Subchronic Toxicity Assessment of Orally Administered Methanol (70%) Seed Extract of Abrus precatorius L. in Wistar Albino Rats

Safety evaluation of a proprietary ayruveda-based polyherbal preparation (arthralgex) used for arthritis

Arthralgex is a proprietary polyherbal preparation used in clinics to treat rheumatoid arthritis for decades. Its safety evaluation has not been reported. The study is aimed at evaluating the safety of arthralgex using Wistar rats, as per OECD guidelines. According to OECD 407, rats of either gender were separated into six groups (n= 6 each). The dose of arthralgex was decided based on an acute toxicity study. Under the treatment group, separate set of rats received arthralgex in three dose levels like - low, medium, and high (200, 400 & 800 mg/kg/day; p.o for 28 days). Satellite groups received high dose (800 mg/kg/day, p.o for 28 days), and control group received equal volume of vehicle. On day 28, blood samples were collected to estimate hematology and biochemistry parameters. Subsequently, rats were euthanized to collect organs for weighing and histopathology. Satellite groups were maintained for an additional 14 days post-treatment to assess toxicity reversibility and euthanized on day 43. Arthralgex did not show any signs of toxicity or major change in body weight in the acute toxicity study. Arthralgex has no significant adverse effect on general health status as confirmed by body weight, feed intake, hematology, biochemistry, urine analysis, internal organs, relative organ weight, and histopathological evaluation after 28 day treatment. Arthralgex could be considered safe for short-term treatment. Present findings may help researchers in dose fixing for sub-chronic and chronic toxicity studies, which is essential for safety evaluation for long-term use.

Ecological and oral toxicity assessment of urea and camphor oil against Rattus norvegicus rats

Background

One of the most challenging pests to control is the wild rat (Rattus norvegicus), which poses serious risks to both human health and the economy. Fertilizers are a more recent method of pest management with various action modes and are considered safe control agents when applied at low doses.

Aim

The present study aimed to examine the toxicological impacts of the contaminated water with urea and camphor oil individually, post-treatment of rats with camphor oil after the pre-treatment with urea and post-treatment of rats with urea mixed with camphor oil after urea pre-treatment against the wild rats (R. norvegicus).

Methods

The study extends to explore the influence of these treatments on the physicochemical parameters of the water administered by rats. Moreover, the effect of the most three toxic treatments was studied on the blood and renal functional parameters and the kidney tissue of rats after 21 days of treatment.

Results

The study showed that urea was more potent than camphor oil when applied individually and increasing the concentration of urea in the pre-treatment or when combined with camphor oil in the post-treatment caused a significant increase in the mortality of rats. The post-treatment of rats with camphor oil only or camphor oil mixed with urea after the pre-treatment with urea induced a synergistic activity against rats. In addition, the exposed water to urea and camphor oil has been modified in physicochemical parameters and formed ulcers and harm to the kidneys of the exposed wild rats.

Conclusion

This study significantly contributes to the ecological and toxicological potential risk indexes of urea and camphor oil together, which are restricted on the perceptible value relevance in the literature of water quality and renal pathology. Therefore, urea and camphor oil represent successful agents for the wild rat's control.

The traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology of Abrus precatorius L.: A comprehensive review

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Abrus precatorius L. (AP) is a folk medicine with a long-term medicinal history worldwide, which is extensively applied to various ailments, such as bronchitis, jaundice, hepatitis, contraception, tumor, abortion, malaria, etc. Meanwhile, its leaves are also served as tea in China, and its roots are employed as a substitute for Glycyrrhiza uralensis or as a raw material for the extraction of glycyrrhizin in India. Thus, AP is considered to be a plant with dual values of medicine and economy as well as its chemical composition and biological activity, which are of growing interest to the scientific community.

AIM OF REVIEW

In the review, the traditional application, botany, chemical constituents, pharmacological activities, and toxicity are comprehensively and systematically summarized.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An extensive database retrieval was conducted to gather the specific information about AP from 1871 to 2022 using online bibliographic databases Web of Science, PubMed, SciFinder, Google Scholar, CNKI, and Baidu Scholar. The search terms comprise the keywords "Abrus precatorius", "phytochemistry", "pharmacological activity", "toxicity" and "traditional application" as a combination.

RESULTS

To date, AP is traditionally used to treat various diseases, including sore throat, cough, bronchitis, jaundice, hepatitis, abdominal pain, contraception, tumor, abortion, malaria, and so on. More than 166 chemical compounds have been identified from AP, which primarily cover flavonoids, phenolics, terpenoids, steroids, alkaloids, organic acids, esters, proteins, polysaccharides, and so on. A wide range of in vitro and in vivo pharmacological functions of AP have been reported, such as antitumor, antimicrobial, insecticidal, antiprotozoal, antiparasitic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, immunomodulatory, antifertility, antidiabetic, other pharmacological activities. The crushed seeds in powder or paste form were comparatively toxic to humans and animals by oral administration. Interestingly, the methanolic extracts were non-toxic to adult Wistar albino rats at various doses (200 and 400 mg/kg) daily.

CONCLUSIONS

The review focuses on the traditional application, botany, phytochemistry, pharmacological activities, and toxicity of AP, which offers a valuable context for researchers on the current research status and a reference for further research and applications of this medicinal plant.

Safety Assessment of Vanillic Acid: Subacute Oral Toxicity Studies in Wistar Rats

OBJECTIVES

Vanillic acid (VA) is a flavoring agent, a phenolic acid, and an intermediary by-product formed during transformation of ferulic acid to vanillin. It has been investigated for diverse pharmacological actions and used in Chinese medicine for decades. However, there is no information in the literature about its mechanism of toxicity or safety with long-term use. The present study will not only supply information on its pharmacological profile but also encourage evidence-based pharmacotherapeutic use. Hence, we performed a subacute toxicity study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Test Guideline 407 (2008), 3 groups of rats were formed consisting of 12 rats (6 male and 6 female) in each group. For the subacute toxicity, the dose was chosen after a limit test was conducted. VA (1000 mg/kg/day) was orally administered for 2 weeks to the treatment group, whereas the control group received an equivalent volume of the vehicle. To assess reversibility, VA (1000 mg/kg/day, p.o.) was administered to the satellite group for 2 weeks and animals were observed for an additional 2 weeks after treatment. The adverse signs, variation in body weight, and mortality were evaluated throughout the study period. On days 15 and 29, blood was collected to evaluate essential biochemical and hematological parameters. The animals were subsequently weighed and sacrificed. The weights of internal organs were recorded; gross necroscopy and histopathological studies were performed.

RESULTS

The hematological parameters of the satellite group increased and the serum sodium level decreased after the treatment. Satellite groups showed no other major change in biochemical parameters when compared to the control group. In addition, relative organ weights, gross necropsy examinations and histopathological structure of the internal organs showed no major alterations.

CONCLUSION

VA showed no adverse effect on the process of leukopoiesis, erythropoiesis or on internal organs, as verified by hematological and biochemical evaluations, gross necropsy, and histopathological studies. The decrease in serum sodium is not considered as a major toxic effect.