Transoral robotic surgery vs open surgery in head and neck cancer. A systematic review of the literature

Transoral robotic surgery with free flap reconstruction: Functional outcomes of 241 patients at a single institution

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal malignancy optimizes oncologic outcomes while preserving functionality. This study identifies patterns of functional recovery after TORS with free flap reconstruction (FFR).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care center of patients with primary oropharyngeal tumors treated with TORS with FFR between 2010 and 2022. Patients were categorized into: adjuvant chemoradiation or radiation, or no adjuvant therapy (NAT). Functional outcomes were measured by functional oral intake scale (FOIS).

RESULTS

241 patients were included. FOIS declined at first postoperative appointment (median = 7.0 to 2.0, IQR = [7.0, 7.0], [2.0, 4.0]), and progressively improved to 6.0 (5.0, 6.0) after 1 year, with NAT having the highest FOIS (7.0, p < 0.05). Predictors of poor long-term FOIS included RT and hypoglossal nerve (CN XII) involvement (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TORS with FFR leads to good long-term function with minimal intake restrictions. Radiation therapy and CN XII involvement increase risk of worse functional outcomes.

Transoral robotic surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of primary unknown head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A preliminary single centre experience

BACKGROUND

Squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) in the head and neck is difficult to diagnose and treat. This report outlines 11 cases of CUP treated with transoral robotic surgery (TORS), aimed at investigating the diagnostic efficiency of primary tumour and radical resection effectiveness of TORS.

METHODS

11 cases of CUP among 68 oropharyngeal cancer patients treated by TORS were analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

All the 11 cases received TORS with cervical lymph node dissection. Primary tumours were found in 8 cases (72.7%), 4 cases in the palatine tonsil and 4 cases in the base of the tongue. The average diameter of the primary tumour was 1.65 cm. All patients resumed eating by mouth within 24 h, no tracheotomy, no pharyngeal fistula and no postoperative death. The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

TORS can improve the diagnostic efficiency of primary tumour of CUP and achieve good oncology and functional results.

Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review on the role of margin status

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays, robotic surgery finds application in the field of head and neck in the treatment of oropharyngeal tumors. The aim of this work is to examine the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in performing safe oncological resections of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), with particular attention to the status of margins.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Literature search of English-language studies focused on TORS through PubMed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases. A total of 431 papers returned to search, but only 24 met the inclusion criteria. The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Guidelines.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Within the selected studies, the overall rate of OPSCC positive margins following TORS is minimal, especially when patient selection is adequate and when TORS is used by high volume centers.

CONCLUSIONS

TORS is a very precise and viable therapeutic tool that provides good results in terms of surgical radicality with low positive margin rates and good results in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival; however, there is still a great heterogeneity in margins definition within the available literature. Consequently, even if this surgical approach is very promising, it is still challenging to draw firm conclusions nowadays.

Surgical margins in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A narrative review

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a prevalent and frequently recurring malignancy, often necessitates surgical intervention. The surgical margin (SM) plays a pivotal role in determining the postoperative treatment strategy and prognostic evaluation of HNSCC. Nonetheless, the process of clinical appraisal and assessment of the SMs remains a complex and indeterminate endeavor, thereby leading to potential difficulties for surgeons in defining the extent of resection. In this regard, we undertake a comprehensive review of the suggested surgical distance in varying circumstances, diverse methods of margin evaluation, and the delicate balance that must be maintained between tissue resection and preservation in head and neck surgical procedures. This review is intended to provide surgeons with pragmatic guidance in selecting the most suitable resection techniques, and in improving patients' quality of life by achieving optimal functional and aesthetic restoration.

Effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery for recurrent head and neck cancers: a systematic review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the best available evidence regarding effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery in patients with recurrent head and neck cancers.

INTRODUCTION

Transoral robotic surgery is now an established modality of treatment for primary head and neck cancer, showing good swallowing outcomes and quality of life for patients post-treatment. In patients with recurrent disease, conventional open surgery is often used, which prolongs recovery time and necessitates tissue disruption to gain access to the tumor site. Transoral robotic surgery is an emerging technique in this field as a minimally invasive approach to resection.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

The review will include experimental or observational studies that investigated the use of transoral robotic surgery in adults (aged 18 years or older) with recurrent head and neck cancers for oncological, functional, and survival outcomes.

