Biologics in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-main advantages and major challenges: A narrative review

Efficacy and safety of gut microbiota-based therapies in autoimmune and rheumatic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 80 randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggested that gut microbiota-based therapies may be effective in treating autoimmune diseases, but a systematic summary is lacking.

METHODS

Pubmed, EMbase, Sinomed, and other databases were searched for RCTs related to the treatment of autoimmune diseases with probiotics from inception to June 2022. RevMan 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis after 2 investigators independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 80 RCTs and 14 types of autoimmune disease [celiac sprue, SLE, and lupus nephritis (LN), RA, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), spondyloarthritis, psoriasis, fibromyalgia syndrome, MS, systemic sclerosis, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), oral lichen planus (OLP), Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis] were included. The results showed that gut microbiota-based therapies may improve the symptoms and/or inflammatory factor of celiac sprue, SLE and LN, JIA, psoriasis, PSS, MS, systemic sclerosis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis. However, gut microbiota-based therapies may not improve the symptoms and/or inflammatory factor of spondyloarthritis and RA. Gut microbiota-based therapies may relieve the pain of fibromyalgia syndrome, but the effect on fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is not significant. Gut microbiota-based therapies may improve HbA1c in T1DM, but its effect on total insulin requirement does not seem to be significant. These RCTs showed that probiotics did not increase the incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Gut microbiota-based therapies may improve several autoimmune diseases (celiac sprue, SLE and LN, JIA, psoriasis, fibromyalgia syndrome, PSS, MS, T1DM, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis).

Temporomandibular involvement in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a 2-year prospective cohort study

This study aimed to clinically evaluate temporomandibular joint (TMJ) involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and the ability to identify and/or predict development of TMJ-deformities over time using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The predictive value of self-reported TMJ pain was also assessed. A prospective longitudinal cohort study comprising 54 children with JIA, 39 girls and 15 boys, was performed. All children had active disease at baseline, 50% with the subtype oligoarthritis. Repeated clinical orofacial and CBCT examinations were performed over a two-year period. At baseline, 39% had radiographic TMJ deformities (24% unilateral, 15% bilateral), at 2-year follow-up, 42% (p > 0.05). Both progressing and improving TMJ deformities were observed. An association was found between TMJ-deformities and self-reported TMJ pain at baseline (p = 0.01). Maximum unassisted mouth opening (MUO) was smaller for children with TMJ-deformities (p < 0.05). The prevalence of palpatory muscle pain was high (48-59%) but not predictive of development of TMJ-deformities. TMJ noises increased over time and crepitations were associated with TMJ-deformities (p < 0.05). In conclusion, in children with JIA, self-reported TMJ pain and dysfunction were common and predictive of TMJ deformities. TMJ deformities were associated with smaller MUO and palpatory TMJ pain as well as crepitations. Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol id: 2010/2089-31/2.

How Safe Are Biological Agents in Pediatric Rheumatology?

OBJECTIVE

Biologic therapy has changed the prognosis of patients with rheumatologic disease. Despite all benefits of the biological agents, adverse events may occur due to their long-term use. The aim of this study is to analyze the adverse events observed in pediatric patients who received biological treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted between January 2010 and January 2022. File records of 139 patients used biological agents for rheumatologic diseases in a pediatric rheumatology clinic were evaluated. Diagnosis, received treatment, the rationale for stopping treatment, requirement of tuberculosis prophylaxis, presence of an adverse event, and results were recorded.

RESULTS

The most used biological therapy was etanercept (41.7%). Anakinra, adalimumab, canakinumab were used in 30.9%, 27.3%, 23.7% of patients, and the others in less than 10%. Totally 491 adverse events (97.9/100 patient-years) were encountered during the duration of biological treatment. The most often adverse event was recurrent upper respiratory tract infection in the patients (31.9/100 patient-years). Elevated aminotransferase levels (10.4/100 patient-years), abdominal pain (7/100 patient-years), and headache (5.2/100 patient-years) were among the other common side effects. Isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis was needed before biological treatment in 20.9% of the patients. Tuberculosis developed in none of the patients followed-up for latent tuberculosis, however, it developed in a patient while receiving etanercept due to noncompliance with his scheduled outpatient visits during etanercept treatment.

