Efficacy of antimicrobial compounds on surface decontamination of seven Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and Salmonella inoculated onto fresh beef

Effective Decontamination Methods for Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli on Beef Surfaces for Application in Beef Carcass Hygiene

Effective methods for decontamination of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) on beef were evaluated by 48 mL spraying, 100 mL, and 500 mL flushing with ethanol, hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, acidified sodium chlorite, and sodium hypochlorite in this study. The flushing with 500 mL of 1,000 ppm peracetic acid was most effective, reducing pathogens by 2.8 log CFU/cm2, followed by 1,200 ppm acidified sodium chlorite. The spraying with 1,000 ppm peracetic acid reduced pathogens by 1.6 log CFU/cm2. The flushing with 500 mL of 200 and 500 ppm acidified sodium chlorite, and 50, 100, 200, and 500 ppm peracetic acid significantly reduced the STEC population compared with those treated with distilled water (p < 0.05), reducing pathogens by 2.1, 2.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.1 and 2.4 log CFU/cm2, respectively. Additionally, the flushing with 500 mL of 200 and 500 ppm acidified sodium chlorite significantly changed the color of beef samples (p < 0.05), whereas 100-500 ppm peracetic acid did not significantly change the color (p > 0.05). The flushing with 500 mL of 200 and 500 ppm acidified sodium chlorite and 200 and 500 ppm peracetic acid significantly changed the odor of beef samples compared with those treated with distilled water (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the reduction of STEC population between peracetic acid treatment at 25 °C and 55 °C, with or without washing with sterilized distilled water after decontamination. Washing with distilled water after flushing with peracetic acid tended to reduce the odor of the samples. These results suggest that treatment with 100, 200, and 500 ppm peracetic acid, followed by washing with distilled water, might reduce the STEC population without retaining the odor of the sanitizer.

Association of resistance to quaternary ammonium compounds and organic acids with genetic markers and their relationship to Escherichia coli serogroup

Sanitizer resistance is being extensively investigated due to the potential for bacterial survival and cross-resistance with other antimicrobials. Similarly, organic acids are being used due to their microbial inactivation potential as well as being generally recognized as safe (GRAS). However, little is known about associations of genetic and phenotypic factors in Escherichia coli related to resistance to sanitizers and organic acids as well as differences between "Top 7" serogroups. Therefore, we investigated 746 E. coli isolates for resistance to lactic acid and two commercial sanitizers based on quaternary ammonium and peracetic acid. Furthermore, we correlated resistance to several genetic markers and investigated 44 isolates using Whole Genome Sequencing. Results indicate that factors related to motility, biofilm formation, and Locus of Heat Resistance played a role in resistance to sanitizers and lactic acid. In addition, Top 7 serogroups significantly differed in sanitizer and acid resistance, with O157 being the most consistently resistant to all treatments. Finally, mutations in rpoA, rpoC, and rpoS genes were observed, in addition to presence of a Gad gene with alpha-toxin formation in all O121 and O145 isolates, which may be related to increased resistance of these serogroups to the acids used in the present study.

Efficacy of Antimicrobial Interventions Used in Meat Processing Plants against Antimicrobial Tolerant Non-Antibiotic-Resistant and Antibiotic-Resistant Salmonella on Fresh Beef

ABSTRACT

Salmonella is a common cause of foodborne illness in the United States, and several strains of Salmonella have been identified as resistant to antibiotics. It is not known whether strains that are antibiotic resistant (ABR) and that have some tolerance to antimicrobial compounds are also able to resist the inactivation effects of antimicrobial interventions used in fresh meat processing. Sixty-eight Salmonella isolates (non-ABR and ABR strains) were treated with half concentrations of lactic acid (LA), peracetic acid (PAA), and cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), which are used in beef processing plants to screen for tolerant strains. Six strains each from non-ABR and ABR Salmonella that were most tolerant of LA (2%), PAA (200 ppm), and CPC (0.4%) were selected. Selected strains were inoculated on surfaces of fresh beef and subjected to spray wash treatment with 4% LA, 400 ppm PAA, or 0.8% CPC for the challenge study. Tissue samples were collected before and after each antimicrobial treatment for enumeration of survivors. Spray treatment with LA, PAA, or CPC significantly reduced non-ABR Salmonella and ABR Salmonella on surfaces of fresh beef by 1.95, 1.22, and 1.33 log CFU/cm2, and 2.14, 1.45, and 1.43 log CFU/cm2, respectively. The order of effectiveness was LA > PAA = CPC. The findings also indicated that LA, PAA, and CPC were equally (P ≤ 0.05) effective against non-ABR and ABR Salmonella on surfaces of fresh beef. These data contribute to the body of work that indicates that foodborne pathogens that have acquired both antibiotic resistance and antimicrobial tolerance are still equally susceptible to meat processing antimicrobial intervention treatments.