METHODS

Three databases will be searched for evidence: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Search terms for each database will include transoral robotic surgery, recurrent, salvage , and head and neck cancers . Reference lists of included articles will be searched for further evidence. Critical appraisal will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers using the JBI critical appraisal tools for quantitative studies. Data will be extracted by the same reviewers. Where appropriate, meta-analysis will be conducted for all outcomes.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023404613.

Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal and Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

With oropharyngeal cancer incidence rising globally, largely due to human papillomavirus (HPV), and hypopharyngeal cancer known for poor outcomes, innovative treatments are needed. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) offers a minimally invasive approach that may improve upon traditional open surgery and radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy (RT/CRT) methods. We conducted a literature review and included 40 PubMed studies comparing TORS, open surgery, and RT/CRT for oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), focusing on survival rates and swallowing function outcomes. TORS provides favorable survival outcomes and typically results in superior swallowing function post-treatment compared to other therapeutic modalities in both oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal SCCs. The clinical benefits of TORS, including improved operative precision and minimized tissue disruption, along with the elimination of surgical incision recovery and reduced RT toxicity, suggest it is a valuable surgical approach for head and neck cancers.

A Narrative Review on Intraoperative Adverse Events: Risks, Prevention, and Mitigation

INTRODUCTION

Adverse events from surgical interventions are common. They can occur at various stages of surgical care, and they carry a heavy burden on the different parties involved. While extensive research and efforts have been made to better understand the etiologies of postoperative complications, more research on intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) remains to be done.

METHODS

In this article, we reviewed the literature looking at iAEs to discuss their risk factors, their implications on surgical care, and the current efforts to mitigate and manage them.

RESULTS

Risk factors for iAEs are diverse and are dictated by patient-related risk factors, the nature and complexity of the procedures, the surgeon's experience, and the work environment of the operating room. The implications of iAEs vary according to their severity and include increased rates of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality, increased length of hospital stay and readmission, increased care cost, and a second victim emotional toll on the operating surgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

While transparent reporting of iAEs remains a challenge, many efforts are using new measures not only to report iAEs but also to provide better surveillance, prevention, and mitigation strategies to reduce their overall adverse impact.

New Medical Device and Therapeutic Approvals in Otolaryngology: State of the Art Review of 2022

Objective

To review new drugs and devices relevant to otolaryngology approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2022.

Data Sources

Publicly available FDA data on drugs and devices approved in 2022.

Review Methods

A preliminary screen was conducted to identify drugs and devices relevant to otolaryngology. A secondary screen by members of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery's (AAO-HNS) Medical Devices and Drugs Committee differentiated between minor updates and new approvals. The final list of drugs and devices was sent to members of each subspecialty for review and analysis.

Conclusion

A total of 1251 devices and 37 drugs were identified on preliminary screening. Of these, 329 devices and 5 drugs were sent to subspecialists for further review, from which 37 devices and 2 novel drugs were selected for further analysis. The newly approved devices spanned all subspecialties within otolaryngology. Many of the newly approved devices aimed to enhance patient experience, including over-the-counter hearing aids, sleep monitoring devices, and refined CPAP devices. Other advances aimed to improve surgical access, convenience, or comfort in the operating room and clinic.

Implications for Practice

Many new devices and drugs are approved each year to improve patient care and care delivery. By staying up to date with these advances, otolaryngologists can leverage new innovations to improve the safety and quality of care. Given the recent approval of these devices, further studies are needed to assess long-term impact within the field of otolaryngology.

Oncological and functional outcomes of transoral surgery compared with non-surgical management in small-volume oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review is to investigate oncological and functional outcomes following primary transoral surgery compared with non-surgical management in patients with small-volume (T1-2, N0-2) oropharyngeal cancer.

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of oropharyngeal cancer is rising. Transoral surgery was introduced to provide a minimally invasive treatment option for patients with small-volume oropharyngeal cancer and to avoid the morbidity that results from open surgery and the potential acute and late toxicities of chemoradiotherapy.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

The review will include all studies on adult patients with small-volume oropharyngeal cancer managed by transoral surgery or non-surgical management with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. All patients must have undergone treatment with curative intent. Participants who underwent palliative treatment will be excluded.

METHODS

This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. Eligible study designs will include randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and prospective or retrospective cohort studies. Databases to be searched will include PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, and multiple trial registries from 1972. Titles and abstracts will be reviewed, and full-text articles will be retrieved if they meet the inclusion criteria. All eligible studies will be critically appraised by 2 independent reviewers using the appropriate JBI tools for experimental and observational designs. Where possible, outcome data from studies will be pooled with statistical meta-analysis to compare both oncological and functional outcomes between the two groups. All time to event to data will be converted to a common metric for oncological outcomes. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be followed to assess the certainty of findings.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD4202235209.

