1
|
Haley BJ, Salaheen S, Kim SW, Van Kessel JA. Virulome analysis of Escherichia coli ST117 from bovine sources identifies similarities and differences with strains isolated from other food animals. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0296514. [PMID: 38175844 PMCID: PMC10766182 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Escherichia coli ST117 is a pandemic extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) causing significant morbidity globally. Poultry are a known reservoir of this pathogen, but the characteristics of ST117 strains from other animal sources have not been adequately investigated. Here we characterize the genomes of 36 ST117 strains recovered primarily from preweaned dairy calves, but also from older postweaned calves and lactating cows, in the context of other bovine-associated strains and strains from poultry, swine, and humans. Results of this study demonstrate that bovine-associated ST117 genomes encode virulence factors (VFs) known to be involved in extraintestinal infections, but also occasionally encode the Shiga toxin, a virulence factor (VF) involved in severe gastrointestinal infections and more frequently identified in E. coli from ruminants than other animals. Bovine-associated ST117 genomes were also more likely to encode afa-VIII (adhesins), pap (P-fimbriae), cdt (cytolethal distending toxin), and stx (Shiga toxins) than were poultry and swine-associated genomes. All of the ST117 genomes were grouped into seven virulence clusters, with bovine-associated genomes grouping into Clusters 1, 2, 4, 5, but not 3, 6, or 7. Major differences in the presence of virulence factors between clusters were observed as well. Antimicrobial resistance genes were detected in 112 of 122 (91%) bovine-associated genomes, with 103 of these being multidrug-resistant (MDR). Inclusion of genomes that differed from ST117 by one multi-locus sequence type (MLST) allele identified 31 STs, four of these among the bovine-associated genomes. These non-ST117 genomes clustered with the ST117 genomes suggesting that they may cause similar disease as ST117. Results of this study identify cattle as a reservoir of ST117 strains, some of which are highly similar to those isolated from other food animals and some of which have unique bovine-specific characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradd J. Haley
- Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States of America
| | - Serajus Salaheen
- Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States of America
| | - Seon Woo Kim
- Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States of America
| | - Jo Ann Van Kessel
- Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wilhelm B, Fossen J, Gow S, Waldner C. A Scoping Review of Antimicrobial Usage and Antimicrobial Resistance in Beef Cow-Calf Herds in the United States and Canada. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1177. [PMID: 37508273 PMCID: PMC10376086 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12071177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The magnitude and knowledge gaps regarding antimicrobial use (AMU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) have not been summarized for the North American cow-calf production sector, although estimates of AMU and AMR are essential to AMR risk analysis. The objectives of this scoping review were to map AMU and AMR in the beef cow-calf sector in Canada and the United States, summarize published AMU/AMR predictors, and identify research gaps. METHODS An electronic search was conducted of four bibliographic databases and Google Scholar, augmented by a hand-search of captured studies. RESULTS Twenty-three of three-hundred and forty-three publications screened advanced to data extraction. Of these, 10 were conducted in the USA and 13 in Canada. Thirteen studied AMR and twelve studied AMU, with two reporting both. Of twelve captured AMU studies, nine presented counts of herd AMU by antimicrobial class or specific antimicrobial. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli (E. coli) was reported in nine studies. Risk factors for AMU include herd size, vaccine use, and start date of calving season. CONCLUSIONS Overall, a small number of AMR studies were available for synthesis in primarily one population (cows) reporting E. coli AMR. Additional studies targeting reasons for AMU in calves, the impact of management procedures on AMU, potential environmental AMR sources, and AMR in respiratory pathogens and enteric organisms other than E. coli for pre-weaning calves are required to inform AMR risk mitigation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jayce Fossen
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B4, Canada
| | - Sheryl Gow
- Public Health Agency of Canada, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B4, Canada
| | - Cheryl Waldner