HIGHLIGHTS

Characterization of Escherichia coli harboring colibactin genes (clb) isolated from beef production and processing systems

Certain strains of Escherichia coli possess and express the toxin colibactin (Clb) which induces host mutations identical to the signature mutations of colorectal cancer (CRC) that lead to tumorigenic lesions. Since cattle are a known reservoir of several Enterobacteriaceae including E. coli, this study screened for clb amongst E. coli isolated from colons of cattle-at-harvest (entering beef processing facility; n = 1430), across the beef processing continuum (feedlot to finished subprimal beef; n = 232), and in ground beef (n = 1074). Results demonstrated that clb⁺E. coli were present in cattle and beef. Prevalence of clb⁺E. coli from colonic contents of cattle and ground beef was 18.3% and 5.5%, respectively. clb⁺E. coli were found susceptible to commonly used meat processing interventions. Whole genome sequencing of 54 bovine and beef clb⁺ isolates showed clb occurred in diverse genetic backgrounds, most frequently in phylogroup B1 (70.4%), MLST 1079 (42.6%), and serogroup O49 (40.7%).

Analysis of scenarios to reduce the probability of acquiring hemolytic uremic syndrome associated with beef consumption

The objective of this study was to develop a quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) model to evaluate potential risk mitigation strategies to reduce the probability of acquiring hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) associated with beef consumption in Argentina. Five scenarios were simulated to evaluate the effect of interventions on the probability of acquiring HUS from Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)-contaminated ground beef and commercial hamburger consumption. These control strategies were chosen based on previous results of the sensitivity analysis of a baseline QMRA model ( Brusa et al., 2020). The application of improvement actions in abattoirs not applying Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) for STEC would result 7.6 times lower in the probability that consumers acquired HUS from ground beef consumption, while the implementation of improvements in butcher shops would lead to a smaller reduction. In abattoirs applying HACCP for STEC, the risk of acquiring HUS from commercial hamburger consumption was significantly reduced. Treatment with 2% lactic acid, hot water and irradiation reduced 4.5, 3.5 and 93.1 times the risk of HUS, respectively. The most efficient interventions, in terms of case reduction, being those that are applied in the initial stages of the meat chain.

Beef abattoir interventions in a risk-based meat safety assurance system

In risk-based meat safety assurance system, the use of interventions is intended to accomplish the meat safety targets on chilled carcasses, particularly in situations when an abattoir is unable to sufficiently reduce risks arising from specific farms/animal batches by using process hygiene alone. Furthermore, interventions are considered whenever food safety authorities identify meat production processes associated with high risks for consumers. This paper overviews the role of beef interventions in a risk-based, meat safety assurance system. Cattle hide interventions (chemical hide washes and microbial immobilisation treatment with shellac) and beef carcass interventions (pasteurisation treatments with hot water and/or steam and organic (lactic) acid washes), show consistent reduction effects of aerobic bacteria and faecal indicators and reduced prevalences of naturally present VTEC and Salmonella. The review also identified interventions where there was a lack of data and further research was needed, and other contextual factors to inform the risk management decisions for further development of risk-based meat safety assurance system.

