Evaluation of the Survival Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma Patients According to Their Plasmacytoma Presentation at Diagnosis

Multiple myeloma clinical trials exclude patients with the highest-risk disease: a systematic review of trial exclusion criteria

Patients with certain subsets of multiple myeloma continue to have poor outcomes and are in need of novel treatment approaches. Strict eligibility criteria for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) limit access to clinical trials and limit the external validity of trial results for these patients. We systematically reviewed RCTs in newly diagnosed myeloma from 2006 to 2023 to ascertain the prevalence of 12 key exclusion criteria and trends over time. 80 RCTs were included. Exclusion criteria included: age in 43 (51%) trials; projected life expectancy in 20 (24%); performance status in 74 (87%); non-secretory and/or oligosecretory disease in 47 (55%), hepatic function in 64 (79%), renal function in 63 (74%), hematological thresholds in 50 (59%), prior malignancy in 68 (80%), and neuropathy in 50 (59%). For 53 trials which had detailed exclusion criteria available, plasma cell leukemia was excluded in 21 (40%), extramedullary disease in 5 (9%) and CNS disease in 13 (25%). The percentage of studies invoking each of these exclusion criteria did not significantly improve over time on univariate regression analysis, and exclusion criteria relating to neuropathy have worsened. The restrictive eligibility criteria of most myeloma RCTs perpetuate a cycle where limited data exists to treat challenging myeloma subtypes.

Experts' consensus on the definition and management of high risk multiple myeloma

High risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) at diagnosis is currently recognized according to the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) which was set up in 2015. Since then, new clinical and biological prognostic factors have been developed, which could implement the definition of High Risk (HR) category. We conducted a survey in order to identify which additional parameters, both clinical and biological, are considered more useful for the clinical practice and to evaluate if the management of Multiple Myeloma (MM) should change on the basis of the risk category. A questionnaire, consisting of 8 statements, was submitted to 6 Italian experts, from the European Myeloma Network (EMN) Research Italy, using the Delphi method. The colleagues were asked to answer each question using a scale between 0 and 100. If a statement did not reach at least 75 out of 100 points from all the participants, it was rephrased on the basis of the proposal of the experts and resubmitted in a second or further round, until a consensus was reached among all. From the first round of the survey a strong consensus was reached regarding the opportunity to revise the R-ISS including chromosome 1 abnormality, TP53 mutation or deletion, circulating plasma cells by next generation flow and extramedullary plasmacytomas. No consensus was reached for the definition of "double hit" MM and for the application in clinical practice of treatment strategies based on the risk category. In the second round of the Delphi questionnaire, "double-hit" MM was recognized by the association of at least two high-risk cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities. Moreover, the experts agreed to reserve an intensified treatment only to specific conditions, such as plasma cell leukaemia or patients with multiple extramedullary plasmacytomas, while they admitted that there are not sufficient real word data in order to modify treatment on the basis of MRD assessment in clinical practice. This survey suggests that the definition of HRMM should be implemented by additional clinical and biological risk factors, that will be useful to guide treatment in the future.

CD20 expression: A risk stratification factor for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with t(11;14)

OBJECTIVE

Translocation (11;14) is one of the most frequent recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma (MM), while its clinical prognostic value remains controversial. CD20 expression is uncommon in MM while strongly associated with t(11;14). This study aimed to investigate whether CD20 could provide further prognostic value in MM patients harboring t(11;14).

METHODS

CD20 expression detected by flow cytometry was retrospectively analyzed in 211 newly diagnosed MM patients with t(11;14). The clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed between CD20 positive and negative patients.

RESULTS

CD20 expression was found in 34.6% (73/211) newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients with t(11;14), associated with lower serum creatine levels and lower incidence of plasmacytoma. Based on similar treatment regimens, CD20 positive patients had a comparable overall response rate to CD20 negative patients, whereas had a lower CR/sCR (complete response/stringent complete response) rate than the latter (31.4% vs. 46.4%, P =0.045). Nevertheless, CD20 positive patients had a longer tendency of progression-free survival (PFS) (59.0 vs. 29.0 months, P =0.163) and significantly longer overall survival (OS) (99.0 vs. 56.0 months, P=0.003) than CD20 negative patients. Further investigation among CD20 expression proportion showed that strong expression of CD20 (>80% of bone marrow plasma cells) exhibited the longest OS (median not reached, P =0.011). However, the favorable impact of CD20 expression on survival was eliminated with the contaminant presence of cytogenetic abnormalities besides t(11;14). Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) could improve the prognosis of CD20 negative t(11;14) patients. Multivariate analysis confirmed that CD20 expression was an independent favorable indicator for longer OS in t(11;14) MM patients.

CONCLUSION

CD20 expression is a favorable prognostic factor in NDMM with t(11;14) and could provide further risk-stratification value in this heterogeneous disease subgroup.

Evaluation of isatuximab in patients with soft-tissue plasmacytomas: An analysis from ICARIA-MM and IKEMA

The Phase 3 ICARIA-MM (NCT02990338) and IKEMA (NCT03275285) studies demonstrated that isatuximab (Isa) plus pomalidomide (P) and dexamethasone (d; Isa-Pd) or carfilzomib (K) and d (Isa-Kd) improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus Pd or Kd in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. In this post hoc analysis of patients with soft-tissue plasmacytomas, we evaluated Isa-Pd/Isa-Kd efficacy using central radiology and central laboratory assessments. Given the low incidence of soft-tissue plasmacytomas (7.8 %, ICARIA-MM; 6.3 %, IKEMA), efficacy data were pooled across the two studies. PFS (HR, 0.47; 95 % CI, 0.21-1.08), overall response rate (50.0 % vs 17.7 %), and very good partial response or better rate (26.9 % vs 11.8 %) were improved with Isa-Pd/Isa-Kd versus Pd/Kd, with consistent improvements within individual studies. Patients with soft-tissue plasmacytomas who received Isa-Pd/Isa-Kd had similar median PFS compared with those without soft-tissue plasmacytomas and received Pd/Kd. Safety is reported individually per study. Longer median treatment duration and more Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in the Isa versus control arms in ICARIA-MM (36.9 vs 8.4 weeks; 85.7 % vs 70.0 %) and IKEMA (41.9 vs 29.9 weeks; 100.0 % vs 57.1 %); however, Isa did not increase the percentage of patients with fatal events or drug discontinuation. Isa-Pd or Isa-Kd is a potential new treatment option and partially overcomes the poor prognosis associated with soft-tissue plasmacytomas in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.

