Chromatin boundary elements organize genomic architecture and developmental gene regulation in Drosophila Hox clusters

The Ty1 retrotransposon harbors a DNA region that performs dual functions as both a gene silencing and chromatin insulator

In various eukaryotic kingdoms, long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons repress transcription by infiltrating heterochromatin generated within their elements. In contrast, the budding yeast LTR retrotransposon Ty1 does not itself undergo transcriptional repression, although it is capable of repressing the transcription of the inserted genes within it. In this study, we identified a DNA region within Ty1 that exerts its silencing effect via sequence orientation. We identified a DNA region within the Ty1 group-specific antigen (GAG) gene that causes gene silencing, termed GAG silencing (GAGsi), in which the silent chromatin in the GAGsi region is created by euchromatin-specific histone modifications. A characteristic inverted repeat (IR) sequence is present at the 5' end of this region, forming a chromatin boundary between promoter-specific chromatin upstream of the IR sequence and silent chromatin downstream of the IR sequence. In addition, Esc2 and Rad57, which are involved in DNA repair, were required for GAGsi silencing. Finally, the chromatin boundary was required for the transcription of Ty1 itself. Thus, the GAGsi sequence contributes to the creation of a chromatin environment that promotes Ty1 transcription.

Precisely timed regulation of enhancer activity defines the binary expression pattern of Fushi tarazu in the Drosophila embryo

The genes that drive development each typically have many different enhancers. Properly coordinating the action of these different enhancers is crucial to correctly specifying cell-fate decisions, yet it remains poorly understood how their activity is choregraphed in time. To shed light on this question, we used recently developed single-cell live imaging tools to dissect the regulation of Fushi tarazu (Ftz) in Drosophila melanogaster embryos. Ftz is a transcription factor that is expressed in asymmetric stripes by two distinct enhancers: autoregulatory and zebra. The anterior edge of each stripe needs to be sharply defined to specify essential lineage boundaries. Here, we tracked how boundary cells commit to either a high-Ftz or low-Ftz fate by measuring Ftz protein traces in real time and simultaneously quantifying transcription from the endogenous locus and individual enhancers. This revealed that the autoregulatory enhancer does not establish this fate choice. Instead, it perpetuates the decision defined by zebra. This is contrary to the prevailing view that autoregulation drives the fate decision by causing bi-stable Ftz expression. Furthermore, we showed that the autoregulatory enhancer is not activated based on a Ftz-concentration threshold but through a timing-based mechanism. We hypothesize that this is regulated by several ubiquitously expressed pioneer-like transcription factors, which have recently been shown to act as timers in the embryo. Our work provides new insight into how precisely timed enhancer activity can directly regulate the dynamics of gene regulatory networks, which may be a general mechanism for ensuring that embryogenesis runs like clockwork.

Mechanisms of Interaction between Enhancers and Promoters in Three Drosophila Model Systems

In higher eukaryotes, the regulation of developmental gene expression is determined by enhancers, which are often located at a large distance from the promoters they regulate. Therefore, the architecture of chromosomes and the mechanisms that determine the functional interaction between enhancers and promoters are of decisive importance in the development of organisms. Mammals and the model animal Drosophila have homologous key architectural proteins and similar mechanisms in the organization of chromosome architecture. This review describes the current progress in understanding the mechanisms of the formation and regulation of long-range interactions between enhancers and promoters at three well-studied key regulatory loci in Drosophila.

Insulators in Plants: Progress and Open Questions

The genomes of higher eukaryotes are partitioned into topologically associated domains or TADs, and insulators (also known as boundary elements) are the key elements responsible for their formation and maintenance. Insulators were first identified and extensively studied in Drosophila as well as mammalian genomes, and have also been described in yeast and plants. In addition, many insulator proteins are known in Drosophila, and some have been investigated in mammals. However, much less is known about this important class of non-coding DNA elements in plant genomes. In this review, we take a detailed look at known plant insulators across different species and provide an overview of potential determinants of plant insulator functions, including cis-elements and boundary proteins. We also discuss methods previously used in attempts to identify plant insulators, provide a perspective on their importance for research and biotechnology, and discuss areas of potential future research.

Chromatin dynamics and the transcriptional competence of HSV-1 genomes during lytic infections

