An Incidental Solitary Plasmacytoma of Bone Mimicking Neuroendocrine Tumor Metastasis on 68Ga-DOTATATE Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography

Prevalence and significance of incidental findings on 68 Ga-DOTA-conjugated somatostatin receptor-targeting peptide PET/CT: a systematic review of the literature

Aim

We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of incidental ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTA-conjugated somatostatin receptor-targeting peptide PET/CT (SSTR PET/CT) findings, their clinical significance in the need for follow-up, and their risk of malignancy.

Materials and methods

Studies reporting incidental SSTR PET/CT findings were systematically searched in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science literature published prior to 1^st of May 2020. Studies were filtered by two independent readers for eligibility based on title and abstract, and subsequently on full text. The main exclusion criteria were: 1) pathological findings that matched scan indication, 2) known organ specific disease and/or incidental findings confirmed on other scan modality prior to SSTR PET/CT, 3) lack of diagnosis and/or follow up, and 4) results published in proceedings or conference abstracts.

Results

Twenty-one studies, comprising a total of 2906 subjects, were eligible for the analysis. Studies included were retrospective cohort studies on incidental SSTR PET/CT findings in a specific organ (n = 2888, 7/21) or case reports (n = 18, 14/21). A total of 133 subjects had incidental SSTR PET/CT findings. Incidental findings were predominantly seen in the thyroid gland (n = 65), spine (n = 30), brain (n = 26) and breast (n = 6). Seventeen of 133 (13%) incidental findings were malignant on final diagnosis. Incidental breast findings were associated with the highest risk of malignancy (67%). In the thyroid, incidental SSTR uptake was caused by malignancy in 8%, all presenting as focal uptake. The lowest risk was seen in the spine with a malignancy rate of 3% in patients with incidental SSTR uptake and benign cases were interpreted as vertebral hemangiomas on CT. Incidental SSTR PET/CT findings in other locations were of malignant etiology in two out of six cases (33%) and should be evaluated individually.

Conclusion

The most incidental SSTR PET/CT findings were found in the thyroid gland, spine, and brain. The risk of malignancy was greatest in incidental SSTR PET/CT findings in the breast, cranially, and thyroid gland. The results of the present study can prove useful in the interpretation of atypical findings on SSTR PET/CT and in the counseling of clinicians.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-022-00484-0.

Somatostatin receptor-positive breast lesions on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT

OBJECTIVE

This study sets out to evaluate patients with increased uptake in breast lesions on ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT (DOTA PET) and determine the clinical significance of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) positive breast lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated all patients with increased SSTR uptake in breast lesions on DOTA PET. Patients with physiological (e.g., lactation) or normal variant breast uptake (e.g., mild diffuse glandular uptake) were excluded. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was calculated using a manually drawn region of interest in the most intense uptake of breast lesions. All lesions were correlated with breast imaging, including mammography and ultrasonography. Histopathological correlation was performed if the lesion was suspicious for malignancy. Lesions were followed up radiologically (1-8 years).

RESULTS

Out of 1573 retrospectively analyzed DOTA PET scans, the incidence of SSTR + breast lesions was measured as 1.1% (n = 18); however, 4 of 18 patients were excluded due to the lack of final diagnosis of lesions. The median age was 35 (range 14-58 years), and all patients were female. The median SUVmax of SSTR + breast lesions was 5.2 (range 1.5-12.6) for a total of 14 patients. Twelve patients had a single SSTR + breast lesion, while 2 patients had multiple SSTR + lesions on bilateral breasts. In 6 patients, single SSTR + lesions were considered as fibroadenoma; in 2 patients, multiple SSTR + lesions were considered as metastases of NET, based on correlative breast imaging. In 6 patients, histopathological confirmation was needed for the final diagnosis. Histopathologic findings confirmed fibroadenoma in 4 patients by biopsy, in 1 patient with surgical removal of the lesion. The last patient who had a history of IDC was diagnosed with a recurrence of IDC with biopsy. The median SUVmax was 5.1 (range 1.5-9.4) for malignant breast lesions and 5.4 (range 2.2-12.6) for benign breast lesions.

CONCLUSION

SSTR + breast lesions on DOTA PET are rarely seen in clinical practice. Uptakes of breast lesions in our cases were variable and not useful for differential diagnosis of lesions. It seems that SSTR + breast lesions should be evaluated with clinical and radiological characteristics, and correlative breast imaging and/or histopathological verification should be performed for suspicious lesions to avoid misdiagnosis.

A Solitary Skull Base Plasmacytoma Mimicking Paraganglioma on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT

The patient was a 61-year-old man with a history of neck pain starting around October 2019. CT of the neck showed a lytic lesion at the right skull base. Subsequent MRI demonstrated an enhancing destructive mass in the right skull base centered in the occipital bone and condyle involving the jugular foramen and hypoglossal canal. An F-FDG PET/CT was performed showing increased FDG uptake in the right jugular foramen tumor. In addition, a PET/CT with Ga-[DOTA-Tyr3]-octreotate (Ga-DOTATATE) demonstrated a Ga-DOTATATE-avid lesion in the right jugular foramen eroding the adjacent osseous structures. Biopsy revealed a plasmacytoma and not paraganglioma.

Recurrence of Extramedullary Plasmacytomas Involving Lymph Nodes and Pancreas Revealed by 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT

A 40-year-old man with history of extramedullary plasmacytoma in nasal cavity presented with right submandibular mass for 3 months. F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated mild radioactivity in the right submandibular mass, pancreatic mass, and lymph nodes in the abdomen and left hilum of the lung. To differentiate from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was performed. The above lesions were TATE avid, and additional lesions with intense radioactivity were also detected in the right internal mammary node and intrapericardial node. Finally, biopsy of the right submandibular mass confirmed recurrence of extramedullary plasmacytoma.

Increased Activity Due to Fractures Does Not Significantly Affect the Accuracy of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in the Detection of Culprit Tumor in the Evaluation of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia

OBJECTIVE

Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT is currently the most common imaging modality in localizing culprit tumors, which can result in tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO). Fracture, which is one of the most common consequences of the TIO, can also lead to increased Ga-DOTATATE activity and potentially affect the accuracy of Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging. The aim of this investigation is to evaluate whether the increased Ga-DOTATATE activity at the sites of the fracture will cause interpretation difficulty in the localizing the culprit tumor causing TIO.

METHOD

The images of Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scan from a total of 54 patients who had multiple foci of increased Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT on PET/CT were retrospectively analyzed. Not only was the intensity of the activity on PET but also the appearance of the activity on CT taken into consideration when the interpretation of the images occurred. The results from imaging analysis were compared with the clinical chart record. All patients had tentative clinical diagnosis of TIO.

RESULTS

The causative tumors in 53 patients were eventually identified. In 1 patient, the causative tumor was not identified. Among the 53 patients with confirmed TIO, 52 tumors were accurately localized.

CONCLUSIONS

Mild activity at the sites of fracture is not a major challenging factor in the interpretation of Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in the evaluation of TIO when both intensity on PET and morphology on CT were assessed.