Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence After Endometriosis Surgery

Application of a Malecot drain in the management of a vaginal cuff dehiscence: A case report and review of the literature

Background

Vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD) in the setting of acute infection is an uncommon but serious complication of total hysterectomy without clear guidelines for management. There is a need for further documentation of best practices around treatment, particularly when it comes to surgical drain utilization and placement.

Case description

We present a case of a 68-year-old with primary peritoneal carcinoma who underwent a robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy as part of an interval debulking surgery and had a VCD. The cuff was repaired vaginally in the operating room with placement of a Malecot catheter for pelvic abscess drainage.

Discussion

The literature is sparse in regard to clear guidelines for management of VCD. Surgical and expectant management approaches are dependent on patient stability, surgical experience, local practice norms, and evidence of intra-abdominal injury. Interventional radiology has become a primary source of drain placement in management of VCD and vaginal cuff abscess. Malecot drains are a low cost, and effective intervention for such management and an important resource for the gynecologic surgeon.

Horizontal versus vertical direction of posterior vaginal wall suture after eradication of rectovaginal endometriosis: A multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To compare safety and effectiveness of two-different directions of suturing the posterior vaginal breach (horizontal [Ho] vs vertical [Ve]) in women undergoing recto-vaginal endometriosis (RVE) nodule resection.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective, observational, cohort study was performed including all women of reproductive age undergoing RVE nodule resection between March 2013 and December 2018 at our tertiary centers. Patients included in the present study were divided into two groups based on the direction in suturing the posterior vaginal fornix defect, for comparisons in terms of rate of postoperative complications, pain relief, pain and anatomical recurrence, and length of hospital stay. Univariate comparisons were performed adopting the t test or the Mann-Whitney test for continuous data and the chi-square test or the Fisher exact test for categorical data, with a significant P value set to <0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 101 women were included: 67 in the Ho-group and 34 in the Ve-group. The two groups did not significantly differ in length of hospital stay (6.7 ± 6.9 vs 6.6 ± 3.3 days; P = 0.95), overall postoperative complications (32.8% vs 14.7%; P = 0.05), pain recurrence (35.8% vs 26.5%; P = 0.34) and anatomical recurrence rate (19.4% vs 23.5%; P = 0.62). Conversely, grade III complications were significantly more common in the Ho-group than in the Ve-group (22.7% vs 20%, P = 0.009), while pain relief in terms of deep dyspareunia, dyschezia, dysuria and chronic pelvic pain was more consistent in the Ve-group patients (P = 0.04, 0.04, 0.05, 0.004, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In symptomatic women undergoing RVE nodule resection, Ho suturing of the vaginal breach appears more commonly associated with severe postoperative complications and a worse pain control.

Prevention and management of vaginal cuff dehiscence: an updated review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Minimally invasive hysterectomy has gained popularity because of its many benefits. However, laparoscopic and robotic assisted hysterectomy have been associated with increased risk of vaginal cuff dehiscence. This review is meant to address risk management and prevention of vaginal cuff dehiscence in patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent findings in the literature focus on addressing modifiable risk factors in patients and on using good surgical technique to help minimize the risk of vaginal cuff dehiscence.

SUMMARY

The focus of this review is to help surgeons identify patient risk factors and address them preoperatively and to review surgical techniques that can minimize the risk of vaginal cuff dehiscence.

Experience in the Management of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence and Evisceration: A Retrospective 37-Year Single-Center Study

Purpose

Vaginal cuff dehiscence (and evisceration) (VCD(E)) is an extremely rare and late-onset complication of total hysterectomy (TH). Limited evidence is available to guide clinicians in managing VCD(E). This study aimed to summarize the clinical characteristics of patients with VCD(E) treated in our center and share our experience in managing VCD(E).

Patients and methods

From 1983 to 2020, a total of 14 cases of VCD(E), including 10 cases in our hospital and 4 cases in other hospitals, were included. Medical records were reviewed to summarize the clinical features and management of VCD(E).

Results

The incidence of VCD(E) in our hospital was 10/46,993 (0.02%), and all 10 patients underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy. The median TH-to-VCD(E) interval was 3.13 months (8 days–27.43 months), and 11/14 (78.57%) patients experienced VCD(E) after coitus. The 3 major symptoms included abdominal pain in 11 patients, irregular vaginal bleeding in 8, and sensation of bulging or prolapsed organs in 4. Except for 2, most patients presented to our hospital within 72 h since the onset of the discomfort. All 14 cases were diagnosed through speculum examination: 3 had simple VCD, and 11 had VCDE. The protruding bowels of 4 patients were immediately manually repositioned in the emergency department without anesthesia. Regarding the surgical approach, 11 patients underwent simple transvaginal, 2 patients underwent laparoscopic-vaginal combined (transvaginal cuff closures), and 1 patient underwent laparoscopic. All but 1 patient did not undergo resection of the eviscerated organs. The median follow-up period was 39.33 (7.9–159.33) months. No patients showed any evidence of recurrence to date.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a risk factor for VCD(E), and early initiation of sexual intercourse is the most common trigger of VCD(E). Clinicians should educate patients to postpone sexual intercourse for at least 3–6 months after TH. Immediate medical attention and patient-specific surgical management are crucial to avoid serious complications.

Complications in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery: definitions, classifications, incidence and risk factors - an up-to-date review

Almost all gynecological and general-surgical operations are - or can be - performed laparoscopically. In comparison to an abdominal approach, the minimally invasive access offers several advantages; however, laparoscopy (both conventional and robotic-assisted) can be associated with a number of approach-specific complications. Although the majority of them are related to the laparoscopic entry, adverse events may also occur due to the presence of pneumoperitoneum or the use of laparoscopic instruments. Unfortunately, a high proportion of complications (especially affecting the bowel and ureter) remain unrecognized during surgery. This narrative review provides comprehensive up-to-date information about definitions, classifications, risk factors and incidence of surgical complications in conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopy, with a special focus on gynecology. The topic is discussed from various perspectives, e.g. in the context of stage of surgery, injured organs, involved instruments, and in relation to malpractice claims.