1
|
Pinarelli Fazion J, Marzoli F, Pezzuto A, Bertola M, Antonelli P, Dolzan B, Barco L, Belluco S. A systematic review of experimental studies on Salmonella persistence in insects. NPJ Sci Food 2023; 7:44. [PMID: 37640696 PMCID: PMC10462725 DOI: 10.1038/s41538-023-00223-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The consumption of insects as food and feed has been recently suggested as a possible alternative to the rising global food need, thus it is crucial to monitor any potential food safety hazards in the insect supply chain. The aims of this systematic review were to collect, select, and evaluate studies investigating the persistence of Salmonella in insects. We searched PUBMED, EMBASE, WEB of Science Core Collection, and Food Science and Technology Abstracts. In total, 36 papers investigating the persistence of Salmonella in insects (both holometabolous and heterometabolous) were included after screening. Regarding complete metamorphosis insects, the longest Salmonella persistence was reported in Phormia regina, in which the pathogen persisted for 29 days at 5 °C. Similarly, Salmonella persisted in the feces of Alphitobius diaperinus for 28 days. The incomplete metamorphosis insect showing the longest Salmonella persistence (>10 months) was Blatella germanica. Periplaneta americana excreted Salmonella via feces for 44 days until all the insects were dead. The retrieved data on the persistence of Salmonella can be useful for further analysis by risk assessors and decision-makers involved in the safety of insect-based food, contributing to defining the sanitary requirements and risk mitigation measures along the supply chain. The review protocol is registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42022329213).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Pinarelli Fazion
- Laboratory of Safety and Quality of the Food Chain, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Delle Venezie, Viale Fiume 78, 36100, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Filippo Marzoli
- Laboratory of Safety and Quality of the Food Chain, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Delle Venezie, Viale Fiume 78, 36100, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Alessandra Pezzuto
- WOAH and Italian National Reference Laboratory for Salmonella and, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell'Università 10, 35020, Legnaro (PD), Italy
- Laboratory of hygiene and safety of the food chain, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Via Calvecchia 4, 30027, San Donà di Piave (VE), Italy
| | - Michela Bertola
- WOAH and Italian National Reference Laboratory for Diseases at the Animal/Human Interface and Laboratory of Parasitology, Micology and Sanitary Entomology, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell'Università 10, 35020, Legnaro (PD), Italy
| | - Pietro Antonelli
- WOAH and Italian National Reference Laboratory for Salmonella and, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell'Università 10, 35020, Legnaro (PD), Italy
| | - Beatrice Dolzan
- Laboratory of Safety and Quality of the Food Chain, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Delle Venezie, Viale Fiume 78, 36100, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Lisa Barco
- WOAH and Italian National Reference Laboratory for Salmonella and, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell'Università 10, 35020, Legnaro (PD), Italy
| | - Simone Belluco
- Laboratory of Safety and Quality of the Food Chain, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Delle Venezie, Viale Fiume 78, 36100, Vicenza, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gehring KB, Sawyer JE, Arnold AN. Longitudinal evaluation of Salmonella in environmental components and peripheral lymph nodes of fed cattle from weaning to finish in three distinct feeding locations. J Food Prot 2023; 86:100062. [PMID: 37005037 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
Salmonella prevalence in bovine lymph nodes (LNs) varies due to seasonality, geographic location, and feedyard environment. The objectives of this study were to (1) establish prevalence rates of Salmonella in environmental components (trough water, pen soil, individual feed ingredients, prepared rations, and fecal samples) and LNs from weaning to finish in three feeding locations, and (2) characterize recovered salmonellae. Calves (n = 120) were raised at the Texas A&M University McGregor Research Center; in lieu of beginning the backgrounding/stocker phase, thirty weanling calves were harvested. Of the remaining ninety calves, thirty were retained at McGregor and sixty were transported to commercial feeding operations (Location A or B; thirty calves each). Locations A and B have historically produced cattle with relatively "low" and "high" rates of Salmonella-positive LNs, respectively. Ten calves per location were harvested at the conclusion of (1) the backgrounding/stocker phase, (2) 60 d on feed, and (3) 165 d on feed. On each harvest day, peripheral LNs were excised. Environmental samples were obtained from each location before and after each phase, and every 30 d during the feeding period. In line with previous work, no Salmonella-positive LNs were recovered from cattle managed at Location A. Salmonella-positive LNs (30%) and environmental components (41%) were most commonly recovered from Location B. Of 7 and 36 total serovars recovered from Salmonella-positive LN and environmental samples, respectively, Anatum was identified most frequently. Data from this study provide insight into Salmonella prevalence differences among feeding locations and the possible influence of environmental and/or management practices at each. Such information can be used to shape industry best practices to reduce Salmonella prevalence in cattle feeding operations, resulting in a decreased prevalence of Salmonella in LNs, and thus, minimizing risks to human health.
