Rehabilitation of children after elbow injuries

Does Surgeon Subspecialty Training Affect Outcomes in the Treatment of Displaced Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children?

INTRODUCTION

The effect of the treating surgeon's subspecialty training on the outcomes of managing displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in the pediatric cohort remains under debate. The objective of this study was to examine patient outcomes and treatment variables for these injuries based on the surgeon subspecialty training.

METHODS

A retrospective study of children who had undergone primary closed reduction and percutaneous fixation for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures was done from January 2012 through May 2019. The following four groups with differing orthopaedic subspecialty training were evaluated: (1) pediatric fellowship trained (2) trauma fellowship trained, (3) sports medicine fellowship trained, and (4) all others. Outcomes examined included time to surgery, surgical time, fluoroscopy usage, postoperative follow-up protocols, radiographic measurements of alignment, and complications between surgeon groups.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-one cases were included (mean age 6 ± 2 years). Pediatric fellowship-trained surgeons took patients to surgery in a more delayed fashion (>12 hours, P = 0.02). Surgical time and fluoroscopy usage were significantly shorter for pediatric fellowship-trained surgeons (P < 0.001). No statistical difference was noted in pin configuration constructs between the groups. Pediatric fellowship-trained surgeons, on average, saw patients two times postoperatively within a year with most patients being within 30 days. Complications were not statistically different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons provide more efficient care on a more delayed basis for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures than other subspecialty-trained orthopaedic surgeons. However, if barriers exist that limit the practicality or availability of these specialists, nonpediatric fellowship-trained surgeons achieve similar and satisfactory outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III retrospective cohort study.

Effects of waiting for outpatient physiotherapy services in persons with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to assess the scientific evidence on the effects of waiting for outpatient physiotherapy services in persons with musculoskeletal disorders.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in three databases (Medline, CINAHL, and Embase) for articles assessing the effects of waiting for outpatient physiotherapy services in persons with musculoskeletal disorders. Clinical and health system outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. The studies varied in designs, settings, and populations. The definition of waiting also varied between studies. The studies were of low to high methodological quality. Waiting for outpatient physiotherapy services was shown to have mixed results on clinical and health system outcomes. Results from included studies suggest the possible detrimental effects of waiting on pain, disability, quality of life, and psychological symptoms in persons with musculoskeletal disorders. There was also evidence of higher healthcare utilization and costs for patients who wait longer before physiotherapy services.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides mixed evidence that suggest potential detrimental effects on the health of individuals with MSDs and at the health system level. Further high-quality studies are needed, such as longitudinal studies specifically addressing the effects of waiting due to lack of access to physiotherapy services.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe findings from this review suggest potential detrimental effects on health outcomes when patients wait longer before receiving physiotherapy services.The findings also suggest higher healthcare utilization and costs for patients with longer wait times compared to those who receive physiotherapy services more rapidly.This review suggests the need to assess and implement strategies and policies to ensure timely access to physiotherapy.

Consensus and different perspectives on treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children

BACKGROUND

Although closed reduction and percutaneous pinning is accepted as the treatment of choice for displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus, there are some debates on the pinning techniques, period of immobilization, elbow range of motion (ROM) exercise, and perceptions on the restoration of elbow ROM. This study was to investigate the consensus and different perspectives on the treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.

METHODS

A questionnaire was designed for this study, which included the choice of pinning technique, methods of elbow motion, and perception on the restoration of elbow ROM. Seventy-six orthopedic surgeons agreed to participate in the study and survey was performed by a direct interview manner in the annual meetings of Korean Pediatric Orthopedic Association and Korean Society for Surgery of the Hand. There were 17 pediatric orthopedic surgeons, 48 hand surgeons, and 11 general orthopedic surgeons.

RESULTS

Ninety-six percent of the orthopedic surgeons agreed that closed reduction and percutaneous pinning was the treatment of choice for the displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children. They showed significant difference in the choice of pin entry (lateral vs. crossed pinning, p = 0.017) between the three groups of orthopedic surgeons, but no significant difference was found in the number of pins, all favoring 2 pins over 3 pins. Most of the orthopedic surgeons used a removable splint during the ROM exercise period. Hand surgeons and general orthopedic surgeons tended to be more concerned about elbow stiffness after supracondylar fracture than pediatric orthopedic surgeons, and favored gentle passive ROM exercise as elbow motion. Pediatric orthopedic surgeons most frequently adopted active ROM exercise as the elbow motion method. Pediatric orthopedic surgeons and general orthopedic surgeons acknowledged that the patient's age was the most contributing factor to the restoration of elbow motion, whereas hand surgeons acknowledged the amount of injury to be the most contributing factor.

CONCLUSIONS

More investigation and communication will be needed to reach a consensus in treating pediatric supracondylar fractures of the humerus between the different subspecialties of orthopedic surgeons, which can minimize malpractice and avoid medicolegal issues.