Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection: a Systematic Review

Rare Complications Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective and durable therapeutic intervention for patients with obesity. In recent years, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most commonly performed primary MBS procedure owing to its technical feasibility and excellent short-term outcomes. Despite these favorable results and perceived advantages, SG is associated with several unique complications. Complications such as a postoperative leak or bleeding have been more commonly observed and reported than others, and their management approaches are well described. However, other complications following SG are far less familiar to surgeons, which may delay recognition and result in poor patient outcomes. Of these complications, we describe splenic injuries; esophageal perforation; staple line malformations; stapling of intraluminal devices; phytobezoar formation; gastro-colic, gastro-pleural and gastro-bronchial fistula; pancreatic leak; and portomesenteric venous thrombosis. It is paramount for surgeons to be aware of these underreported issues and have the resources to learn how to recognize and manage them when they arise. This review aims to describe rare (i.e., reported incidence <1%) and underdescribed complications after SG, focusing on causes, clinical presentation, prevention strategies, and management.

Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Esophagogastric Devascularization Versus Endoscopic Varices Ligation Plus Laparoscopic Splenectomy in the Treatment of Portal Hypertension

Background/Aims: To compare laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization (LSED) with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) plus laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) in treating esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) caused by portal hypertension (PH). Methods: Between January 2015 and May 2022, 87 patients with PH caused by hepatitis B cirrhosis were included in the retrospective study (34 in LSED versus 53 in EVL + LS). Results: The clinical features of both groups were well-matched (P > .05). The EVL+LS group was associated with shorter operation time, lower operative blood loss, faster gastrointestinal (GI) recovery, lower C-reactive protein levels, and shorter hospital stays after operation (P < .05). Operative morbidity was more significant in the LSED group (19 55.9% versus 18 33.9%) (P < .05). On postoperative days 1 and 3, albumin levels were remarkably lower (P < .05) in the LSED group. The mean follow-up was 24.3 months for LSED and 26.5 for EVL+LS. Hematological parameters, hepatic functional status, hepatic hemodynamics, and endoscopy indicated a substantial improvement in both groups (P < .05), but no significant difference was identified (P > .05). There was no discernible difference in the incidence of GI bleeding between the two groups (P > .05). Conclusion: EVL+LS is a safer, simpler, and more minimally invasive treatment of EGVB secondary to PH.

Effects of laparoscopic splenectomy on surgical site wound infection in patients with spleen rupture: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis was performed to compare the effects of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) and open splenectomy (OS) for splenic rupture on postoperative surgical site wound infections and postoperative complications. A comprehensive computerised search was conducted for studies comparing LS with OS for the treatment of splenic rupture in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and Wanfang databases, with the search including studies published in any language between the creation of the databases and August 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted the data. Literature quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the included data were collated and analysed using Stata 17.0 software for meta-analysis. Twenty-two studies involving 1545 patients were included. LS was superior to OS in the following aspects: reduced risk of postoperative surgical site wound infection (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.11-0.34, p = 0.000), shortened hospital stay (standardised mean difference = -1.73, 95% CI: -2.05 to -1.40, p = 0.000), and reduced postoperative complication rate (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.16-0.31, p = 0.000). Compared with OS, LS has a lower rate of postoperative wound infection, shorter hospital stay, and reduced rate of postoperative complications. LS is safe and effective for the treatment of splenic rupture and can be promoted clinically.

Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Splenectomy Advantages Over Complete Laparoscopic Splenectomy For Splenomegaly

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is generally applied for splenectomy, However, it also brings some technical challenges, especially for splenomegaly. Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy (HALS) can help to overcome these drawbacks while maintaining the superiority of LS. This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and advantage of HALS for splenomegaly.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2014 and November 2017, 91 patients with splenomegaly in 2 surgical centers were randomly assigned to either HALS (n=45) or LS (n=46). The patients' characteristics, intraoperative details, and the postoperative outcomes in both groups were compared.

RESULTS

Baseline features (sex, age, main diameter, Child-Pugh grade) of both groups had no significant difference (P<0.05). Compared with LS group, the HALS group operation time (141±46 vs. 172±43 min; P=0.001) was shorter, intraoperative blood loss [215 (122.332) vs. 230 (130.740) mL; P=0.026], hospital expenses (5.5±1.5 vs. 6.4±2.4 WanRMB; P=0.022), and conversion rate (1/45 vs. 9/46; P=0.015) were lower. However, there was no significant difference for hospital stay (6.4±2.8 vs. 6.7±3.0 d; P=0.662) and complications (15/45 vs. 12/46; P=0.893) between the 2 groups. In addition, there were no significant differences in postoperative white blood cell (10.6±2.9 vs. 10.9±3.5; P=0.747), AST [61 (47.94) vs. 57 (37.86) U/L; P=0.513], and ALT [68 (54.120) vs. 55 (36.99) U/L; P=0.302] levels.