Collapse
|
3
|
Edrington TS, Brown TR. A Commentary on Salmonella From a Pre-Harvest Perspective. FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fanim.2022.877392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Salmonella occurs in all the major meat producing livestock species (ruminants, swine and poultry), most often residing within the gastrointestinal tract asymptomatically. While considerable success has been achieved post-harvest, the design of effective pre-harvest interventions to control Salmonella has lagged. A simplistic view of the extremely complex host/pathogen interaction suggests that the pathogen has a vested interest in not causing illness or death to the host. The former would initiate an immune response from the host and/or the application of therapeutic antibacterial agents, while the latter would require finding another suitable host. Due to the widespread prevalence of Salmonella within livestock and poultry, and the relatively few salmonellosis cases in comparison, it appears, and is supported by new research, that Salmonella has developed methods to avoid detection by the animal’s immune system and live essentially as a commensal organism within the gastrointestinal tract of the animal. Yet, for reasons that are not fully understood, this “commensal” Salmonella does on occasion become virulent, in young and mature animals alike. Indeed, these researchers have documented Salmonella carriage throughout the year in cattle, but only rarely, if at all, was salmonellosis observed. Further, evaluation of Salmonella isolates (serotype and antimicrobial resistance patterns) from sick and healthy cattle failed to explain that while Salmonella was present in the majority of cattle sampled on that farm, only a few developed salmonellosis. Virulence, as well as multi-drug resistance, in both livestock and humans appears to cluster within a few serotypes. As a result, petitions are circulating calling for the labeling of some Salmonella serotypes as adulterants, as was done with Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other enterohemorrhagic E. coli strains. Regulators are considering approaching the Salmonella problem by serotype, such as focusing specifically on the top 10 reported serotypes causing human illness. Herein, the authors will discuss the many challenges of controlling Salmonella pre-harvest, reflecting on the significant research portfolio that has been generated over the last 25 years, as well as challenging existing paradigms surrounding this pathogen and the experimental methods used to further our understanding of Salmonella and/or evaluate methods of control.
Collapse
|
4
|
Xie Y, Thompson T, O'Leary C, Crosby S, Nguyen QX, Liu M, Gill JJ. Differential Bacteriophage Efficacy in Controlling Salmonella in Cattle Hide and Soil Models. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:657524. [PMID: 34262535 PMCID: PMC8273493 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.657524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Asymptomatic Salmonella carriage in beef cattle is a food safety concern and the beef feedlot environment and cattle hides are reservoirs of this pathogen. Bacteriophages present an attractive non-antibiotic strategy for control of Salmonella in beef. In this study, four diverse and genetically unrelated Salmonella phages, Sergei, Season12, Sw2, and Munch, were characterized and tested alone and in combination for their ability to control Salmonella in cattle hide and soil systems, which are relevant models for Salmonella control in beef production. Phage Sergei is a member of the genus Sashavirus, phage Season12 was identified as a member of the Chivirus genus, Sw2 was identified as a member of the T5-like Epseptimavirus genus, and Munch was found to be a novel “jumbo” myovirus. Observed pathogen reductions in the model systems ranged from 0.50 to 1.75 log10 CFU/cm2 in hides and from 0.53 to 1.38 log10 CFU/g in soil, with phages Sergei and Sw2 producing greater reductions (∼1 log10 CFU/cm2 or CFU/g) than Season12 and Munch. These findings are in accordance with previous observations of phage virulence, suggesting the simple ability of a phage to form plaques on a bacterial strain is not a strong indicator of antimicrobial activity, but performance in liquid culture assays provides a better predictor. The antimicrobial efficacies of phage treatments were found to be phage-specific across model systems, implying that a phage capable of achieving bacterial reduction in one model is more likely to perform well in another. Phage combinations did not produce significantly greater efficacy than single phages even after 24 h in the soil model, and phage-insensitive colonies were not isolated from treated samples, suggesting that the emergence of phage resistance was not a major factor limiting efficacy in this system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yicheng Xie
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.,Center for Phage Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Tyler Thompson
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Chandler O'Leary
- Center for Phage Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.,Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Stephen Crosby
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Quang X Nguyen
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Mei Liu
- Center for Phage Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Jason J Gill