During latent infections with herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1), viral transcription is restricted and the genomes are mostly maintained in silenced chromatin, whereas in lytically infected cells all viral genes are transcribed and the genomes are dynamically chromatinized. Histones in the viral chromatin bear markers of silenced chromatin at early times in lytic infection or of active transcription at later times. The virion protein VP16 activates transcription of the immediate-early (IE) genes by recruiting transcription activators and chromatin remodelers to their promoters. Two IE proteins, ICP0 and ICP4 which modulate chromatin epigenetics, then activate transcription of early and late genes. Although chromatin is involved in the mechanism of activation of HSV- transcription, its precise role is not entirely understood. In the cellular genome, chromatin dynamics often modulate transcription competence whereas promoter-specific transcription factors determine transcription activity. Here, biophysical fractionation of serially digested HSV-1 chromatin followed by short-read deep sequencing indicates that nuclear HSV-1 DNA has different biophysical properties than protein-free or encapsidated HSV-1 DNA. The entire HSV-1 genomes in infected cells were equally accessible. The accessibility of transcribed or non-transcribed genes under any given condition did not differ, and each gene was entirely sampled in both the most and least accessible chromatin. However, HSV-1 genomes fractionated differently under conditions of generalized or restricted transcription. Approximately 1/3 of the HSV-1 DNA including fully sampled genes resolved to the most accessible chromatin when HSV-1 transcription was active, but such enrichment was reduced to only 3% under conditions of restricted HSV-1 transcription. Short sequences of restricted accessibility separated genes with different transcription levels. Chromatin dynamics thus provide a first level of regulation on HSV-1 transcription, dictating the transcriptional competency of the genomes during lytic infections, whereas the transcription of individual genes is then most likely activated by specific transcription factors. Moreover, genes transcribed to different levels are separated by short sequences with limited accessibility.

Although chromatin epigenetics modulate transcription of the nuclear replicating DNA viruses, and play major roles in the process of establishment of, and reactivation from, latency, the specific mechanisms of this modulation are not totally clear. Chromatin often regulates the transcriptional competency of cellular genes, rather than the actual level of transcription of individual genes. Here, we show that chromatin dynamics regulate the transcription competency of entire herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) genomes, rather than the actual transcription level of individual genes. Moreover, CTCF/ insulator containing sequences flanking the immediate-early gene loci are more inaccessible when these genes are highly transcribed in a context of little transcription from the rest of the genome than when no gene was highly transcribed or all genes were. We postulate that chromatin dynamics modulate the transcriptional competency of the HSV-1 genome. Genes in genomes rendered transcriptionally inactive by chromatin dynamics cannot be transcribed, whereas transcription of individual genes, or of group of genes, is regulated separately in the transcriptionally competent genomes.

The BEN Domain Protein Insensitive Binds to the Fab-7 Chromatin Boundary To Establish Proper Segmental Identity in Drosophila

Boundaries (insulators) in the Drosophila bithorax complex (BX-C) delimit autonomous regulatory domains that orchestrate the parasegment (PS)-specific expression of the BX-C homeotic genes. The Fab-7 boundary separates the iab-6 and iab-7 regulatory domains, which control Abd-B expression in PS11 and PS12, respectively. This boundary is composed of multiple functionally redundant elements and has two key functions: it blocks cross talk between iab-6 and iab-7 and facilitates boundary bypass. Here, we show that two BEN domain protein complexes, Insensitive and Elba, bind to multiple sequences located in the Fab-7 nuclease hypersensitive regions. Two of these sequences are recognized by both Insv and Elba and correspond to a CCAATTGG palindrome. Elba also binds to a related CCAATAAG sequence, while Insv does not. However, the third Insv recognition sequences is ∼100 bp in length and contains the CCAATAAG sequence at one end. Both Insv and Elba are assembled into large complexes (∼420 and ∼265-290 kDa, respectively) in nuclear extracts. Using a sensitized genetic background, we show that the Insv protein is required for Fab-7 boundary function and that PS11 identity is not properly established in insv mutants. This is the first demonstration that a BEN domain protein is important for the functioning of an endogenous fly boundary.

Transcriptome comparison identifies potential biomarkers of spine and skull base chordomas

Chordomas are rare, slowly growing, locally aggressive bone neoplasms that arise from embryonic remnants of the notochord, showing dual epithelial-mesenchymal differentiation. The high plasticity probably is the main reason for the high variety in phenotypes of chordoma, from its high heterogeneity on a cellular level to its subtype variations depending on tissue location, with its potential to develop from an inactive quiescent form to an aggressive cancer with extreme adaptability and resistance to drugs and other treatments. Gene expression profiles of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded skull chordoma, spine chordoma, and normal tissue specimens were generated and compared. Using strict criteria, we identified 222 differentially expressed transcripts unique to skull base chordoma, 261 unique to spine chordoma, and 192 common to both chordoma subtypes. Further analysis of these three groups of transcripts allowed the selection of three subsets of highly differentially expressed genes as potential biomarkers, disease drivers, and therapeutic targets in both chordoma subtypes. Immunohistochemistry revealed LMX1A to be dominant in skull base chordoma, SALL3 to be unique to spine chordoma, and T to be common to both chordoma subtypes. In both chordoma subtypes, the genes with the highest expression were predominantly development-related genes, mostly transcription factors. Our findings indicate that these developmental genes play important oncogenic roles in chordoma, mainly causing high plasticity and resistance to therapy in both these cancer subtypes but also determining their differentiation status and proliferation activity, pointing to features expected of heterogeneous stem cell-like tissues with similarities to their notochord origins.