CONCLUSIONS

HALS can maximize the benefits for patients, while maintaining the advantages of LS and open splenectomy. It is the ideal surgical treatment for splenomegaly.

Elective Splenectomy Combined with Modified Hassab's or Sugiura Procedure for Portal Hypertension in Decompensated Cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

Portal hypertension is a major complication of decompensated cirrhosis. In China, modified Hassab's and Sugiura procedure are the two major methods of nonshunting surgery. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of the two procedures for portal hypertension.

METHOD

Between January 1994 and December 2009, 172 elective patients diagnosed with decompensated cirrhosis with significant hypersplenism adopted elective splenectomy for hypersplenism, and also modified Hassab's (n = 91) or Sugiura (n = 81) procedure was additionally performed to reduce the risk of variceal bleeding. Postoperative mortality and morbidity data were collected, and a retrospectively comparative analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

All of the patients were treated successfully without death during operation, and no variceal bleeding occurred during hospitalization. There were 4 (4.4%) deaths in Hassab's group and 3 (3.7%) deaths in Sugiura group postoperatively (P > 0.05). During follow-up, the survival rate was 90.2%, 82.42%, and 71.43% in Hassab's group and 96.29%, 81.48%, and 75.31% in Sugiura group in 1, 3, and 5 years (P > 0.05). There were 22/71 and 12/63 patients in each groups who suffered no deadly variceal bleeding (P = 0.11). Bleeding related death and no bleeding related death occurred in 7/23 and 3/13 patients in each group (P = 0.26 and 0.14, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Elective splenectomy combined with modified Sugiura procedure seemed to be associated with a reduced trend of no deadly variceal bleeding compared with Hassab's procedure. As statistical significance was not found, further large scale and prospective study was warranted.

Liver Retraction Using n-Butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate (NBCA) Glue during Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection in Cirrhotic Patients

Background

Although liver retraction using n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) glue has been applied to laparoscopic upper abdominal surgery in noncirrhotic patients, there is still no consensus on its safety and feasibility for cirrhotic patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of liver retraction using NBCA glue during laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (LSD) for gastroesophageal varices and hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Methods

Thirty-nine gastroesophageal varices and hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension patients were included in our study. We performed LSD in the presence of NBCA glue (n = 22, NBCA group) and absence of NBCA glue (n = 17, n-NBCA group), respectively. The operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospitalization, and liver function were compared between the two groups.

Results

There was no mortality during the operation. One patient in non-NBCA group received open surgery due to parenchyma hemorrhage. Postoperative pleural effusion occurred in 2 cases of the NBCA group and 1 of the non-NBCA group. One showed left subphrenic abscess in the non-NBCA group. No postoperative bleeding occurred after 9-30 months of follow-up. The time of operation in NBCA group was significantly shorter than those in n-NBCA group (198.86±17.86 versus 217.81±20.25min, P<0.01). Blood loss in NBCA group was significantly lower than non-NBCA group (159.09±56.98 versus 212.50±88.51 ml, P<0.05). The levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were increased on day 1 after LSD and decreased to normal level on day 7 after LSD in both groups. There was no significant difference in postoperative hospitalization and liver function between the two groups.

Conclusion

Liver retraction using NBCA glue during LSD for gastroesophageal varices and hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension is safe, effective, and feasible.

Use of Iodized Oil and Gelatin Sponge Embolization in Splenic Artery Coiling Reduces Bleeding from Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension Patients with Complicating Hypersplenic Splenomegaly: A Comparative Study

OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is relatively contraindicated in cirrhotic portal hypertension (CPH) patients with complicating hypersplenic splenomegaly (HS). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of incorporation of iodized oil and gelatin sponge embolization to conventional splenic artery embolization (cSAE) with coiling in CPH/HS patients undergoing LS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 2012 and March 2014, eligible CPH/HS patients (n = 56) were assigned to preoperative modified SAE (mSAE) with LS (mSAE+LS group, n = 16), cSAE with LS (cSAE+LS group, n = 20) or LS alone (LS group, n = 20). Main outcome measures included frequency of conversion to laparotomy, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and transfusion.

RESULTS

The three groups had similar baseline characteristics (all P > .05). mSAE and cSAE similarly decreased LS conversion frequency (mSAE+LS versus cSAE+LS versus LS, 0.0% versus 10.0% versus 30.0%, P = .030) and operative time (155 ± 23 minutes versus 170 ± 26 minutes versus 221 ± 42 minutes, P < .001) compared with LS alone. mSAE significantly reduced bleeding (178 ± 22 mL versus 250 ± 27 mL versus 328 ± 67 mL, P < .001) compared with cSAE and LS alone. The three groups had similar postoperative recovery times and surgical morbidities (all P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In CPH/HS patients, preoperative SAE reduced LS conversion frequency and reduced operative time compared with LS alone, while mSAE further decreased volume of blood loss.