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guragain M, Schmidt JW, Kalchayanand N, Dickey AM, Bosilevac JM. Characterization of Escherichia coli harboring colibactin genes (clb) isolated from beef production and processing systems. Sci Rep 2022; 12:5305. [PMID: 35351927 PMCID: PMC8964808 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09274-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Certain strains of Escherichia coli possess and express the toxin colibactin (Clb) which induces host mutations identical to the signature mutations of colorectal cancer (CRC) that lead to tumorigenic lesions. Since cattle are a known reservoir of several Enterobacteriaceae including E. coli, this study screened for clb amongst E. coli isolated from colons of cattle-at-harvest (entering beef processing facility; n = 1430), across the beef processing continuum (feedlot to finished subprimal beef; n = 232), and in ground beef (n = 1074). Results demonstrated that clb+E. coli were present in cattle and beef. Prevalence of clb+E. coli from colonic contents of cattle and ground beef was 18.3% and 5.5%, respectively. clb+E. coli were found susceptible to commonly used meat processing interventions. Whole genome sequencing of 54 bovine and beef clb+ isolates showed clb occurred in diverse genetic backgrounds, most frequently in phylogroup B1 (70.4%), MLST 1079 (42.6%), and serogroup O49 (40.7%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manita Guragain
- Meat Safety and Quality Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, State Spur 18D, P.O. Box 166, Clay Center, Nebraska, 68933, USA
| | - John W Schmidt
- Meat Safety and Quality Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, State Spur 18D, P.O. Box 166, Clay Center, Nebraska, 68933, USA
| | - Norasak Kalchayanand
- Meat Safety and Quality Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, State Spur 18D, P.O. Box 166, Clay Center, Nebraska, 68933, USA
| | - Aaron M Dickey
- Meat Safety and Quality Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, State Spur 18D, P.O. Box 166, Clay Center, Nebraska, 68933, USA
| | - Joseph M Bosilevac
- Meat Safety and Quality Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, State Spur 18D, P.O. Box 166, Clay Center, Nebraska, 68933, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weinroth MD, Thomas KM, Doster E, Vikram A, Schmidt JW, Arthur TM, Wheeler TL, Parker JK, Hanes AS, Alekoza N, Wolfe C, Metcalf JL, Morley PS, Belk KE. Resistomes and microbiome of meat trimmings and colon content from culled cows raised in conventional and organic production systems. Anim Microbiome 2022; 4:21. [PMID: 35272712 PMCID: PMC8908682 DOI: 10.1186/s42523-022-00166-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The potential to distribute bacteria resistant to antimicrobial drugs in the meat supply is a public health concern. Market cows make up a fifth of the U.S. beef produced but little is known about the entire population of bacteria (the microbiome) and entirety of all resistance genes (the resistome) that are found in this population. The objective of this study was to characterize and compare the resistomes and microbiome of beef, dairy, and organic dairy market cows at slaughter. METHODS Fifty-four (N = 54) composite samples of both colon content and meat trimmings rinsate samples were collected over six visits to two harvest facilities from cows raised in three different production systems: conventional beef, conventional dairy, and organic dairy (n = 3 samples per visit per production system). Metagenomic DNA obtained from samples were analyzed using target-enriched sequencing (resistome) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing (microbiome). RESULTS All colon content samples had at least one identifiable antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG), while 21 of the 54 meat trimmings samples harbored at least one identifiable ARGs. Tetracycline ARGs were the most abundant class in both colon content and carcass meat trimmings. The resistome found on carcass meat trimmings was not significantly different by production system (P = 0.84, R2 = 0.00) or harvest facility (P = 0.10, R2 = 0.09). However, the resistome of colon content differed (P = 0.01; R2 = 0.05) among production systems, but not among the harvest facilities (P = 0.41; R2 = 0.00). Amplicon sequencing revealed differences (P < 0.05) in microbial populations in both meat trimmings and colon content between harvest facilities but not production systems (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS These data provide a baseline characterization of an important segment of the beef industry and highlight the effect that the production system where cattle are raised and the harvest facilities where an animal is processed can impact associated microbiome and resistomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret D Weinroth
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Kevin M Thomas
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Enrique Doster
- Department of Microbiology Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Amit Vikram
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, USA
- Intralytix, Columbia, MD, 21046, USA
| | - John W Schmidt
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, USA
| | - Terrance M Arthur
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, USA
| | - Tommy L Wheeler
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, USA
| | - Jennifer K Parker
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Ayanna S Hanes
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Najla Alekoza
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Cory Wolfe
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Jessica L Metcalf
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Paul S Morley
- Veterinary Education, Research, and Outreach Program, Texas A&M University and West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, 79105, USA.