Application of chlorine dioxide and peroxyacetic acid during spray chilling as a potential antimicrobial intervention for beef carcasses

Enteric pathogens such as Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and Salmonella spp. continue to be a major food safety concern for the beef industry. Currently, no single method is completely effective in controlling these pathogens during carcass processing. Previous research, however, suggested that STEC might become more susceptible to oxidative damage when exposed to carcass chilling (King et al., 2016). We aimed to test that hypothesis by evaluating the antimicrobial effects of an oxidant (chlorine dioxide, ClO₂ or peroxyacetic acid, PAA) on beef meat during a simulated spray chilling process (sprayed for 4 s every 15 min for 36 cycles) and/or when applied (sprayed for 144 s) prior to spray chilling with water. In all experiments, the inactivating effects of oxidants were greatest on fat surfaces and much less effective on lean surfaces. ClO₂ at 15 ppm, a non-lethal level for E. coli under optimal growth conditions, caused higher log reductions in E. coli numbers (approximately 3-log reduction) when applied during spray chilling than when applied immediately prior to 'normal' spray chilling (approximately 1-log reduction). This confirms the hypothesis that E. coli are more susceptible to oxidative stress during spray chilling. In subsequent studies, both ClO₂ and PAA at lethal levels (at ≥20 and ≥ 200 ppm, respectively) applied during spray chilling resulted in pronounced inactivation of both E. coli and Salmonella enterica strains, achieving a ≥4-log reduction at the end of chilling. These results indicate that an oxidant-based application during spray chilling as an antimicrobial intervention could be effective to minimise the problems associated with enteric pathogen contamination on beef meat.

Relative response of populations of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica to exposure to thermal, alkaline and acidic treatments

We evaluated the relative response of generic Escherichia coli (GEC), Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) and Salmonella enterica to heat, alkaline or acid treatments. GEC included strains from carcasses (n = 24) and trim (n = 25) at a small beef plant where no decontamination interventions are used and at a large plant where multiple decontamination interventions are used (carcass n = 25 and trim n = 25). STEC strains belonging to nine serogroups, included isolates from cattle (n = 53), beef (n = 16) and humans (n = 44). S. enterica strains belonging to 29 serotypes, included isolates from humans (n = 30), poultry (n = 26), pork (n = 10) and beef (n = 33). Strains were grown in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth and subjected to the following treatments: 60 °C for 2 min, 5% lactic acid (pH 2.9) for 1 h at 4 °C, or NaOH (pH 11.0) for 2 h at 4 °C. Median log reductions of the GEC populations after heat, alkaline and acid treatment ranged from 2.3 to 3.8, 0.7 to 2.2 and 0.7 to 1.2 log CFU/mL, respectively. No statistically significant difference in reductions was observed between carcass GEC or trim GEC from the large or small plant, except for a greater reduction in trim GEC from the small plant. Median reductions of the STEC populations ranged from 3.3 to 3.5, 0.0 to 0.6, and 0.3 to 0.5 log CFU/mL after heat, alkaline and acid treatment, respectively. The median reductions were not dependent upon isolation source, except between STEC cattle and human isolates after alkaline treatment, where the reduction of the former was higher by 0.6 log unit. For the Salmonella populations, median log reductions ranged from 3.5 to 4.0, 1.7 to 2.4 and 3.7 to 4.1 log CFU/mL after heat, alkaline and acid treatment, respectively. The reductions were not isolation source related. The median log reductions were in the order GEC < STEC < Salmonella after heat treatment and STEC < GEC < Salmonella after alkaline or acid treatment. Overall, the relative response of GEC, STEC and Salmonella in the model system suggests that exposure to heat or pH-based decontamination interventions in meat plants is not associated with increased resistance among E. coli strains in these environments, and total E. coli counts on beef can be indicative of treatment efficacy for the control of Salmonella by heat, lactic acid and alkaline treatment and for the control of STEC subjected to heat.

Recent Advances in Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Research in Latin America

Pathogenic Escherichia coli are known to be a common cause of diarrheal disease and a frequently occurring bacterial infection in children and adults in Latin America. Despite the effort to combat diarrheal infections, the south of the American continent remains a hot spot for infections and sequelae associated with the acquisition of one category of pathogenic E. coli, the Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC). This review will focus on an overview of the prevalence of different STEC serotypes in human, animals and food products, focusing on recent reports from Latin America outlining the recent research progress achieved in this region to combat disease and endemicity in affected countries and to improve understanding on emerging serotypes and their virulence factors. Furthermore, this review will highlight the progress done in vaccine development and treatment and will also discuss the effort of the Latin American investigators to respond to the thread of STEC infections by establishing a multidisciplinary network of experts that are addressing STEC-associated animal, human and environmental health issues, while trying to reduce human disease. Regardless of the significant scientific contributions to understand and combat STEC infections worldwide, many significant challenges still exist and this review has focus in the Latin American efforts as an example of what can be accomplished when multiple groups have a common goal.

