an effective imaging modality for lymphedema characterization with minimal invasiveness and high sensitivity and specificity. BIS is widely used to identify and monitor lower extremity lymphedema but has been reported to have low sensitivity and lacks the ability to account for changes in tissue composition such as fibrosis. US and MRL are favored for lipedema diagnosis, with MRL providing comprehensive anatomical and functional insights, albeit with cost and accessibility limitations compared to US. While CT, MRI, US, and TDC are all useful for differentiating lymphedema from lipedema, MRI is the preferred modality due to its anatomical and functional diagnostic capabilities. However, US is a pragmatic alternative for use with obese patients or when MRI is not an option.

Differences in Transient Fluid Retention and Lymphedema With Breast Cancer Treatment for Lymphatic Microsurgery

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common complication. Repeated taxane-based chemotherapy has been shown to induce endothelial inflammation, leading to fluid retention. Patients with transient fluid retention only have upper limb edema without lymphatic dysfunction. Therefore, indocyanine green lymphography revealed linear findings, and lymphatic microsurgery is not required. This study aimed to investigate the difference between BCRL and fluid retention and present the indication for lymphatic microsurgery for these patients.

METHODS

The study population was divided into BCRL and fluid retention groups. Age, body mass index, laterality, surgery type (lymph node, breast, or no surgery), disease stage, regional lymph node irradiation, hormone therapy, chemotherapy type (taxane- or non-taxane-based group), and treatment with trastuzumab were compared.

RESULTS

The BCRL and fluid retention groups consisted of 168 and 73 patients, respectively. The BCRL group had significantly higher rates of axillary lymph node dissection (96.4%) and lymph node irradiation (51.8%) than the fluid retention group (53.4% and 24.7%, respectively; P < 0.001 for both). The fluid retention group had a significantly higher rate of taxane-based chemotherapy (100%) than the BCRL group (92.9%; P = 0.02). No significant differences in other characteristics, including treatments with hormone and trastuzumab, were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphatic microsurgery should be performed after confirming the diagnosis by indocyanine green lymphography, particularly for patients with fluid retention induced by taxane-based chemotherapy. Because the generalized swelling induced by taxane-based chemotherapy is resolved 6 months after chemotherapy, we should wait at least 6 months to perform lymphatic microsurgery.

Evaluation of Longitudinal Lymphatic Function Changes upon Injury in the Mouse Tail with Photodynamic Therapy

PURPOSE

The lymphatic system is an essential but often understudied component of the circulatory system in comparison with its cardiovascular counterpart. Such disparity could often be explained by the difficulty in imaging lymphatics and the specialized microsurgical skills that are often required for lymphatic injury models. Recently, it has been shown that verteporfin, a photosensitive drug used for photodynamic therapy (PDT) to ablate the blood vessels, provides a similar effect on lymphatic vessels. Here, we seek to administer verteporfin and perform a modified form of PDT on collecting lymphatics in the mouse tail, a commonly used location for the study of lymphatic disorders, and examine lymphatic remodeling, contractility, and transport in response to the procedure.

METHODS

Mice collecting lymphatics in the tail were injured by PDT through an intradermal injection of verteporfin in the distal tip of the tail followed by light activation on the proximal portion of the tail downstream of the injection site. Lymphatic function was evaluated using a near-infrared (NIR) imaging system weekly for up to 28 days after injury.

RESULTS

PDT resulted in a loss in lymphatic function contractile frequency that persisted for up to 7 days after injury. Packet transport and packet amplitude, measurements reflective of the strength of contraction, were significantly reduced 14 days after injury. The lymphatics showed a delayed increase in lymphatic leakage at 7 days that persisted until the study endpoint on day 28.

CONCLUSION

This technique provides an easy-to-use method for injuring lymphatics to understand their remodeling response to injury by PDT as well as potentially for screening therapeutics that seek to normalize lymphatic permeability or contractile function after injury.

Three-dimensional analysis of dermal backflow in cancer-related lymphedema using photoacoustic lymphangiography

Background

Dermal backflow (DBF), which refers to lymphatic reflux due to lymphatic valve insufficiency, is a diagnostic finding in lymphedema. However, the three-dimensional structure of DBF remains unknown. Photoacoustic lymphangiography (PAL) is a new technique that enables the visualization of the distribution of light-absorbing molecules, such as hemoglobin or indocyanine green (ICG), and can provide three-dimensional images of superficial lymphatic vessels and the venous system. This study reports the use of PAL to visualize DBF structures in the extremities of patients with lymphedema after cancer surgery.

Methods

Patients with a clinical or lymphographic diagnosis of lymphedema who previously underwent surgery for cancer at one of two participating hospitals were included in this study. PAL was performed using the PAI-05 system. ICG was administered subcutaneously in the affected hand or foot, and ICG fluorescence lymphography was performed using a nearinfrared camera system prior to PAL.