| | - Keith E Belk
- Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schmidt JW, Murray SA, Dickey AM, Wheeler TL, Harhay DM, Arthur TM. Twenty-Four-Month Longitudinal Study Suggests Little to No Horizontal Gene Transfer In Situ between Third-Generation Cephalosporin-Resistant Salmonella and Third-Generation Cephalosporin-Resistant Escherichia coli in a Beef Cattle Feedyard. J Food Prot 2022; 85:323-335. [PMID: 34788437 DOI: 10.4315/jfp-21-371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs) are preferred treatments for serious human Salmonella enterica infections. Beef cattle are suspected to contribute to human 3GC-resistant Salmonella infections. Commensal 3GC-resistant Escherichia coli are thought to act as reservoirs of 3GC resistance because these strains are isolated more frequently than are 3GC-resistant Salmonella strains at beef cattle feedyards. During each of 24 consecutive months, four samples of pen surface material were obtained from five pens (N = 480) at a Nebraska feedyard to determine to the contribution of 3GC-resistant E. coli to the occurrence of 3GC-resistant Salmonella. Illumina whole genome sequencing was performed, and susceptibility to 14 antimicrobial agents was determined for 121 3GC-susceptible Salmonella, 121 3GC-resistant Salmonella, and 203 3GC-resistant E. coli isolates. 3GC-susceptible Salmonella isolates were predominantly from serotypes Muenchen (70.2%) and Montevideo clade 1 (23.1%). 3GC-resistant Salmonella isolates were predominantly from serotypes Montevideo clade 2 (84.3%). One bla gene type (blaCMY-2) and the IncC plasmid replicon were present in 100 and 97.5% of the 3GC-resistant Salmonella, respectively. Eleven bla gene types were detected in the 3GC-resistant E. coli, which were distributed across 42 multilocus sequence types. The blaCMY-2 gene and IncC plasmid replicon were present in 37.9 and 9.9% of the 3GC-resistant E. coli, respectively. These results suggest that 3GC resistance in Salmonella was primarily due the persistence of Salmonella Montevideo clade 2 with very minimal or no contribution from 3GC-resistant E. coli via horizontal gene transfer and that 3GC-resistant E. coli may not be a useful indicator for 3GC-resistant Salmonella in beef cattle production environments. HIGHLIGHTS
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John W Schmidt
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933, USA
| | - Sarah A Murray
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933, USA
| | - Aaron M Dickey
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933, USA
| | - Tommy L Wheeler
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933, USA
| | - Dayna M Harhay
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933, USA
| | - Terrance M Arthur
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Haley BJ, Van Kessel JAS. The resistome of the bovine gastrointestinal tract. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2021; 73:213-219. [PMID: 34492620 DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The gastrointestinal tracts of beef and dairy cattle are reservoirs of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, and our knowledge of the ecology of resistance in these animals has changed with the advent of novel molecular technologies. Application of metagenomics and qPCR to the study of bovine gut ecology has demonstrated that there is overlap, with some differences, between beef and dairy cattle fecal resistomes, that treatment with antimicrobials often transiently influences the resistome, and young calves carry a high abundance of ARGs. Future work should harness emerging metagenome sequencing technologies to better describe the taxa harboring ARGs and collocated non-resistance genes and use these data along with identifying the multiplicity of factors driving resistance to develop strategies to reduce AMR carriage in cattle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradd J Haley
- Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA.
| | - Jo Ann S Van Kessel
- Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|