Surgical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach

Complications Following Open Versus Minimally Invasive Resection of Gastric Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) is commonly treated with open or minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The preferred surgical approach remains unclear. This study sought to assess utilization over time, compare complication rates by surgical approach, and identify predictors of experiencing complications.

METHODS

Patients who underwent GA resection from 2016 to 2022 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and compared based on receipt of open gastrectomy versus MIS. Complication rates were compared with χ2 tests. Predictors of experiencing complications or receiving MIS were assessed using multivariable Poisson regressions with robust variance.

RESULTS

Out of 4,429 patients, most underwent open gastrectomy versus MIS (84.2% vs. 15.9%). MIS uptake did not increase. Open gastrectomy patients experienced more major complications (18.5% vs. 13.1%), higher perioperative mortality (1.53% vs. 0.57%), and longer hospital stays (7 vs. 5 days) compared to MIS patients (all p values < 0.01). MIS patients had a decreased risk of experiencing any complications (RR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.5-0.8). Non-white patients were less likely to receive MIS.

CONCLUSIONS

MIS is associated with a decreased risk of experiencing complications compared to open gastrectomy for GA, yet its utilization has plateaued. Sociodemographic predictors of receipt of MIS indicate potential disparities in accessing certain treatments.

SUMMARY

The preferred surgical approach for gastric cancer is unclear. This analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program compared complication rates of open gastrectomy with minimally invasive surgery (MIS). MIS was associated with a decreased risk of experiencing complications, yet utilization has plateaued.

Minimally invasive resection of gastric GIST tumor by trans-gastric approach: A case report of a novel technique

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

GIST (Gastro Intestinal Stromal Tumor) treatment is surgical however surgical resection, especially for gGIST (gastric GIST), may be challenging due to location of tumor and the possible sequelae post resection.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case of 66-year-old female presented for the management of gGIST. We opted for transgastric resection assisted by robot. The resection was with free surgical margins for a 4 cm GIST tumor low in grade.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Classical wedge resection of gastric tumors poses post-operative complications especially if the tumor is located near the cardia or pylorus. Various minimally invasive techniques were described aiming to avoid post-operative complications as in stenosis and gastric reflux.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive transgastric resection of gGIST tumor seems to be worth of attention for it can prevent stenosis, hemorrhage and can preserve gastric tissue. Further studies need to be involved to endorse this technique.

Role of Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition Composition on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy or Colectomy: A Phase III Indian Clinical Trial

Aims and background

Various types of parenteral nutritional products exist, each with specific formulations designed to meet the diverse nutritional needs of patient's post-abdominal surgery. Here, two different parenteral nutrition (PN) solutions BFLUID and NUTRIFLEX PERI are compared in terms of therapeutic efficacy and safety profile.

Materials and methods

A prospective, multi-center, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority Phase III clinical trial compared two PN solutions namely BFLUID (N = 78) and NUTRIFLEX PERI (N = 72) in 150 patients undergoing gastrectomy or colectomy. Primary endpoints included length of hospital stay while secondary endpoints included assessment and comparison of length of ICU/HDU stay, assessment of incidents of infections and mortality, change in blood levels of vitamin B1, change in nutritional parameters, thrombophlebitis, pain at the injection site, and recording of adverse events (AEs).

Results

There was no significant difference in terms of length of hospital stay, length of ICU/HDU stay as well as changes in nutritional parameters from baseline and change in blood levels of vitamin B1 from baseline. Both study groups exhibited comparability in terms of AEs, pain at the injection site, and the incidence of phlebitis. There was no significant difference in the number and severity of adverse events reported in both groups. Additionally, no signs of infection were observed in patients from either group.

Conclusion

The trial successfully demonstrated the non-inferiority of BFLUID to NUTRIFLEX PERI. Moreover, the results indicated that PN enriched with high levels of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), essential amino acids (EAAs), and thiamine is both safe and efficacious for adult patients undergoing gastrectomy or colectomy.

How to cite this article

Goyal A, Pathak A, BS Madhu, Soni H, Bhatt K, Raju KVVN, et al. Role of Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition Composition on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy or Colectomy: A Phase III Indian Clinical Trial. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(9):871-878.

Laparoscopic compared to open approach for distal gastrectomy may reduce pneumonia risk for patients with gastric cancer

Background

Whether laparoscopic approach to gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC) reduces the risk of pneumonia remains unknown. In this study, we compared pneumonia outcomes for patients with GC who underwent either laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) or open gastrectomy (OG).

Methods

The ACS NSQIP database was queried to identify patients with GC who underwent LG or OG between Jan 2012 - Dec 2018. Outcomes were compared using regression models. A post-hoc analysis was performed for elderly patients.

Results

The study cohort included 2661 patients, 23.4 % undergoing LG. Laparoscopic approach lowered pneumonia risk (OR 0.47, p = .028) and reduced hospital length of stay, (5.3 vs 7.1 days, p < .001). Elderly patients undergoing LG demonstrated similar benefits. Risk factors for pneumonia included advanced age, dyspnea and weight-loss, whereas laparoscopic approach reduced this risk.