Results

Between April 2018 and January 2019, 21 patients were enrolled and examined using PAL. The DBF was composed of dense, interconnecting, three-dimensional lymphatic vessels. It was classified into three patterns according to the composition of the lymphatic vessels: a linear structure of lymphatic collectors (pattern 1), a network of lymphatic capillaries and lymphatic collectors in an underlying layer (pattern 2), and lymphatic capillaries and precollectors with no lymphatic collectors (pattern 3).

Conclusions

PAL showed the structure of DBF more precisely than ICG fluorescence lymphography. The use of PAL to visualize DBF assists in understanding the pathophysiology and assessing the severity of cancer-related lymphedema.

Pathological Changes in the Lymphatic System of Patients with Secondary Lower Limb Lymphedema Based on Single Photon-Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography/Lymphoscintigraphy Images

Background:

In patients with secondary upper limb lymphedema, positive correlations have been observed between the dermal back flow (DBF) type and visualization of lymph nodes around the clavicle, between the former and the lymph flow pathway type, and between the latter and the visualization of lymph nodes around the clavicle when using single photon-emission computed tomography/computed tomography/lymphoscintigraphy (SPECT-CT LSG).

Methods and Results:

We analyzed the associations between the visualization of inguinal lymph nodes, the lymph flow pathway type, and the DBF type using SPECT-CT LSG in 81 patients with unilateral secondary lower limb lymphedema by statistical analysis using Fisher's exact test. We revealed that the lymph flow pathways in the lower limb can be classified into nine types because the type in the lower leg is not always equal to the type in the thigh. Associations were observed between the visualization of inguinal lymph nodes and types of DBF (p < 0.01), between the types of lymph flow pathway in the thighs and visualization of the inguinal lymph nodes (p = 0.02), and between the lymph flow pathway types in the thighs and lower legs (p < 0.01).

Conclusion:

Detriment to the superficial lymph flow pathways in the lower limb appears to usually start from the proximal side, and deep pathways are considered to become dominant from a compensatory perspective as lymphedema severity increases.

Lymphedema: Pathogenesis and Novel Therapies

Lymphedema affects up to 1 in 6 patients who undergo treatment for a solid tumor in the United States. Its prevalence has increased as more effective oncologic therapies have improved patient survival, but there remains no definitive cure. Recent research has elucidated new details in the pathogenesis of the disease and has demonstrated that it is fundamentally an immunologic process that ultimately results in inflammation, fibroadipose deposition, impaired lymphangiogenesis, and dysfunctional lymphatic pumping. These findings have allowed for the development of novel medical and surgical therapies that may potentially alter the standard of care for a disease that has largely been treated by compression. This review seeks to provide an overview of the emerging therapies and how they can be utilized for effective management of lymphedema.

Haemodynamic Performance of Low Strength Below Knee Graduated Elastic Compression Stockings in Health, Venous Disease, and Lymphoedema

OBJECTIVE

To test the in vivo haemodynamic performance of graduated elastic compression (GEC) stockings using air-plethysmography (APG) in healthy volunteers (controls) and patients with varicose veins (VVs), post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), or lymphoedema. Responsiveness data were used to determine which group benefited the most from GEC.

METHODS

There were 12 patients per group compared using no compression, knee-length Class 1 (18-21 mmHg) compression, and Class 2 (23-32 mmHg) compression. Stocking/leg interface pressures (mmHg) were measured supine in two places using an air-sensor transducer. Stocking performance parameters, investigated before and after GEC, included the standard APG tests (working venous volume [wVV], venous filling index [VFI], venous drainage index [VDI], ejection fraction [EF]) and the occlusion plethysmography tests (incremental pressure causing the maximal increase in calf volume [IPMIV], outflow fraction [OF]). Results were expressed as median and interquartile range.

RESULTS

Significant graduated compression was achieved in all four groups with higher interface pressures at the ankle. Only the VVs patients had a significant reduction in their wVV (without: 133 [109-146] vs. class1: 93 [74-113] mL) and the VFI (without: 4.6 [3-7.1] vs. class1: 3.1 [1.9-5] mL/s), both at p <.05. The IPMIV improved significantly in all groups except in the PTS group (p <.05). The OF improved only in the controls (without: 43 [38-51] vs. class1: 50 [48-53] %) and the VVs patients (without: 47 [39-58] vs. class1: 56 [50-64] %), both at p <.05. There were no significant differences in the VDI or the EF with GEC. Compression dose-response relationships were not observed.

CONCLUSION

Patients with varicose veins improved the most, whereas those with PTS improved the least. Performance seemed to depend more on disease pathophysiology than compression strength. However, the lack of responsiveness to compression strength may be related to the low external pressures used. Stocking performance tests may have value in selecting those patients who benefit most from compression.