A Toolkit for Medical Education Scholarship

Reflective practice by health professions educators to enhance learning and teaching: AMEE Guide No. 166

Reflective practice is an essential aspect of the professional development of all health professions educators, with the intention to enhance both learning and teaching. This Guide presents an overview of reflective practice for educators and provides a practical and developmental reflective practice approach for health professions educators. The importance of structured thinking frameworks to stimulate greater understanding of both learning and teaching situations is highlighted. Medical Educator Reflective Practice Sets (MERPS) is an innovative approach for enhancing learning and teaching in health professions education that integrates lesson study and action learning. The key features of the approach are participation in three collaborative sessions, the use of structured thinking frameworks, and solution-focussed teaching in response to the identified problem. The MERPS approach is flexible and can be adapted for implementation across the continuum of health professions education, from undergraduate to postgraduate and continuing professional development.

Fostering Careers in Medical Education

Many careers are available to psychiatrist-educators, and residents should learn about these pathways in addition to developing a core set of teaching skills regardless of their intended career trajectory. Clinician-Educator Programs offer structured opportunities for residents to explore advanced concepts, practice teaching skills, pursue scholarship, and receive mentorship in medical education. Women and persons from minority groups, particularly people of color and gender-diverse individuals, have long been passed over in the promotions process, and correction of these inequities is essential to creating a robust workforce of clinician-educators.

An Inter-Institutional External Peer-Review Process to Evaluate Educators at Schools of Veterinary Medicine

Despite its fundamental importance, the educational mission of most schools of veterinary medicine receives far less recognition and support than the missions of research and discovery. This disparity is evident in promotion and tenure processes. Despite the frequent assertion that education is every college's core mission, there is a broad consensus that faculty are promoted primarily on the basis of meeting expectations relative to publications and grant funding. This expectation is evident in the promotion packets faculty are expected to produce and the criteria by which those packets are reviewed. Among the outcomes is increasing difficulty in hiring and retaining faculty, including young clinicians and basic scientists who are drawn to academic institutions because of the opportunity to teach. The Regional Teaching Academy (RTA) of the West Region Consortium of Colleges of Veterinary Medicine initiated an inter-institutional collaboration to address the most important obstacles to recognizing and rewarding teaching in its five member colleges. Working from the medical education literature, the RTA developed an Educator's Promotion Dossier, workshops to train promotion applicants, and an external review process. Initial use has shown that the reviews are efficient and complete. Administrators have expressed strong support for the product, a letter of external review that is returned to a promotion applicant's home institution. The overall result is an evidence-based, structured process by which teaching-intensive faculty can more fully document their achievements in teaching and educational leadership and a more rigorous external review process by which member colleges can assess quality, impact, and scholarly approach.

Integrating the basic sciences in medical curricula: focus on the basic scientists

Basic science educators are not trained as clinicians, yet are expected to adjust their content to mesh appropriately with its clinical application. While achievable, this is a challenge that requires intentional effort on the part of the basic science educators. A practical solution to facilitate curricular integration is to create experiential opportunities for basic scientists to observe the clinical application of their content and to pair these initiatives with training in effective medical education practices.

Tools for Medical Education Scholarship: From Curricular Development to Educational Research

The development of successful educational scholarship, either curricula or medical education research, is vital in ensuring that the field of medical education continues to evolve. Fostering the skills of medical educators in conducting high-quality educational research is essential to this process because publishing such research helps to disseminate best educational practices to the medical community at large. Unfortunately, developing rigorous medical education research can be challenging for pediatric hospitalists within busy clinical settings. In this article, we aim to discuss key principles and frameworks for curricular development as well as offer guidance in transforming a curriculum into a scholarly medical education research product for pediatric hospital medicine providers.