Early surgical repair of penile fractures

What is the most dangerous sexual position that caused the penile fracture? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Penile fracture (PF) affects 1,14 to 10,48 men in every 100.000 men in East Asia, and the primary aetiology is sexual intercourse, but the knowledge regarding the most dangerous sexual position is not well explained. This study compares three sexual positions: man on top position (MTP), woman on top position (WTP), and doggy style position (DSP), leading to PF potential.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of sexual position-related PF in Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane, and PMC Europe was performed. Criteria inclusion was the full text of relevant articles which describ the number of sexual positions. It was analyzed by odds ratio, random model effect, and the OR and 95%CI were calculated.

RESULTS

12 relevant papers involving 490 patients comprised 169 MTP, 120 WTP, 158 DSP, and 43 no intercourse cases. Meta-analysis of all sexual positions was a MTP P= 0,04, WTP P=0,49, and DSP P=0,0005.

CONCLUSION

The man-dominant positions (MTP and DSP) were significantly potential for PF, which speculated that when a man is dominant and very excited, intercourse may become highly vigorous and impact trauma. This study found that man's dominant position consists of DSP and the MTP significantly lead to PF.

Current Management of Penile Fracture: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Because of the low incidence of penile fracture, many aspects of the diagnostic process and of the surgical and functional outcomes are rarely reported.

AIM

To systematically review the current literature on the surgical management of penile fracture, focusing on etiology, diagnosis, functional outcomes, and postoperative complications.

METHODS

The present review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) declaration standards for systematic reviews. A systematic search for the terms penile fracture, fracture of penis, trauma of penis, rupture of corpora cavernosa, and immediate management of penile fracture was been carried out in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and Science Citation Index databases.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Etiology of penile fracture, clinical presentation, types of radiologic investigations and their accuracy, surgical approach, suture material used for tunica repair, timing of surgical exploration, intraoperative findings, surgical complications, and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

The total number of patients analyzed was 438, and the patients' an average age was 36 years. The most frequent reported cause of penile fracture was sexual intercourse (80% of cases). The most common finding at examination was a penile hematoma (97.5%). Although operator dependent, in experienced hands, ultrasonography was found to be a useful tool in confirming the location of the albuginea tear and identifying the presence of any concomitant urethral injury, helping the surgeon to choose the best surgical approach. Early surgical repair of a penile fracture was found to be a safe procedure, although long-term complications are not uncommon. Tertiary referral centers that managed a larger number of cases seemed to obtain more satisfactory long-term results with a significantly smaller number of complications.

CONCLUSION

A low incidence of postoperative complications and full satisfactory functional outcomes are reported when early repair is performed in high-volume centers. Falcone M, Garaffa G, Castiglione F, Ralph DJ. Current Management of Penile Fracture: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:253-260.

Penile Fracture: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To review the causes and management of penile fracture and to compare between surgical and conservative management as well as immediate and delayed interventions in terms of overall and specific complications.

METHODS

A search of all reported literature was conducted for all articles reporting on the management and outcomes of penile fractures. Full texts of relevant articles were obtained and screened according to the inclusion criteria. Outcomes measures were numbers of patients receiving surgical or conservative management, aetiology of fracture, length of admission, complications as well as the specifics of diagnostic approaches and operative management. Data was collated and where possible meta-analysed using Revman software.

RESULTS

A total of 58 relevant studies involving 3,213 patients demonstrated that intercourse accounts for only 48% of cases with masturbation and forced flexion accounting for 39%. Meta-analysis shows that surgical intervention was associated with significantly fewer complications vs. conservative management (p < 0.000001). Surgical intervention results in significantly less erectile dysfunction (ED), curvature and painful erection than conservative management. There was no significant difference in the number of patients developing plaques/nodules (p = 0.94). Meta-analysis shows that overall early surgery is preferable to delayed surgery but that rates of ED are not significantly different.

