Incidence and risk factors of delirium in post-anaesthesia care unit

The utility of the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) in detecting cognitive impairment in surgical populations - A systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in detecting cognitive impairment (CI) and assess the association of MoCA scores with adverse postoperative outcomes in surgical populations.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Perioperative setting.

PATIENTS

Adults undergoing elective or emergent surgery screened for CI preoperatively using the MoCA.

MEASUREMENTS

The outcomes included the diagnostic accuracy of the MoCA in screening for CI and the pooled prevalence of CI in various surgical populations. CI and its association with adverse events including delirium, hospital length-of-stay (LOS), postoperative complications, discharge destination, and mortality was determined.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-six studies (5059 patients, 18 non-cardiac studies, 8 cardiac studies) were included. With a MoCA cut-off score of <26, the prevalence of preoperative CI was 48% (95% CI: 41%-54%). The MoCA had 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79-0.93) sensitivity, 0.72 (95% CI: 0.62-0.80) specificity, PPV of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.65-0.81), and NPV of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.77-0.92) when validated against Petersen criteria, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association criteria to identify CI. Using the MoCA as a screening tool, the LOS was 3.75 (95% CI: -0.03-7.53, P = 0.05, not significant) days longer in the CI group after non-cardiac surgeries and 3.33 (95% CI: 1.24-5.41, P < 0.002) days longer after cardiac surgeries than the non-cognitively impaired group.

CONCLUSIONS

MoCA had been validated in the surgical population. MoCA with a cut-off score of <26 was shown to have 87% sensitivity and 72% specificity in identifying CI. A positive screen in MoCA was associated with a 3-day longer hospital LOS in cardiac surgery in the CI group than in the non-CI group.

Effects of qCON and qNOX-guided general anaesthesia management on patient opioid use and prognosis: a study protocol

INTRODUCTION

The adverse effects of general anaesthetic drugs (especially opioids) cannot be ignored. However, current nociceptive-monitoring techniques still lack consistency in guiding the use of opioids. This trial will study the demand for opioid use and patient prognosis in qCON and qNOX-guided general anaesthesia management.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This prospective, randomised, controlled trial will randomly recruit 124 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for non-cardiac surgery in equal numbers to either the qCON or BIS group. The qCON group will adjust intraoperative propofol and remifentanil dosage according to qCON and qNOX values, while the BIS group will adjust according to BIS values and haemodynamic fluctuations. The differences between the two groups will be observed in remifentanil dosing and prognosis. The primary outcome will be intraoperative remifentanil use. Secondary outcomes will include propofol consumption; the predictive ability of BIS, qCON and qNOX on conscious responses, noxious stimulus and body movements; and changes in cognitive function at 90 days postoperatively.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study involves human participants and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (IRB2022-YX-075-01). Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant academic conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200059877.