CONCLUSION

The most commonly used biological treatments were TNFi and IL-antagonists, and the majority of side effects were infections and laboratory abnormalities. Although the rate of serious adverse events is quite low, close follow-up of patients receiving biological therapy is very important.

Adalimumab Effectively Decreases Inflammation Downstream of TNFα Signaling in Synoviocytes from Extended Oligoarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) play a critical role in inflammation that contributes to disease progression in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), FLS express tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα). TNFα signaling has been shown to be upstream of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) signaling. Overexpression of TNFα and TGFβ, as well as related proteins, can cause increased inflammation in RA. In this study, we examine the effects of inhibiting TNFα signaling with adalimumab on FLS isolated from synovial fluid of patients with JIA.

METHODS

Synovial fluid samples were selected from 41 patients in our repository. Of these samples, 23 were diagnosed with persistent oligoarticular JIA and 18 were diagnosed with extended oligoarticular JIA. All samples were taken prior to patients extending to a polyarticular course, or what we termed extended-to-be (ETB), and were on no medications or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) only at the time of arthrocentesis. For cell studies, FLS were isolated from synovial fluid and treated with adalimumab for 24 h. Protein antibody arrays were performed by RayBiotech, Inc. according to their protocols.

RESULTS

In persistent FLS, TNFα (fold change [FC] = 1.2 p = 0.001), TGFβ (FC = 1.5 p = 0.001), lymphotoxin alpha (LTα) (FC = 4.3 p = 0.015), soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNFRI) (FC = 5.1 p = 0.008), and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (sTNFRII) (FC = 3.8 p = 0.025) were significantly elevated in adalimumab treated cells compared to untreated cells. In ETB FLS, TNFα was significantly elevated (FC = 1.04 p = 0.023) while TGFβ (FC = 1.03 p = 0.037) was significantly decreased in adalimumab-treated cells compared to untreated cells.

CONCLUSIONS

This data suggests that, after only 24 h, adalimumab is effective at decreasing inflammation that occurs downstream of initial TNFα signaling in extended-to-be fibroblast-like synoviocytes.

Ovarian reserve in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis using biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to assess the effect of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) on ovarian reserve in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed from March 2021 to March 2022 and included 81 patients with JIA and 49 healthy children. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and estradiol levels were analyzed using electrochemiluminescence methods.

RESULTS

The mean of current age (13.5 ± 3.2 vs. 14.4 ± 2.4 years), height standard deviation score (SDS) (- 0.35 ± 1.18 vs. - 0.44 ± 0.94), body mass index SDS (0.12 ± 1.33 vs. 0.25 ± 1.28), and the median weight SDS (- 0.13 (- 2.27-3.23) vs. - 0.52 (- 3.4-3.3)) were similar in JIA patients and controls (p > 0.05). Patients with JIA were divided into two groups according to their treatment regimens: treated with methotrexate (MTX) (biologic naive) (n = 32) and treated with MTX plus bDMARDs (n = 49). No significant differences were detected between the 3 groups regarding menarche age, menstrual cycle length, and flow duration (for all p > 0.05). The median serum concentration of AMH was 2.94 (1.12-7.88) ng/ml in the control group, 3.02 (0.36-8.54) ng/ml in the biologic naïve group, and 3.01 (0.99-8.26) ng/ml in the MTX plus bDMARD group. There were no significant differences between 3 groups according to serum AMH, FSH, LH, and estradiol levels (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Biologic DMARDs are reassuring in terms of ovarian reserve in girls with JIA and demonstrate that AMH is unaffected by treatment. Prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm our findings and to evaluate the impact on the future fertility of patients. Key Points • Although biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are being game-changing treatment options in juvenile idiopathic arthritis, their effect on fertility and ovarian reserve is one of the most discussed issues. • In addition to treatment used, autoimmune diseases might also have a negative effect on fertility. • In this cross-sectional study, we found that anti-Mullerian hormone level of patients who were on bDMARDs, patients who were on methotrexate, and healthy controls were similar. • Our results suggest that bDMARDs are reassuring in terms of ovarian reserve in girls with JIA and demonstrate that AMH is unaffected by treatment.

