1
|
Dysregulated haemostasis in thrombo-inflammatory disease. Clin Sci (Lond) 2022; 136:1809-1829. [PMID: 36524413 PMCID: PMC9760580 DOI: 10.1042/cs20220208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Inflammatory disease is often associated with an increased incidence of venous thromboembolism in affected patients, although in most instances, the mechanistic basis for this increased thrombogenicity remains poorly understood. Acute infection, as exemplified by sepsis, malaria and most recently, COVID-19, drives 'immunothrombosis', where the immune defence response to capture and neutralise invading pathogens causes concurrent activation of deleterious prothrombotic cellular and biological responses. Moreover, dysregulated innate and adaptive immune responses in patients with chronic inflammatory conditions, such as inflammatory bowel disease, allergies, and neurodegenerative disorders, are now recognised to occur in parallel with activation of coagulation. In this review, we describe the detailed cellular and biochemical mechanisms that cause inflammation-driven haemostatic dysregulation, including aberrant contact pathway activation, increased tissue factor activity and release, innate immune cell activation and programmed cell death, and T cell-mediated changes in thrombus resolution. In addition, we consider how lifestyle changes increasingly associated with modern life, such as circadian rhythm disruption, chronic stress and old age, are increasingly implicated in unbalancing haemostasis. Finally, we describe the emergence of potential therapies with broad-ranging immunothrombotic functions, and how drug development in this area is challenged by our nascent understanding of the key molecular and cellular parameters that control the shared nodes of proinflammatory and procoagulant pathways. Despite the increasing recognition and understanding of the prothrombotic nature of inflammatory disease, significant challenges remain in effectively managing affected patients, and new therapeutic approaches to curtail the key pathogenic steps in immune response-driven thrombosis are urgently required.
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang GC, Zhang YY, Zeng QZ, Meng XY, Zhao P, Fu HX, He Y, Zhu XL, Mo XD, Wang JZ, Yan CH, Wang FR, Chen H, Chen Y, Han W, Wang Y, Xu LP, Liu KY, Huang XJ, Zhang XH. Outcomes of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after haploidentical donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and comparison with human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling transplantation. Thromb Res 2020; 194:168-175. [PMID: 32788111 DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.06.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is regarded as a curative therapy for majority of hematologic malignancies and some non-malignant hematologic diseases. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has become increasingly recognized as a severe complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). OBJECTIVES To show the characteristics of VTE after haploidentical donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID-HSCT) and make comparisons with matched related donor HSCT (MRD-HSCT). PATIENTS/METHODS A retrospective nested case-control study design was used, cases with VTE and matched controls were selected, with 3534 patients underwent HID-HSCT and 1289 underwent MRD-HSCT. RESULTS During follow-up, 114 patients with VTE were identified. The incidence of VTE in HID-HSCT group was similar to that of MRD-HSCT group (2.4% versus 2.3%, P = 0.92). In HID-HSCT group, VTE occurred at a median time of 92.5 days, which was earlier than MRD-HSCT group (243.5 days). For HID-HSCT, advanced disease status, cardiovascular risk factors, acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), and relapse were the independent risk factors for VTE. For MRD-HSCT, cardiovascular risk factors, aGVHD, and relapse were associated with VTE. Overall survival (OS) of patients following HID-HSCT and MRD-HSCT were similar, but the OS in patients with VTE was significantly lower than patients without VTE. CONCLUSIONS There was no statistical difference in the incidence of VTE after HID-HSCT compared with MRD-HSCT. The development of VTE adversely impacted the OS after allo-HSCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gao-Chao Zhang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Yuan-Yuan Zhang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Qiao-Zhu Zeng
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Xing-Ye Meng
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Peng Zhao
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Hai-Xia Fu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Yun He
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Xiao-Lu Zhu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Mo
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Jing-Zhi Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Chen-Hua Yan
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Feng-Rong Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Huan Chen
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Yao Chen
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Wei Han
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Lan-Ping Xu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Kai-Yan Liu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Xiao-Jun Huang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China
| | - Xiao-Hui Zhang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Venous thromboembolism incidence in hematologic malignancies. Blood Rev 2018; 33:24-32. [PMID: 30262170 DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2018.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2017] [Revised: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Although some very well validated scores delineate the risk of VTE by cancer subtype and other risk factors, hematologic malignancies are underrepresented in these models. This subgroup represents a unique entity that undergoes therapy that can be thrombogenic. The overall risk of VTE in patients with leukemia depends on the use of L-asparaginase treatment, older age, comorbidities and central venous catheters. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia are at particularly high risk of VTE but also have an increased risk of bleeding. Patients with aggressive lymphomas have a high incidence of VTE, roughly 10%. Patients with multiple myeloma at highest risk of VTE are those receiving immunomodulatory agents such as thalidomide or lenalidomide. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation carries a risk of thrombosis, particularly in patients developing graft versus host disease. This review summarizes the incidence of VTE in leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma and stem cell transplantation and provides practical guidance for preventing and managing VTE in patients with hematologic malignancies.