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.,Center for Phage Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Horton BC, Gehring KB, Sawyer JE, Arnold AN. Evaluation of Autogenous Vaccine Use in Mitigating Salmonella in Lymph Nodes from Feedlot Cattle in Texas. J Food Prot 2021; 84:80-86. [PMID: 32853371 DOI: 10.4315/jfp-20-171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Managing the presence of Salmonella in ground beef has been an ongoing challenge for the beef industry. Salmonella prevalence can vary regionally, seasonally, and within the animal, making the development of interventions difficult. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of an autogenous Salmonella vaccine in mitigating Salmonella in lymph nodes (LNs) of feedlot cattle. An autogenous vaccine was developed using the most common Salmonella enterica serovars (Salmonella Kentucky, Salmonella Anatum, Salmonella Muenchen, Salmonella Montevideo, and Salmonella Mbandaka) identified from cattle managed at a South Texas feedlot with historically high Salmonella prevalence. Fifty-five heifers were selected for even distribution across five groups: (i) BASE, which received no autogenous vaccinations and were harvested after the stocker stage, (ii) CNTRL, which received no autogenous vaccinations, (iii) FARM, which received autogenous vaccinations at the ranch only, (iv) SPLIT, which received autogenous vaccinations at both the ranch and feedlot, and (v) YARD, which received vaccinations at the feedlot only. One heifer each from the BASE and CNTRL groups did not complete the study. All treatment groups except BASE were harvested after reaching market weight. Left and right superficial cervical and subiliac LNs from each carcass were collected and analyzed for Salmonella presence, and positive samples were serotyped. No salmonellae were recovered from LNs derived from BASE, FARM, SPLIT, or YARD groups. Cattle in the BASE group were expected to have a low occurrence of Salmonella based on previous research. However, the percentage of Salmonella-positive animals in the CNTRL group was 20.0% (2 of 10), which is lower than expected based on historical data from the same feeding location. There could be several causes of decreased Salmonella presence in the LNs of control cattle, creating an opportunity for future investigation into the development of preharvest interventions to combat Salmonella in feedlots. HIGHLIGHTS
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brogan C Horton
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, 2471 TAMU, College Station, Texas 77843-2471 (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6346-9437 [A.N.A.]); and
| | - Kerri B Gehring
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, 2471 TAMU, College Station, Texas 77843-2471 (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6346-9437 [A.N.A.]); and
| | - Jason E Sawyer
- King Ranch Institute for Ranch Management, Texas A&M University, Kingsville, MSC 137, Kingsville, Texas 78363, USA
| | - Ashley N Arnold
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, 2471 TAMU, College Station, Texas 77843-2471 (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6346-9437 [A.N.A.]); and
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Population Dynamics of Salmonella enterica within Beef Cattle Cohorts Followed from Single-Dose Metaphylactic Antibiotic Treatment until Slaughter. Appl Environ Microbiol 2019; 85:AEM.01386-19. [PMID: 31519659 DOI: 10.1128/aem.01386-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Antibiotic use in cattle can select for multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica, which is considered a serious threat by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A randomized controlled longitudinal field trial was designed to determine the long-term effects of a single dose of ceftiofur or tulathromycin on Salmonella population characteristics in cattle feces and peripheral lymph nodes and on hides. A total of 134 beef cattle from two sources were divided among 12 pens, with cattle in each of the 3-pen blocks receiving a single dose of either ceftiofur or tulathromycin or neither (control) on day 0. Fecal samples were collected before treatment (day 0) and repeatedly following treatment until slaughter (day 99+). Hide and lymph node samples were collected at slaughter age. Salmonella prevalence, phenotypic antimicrobial resistance, serotype, and phylogenetic relationships were examined. Multilevel mixed logistic regression models indicated no significant effects (P ≥ 0.218) of metaphylactic antibiotics on the prevalence of Salmonella across sample types. However, there was a significant time effect observed, with prevalence increasing from spring through the midsummer months (P < 0.0001) in feces. The majority of Salmonella isolates were pansusceptible to a panel of 14 antibiotics both before and after treatment. Highly prevalent Salmonella serotypes were Salmonella enterica serovar Montevideo, Salmonella enterica serovar Anatum, Salmonella enterica serovar Cerro, and Salmonella enterica serovar Lubbock across all sample types. Strong pen and cattle source serotype clustering effects were observed among Salmonella isolates originating from fecal, lymph node, and hide samples; however, the potential role of Salmonella isolates from the pen environment prior to animal placement was not assessed in this study.IMPORTANCE Salmonella is a leading bacterial foodborne pathogen, causing a significant number of human infections and deaths every year in the United States. Macrolides and 3rd-generation cephalosporins play critical roles in the treatment of human salmonellosis. Use of these antibiotics in beef cattle can select for resistant bacteria that may enter the food chain or spread from the farm via manure. There is a lack of longitudinal research concerning the long-term effects of metaphylactic antibiotic administration. Here, we assessed Salmonella population dynamics during the feeding period until slaughter following single-dose antibiotic treatment. We found no long-term effects of antibiotic use early in the cattle-feeding period on Salmonella prevalence and antimicrobial resistance at slaughter. We identified the pens in which cattle were housed as the factor that contributed most to Salmonella serotypes being shared; importantly, the dominant strain in each pen changed repeatedly over the entire feeding period.
