Comparison of baseline bacterial levels in retail ground beef originating from different regulatory, processing, and packaging environments

Exposure to antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli through the consumption of ground beef in Western Canada

Emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in food-borne bacteria is a public health issue. Retail meat is considered an important carrier for antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli. Currently, resistance of E. coli strains to third generation cephalosporins are of particular concern, with significant potential animal and public health consequences. Resistance to tetracyclines is also a concern, due to high prevalence of this resistance and important co-resistance patterns. However, the actual likelihood of exposure to antimicrobial-resistant bacteria via the consumption of retail meats, beyond the simple frequencies of resistance found in samples of meat at the grocery store, in Canada remains to be investigated. This study was conducted to estimate the potential human exposure to ceftriaxone- and tetracycline-resistant E.coli (CREC and TREC; the hazards of interest) through the consumption of ground beef in Western Canada. Our exposure assessment simulation model included five modules: 1) estimation of prevalence and concentration of the hazards of interest in retail ground beef samples collected by the Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS), 2011-2014; 2) potential growth of the hazards during transportation from retail to home; 3) potential growth or reduction of the hazards during home storage; 4) thermal inactivation of the hazards due to cooking; and 5) consumption. The outputs of the model were presented as the probability of consumers' exposure to various threshold levels of the hazards [10 to 10⁶ colony forming units (CFU)] in one serving of cooked ground beef. Overall, the probabilities of exposure to high threshold levels of the hazards (>4 log₁₀ CFU/serving) were estimated to be lower than 0.12% in the study population (2011-2014). The mean probabilities of exposure to at least 1 log₁₀ CFU CREC and TREC in a single meal containing cooked ground beef were 0.067% (SD: 0.001%) and 1.20% (SD: 0.02%), respectively. This probability substantially decreased as the threshold level of exposure increased to ≥6 log₁₀ CFU. The probability of exposure to TREC was consistently greater than that for CREC. Cooking led to a prominent drop in the mean concentration of the hazards (4.7 log₁₀ CFU/g). The findings from this research could inform the policy-making process and provide suggestions for adjustments in future retail surveillance plans. In addition, important knowledge gaps in this area have been highlighted.

Prevalence and diversity of Campylobacter species in Saskatchewan retail ground beef

The primary objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. DNA by PCR in retail ground beef sold in Saskatchewan, Canada, and to identify the presence of individual Campylobacter species (C. coli, C. curvus, C. fetus, C. hyointestinalis, C. jejuni, C. rectus, and C. upsaliensis) using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). Secondary objectives were to assess potential differences in the prevalence of Campylobacter between ground beef offered for sale during cold and warm seasons as well as that offered for sale fresh and frozen, to investigate any association between the presence of Campylobacter spp. DNA and E. coli and/or aerobic bacterial counts, and finally to compare the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. DNA in ground beef originating from different production and retail environments. Out of the 309 total samples included in the study, 50 (16.2%) samples tested positive for Campylobacter spp. DNA, while 49 (15.9%) samples were determined positive for up to five individual species. Collectively, these assays determined that 14 (4.5%) samples were positive for C. coli, 11 (3.6%) for C. curvus, 6 (1.9%) for C. fetus, 24 (7.8%) for C. hyointestinalis, 12 (3.9%) for C. jejuni, 6 (1.9%) for C. rectus, and 9 (2.9%) for C. upsaliensis. There were 27 (8.7%) samples that were positive at the genus level that did not test positive for any of the seven Campylobacter species investigated (suggesting an alternate Campylobacter species). Also, 26 (8.4%) samples generated positive results by one of the species-specific qPCR assays, but returned no product in the conventional genus-level assay (suggesting a higher sensitivity for the species-specific qPCR assays). There was no significant association between the presence of Campylobacter spp. in Saskatchewan retail ground beef and any of the investigated risk factors.