Collapse
|
4
|
Laboratory biomarkers for venous thromboembolism risk in patients with hematologic malignancies: A review. Thromb Res 2018; 163:138-145. [PMID: 29407626 DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.01.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2017] [Revised: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite high rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with hematologic malignancies, few tools exist to assist providers in identifying those patients at highest risk for this potentially fatal complication. Laboratory biomarkers, such as d-dimer, have demonstrated utility in some clinical settings to distinguish patients at increased risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a systematic review of the literature utilizing search terms including "biomarker", "venous thromboembolism", "hematologic malignancy", "lymphoma", "myeloma" and "leukemia" in the Medline database. A total of 25 studies investigating laboratory biomarkers of increased thrombotic risk in the setting of hematologic malignancy were identified and included in this review. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The most studied biomarkers, d-dimer and fibrinogen, demonstrated some degree of efficacy in identifying high-risk patients at levels >4.0 mg/L or <1.0 g/L respectively. Additional markers which demonstrated promise included thrombin generation, mean platelet volume, soluble VEGF, soluble P-selectin and extracellular vesicles. Other biomarkers reviewed, which did not consistently demonstrate significant associations with VTE included prothrombin fragments F1 + 2, factor VIII, protein C, protein S, von Willebrand antigen and activity, antithrombin, thrombin antithrombin complex, antiphospholopid antibody, plasminogen activator inhibitor, tissue factor pathway inhibitor and several variants associated with known hypercoagulable states (factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene variant, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase variant). Data to support any of the biomarkers discussed here in routine clinical decision-making are currently lacking, but additional investigation in clinical studies, ideally in combination with clinical factors known to be associated with increased thrombotic risk, is warranted.
Collapse
|
5
|
Venous Thromboembolism in Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplant: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2017; 24:337-342. [PMID: 29128552 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.10.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is associated with a proinflammatory, procoagulant environment that places recipients at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although the incidence of VTE in adult HCT recipients has been extensively studied, similar data for children are lacking. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study to analyze the prevalence of VTE and associated risk factors in a large cohort of patients who underwent HCT at tertiary care US children's hospitals. The Pediatric Health Information System database, a large administrative database that contains clinical and resource utilization data from 49 freestanding children's hospitals in the United States, was used to extract data. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to identify HCT recipients, VTE events, post-HCT complications, and associated risk factors up to 1 year post-transplant. Data on patients who received HCT from January 2010 through September 2014 were collected. A total of 4158 unique patients mean ± standard deviation age at transplant admit, 8.8 ± 6.5 years; range, birth to 33.4 years) were identified. After HCT 290 subjects (6.9%) developed VTE. VTE prevalence was greater in patients aged ≥ 13 versus <13 years (8.54% versus 6.33%; P = .01) and in recipients of allogeneic versus autologous grafts (7.7% versus 5%; P ≤ .01). VTE was associated with prolonged median duration of hospitalization (81 versus 54 days; P ≤.01) and increased 1-year mortality (13.9% versus 5.9%; P ≤ .01). Infections and presence of any graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were significantly associated with VTE occurrence in recipients of allogenic grafts. Prevalence of VTE in patients who underwent HCT at pediatric tertiary care hospitals is about 7%. Age ≥ 13 years and allogeneic grafts were significant pre-HCT VTE risk factors, with GVHD and infections seen more frequently in patients with VTE.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kekre N, Kim HT, Ho VT, Cutler C, Armand P, Nikiforow S, Alyea EP, Soiffer RJ, Antin JH, Connors JM, Koreth J. Venous thromboembolism is associated with graft- versus-host disease and increased non-relapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica 2017; 102:1185-1191. [PMID: 28341735 PMCID: PMC5566023 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2017.164012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2017] [Accepted: 03/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Although venous thromboembolism rates and risk factors are well described in patients with cancer, there are limited data on the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of thrombosis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, a curative therapy for patients with hematologic malignancies. We aimed to determine the incidence and risks associated with venous thrombosis in allogeneic stem cell transplants. We studied 2276 recipients of first transplant between 2002–2013 at our institution with a median follow up of 50 months (range 4–146). Using pharmacy records and subsequent chart reviews, 190 patients who received systemic anticoagulation for venous thrombosis were identified. The 1-and 2-year cumulative incidence of all venous thrombotic events were 5.