1
|
Michaels BS, Ayers T, Brooks-McLaughlin J, McLaughlin RJ, Sandoval-Warren K, Schlenker C, Ronaldson L, Ardagh S. Potential for Glove Risk Amplification via Direct Physical, Chemical, and Microbiological Contamination. J Food Prot 2024; 87:100283. [PMID: 38679200 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
This review focuses on the potential direct physical, chemical, and microbiological contamination from disposable gloves when utilized in food environments, inclusive of the risks posed to food products as well as worker safety. Unrecognized problems endemic to glove manufacturing were magnified during the COVID-19 pandemic due to high demand, increased focus on PPE performance, availability, supply chain instability, and labor shortages. Multiple evidence-based reports of contamination, toxicity, illness, deaths, and related regulatory action linked to contaminated gloves in food and healthcare have highlighted problems indicative of systemic glove industry shortcomings. The glove manufacturing process was diagramed with sources and pathways of contamination identified, indicating weak points with documented occurrences detailed. Numerous unsafe ingredients can introduce chemical contaminants, potentially posing risks to food and to glove users. Microbial hazards present significant challenges to overall glove safety as contaminants appear to be introduced via polluted water sources or flawed glove manufacturing processes, resulting in increased risks within food and healthcare environments. Frank and opportunistic pathogens along with food spoilage organisms can be introduced to foods and wearers. When the sources and pathways of glove-borne contamination were explored, it was found that physical failures play a pivotal role in the release of sweat build-up, liquefaction of chemical residues, and incubation of microbial contaminants from hands and gloves. Thus, with glove physical integrity issues, including punctures in new, unused gloves that can develop into significant rips and tears, not only can direct physical food contamination occur but also chemical and microbiological contamination can find their way into food. Enhanced regulatory requirements for Acceptable Quality Limits of food-grade gloves, and the establishment of appropriate bioburden standards would enhance safety in food applications. Based on the information provided, together with a false sense of security associated with glove use, the unconditional belief in glove chemical and microbiological purity may be unfounded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barry S Michaels
- B. Michaels Group Inc., 487 West River Road, Palatka, FL 32177, USA.
| | - Troy Ayers
- Eurofins Microbiology Laboratories Inc., Des Moines, IA 50321, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Lynda Ronaldson
- Eagle Protect PBC, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150, USA; Eagle Protect Ltd. Christchurch 8011, New Zealand
| | - Steve Ardagh
- Eagle Protect PBC, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150, USA; Eagle Protect Ltd. Christchurch 8011, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Holst MM, Salinas S, Tellier WT, Wittry BC. Environmental Antecedents of Foodborne Illness Outbreaks, United States, 2017-2019. J Food Prot 2024; 87:100293. [PMID: 38718983 PMCID: PMC11213657 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
Foodborne outbreak investigations often provide data for public health officials to determine how the environment contributed to the outbreak and on how to prevent future outbreaks. State and local health departments are responsible for investigating foodborne illness outbreaks in their jurisdictions and reporting the data to national-level surveillance systems, including information from the environmental assessment. This assessment is designed to describe how the environment contributed to the outbreak and identifies factors that contributed to the outbreak and environmental antecedents to the outbreak. Environmental antecedents, also referred to as root causes, are specific reasons that allow biological or chemical agents to contaminate, survive, or grow in food. From 2017 to 2019, 24 jurisdictions reported 1,430 antecedents from 393 outbreaks to the National Environmental Assessment Reporting System. The most reported antecedents were lack of oversight of employees/enforcement of policies (89.1%), lack of training of employees on specific processes (74.0%), and lack of a food safety culture/attitude towards food safety (57.5%). These findings highlight the critical role that employees play in restaurant food safety and are heavily influenced by restaurant management, who can exercise active managerial control to manage these antecedents. Identifying antecedents during investigations is essential for understanding the outbreak's root cause and implementing sustainable corrective actions to stop the immediate outbreak and future outbreaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan M Holst
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, 4770 Buford Highway, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
| | - Sabrina Salinas
- Harris County Public Health, Environmental Public Health, 1111 Fannin Street, Houston 77002, USA
| | - Waimon T Tellier
- Washington State Department of Health, Office of Communicable Disease Epidemiology, 1610 NE 150th Street, Shoreline, WA 98155, USA
| | - Beth C Wittry
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, 4770 Buford Highway, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rickamer Hoover E, Masters M, Johnson J, McKelvey W, Hedeen N, Ripley D, Brown L. Restaurant and Staff Characteristics Related to Practices that Could Contribute to Cross-Contamination. J Food Prot 2023; 86:100182. [PMID: 37863320 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
Foodborne illness is a persistent public health concern in the U.S.; over 800 foodborne illness outbreaks are reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) annually. Most of these outbreaks (60%) are linked with restaurants. Contamination of food with foodborne pathogens during preparation and storage is a significant contributing factor to many of these outbreaks. The CDC's Environmental Health Specialists Network (EHS-Net) collected data to identify restaurant characteristics, policies, and practices associated with contamination prevention practices. Data collectors interviewed managers and conducted kitchen observations in 312 restaurants across six EHS-Net sites in five states. Data collectors observed at least one food worker action that could lead to contamination in 63.1% of restaurants. The most frequently observed action that could lead to contamination was bare-hand or dirty glove contact with ready-to-eat food (35.9%). The estimated mean number of observed potential contamination actions was greater in restaurants that were independently owned (does not share a name and operations with other restaurants), did not require managers to be certified in food safety, did not have workers trained in food safety, did not have a handwashing policy, did not have a policy minimizing bare-hand contact with ready-to-eat foods, and had a manager with more than two years of experience at their current restaurant. These results suggest that to improve contamination prevention, the foodservice industry and food safety officials can consider supporting and encouraging strong food safety training and policies, particularly concerning hand hygiene, and targeting interventions to independent restaurants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Rickamer Hoover