Comparison of the Efficacy of a Sulfuric Acid-Sodium Sulfate Blend and Lactic Acid for the Reduction of Salmonella on Prerigor Beef Carcass Surface Tissue

A study was conducted to compare the efficacy of a commercially available sulfuric acid-sodium sulfate blend (SSS) and lactic acid (LA) in reducing inoculated Salmonella populations on beef. Sixty pieces of prerigor beef carcass surface brisket tissue, collected directly from the processing line of a commercial beef processing plant, were cut into two sections (10 by 10 cm each) and spot inoculated (6 to 7 log CFU/cm2) on the adipose side with a six-strain mixture of Salmonella. One section per piece of brisket tissue was left untreated (control), while the second section was spray treated (5 s, 15 lb/in2, and 33 mL/s flow rate) with unheated (21°C) or heated (52°C) solutions of SSS (pH 1.1) or LA (4%). Unheated and heated SSS lowered (P < 0.05) total bacterial counts from 6.3 to 4.6 and 4.3 log CFU/cm2, respectively. Likewise, unheated and heated LA reduced (P < 0.05) total bacterial counts from 6.3 to 4.7 and 4.4 log CFU/cm2, respectively. Initial counts of inoculated Salmonella populations (6.1 to 6.2 log CFU/cm2) were reduced (P < 0.05) to 4.2 and 3.9 log CFU/cm2 following treatment with unheated and heated SSS, respectively, and to 3.7 and 3.8 log CFU/cm2 after treatment with unheated and heated LA, respectively. Overall, the temperature of the chemical solutions had a small (0.3 log CFU/cm2), but significant (P < 0.05), effect on total bacterial counts but not (P > 0.05) on Salmonella counts. Regardless of solution temperature, Salmonella counts for LA-treated samples were 0.3 log CFU/cm2 lower (P < 0.05) than those of samples treated with SSS. These results indicate that both unheated and heated solutions of SSS and LA are effective interventions for reducing Salmonella contamination on prerigor beef carcass surface tissue.

Effect of Exposure Time and Organic Matter on Efficacy of Antimicrobial Compounds against Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli and Salmonella

Several antimicrobial compounds are in commercial meat processing plants for pathogen control on beef carcasses. However, the efficacy of the method used is influenced by a number of factors, such as spray pressure, temperature, type of chemical and concentration, exposure time, method of application, equipment design, and the stage in the process that the method is applied. The objective of this study was to evaluate effectiveness of time of exposure of various antimicrobial compounds against nine strains of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and four strains of Salmonella in aqueous antimicrobial solutions with and without organic matter. Non-O157 STEC, STEC O157:H7, and Salmonella were exposed to the following aqueous antimicrobial solutions with or without beef purge for 15, 30, 60, 120, 300, 600, and 1,800 s: (i) 2.5% lactic acid, (ii) 4.0% lactic acid, (iii) 2.5% Beefxide, (iv) 1% Aftec 3000, (v) 200 ppm of peracetic acid, (vi) 300 ppm of hypobromous acid, and (vii) water as a control. In general, increasing exposure time to antimicrobial compounds significantly (P ≤ 0.05) increased the effectiveness against pathogens tested. In aqueous antimicrobial solutions without organic matter, both peracetic acid and hypobromous acid were the most effective in inactivating populations of STEC and Salmonella, providing at least 5.0-log reductions with exposure for 15 s. However, in antimicrobials containing organic matter, 4.0% lactic acid was the most effective compound in reducing levels of STEC and Salmonella, providing 2- to 3-log reductions with exposure for 15 s. The results of this study indicated that organic matter and exposure time influenced the efficacy of antimicrobial compounds against pathogens, especially with oxidizer compounds. These factors should be considered when choosing an antimicrobial compound for an intervention.