Efficacy of Galantamine on Cognition in Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Dementia after Failure to Respond to Donepezil

Patterns of Dementia Treatment and Frank Prescribing Errors in Older Adults With Parkinson Disease

Importance

Dementia is common in Parkinson disease, but few data exist on dementia treatment patterns or the concurrent use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (ACHEIs) and anticholinergic medications, a frank prescribing error.

Objectives

To describe dementia treatment patterns, and to determine the extent to which the concurrent use of ACHEIs and drugs with strong anticholinergic activity occurs among individuals with Parkinson disease in the United States.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional analysis included adult Medicare beneficiaries (aged 65 years or older) with Parkinson disease diagnosis with 12 consecutive months of inpatient, outpatient, and prescription drug coverage from January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. Beneficiaries with other parkinsonian syndromes were excluded. Demographic, geographic, prescription claims, and other data were extracted from the 2014 Carrier, Beneficiary Summary, and Prescription Drug Event research identifiable files of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Data analysis was conducted from August 1, 2017, to November 30, 2017.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes were use of dementia drug, specific dementia medication, and concurrent exposure to a high-potency anticholinergic drug and an ACHEI. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression models determined the extent to which patient characteristics and comorbid conditions were associated with dementia treatment or with a high-potency anticholinergic and ACHEI never event.

Results

Of 268 407 Medicare beneficiaries with Parkinson disease (mean [SD] age, 78.9 [7.5]; 134 575 male [50.1%]), most were identified in the files as white (232 831 [86.7%]), followed by black (14 629 [5.5%]), Hispanic (7176 [2.7%]), Asian (7115 [2.7%]), and Native American (874 [0.3%]). Among these beneficiaries, 73 093 (27.2%) were given a prescription for at least 1 antidementia medication. The most commonly prescribed medication was donepezil hydrochloride (46 027 [63.0%] users), followed by memantine hydrochloride (30 578 [41.8%] users) and rivastigmine tartrate (19 278 [26.4%] users). Dementia drugs were more likely to be prescribed to black (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.28-1.38) and Hispanic (AOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.22-1.35) beneficiaries and less likely for Native American beneficiaries (AOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51-0.74). Women were less likely than men to be given a prescription for dementia medication (AOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.84-0.87). Of the 64 017 beneficiaries receiving an ACHEI, 28 495 (44.5%) experienced at least 1 high-potency anticholinergic-ACHEI event. Hispanic (AOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.00-1.23) and women (AOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.25-1.35) beneficiaries had greater odds of experiencing this never event. Statistically significant clusters of the prevalence of this prescribing error were observed across the United States (Moran I = 0.24; P < .001), with clusters of high prevalence in the southern and midwestern states.

Conclusions and Relevance

Dementia medication use by persons with Parkinson disease varies by race/ethnicity and sex; potentially inappropriate prescribing is common among those being treated for cognitive impairment and varies by race/ethnicity, sex, and geography. These findings may serve as national and local targets for improving care quality and outcomes for persons with Parkinson disease.

Strategies for Continued Successful Treatment in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease: An Overview of Switching Between Pharmacological Agents

Introduction:

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, characterized by a progressive decline in cognition and function. Current treatment options for AD include the cholines-terase inhibitors (ChEIs) donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine, as well as the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist memantine. Treatment guidelines recommend the use of ChEIs as the standard of care first-line therapy. Several randomized clinical studies have demonstrated the benefits of ChEIs on cogni-tion, global function, behavior and activities of daily living. However, patients may fail to achieve sus-tained clinical benefits from ChEIs due to lack/loss of efficacy and/or safety, tolerability issues, and poor adherence to the treatment. The purpose of this review is to explore the strategies for continued successful treatment in patients with AD.

Methods:

Literature search was performed for articles published in PubMed and MEDLINE, using pre-specified search terms. Articles were critically evaluated for inclusion based on their titles, abstracts, and full text of the publication.

Results and Conclusion:

The findings of this review indicate that dose up-titration and switching between ChEIs may help to improve response to ChEI treatment and also address issues such as lack/loss of effica-cy or safety/tolerability in patients with AD. However, well-designed studies are needed to provide robust evidence.

A review of clinical treatment considerations of donepezil in severe Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that affects over 45 million people worldwide. Patients with severe AD require help with daily activities and show severe memory impairment. Currently, donepezil is one of two drugs approved by FDA and Health Canada for the treatment of severe AD (MMSE score <10). It is prescribed as 5 or 10 mg/d and an FDA-approved 23-mg/d dose.

METHOD

This review will discuss risks and benefits of donepezil at these doses in severe AD. Articles were identified using PubMed using the MeSH terms "donepezil" AND "Alzheimer Disease" AND "severe." Three double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized studies, one post hoc analysis, and one subgroup analysis were selected.

RESULTS

Donepezil was found to benefit patients in cognition and global functioning. The most consistent improvement was in severe impairment battery (SIB) scores. However, more patients treated with high dosage of donepezil discontinued their treatment due to various adverse events (AEs).

CONCLUSION

Clinicians must weigh benefits against adverse events when determining the course of therapy, as recommendations for cholinesterase inhibitors in advanced AD remain unclear and vary with different guidelines.

Galantamine and Environmental Enrichment Enhance Cognitive Recovery after Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury But Do Not Confer Additional Benefits When Combined

Environmental enrichment (EE) enhances cognition after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Galantamine (GAL) is an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor that also may promote benefits. Hence, the aims of this study were to assess the efficacy of GAL alone (standard [STD] housing) and in combination with EE in adult male rats after TBI. The hypothesis was that both therapies would confer motor, cognitive, and histological benefits when provided singly, but that their combination would be more efficacious. Anesthetized rats received a controlled cortical impact or sham injury, then were randomly assigned to receive GAL (1, 2, or 3 mg/kg; intraperitoneally [i.p.]) or saline vehicle (VEH; 1 mL/kg; i.p.) beginning 24 h after surgery and once daily for 21 days (experiment 1). Motor (beam-balance/walk) and cognitive (Morris water maze [MWM]) assessments were conducted on post-operative Days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively. Cortical lesion volumes were quantified on Day 21. Sham controls were better versus all TBI groups. No differences in motor function or lesion volumes were observed among the TBI groups (p > 0.05). In contrast, GAL (2 mg/kg) enhanced MWM performance versus VEH and GAL (1 and 3 mg/kg; p < 0.05). In experiment 2, GAL (2 mg/kg) or VEH was combined with EE and the data were compared with the STD-housed groups from experiment 1. EE alone enhanced motor performance over the VEH-treated and GAL-treated (2 mg/kg) STD-housed groups (p < 0.05). Moreover, both EE groups (VEH or GAL) facilitated spatial learning and reduced lesion size versus STD + VEH controls (p < 0.05). No additional benefits were observed with the combination paradigm, which does not support the hypothesis. Overall, the data demonstrate that EE and once daily GAL (2 mg/kg) promote cognitive recovery after TBI. Importantly, the combined therapies did not negatively affect outcome and thus this therapeutic protocol may have clinical utility.