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
| | - Matthew Masters
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
| | - Jona Johnson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
| | - Wendy McKelvey
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY 10013, USA
| | - Nicole Hedeen
- Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN 55164, USA
| | - Danny Ripley
- Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, TN 37243, USA
| | - Laura Brown
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fanaselle W, Pouillot R, Papafragkou E, Liggins G, Williams L, Doren JMVAN. Evaluation of the Impact of Compliance with Mitigation Strategies and Frequency of Restaurant Surface Cleaning and Sanitizing on Control of Norovirus Transmission from Ill Food Employees Using an Existing Quantitative Risk Assessment Model. J Food Prot 2022; 85:1177-1191. [PMID: 35358310 DOI: 10.4315/jfp-21-423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Reduction of foodborne illness caused by norovirus (NoV) continues to be a focus for the food safety community. Using a previously published quantitative risk assessment model, we evaluated more than 60 scenarios examining the impact of implementation of and compliance with risk management strategies identified in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Food Code for (a) surface cleaning and sanitizing, (b) hand hygiene, (c) exclusion, or (d) restriction of ill employees. Implementation of and compliance with hand hygiene and ill food employee exclusion strategies had the largest impact on the predicted number of highly contaminated food servings and associated consumer illnesses. In scenarios in which gloves were always worn and hand washing compliance was 90%, the model estimated reductions in the number of highly contaminated food servings and ill consumers to 39 and 43% of baseline estimates (i.e., typical practice), respectively. Reductions were smaller when gloves were never worn. Hand washing compliance after using the restroom strongly impacted predicted numbers of highly contaminated servings and consumer illnesses. Ten percent compliance with removing or excluding ill food employees was predicted to increase the number of highly contaminated food servings and ill consumers to 221 and 213% of baseline estimates, respectively. Ninety-four percent compliance with exclusion of ill food employees was predicted to decrease these numbers to 69 and 71% of baseline estimates, respectively. Surface cleaning in food establishments had a relatively small impact on these measures. Restriction of food employees (removed from contact with food and food contact equipment and utensils) was not effective for reducing NoV illness unless this restriction included additional provisions. The results from this study can help risk managers prioritize mitigation strategies and their implementation for controlling the transmission of NoV and subsequent consumer foodborne illness. HIGHLIGHTS
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Fanaselle
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA
| | - Régis Pouillot
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA
| | - Efstathia Papafragkou
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA
| | - Girvin Liggins
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA
| | - Laurie Williams
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA
| | - Jane M VAN Doren
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wittry BC, Holst MM, Anderberg J, Hedeen N. Operational Antecedents Associated with Clostridium perfringens Outbreaks in Retail Food Establishments, United States, 2015-2018. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2022; 19:209-216. [PMID: 35006004 PMCID: PMC10025997 DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2021.0068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Clostridium perfringens is a common foodborne pathogen, frequently associated with improper cooking, and cooling or reheating of animal products. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration Food Code outlines proper food preparation practices to prevent foodborne outbreaks; however, retail food establishments continue to have C. perfringens outbreaks. We qualitatively analyzed responses to two open-ended questions from the National Environmental Assessment Reporting System (NEARS) to understand patterns of unique circumstances in the retail food establishment that precede a C. perfringens outbreak. We identified three environmental antecedents, with three subcategories, to create nine operational antecedents to help explain why a C. perfringens outbreak occurred. Those antecedents included factors related to (1) people (a lack of adherence to food safety procedures, a lack of food safety culture, and no active managerial control), (2) processes (increased demand, a process change during food preparation, and new operations), and (3) equipment (not enough equipment, malfunctioning cold-holding equipment, and holding equipment not used as intended). We recommend that food establishments support food safety training and certification programs and adhere to a food safety management plan to reduce errors made by people and processes. Retail food establishments should conduct routine maintenance on equipment and use only properly working equipment for temperature control. They also should train workers on the purpose, use, and functionality of the equipment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth C Wittry
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Meghan M Holst
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Janet Anderberg
- Food Safety Program, Washington State Department of Health, Olympia, Washington, USA
| | - Nicole Hedeen
- Environmental Health Division, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|