Breastfeeding skills of full-term newborns and associated factors in a low-and-middle-income setting

The Association Between Breastfeeding and Growth Among Infants with Moderately Low Birth Weight: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between breastfeeding competency, as determined by Latch, Audible swallowing, Type of nipple, Comfort, and Hold (LATCH) and Preterm Infant Breastfeeding Behavior Scale (PIBBS) scores, and exclusive breastfeeding and growth among infants with low birth weight (LBW) in India, Malawi, and Tanzania.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted LATCH and PIBBS assessments among mother-infant dyads enrolled in the Low Birthweight Infant Feeding Exploration (LIFE) observational study of infants with moderately LBW (1500g-2499 g) in India, Malawi, and Tanzania. We analyzed feeding and growth patterns among this cohort.

RESULTS

We observed 988 infants. We found no association between LATCH or PIBBS scores and rates of exclusive breastfeeding at 4 or 6 months. Higher week 1 LATCH and PIBBS scores were associated with increased likelihood of regaining birth weight by 2 weeks of age [LATCH: aRR 1.42 (95% CI 1.15, 1.76); PIBBS: aRR 1.15 (95% CI 1.07, 1.23); adjusted for maternal age, parity, education, residence, delivery mode, LBW type, number of offspring, and site]. Higher PIBBS scores at 1 week were associated with improved weight gain velocity (weight-for-age z-score change) at 1, 4, and 6 months [adjusted beta coefficient: 1 month 0.04 (95% CI 0.01, 0.06); 4 month 0.04 (95% CI 0.01, 0.06); and 6 month 0.04 (95% CI 0.00, 0.08)].

CONCLUSION

Although week 1 LATCH and PIBBS scores were not associated with rates of exclusive breastfeeding, higher scores were positively associated with growth metrics among infants with LBW, suggesting that these tools may be useful to identify dyads who would benefit from early lactation support.

Breastfeeding Outcomes and Associated Risks in HIV-Infected and HIV-Exposed Infants: A Systematic Review

Purpose: To critically appraise recent literature regarding breastfeeding outcomes and associated risks in HIV-infected (HI) and HIV-exposed (HE) infants, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement guidelines. Materials and Methods: Five electronic databases were systematically searched to obtain English publications from the last 10 years (2010-2020), pertaining to breastfeeding outcomes and associated risks of HI and HE infants and children. Gray literature sources were also included. Data were extracted according to various data items and were synthesized using thematic synthesis. Results: Of the initial 7,151 sources identified, 42 articles were eligible for final inclusion. The final selection included 19 cohort studies and 2 expert committee reports, classified as gray literature. The remaining 21 studies comprised case-control, cross-sectional, and randomized controlled trial studies. The following themes were identified: breastfeeding outcomes in HI and HE infants, risks for suboptimal breastfeeding, HI and HE infant growth and developmental outcomes, and barriers and facilitators to feeding decisions. Most studies highlighted HE infants' growth and developmental outcomes and did not directly interrogate breastfeeding outcomes. The most prevalent risks for suboptimal breastfeeding were maternal factors affecting decision making for breastfeeding. Conclusions: This systematic review adds to the evidence of breastfeeding in HIV-affected mother-infant dyads. Findings reiterated that exclusive breastfeeding has a positive outcome on growth and development of all infants irrespective of HIV status. The review highlighted a dearth of research on breastfeeding outcomes of HI and HE infants. Large-scale prospective comparative studies should profile breastfeeding and developmental outcomes of infants with HIV infection or exposure and antiretroviral treatment exposure to enable early identification and intervention for this vulnerable population in low-income settings.

Editorial

Nil.