Collapse
|
7
|
Jones-Ibarra AM, Alvarado CZ, Caldwell DH, Byrd JA, Taylor TM. Salmonella recovery from chicken bone marrow and cecal counts differ by pathogen challenge method. Poult Sci 2019; 98:4104-4112. [DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
8
|
Neutral barcoding of genomes reveals the dynamics of Salmonella colonization in cattle and their peripheral lymph nodes. Vet Microbiol 2018; 220:97-106. [PMID: 29885808 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Revised: 05/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Feedlot cattle often contain Salmonella. The number of bacteria that initiate colonization of different cattle organs and the bacterial migration within these large animals are poorly understood. To investigate these questions, we constructed wild-type isogenic tagged strains (WITS) of Salmonella by inserting 21-base barcodes flanked by Illumina sequencing primers into a neutral genome location. We then delivered several different pools of uniquely barcoded clones orally and into multiple intradermal sites, in individual Holstein steers, and subsequently performed Salmonella-directed sequence tag-based analysis of microbial populations (STAMP). Using high-throughput sequencing of the barcodes of Salmonella grown from steer lymph nodes, organs and feces, we monitored how individual barcoded clones travel from different entry sites within animals. Data showed that gastrointestinal colonization was established by up to hundreds of Salmonella founder cells, whereas peripheral lymph nodes were usually colonized by very low numbers of founding bacteria, often originating from the nearest draining intradermal delivery site. Transmission of Salmonella from the gastrointestinal tract to the lymphatic system was frequently observed, whereas entry of intradermally delivered bacteria into the gut was rare. Bacteria undergo limited extraintestinal proliferation within or prior to arrival at peripheral lymph nodes. Overall, the application of the STAMP technique facilitated characterization of the migration routes and founder population size of Salmonella within feedlot cattle and their organs and lymph nodes in unprecedented detail.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bailey G, Huynh L, Govenlock L, Jordan D, Jenson I. Low Prevalence of Salmonella and Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Lymph Nodes of Australian Beef Cattle. J Food Prot 2017; 80:2105-2111. [PMID: 29166174 DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-17-180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Salmonella contamination of ground beef has been viewed as originating from the surface of carcasses. Recent studies have identified lymph nodes as a potential source of Salmonella contamination because these tissues play an active role in containment of pathogens in the live animal and because some lymph nodes are unavoidably present in manufacturing beef trimmings or primal cuts that may be incorporated into ground beef. A survey was conducted of the microbiological status of lymph nodes from Australian cattle at the time of slaughter to determine the prevalence of microbiological contamination. Sets of lymph nodes (n = 197), consisting of the superficial cervical (prescapular), prepectoral, axillary, presternal, popliteal, ischiatic, subiliac (precrural), coxalis, and iliofemoralis (deep inguinal), were collected from five geographically separated Australian abattoirs over a period of 14 months. Samples were tested for the presence of Salmonella spp. and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli by BAX PCR assay. Aerobic plate count, E. coli, and coliforms were enumerated with a lower limit of detection of 80 CFU per node. The observed prevalence of Salmonella within peripheral lymph nodes was 0.48% (7 of 1,464). Two of the seven lymph nodes in which Salmonella organisms were detected came from the same animal. Grass-fed, grain-fed, and cull dairy cattle were all found to have detectable Salmonella in lymph nodes. All Salmonella detections occurred during cooler months of the year. No Shiga toxin-producing E. coli were detected. Aerobic microorganisms were detected above the limit of quantification in 3.2% of nodes (median count 2.24 log per node), and E. coli was detected in 0.8% of nodes (median count 3.05 log per node). The low prevalence of Salmonella and low concentration of aerobic microorganisms in Salmonella-positive lymph nodes of Australian cattle at the time of slaughter suggest that the likelihood of lymph nodes contributing significantly to the presence of Salmonella in ground beef is low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin Bailey