DISCUSSION

Early surgical intervention is associated with significantly fewer complications than conservative management or delayed surgery. The combined outcome of rapid diagnosis by history and clinical examination and swift surgical intervention is key for reconstruction with minimal long-term complications.

FRACTURE OF THE PENIS IN THE NIGER DELTA REGION OF NIGERIA

BACKGROUND

Penile fracture is a surgical emergency which often frightens the patient and partner. Varying incident rates, precipitating mechanisms and outcomes of treatment have been reported from different parts of the world.

AIM

To determine clinical presentation, aetiological factors and outcome of treatment of penile fracture in Port Harcourt, Niger Delta region of Nigeria.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of all patients who presented with penile fracture to our institution from 2007 and 2015. Data on age of patient, events leading to the injury, mode and time of presentation, mode and outcome and complications of treatment were collected and analysed with SPSS 20.0 software.

RESULTS

Twenty one patients with a median age of 34.0 years (21-45) were treated within the study period. Nine patients (42.9%) were married. Overenthusiastic/ vigorous sex-related events were responsible for penile fracture in 17 patients (81.0%). Seven injuries were self inflicted while in 14 patients (66.7%), partners were involved. All the patients presented with pain, swelling, sudden detumescence and deviation of the penis. The right side was affected in 61.9% of the cases. The penile mid-shaft was the site of injury in 57.1% of cases. Six patients (28.6%) had associated urethral injuries. Eighteen patients (85.7%) had immediate surgery, 2 patients (9.5%) refused surgery and were treated conservatively. One patient who presented late was also managed conservatively. All but one patient had satisfactory penile erections with no significant complications.

CONCLUSION

Overenthusiastic and vigorous sexual activities were the most common causes of penile fracture in this study. A third of the patients had associated urethral injuries. Early surgical repair led to satisfactory outcome.

Synergism of clinical evaluation and penile sonographic imaging in diagnosis of penile fracture: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Penile fracture is an uncommon urologic emergency, and is the traumatic rupture of the tunica albuginea covering the corpus cavernosa. This usually occurs following blunt trauma sustained during coitus, masturbation or self-manipulations to hide or suppress an erection. Clinical diagnosis can often be easily made with typical history and examination findings. However, the patient may present atypically and/or with a suspicion of associated urethral injury. The roles of various diagnostic investigations are being evaluated in these situations.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the case of a 31-year-old African man with penile fracture and suspected associated urethral injury that occurred after self-manipulations to hide an erection.

CONCLUSIONS

Penile ultrasound and sonourethrography provide useful additional diagnostic information to supplement clinical history and physical examination findings and can be performed easily, at low cost and with no delays to surgery.

Increase in fracture of the penis in south-west Nigeria

OBJECTIVE

To present our recent experience in the management of penile fracture.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present 21 cases of penile fracture managed at the two Federal-owned tertiary hospitals in two neighbouring states in south-west Nigeria between 2001 and 2011. The diagnosis was based mainly on a clinical evaluation. The treatment was surgical in patients who presented within 2 weeks of the fracture. The emphasis during the follow-up was on erectile function and micturition.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients presented within 48 h, two presented after a week, while two reported months later with penile deviation. The mean age of the patients was 26.4 years. The cause of fracture was sexual intercourse in 11 (52%) patients and forceful manipulation of the erect penis in 10 (48%). Thirteen (62%) of all injuries occurred in the last 2 years of the study, of which eight men were injured during rear entry with the woman on top (reverse coital) position. Six of the patients with reverse coital injuries reported trying the position after watching it on the Internet, specifically on their cellular phones. Eighteen patients had surgical treatment, with a satisfactory outcome. Two of the other three patients had penile deviation during erection.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence and causes of penile fracture appear to have changed drastically over the last 2 years in our environment. The rapid demographic changes in south-west Nigeria are probably responsible. There appears to be a relationship between the cause of fracture and the use of the Internet, although that might be coincidental. Surgical repair, irrespective of the delay before intervention, usually offers a satisfactory outcome.