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.6–6.5%) and 7.1% (95% CI 6.1–8.2%), respectively. There was no difference in age, sex, body mass index, diagnosis, disease risk index, conditioning intensity, donor type or graft source between transplant recipients with and without subsequent thrombosis. In multivariable models, both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were independently associated with thrombosis occurrence (Hazard ratio (HR)=2.05, 95% CI 1.52–2.76; HR=1.71, 95% CI 1.19–2.46, respectively). Upper extremity thrombosis differed from all other thromboses in terms of timing, risk factors and clinical impact, and was not associated with non-relapse mortality (HR=1.15; 95% CI 0.69–1.90), unlike all other thromboses which did increase non-relapse mortality (HR=1.71; 95% CI 1.17–2.49). In subgroup analysis evaluating conventional thrombosis predictors by comparing patients with and without thrombosis, a history of prior venous thrombosis was the only significant predictor. Venous thromboembolism has a high incidence after allogeneic stem cell transplant and is associated with graft-versus-host disease and non-relapse mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Kekre
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Haesook T Kim
- Department of Biostatistics/Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vincent T Ho
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Corey Cutler
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Philippe Armand
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Nikiforow
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Edwin P Alyea
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert J Soiffer
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph H Antin
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jean M Connors
- Division of Hematology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John Koreth
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang XH, Feng FE, Han W, Wang FR, Wang JZ, Wang Y, Chen Y, Fu HX, Mo XD, Zhang YY, Yan CH, Chen H, Chen YH, Liu Y, Xu LP, Liu KY, Huang XJ. High-dose corticosteroid associated with catheter-related thrombosis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Thromb Res 2016; 144:6-11. [PMID: 27261538 DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2016] [Revised: 04/15/2016] [Accepted: 04/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients are at an increased risk of thrombotic complications, most of which are catheter-related and present a substantial challenge. The incidence of CRT varies considerably depending on clinical factors. However, the underlying pathogenesis and risk factors remain unclear. METHODS We performed a retrospective nested case-control study in patients following allo-HSCT. Thrombotic episodes were diagnosed based on the clinical suspicion of the physician (pain, swelling, etc.) with subsequent CVC or PICC thrombosis confirmed via duplex ultrasound. Cases with CRT and controls were matched for time of HSCT, age at HSCT, donor source and type of insertion (CVCs or PICC). RESULTS During the 8-year period, catheters were placed in 2896 patients, with a total of 40 patients (1.38%) developed CRT, among which 11 were associated with CVCs and 29 were associated with PICCs. The median duration from catheter insertion to thrombosis was 97days. Despite reports of an association between thrombosis and infection, central line-associated bloodstream infection was comparable between groups. No significant differences were noted in terms of primary disease, donor type, conditioning regimen or catheter type between the cases and controls. A multivariate regression analysis identified high-dose corticosteroids as independent risk factors for the development of CRT. CRT seems to negatively affect prognosis in allo-HSCT patients. CONCLUSION In conclusion, we demonstrate that the use of high-dose corticosteroids is correlated with the onset of CRT. However, the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis in this population require further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Hui Zhang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Fei-Er Feng
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Han
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Feng-Rong Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Jing-Zhi Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Yao Chen
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Hai-Xia Fu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Mo
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan-Yuan Zhang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Chen-Hua Yan
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Huan Chen
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Yu-Hong Chen
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Lan-Ping Xu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Kai-Yan Liu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Jun Huang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Management patterns and outcomes in symptomatic venous thromboembolism following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A 15-years experience at a single center. Thromb Res 2016; 142:52-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2015] [Revised: 02/11/2016] [Accepted: 02/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|