Conclusions

LG in patients with GC has both statistically and clinically significant advantages over OG with respect to pneumonia. Further studies are needed to validate the relationship between postoperative pneumonia and surgical approach for gastrectomy.

Comparison of endoscopic versus laparoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A preliminary meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

For localized disease, complete surgical resection is regarded as the "gold standard" therapeutic modality. With the rapid development of endoscopic techniques, endoscopic resection (ESR) has been confirmed as an efficient and safe alternative for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in the stomach. Nevertheless, the management of gastric GISTs remains poorly defined. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the security and effectiveness of ESR with laparoscopic resection (LAR) for gastric GISTs.

METHODS

A literature search of online databases was conducted to identify relevant comparative studies of ESR and LAR procedures for gastric GISTs published before April 10, 2020. The cumulative data analysis was also performed utilizing the software STATA.

RESULTS

In total, 10 studies involving 1165 patients met the inclusion criteria for analysis (651 for ESR and 514 for LAR). From the results of meta-analysis, patients who underwent ESR experienced decreased operative time (P = 0.000), less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.002), earlier time to diet (P = 0.000), shorter hospital stay (P = 0.000), and lower total charges (P = 0.000) compared with LAR. Moreover, there were no significant differences between these two approaches concerning tumor rupture, conversion rate to other procedure, complete resection rate, postoperative complication rate, recurrence rate, and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic resection, as an effective alternative treatment strategy with satisfactory outcomes, is acceptable for selective patients with gastric GISTs compared with LAR. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials with large samples are warranted to corroborate our observations.

The Era of the Large Databases: Outcomes After Gastroesophageal Surgery According to NSQIP, NIS, and NCDB Databases. Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

The term big data refers to databases that include large amounts of information used in various areas of knowledge. Currently, there are large databases that allow the evaluation of postoperative evolution, such as the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS), and the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The aim of this review was to evaluate the clinical impact of information obtained from these registries regarding gastroesophageal surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review using the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines was performed. The research was carried out using the PubMed database identifying 251 articles. All outcomes related to gastroesophageal surgery were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 34 articles published between January 2007 and July 2017 were included, for a total of 345 697 patients. Studies were analyzed and divided according to the type of surgery and main theme in (1) esophageal surgery and (2) gastric surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The information provided by these databases is an effective way to obtain levels of evidence not obtainable by conventional methods. Furthermore, this information is useful for the external validation of previous studies, to establish benchmarks that allow comparisons between centers and have a positive impact on the quality of care.

Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. The stomach is the most common site of origin. Management of GISTs changed after the introduction of molecularly targeted therapies. Although the only potentially curative treatment of resectable primary GISTs is surgery, recurrence is common. Patients with primary GISTs at intermediate or high risk of recurrence should receive imatinib postoperatively. Imatinib is also first-line therapy for advanced disease. Cytoreductive surgery might be considered in advanced GIST for patients with stable/responding disease or limited focal progression on tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. GIST requires multidisciplinary management.

Using endoscopy to minimize the extent of resection in the management of giant GISTs of the stomach

•

Giant gastric GISTs are usually managed with neo-adjuvant therapy followed by a partial or total gastrectomy.

•

We present a case of where intraoperative endoscopy was used to limit the extent of resection.

•

Simultaneous intra-operative endoscopy demonstrated a 2 mm fistula on the lesser curvature of the stomach. A stapler was used to encompass the mass and the fistulous opening.

•

A frozen-section showed clear margins and the endoscope was used to confirm luminal patency and perform an air-leak test.

•

Oncologic principles of minimal tissue handling and negative margins were observed.

Introduction

Presentation of case

Discussion

Conclusion

Laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In past decades, laparoscopic surgery has been introduced for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Recently, additional studies comparing laparoscopic versus open surgery for gastric GISTs have been published, and an updated meta-analysis of this subject is necessary.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Comparative studies of laparoscopic and open surgery for gastric GISTs published before June 2014 were identified from databases. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to perform quality assessment and original data were extracted. The statistical software STATA (version 12.0) was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Finally, 22 studies, including a total of 1,166 cases, meet the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. The operation time was similar between laparoscopic and open surgery. Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic resection was associated withless blood loss (WMD = -58.91 ml; 95% CI, -84.60 to -33.22 ml; P <0.01); earlier time to flatus (WMD = -1.31 d; 95% CI, -1.56 to -1.06, P <0.01) and oral diet (WMD = -1.75 d; 95% CI, -2.12 to -1.39; P <0.01); shorter hospital stay (WMD = -3.68 d; 95% CI, -4.47 to -2.88; P <0.01); and decreased overall complications (relative risk = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.89; P = 0.01). For long-term outcomes, there were no significant differences between two surgical procedures on recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic surgery for gastric GISTs is acceptable for selective patients with better short-term outcomes compared with open surgery. The long-term survival situation of patients mainly depends on the nature of tumor itself, and laparoscopic surgery was not associated with worse oncological outcomes.