Bone-Related Extramedullary Disease in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients is an Independent Poor Prognostic Predictor

Background

Bone-related extramedullary disease (EMD-B) is mass of clonal plasma cells derived from adjacent bone lesions and has obvious heterogeneities in clinical outcomes. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the treatment outcomes and long-term prognosis of newly diagnosed myeloma patients with EMD-B.

Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019. Seventy-seven newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients with EMD-B were selected. Propensity score matching (1:2) was used to match patients with and without EMD-B. After matching, 132 patients without extramedullary disease (non-EMD) were included in the study. All patients received bortezomib-based regimens as induction therapy.

Results

After matching, baseline data of the 2 groups were comparable. The Cox regression analysis of patients with EMD-B showed that age, paravertebral lesions, and immunoglobulin D (IgD) type may have adverse effects on survival. Bone-related extramedullary disease at new diagnosis was a risk predictor of survival (hazard ration [HR] = 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-2.98, P = .022). The median survival time of the EMD-B group was significantly shorter than that of the non-EMD group (52 months vs 96 months, P = .043). Induction therapy did not show any significant differences in effectiveness between the 2 groups. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) significantly increased complete remission rate of patients with EMD-B (EMD-B vs non-EMD: no ASCT 15.7% vs 31.9%, P = .035; ASCT 42.3% vs 48.8%, P = .626) and improved their median overall survival rate (EMD-B vs non-EMD: no ASCT 49 months vs 75 months, P = .003; ASCT not reached vs 96 months, P = .505).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that newly diagnosed myeloma patients with EMD-B had poor outcomes, which could be improved by ASCT.

Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma: a systematic literature review

Extramedullary involvement (or extramedullary disease, EMD) represents an aggressive form of multiple myeloma (MM), characterized by the ability of a clone and/or subclone to thrive and grow independent of the bone marrow microenvironment. Several different definitions of EMD have been used in the published literature. We advocate that true EMD is restricted to soft-tissue plasmacytomas that arise due to hematogenous spread and have no contact with bony structures. Typical sites of EMD vary according to the phase of MM. At diagnosis, EMD is typically found in skin and soft tissues; at relapse, typical sites involved include liver, kidneys, lymph nodes, central nervous system (CNS), breast, pleura, and pericardium. The reported incidence of EMD varies considerably, and differences in diagnostic approach between studies are likely to contribute to this variability. In patients with newly diagnosed MM, the reported incidence ranges from 0.5% to 4.8%, while in relapsed/refractory MM the reported incidence is 3.4 to 14%. Available data demonstrate that the prognosis is poor, and considerably worse than for MM without soft-tissue plasmacytomas. Among patients with plasmacytomas, those with EMD have poorer outcomes than those with paraskeletal involvement. CNS involvement is rare, but prognosis is even more dismal than for EMD in other locations, particularly if there is leptomeningeal involvement. Available data on treatment outcomes for EMD are derived almost entirely from retrospective studies. Some agents and combinations have shown a degree of efficacy but, as would be expected, this is less than in MM patients with no extramedullary involvement. The paucity of prospective studies makes it difficult to justify strong recommendations for any treatment approach. Prospective data from patients with clearly defined EMD are important for the optimal evaluation of treatment outcomes.

Myelomatous ascites and pleural effusion in relapsed multiple myeloma

Extramedullary multiple myeloma is seen in advanced and aggressive disease and occurs due to plasma cell infiltration of sites other than the bone marrow. Myelomatous ascites or pleural effusion is seen in less than 1% of cases and can be differentiated from infectious etiologies based on fluid cytology.

Trends of incidence, mortality and survival of multiple myeloma in Spain. A twenty-three-year population-based study

BACKGROUND

Despite major advances, multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease. Epidemiological data from high-quality population-based registries are needed to understand the heterogeneous landscape of the disease.

METHODS

Incidence, mortality and survival in multiple myeloma were comprehensively analyzed in the Girona and Granada population-based cancer registries, over a 23-year study (1994-2016), divided into three periods (1994-2001, 2002-2009 and 2010-2016). Joinpoint regression analysis was used to estimate the annual percentage change in incidence and mortality. Age-standardized net survival was calculated with the Pohar-Perme method.

RESULTS

1957 myeloma patients were included in the study, with a median age of 72 years. Age-standardized incidence and mortality rates decreased over time in both sexes and both rates were higher in males. Five-year age-standardized net survival by period was 27.4% (1994-2001), 38.8% (2002-2009), and 47.4% (2010-2016). Survival improved for all age groups: 32.4%, 74.1% and 78.5% for patients aged 15-49; 27.5%, 44.6%, and 58.5% for those aged 50-69; finally, 24.8%, 25.5%, and 26.3% for the older group.

CONCLUSION

Incidence remained overall stable throughout the study, with only a small increase for men. Mortality was progressively decreasing in both sexes. Both incidence and mortality were higher in men. Age plays a critical role in survival, with impressive improvement in patients younger than 70 years, but only a minor benefit in those older than 70.