Reconstruction of head and neck oncological soft tissue defects post-resection using robotic surgery: a systematic review of the current literature

Head and neck cancer (HNC) resection often leaves soft tissue defects and exposure of vital structures. In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of robotic surgery for HNC resections. This allows for achieving smaller defects by using a tissue-sparing approach. However, this poses a challenge for reconstruction with less space available to perform microsurgery. We reviewed the efficacy of robotic surgery in the reconstruction of HNC defects by assessing the impact on flap success and complication rates. A literature search was conducted on Pubmed, Prospero, Dynamed, DARE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases. A total of 14 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria with 96 patients aged mean (range) 60.7 (29-87) years, undergoing robotic reconstruction. The radial forearm flap was the most commonly used flap for robot-assisted reconstruction (n = 47). Robotic graft inset was performed in 94 cases and robotic assisted microvascular anastomoses for 25 vessels. One hundred per cent of flaps survived with a total of 25 (26.0%) complications (wound healing (n = 7), fistula formation (n = 2), haematoma (n = 4), dehiscence (n = 10), and wound infection (n = 2). Seven (12.2%) patients required additional surgery for managing complications and revision of the flap. Fewer complications were seen in patients undergoing robotic-assisted microvascular anastomoses compared with open anastomoses (4.0% versus 34.2%, p < 0.05). Robot-assisted reconstruction in HNC defects demonstrates 100% success rate with minor associated complications. Our results also support feasibility in both flap inset and microvascular anastomoses. Our results also demonstrate feasibility in both flap inset and microvascular anastomoses. Significantly fewer complications were seen with robotic-assisted microvascular anastomoses compared with open anastomoses.

Thunderbeat®: a new step forward in transoral surgery-systematic review of literature and our experience

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive surgery is today the main challenge of ENT surgeons who aim to achieve oncological radicality with less aesthetic and functional impact. This is the basis for the widespread transoral surgical techniques, as the Thunderbeat^®.

OBJECTIVE

To date, the use of Thunderbeat^® in transoral surgery is still little known and widespread. So, this study analyzes, with a systematic review, current literature about the transoral use of Thunderbeat^® and shows our case studies.

METHODS

The research was carried out on Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane databases using specific keywords. Then, a retrospective study was carried out on 10 patients who underwent transoral surgery by Thunderbeat^® in our ENT Clinic. Both in our cases and in the systematic review the following parameters have been evaluated: treated anatomical site and subsite, histological diagnosis, type of surgery, duration of nasogastric tube and hospitalization, post-operative complications, tracheostomy, resection margin status.

RESULTS

The review included 3 articles that described transoral use of Thunderbeat^® for a total of 31 patients suffering from oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal and/or laryngeal carcinoma. Nasogastric tube was removed after 21.5 days on average, temporary tracheostomy was performed in 6 patients. The main complications were: bleeding (12.90%) and pharyngocutaneous fistula (29.03%). Thunderbeat^® shaft was 35 cm long and 5 mm large. Our case studies included 5 males and 5 females, mean age 64.4 ± 10.28, with oropharyngeal or supraglottic carcinoma, parapharyngeal pleomorphic adenoma and cavernous hemangioma of the tongue base. Temporary tracheostomy was performed in 8 patients. Free resection margins were achieved in all cases (100%). No peri-operative complications occurred. Nasogastric tube was removed after 5.3 ± 2 days on average. All patients were discharged without tracheal tube and NGT after 18.2 ± 4.72 days on average.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that Thunderbeat^® has several advantages over other transoral surgical approaches, such as CO2 laser and robotic surgery, in terms of best combination of oncological and functional success, less post-operative complications and costs. So, it could represent a step forward in transoral surgery.

Oropharyngeal reconstruction after transoral robotic surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has experienced an evolution in recent years. This technique has proved to be a safe and effective method for extirpation of select oropharyngeal tumors. Advances in technology as well as improved surgeon experience allow for the resection of larger, more complex cancers. Although healing by secondary intention remains the current standard for limited oropharyngeal defects, larger resections demand reconstruction with vascularized tissue to minimize morbidity and optimize functional outcomes. The objective of this review is to evaluate recent literature regarding oropharyngeal reconstruction after TORS.