Risk of flare in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Is it related to the methotrexate treatment strategy or patient characteristics?

Objectives

The study aimed to determine the factors that increase the risk of disease flare in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis who stopped methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy following inactive disease (ID).

Patients and methods

In the retrospective study, files of all juvenile idiopathic arthritis cases between April 1992 and June 2022 were examined. Patients who stopped MTX monotherapy following ID were evaluated. Patients with disease flare and persistent ID were compared. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis subgroup, age of symptom onset, autoantibodies, acute phase reactants, MTX method of use, and withdrawal strategy were recorded. Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients were excluded from the study due to different clinical symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment methods.

Results

Files of 1,036 patients were evaluated, and 107 patients (88 females, 19 males; mean age: 5.9±4.2 years; range, 0.8-16.5 years) were included in the study. The median age at symptom onset was 4.8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-7.6) years. In terms of juvenile idiopathic arthritis subgroups, 52 (48.6%) had oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, 43 (40.2%) had polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and 12 (11.2%) had juvenile psoriatic arthritis. The patients reached ID in nine (IQR: 4.8-17.7) months after starting MTX, and MTX treatment was discontinued after one (IQR: 0.7-1.3) year following ID. The disease flare developed in 59 (55%) of the cases. The ID continued in 48 (45%) patients. In multivariate analysis, the risk of flare was associated with younger symptom onset (odds ratio [OR]=2.2, p=0.006), antinuclear antibody positivity (OR=1.6, p=0.03), higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (OR=1.01, p=0.04), and C-reactive protein (OR=1, p=0.02) at the MTX onset. No difference was observed between the two groups regarding MTX dose, route of administration, prior and concomitant treatments, time to reach ID, and time and method of MTX discontinuation.

Conclusion

In this study, the risk of flare was associated with patient's characteristics, rather than the administration and discontinuation method of MTX.

Research progress in drug therapy of juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in children. With the gradual expansion of the incidence of JIA in the population, the pathogenesis and treatment of JIA were further explored and analyzed, and JIA has achieved some success in drug therapy.

DATA SOURCES

A systemic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register, and the EU Clinical Trials Register. Through the searching of clinical trials of JIA in recent years, we summarized the progress of the clinical treatment of JIA.

RESULTS

The main treatment drugs for JIA include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biological agents. So far, a variety of biological agents targeting the cytokines and receptors involved in its pathogenesis have been gradually approved for JIA in many countries. The application of biological agents in JIA showed good efficacy and safety, bringing unprecedented experience to children and adolescents with JIA.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential and advantages of biologic agents in the treatment of JIA are significant, and the application of biologic agents in the treatment of JIA will be more and more common.

Considerations for the Primary Care Provider Caring for Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Receiving Biologic Therapy

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatologic condition in children. JIA is a chronic autoimmune disease with no known cure affecting more than 1 in 1,000 children. With the development of targeted biologic therapies for JIA in the late 1990s, the outlook for children with JIA dramatically improved. Since that time, many children have received biologic therapies, allowing for better disease control and even disease remission. Given the frequency of JIA and increasing use of biologic medications, primary care providers require a basic understanding about these medications and their side effects as well as how the primary care provider can best support the patients who are receiving biologic therapy. [Pediatr Ann. 2022;51(2):e54-e56.].