- 1 DTS Food Assurance, 148 Tennyson Memorial Avenue, Brisbane, Queensland 4105, Australia
| | - Long Huynh
- 2 Meat & Livestock Australia, P.O. Box 1961, North Sydney, New South Wales 2059, Australia (ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3111-4217 [I.J.]); and
| | - Lachlan Govenlock
- 1 DTS Food Assurance, 148 Tennyson Memorial Avenue, Brisbane, Queensland 4105, Australia
| | - David Jordan
- 3 New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, 1243 Bruxner Highway, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2477, Australia (ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1763-9551 )
| | - Ian Jenson
- 2 Meat & Livestock Australia, P.O. Box 1961, North Sydney, New South Wales 2059, Australia (ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3111-4217 [I.J.]); and
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Webb HE, Brichta-Harhay DM, Brashears MM, Nightingale KK, Arthur TM, Bosilevac JM, Kalchayanand N, Schmidt JW, Wang R, Granier SA, Brown TR, Edrington TS, Shackelford SD, Wheeler TL, Loneragan GH. Salmonella in Peripheral Lymph Nodes of Healthy Cattle at Slaughter. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:2214. [PMID: 29170662 PMCID: PMC5684184 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
To more fully characterize the burden of Salmonella enterica in bovine peripheral lymph nodes (PLN), PLN (n = 5,450) were collected from healthy cattle at slaughter in 12 commercial abattoirs that slaughtered feedlot-fattened (FF) cattle exclusively (n = 7), cattle removed (or culled) from breeding herds (n = 3), or both FF and cull cattle (n = 2). Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to estimate prevalence and concentration of Salmonella in PLN. Isolates were subjected to a variety of phenotypic, serological, and molecular assays. Overall, Salmonella prevalence in PLN from FF and cull cattle was 7.1 and 1.8%. However, burden varied by season in that observed prevalence in PLN collected in cooler or warmer seasons was 2.4 and 8.2%, respectively. Prevalence in PLN from cull cattle in the southwest region of the US was 2.1 and 1.1% for cool and warm seasons, respectively; however, prevalence in FF PLN was far greater in that it was 6.5 and 31.1%, respectively. Salmonella was recovered from 289 (5.6%) PLN and 2.9% (n = 160) of all PLN tested had quantifiable concentrations that varied from 1.6 to 4.9 log10 colony forming units/PLN. The most common serotypes isolated from PLN were Montevideo (26.9%), Lille (14.9%), Cerro (13.0%), Anatum (12.8%), and Dublin (6.9%). In all, 376 unique isolates were collected from the 289 Salmonella-positive PLN. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed the majority (80.6%) of these isolates were pansusceptible; however, 10.7% of isolates were found to be resistant to two or more antimicrobial classes. We were able to document an observed increased in prevalence of Salmonella in PLN during the warmer season, particularly in FF cattle from the southwest region of the US. The mechanisms underlying the observed association between season, region, and production source have yet to be elucidated. Nevertheless, these findings increase our understanding of the sources of contamination of beef products and shed light on transmission dynamics that may be useful in targeting these sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hattie E Webb
- International Center for Food Industry Excellence, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States
| | - Dayna M Brichta-Harhay
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States
| | - Mindy M Brashears
- International Center for Food Industry Excellence, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States
| | - Kendra K Nightingale
- International Center for Food Industry Excellence, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States
| | - Terrance M Arthur
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States
| | - Joseph M Bosilevac
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States
| | - Norasak Kalchayanand
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States
| | - John W Schmidt
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States
| | - Rong Wang
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States
| | - Sophie A Granier
- Laboratory for Food Safety, ANSES, Université Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | | | | | - Steven D Shackelford
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States
| | - Tommy L Wheeler
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States
| | - Guy H Loneragan
- International Center for Food Industry Excellence, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|