RECENT FINDINGS

A variety of reconstructive options to manage oropharyngeal defects exist. Several reconstructive algorithms have been suggested; however, careful consideration must be used to select the most ideal flap type. Locoregional flaps have shown excellent functional outcomes with limited morbidity. An increase in free flap reconstruction has been demonstrated, particularly among patients with larger TORS defects and following chemoradiation therapy. Despite limited data, robotic-assisted flap inset and microvascular anastomosis has recently shown promise.

SUMMARY

Reconstruction and flap selection following TORS should be tailored to the patient and unique oropharyngeal defect. Functional outcomes are promising with low complication rates among these patients.

Acute Swallowing Outcomes After Surgical Resection of Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancers With the Mandibular Lingual Release Approach

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence, nature, severity, and recovery of early dysphagia in patients following surgical resection of oral and/or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with a mandibular lingual release approach (MLRA).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary head and neck cancer center.

METHODS

Inclusion of patients' after surgical resection of oral cavity and/or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma via an MLRA between 2012 and 2017. Data collection included acute medical care, enteral feeding, and swallowing outcomes derived from clinical swallow examination and videofluoroscopic swallowing study assessments at baseline, after surgery, and prior to discharge.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were eligible for participation (23 males; mean age, 63 years). Baseline clinical swallow examination findings revealed that 32% (n = 9) were tolerating normal diet and fluids preoperatively (Functional Oral Intake Scale [FOIS] = 7). Following surgery, the majority (n = 21, 75%) experienced severe dysphagia (FOIS ≤4), of which 15 were nil by mouth. Twelve patients received a postoperative videofluoroscopic swallowing study, with silent aspiration observed in 9 cases. At discharge, 12 (43%) patients had persistent severe functional dysphagia (FOIS ≤4) with ongoing enteral feeding requirements, of which 7 were nil by mouth. Eleven (39%) were managing diets of modified fluid/diet consistencies (FOIS = 5), and 5 (18%) had mild dysphagia (FOIS ≥6) at discharge. None were able to manage a normal diet. The average length of hospital stay was 27.9 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Early dysphagia post-MLRA is a common and often severe complication of surgery. Patients require extended hospital admission with prolonged enteral feeding, which may persist postdischarge. This cohort requires early intervention by speech-language pathology services to aid swallow rehabilitation.

Practice patterns in transoral robotic surgery: results of an American head and neck society survey

To understand perioperative practices for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) among academic medical centers. An electronic cross-sectional survey was distributed to fellows and program directors participating in 49 American Head and Neck Society fellowships. Operative decisions, medical and swallowing management, and disposition planning were assessed. Thirty-eight responses were collected (77.6%). Twenty-three centers (60.5%) performed > 25 cases annually with the remainder performing fewer. The da Vinci Si was the most commonly used platform (n = 28, 73.7%). A majority of institutions advocated tailored resection to adequate margins (n = 27, 71.1%) over fixed subunit-based resection (n = 11, 28.9%). Most surgeons (n = 29, 76.3%) performed neck dissection concurrent with TORS, and 89.5% (n = 34) routinely ligated external carotid artery branches. A minority of institutions (n = 17, 45.9%) endorsed a standardized TORS care pathway. Antibiotic choices and duration varied, the most common choice being ampicillin/sulbactam (n = 21, 55.3%), and the most common duration being 24 h or less (n = 22, 57.9%). Multimodal analgesia was used at 36 centers (94.7%), steroids at 31 centers (81.6%), and pharmacologic venous thromboembolic prophylaxis at 29 centers (76.3%). Nasogastric feeding tubes were placed during surgery at 20 institutions (54.1%). Speech-language pathologists routinely performed postoperative swallow evaluations at 29 (78.4%) sites. Practice patterns are variable among institutions performing TORS. While certain surgical and postoperative practices were quite common, many institutions reported no standard TORS care pathway. Further understanding of the impact of individual practices on outcomes is necessary to develop evidence-based perioperative protocols for TORS.

Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided surgery in head and neck cancer: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of indocyanine green (ICG) for image-guided resection of head and neck cancer (HNC).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases.

REVIEW METHODS

Searches were conducted from database inception to February 2022. Patient and study characteristics, imaging parameters, and imaging efficacy data were extracted from each study.

RESULTS

Nine studies met inclusion criteria, representing 103 head and neck tumors. Weighted mean ICG dose and imaging time were 1.27 mg/kg and 11.77 h, respectively. Among the five studies that provided quantitative metrics of imaging efficacy, average ICG tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) was 1.56 and weighted mean ONM-100 TBR was 3.64. Pooled sensitivity and specificity across the five studies were 91.7 % and 71.9 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

FGS with ICG may facilitate real-time tumor-margin delineation to improve margin clearance rates and progression-free survival. Future studies with validated, quantitative metrics of imaging success are necessary to further evaluate the prognostic benefit of these techniques.

Methodology in Conventional Head and Neck Reconstruction Following Robotic Cancer Surgery: A Bridgehead Robotic Head and Neck Reconstruction

PURPOSE

Robotic head and neck surgery is widespread nowadays. However, in the reconstruction field, the use of robotic operations is not. This article aimed to examine methodologies for conventional head and neck reconstruction after robotic tumor surgery in an effort to obtain further options for future reconstruction manipulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who received head and neck robot surgery and conventional reconstructive surgery between October 2016 and September 2021.

RESULTS

In total, 53 cases were performed. 67.9% of the tumors were greater than 4 cm. Regarding defect size, 47.2% of the lesions were greater than 8 cm. In terms of TNM stage, stage 3 disease was recorded in 26.4% and stage 4 in 52.8%. To make a deep and narrow field wider, we changed the patient's posture in pre-op field, additional dissection was done. We used radial forearm flap mostly (62.2%).

CONCLUSION

Conventional head and neck reconstruction after robotic ENT cancer surgery is possible. One key step is to secure additional space in the deep and narrow space left after robotic surgery. For this, we opted for a radial forearm flap mostly. This can be performed as a bridgehead to perform robotic head and neck reconstruction.

Survival Outcomes Related to Treatment Modalities in Patients With Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

More patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) in Eastern countries receive surgically inclusive treatment (SIT), while most patients in Western countries receive nonsurgical treatment (NST). The optimal treatment modality for OPSCC patients remains controversial.

METHODS

A total of 153 consecutive OPSCC cases diagnosed between 2009 and 2019 in West China Hospital (WCH) and 15,400 OPSCC cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000-2017) were obtained. Clinical characteristics, treatments, and survival outcomes were retrospectively collected. We constructed Kaplan-Meier curves and performed univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) analyses to compare the prognosis of OPSCC patients among the WCH, SEER Asian, and SEER all ethnic populations by different treatment modality, human papilloma virus (HPV) infection status, age, and tumor stage.

RESULTS

Overall, the proportions of patients with younger age, advanced tumors and HPV-negative status, and receiving SIT in WCH population were higher than those in the SEER all ethnic population, while the proportions in the SEER Asian population were between those of the other two populations. We observed consistent beneficial effects of SIT on the overall survival (OS) in OPSCC patients in all three populations (SEER Asian: MVA, hazard ratio (HR): 0.2, p < .001; SEER all ethnic: MVA, HR: 0.46, p < .001; WCH: UVA, HR: 0.62, p = .071), and HPV-negative Asian patients showed greater benefits from the SIT than HPV-positive Asian patients (HPV Negative: HR: 0.16, p = .005; HPV positive: HR = 0.28, p = .059). Male was a risk factor for reduced OS in OPSCC patients in the WCH population (HR: 3.17, p = .043), but was a protective factor in the SEER population (HR: 0.8, p = .002), which might be related to the differences of HPV infection status.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though differences in patient characteristics existed between the Chinese, American, and Asian American populations, our ten-year real-world data and SEER data suggested that patients with OPSCC who received SIT had a better prognosis than those who received NST.

Transoral robotic cordectomy for glottic carcinoma: a rapid review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate feasibility, surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of transoral robotic cordectomy (TORS-Co) and whether TORS-Co reported comparable outcomes of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM).

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched by three laryngologists for studies investigating feasibility, surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of patients benefiting from TORS-Co. The following outcomes were investigated according to the PRISMA statements: age; cT stage; types of cordectomy; surgical settings; complications; and functional and feasibility features.

RESULTS

Nine studies published between 2009 and 2021 met our inclusion criteria, accounting for 114 patients. There was no controlled study. TORS-Co was performed in cT1 or cT2 glottic cancer through types II, III, IV, V, or VI cordectomies. The exposure was inadequate in 4% of cases, leading to conversion in transoral laser cordectomy. Margins were positive in 4.5% and local recurrence occurred in 10.7% (N = 8/75). Tracheotomy and feeding tube requirement varied across studies, depending on the types of TORS-Co. The mean duration of robot installation/vocal cord exposure and operative times ranged from 20 to 42 min and 10 to 40 min, respectively. The mean duration of hospital stay ranged from 2 to 7 days. Complications included dyspnea, bleeding, granuloma, synechia, and tongue hematoma and dysesthesia.

CONCLUSION

The current robotic systems do not appear adequate for TORS-Co. TORS-Co was associated with higher rates of complications and tracheotomy than TLM.

Dysphagia, hypothyroidism, and osteoradionecrosis after radiation therapy for head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the long-term side effects of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS

Retrospective chart analysis of all 688 HNC patients treated during 2010-2015 at Turku University Hospital, Finland. All patients who survived for more than a year after RT/chemoRT were included (n = 233). Intensity modulated RT (IMRT) with standard fractionation was applied in each case.

RESULTS

One hundred and six patients (45%) reported persisting dysphagia, for which neck RT increased risk. Definitive neck RT to high-risk volume did not increase late toxicity risks compared to elective neck RT. Radiation-induced hypothyroidism (29%, n = 67) was more common among younger patients and females. Osteoradionecrosis (12%, n = 29) was more common in the oral cavity cancer group (20.7%, n = 92) compared to all other subsites.

CONCLUSIONS

Late toxicities of RT for HNC are common. Age, gender, tumor subsite, and neck RT affect susceptibility to long-term side effects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treatment in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

While head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are marginally decreasing due to the reduction in exposure to the major risk factors, tobacco and alcohol, the incidence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharynx squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC), especially those in the tonsil and base of tongue subsites, are increasing. Patients with the latter are younger, display a longer overall survival, and show a lower recurrence rate after standard-of-care treatment than those with HPV-negative OPSCC. This may reflect an important role for immune surveillance and control during the natural history of the virally driven tumour development. Immune deviation through acquisition of immune-suppressive factors in the tumour microenvironment (TME) is discussed in relation to treatment response. Understanding how the different immune factors are integrated in the TME battleground offers opportunities for identifying prognostic biomarkers as well as novel therapeutic strategies. OPSCC generally receive surgery or radiotherapy for early-stage tumour treatment, but many patients present with locoregionally advanced disease requiring multimodality therapies which can involve considerable complications. This review focuses on the utilization of newly emerged immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1/PD-L1 pathway) for treatment of HNSCC, in particular HPV-positive OPSCC, since they could be less toxic and more efficacious. PD-1/PD-L1 expression in the TME has been extensively investigated as a biomarker of patient response but is yet to provide a really effective means for stratification of treatment. Extensive testing of combinations of therapeutic approaches by types and sequencing will fuel the next evolution of treatment for OPSCC.

Indications and Clinical Outcomes of Transoral Robotic Surgery and Free Flap Reconstruction

We reviewed the indications, peroperative feasibility, and postoperative clinical outcomes of our first 50 consecutive patients who underwent free flap reconstruction after TORS for complex pharyngeal defects at our institution. We analyzed indications according to previous radiotherapy, the size of the resection, and the transoral exposure of critical structures. We reviewed surgical data, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes comprising tracheostomy and alimentation management. Indications were upfront surgery (34%), a second primary surgery after radiotherapy (28%), or salvage surgery after chemoradiotherapy failure (38%). Localizations were the tongue base (44%), tonsillar fossa (28%), pharyngeal wall (22%), and soft palate (6%). T-classifications were T1 (6%), T2 (52%), T3 (20%), and T4 (22%). The mean length of the surgery was 574 min. Two patients were intraoperatively converted to a conventional approach at the beginning of the learning curve. In conclusion, TORS and free flap reconstruction in complex situations were associated with low rates of postoperative complications and satisfactory functional outcomes. They were, however, associated with a renewed learning curve.

Transoral robotic surgery versus nonrobotic resection of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) compared to nonrobotic surgery (NRS) on overall survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). We performed a retrospective study of patients with HPV+ and HPV- OPSCC undergoing TORS or NRS with neck dissection using the National Cancer Database from the years 2010-2016. Among patients with OPSCC in our cohort, 3167 (58.1%) patients underwent NRS and 2288 (41.9%) underwent TORS. TORS patients demonstrated better overall survival than NRS patients (HPV+ patients: aHR 0.74, p = 0.02; HPV- patients: aHR 0.58, p < 0.01). Subsite analysis showed TORS was correlated with improved survival in base of tongue (BoT) primaries for both HPV+ (aHR 0.46, p = 0.01) and HPV- (aHR 0.42, p = 0.01) OPSCC. Compared to NRS, TORS is associated with improved overall survival for HPV+ and HPV- OPSCC, as well as greater overall survival for BoT primaries.