Association between Fever and Primary Tooth Eruption: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Teething - filling in the gaps…

Dentists and dental care professionals may be faced with concerns from parents and carers regarding teething in infants and young children. Teething is a normal physiological and self-limiting process; however, the diverse signs and symptoms that have, over time, been attributed to teething, can make diagnosis challenging. Appropriate diagnosis is crucial in preventing the potentially life-threatening sequalae of dismissing symptoms as teething and delaying appropriate treatment of a systemically unwell child. Management of teething can be approached in a five-step process based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical knowledge summary on teething. These include: 1) history-taking, clinical examination, diagnosis and referral of systemically unwell or severely distressed children for urgent medical review; 2) providing parental/carer reassurance, information and preventative advice; 3) simple, non-pharmacological management strategies; 4) pharmacological intervention; 5) safety-netting advice in case the child becomes systemically unwell, has prolonged symptoms, or is in severe distress. The purpose of this article is to bridge knowledge gaps regarding teething to enable appropriate diagnosis and encourage dissemination of preliminary information and ensure appropriate referral by frontline dental professionals.

[Prospective analysis of inflammatory markers and perioperative clinical data in children with craniosynostosis undergoing reconstructive surgery]

BACKGROUND

Craniosynostosis (CS) is a group of skull malformations manifested by congenital absence or premature closure of cranial sutures. Reconstructive surgery in the second half of life is traditional approach for CS. The issues of surgical stress response after reconstructive surgery for CS in children are still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical and laboratory parameters in children undergoing traumatic reconstructive surgery for CS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria were CS, reconstructive surgery, age <24 months, no comorbidities and available laboratory diagnostic protocol including complete blood count, biochemical blood test with analysis of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, ferritin and presepsin. The study included 32 patients (24 (75%) boys and 8 (25%) girls) aged 10.29±4.99 months after surgery between October 2021 and June 2022. Non-syndromic and syndromic forms of CS were observed in 25 (78.1%) and 7 (21.9%) cases, respectively.

RESULTS

There were no infectious complications. We analyzed postoperative clinical data, fever, clinical and biochemical markers of inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Early postoperative period after reconstructive surgery for CS in children is accompanied by significant increase of inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, ferritin). However, these findings do not indicate infectious complications. This is a manifestation of nonspecific systemic reaction. Severity of systemic inflammatory response syndrome with increase in acute phase proteins indicates highly traumatic reconstructive surgery for CS in children. Analysis of serum presepsin allows for differential diagnosis between infectious complication and uncomplicated course of early postoperative period.

Parental beliefs in and attitudes toward teething signs and symptoms: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Parents believe that teething is associated with signs and symptoms, which may induce them to give medications that could harm their children. Some children may require alleviation of symptoms and overall attention.

AIM

To assess parents' beliefs in and attitudes toward teething.

DESIGN

Through electronic databases and gray literature, this systematic review identified cross-sectional studies reporting parents' beliefs in, knowledge about, and attitudes toward the signs and symptoms of primary tooth eruption in children aged between 0 and 36 months. Three reviewers independently selected the studies, collected the information, assessed methodological quality, and checked for accuracy with disagreements solved by a fourth reviewer. The Agency of Research and Quality in Health questionnaire for cross-sectional studies was used for quality assessment. Descriptive analysis with median and interquartile ranges was adopted.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies comprising 10 524 participants from all geographic regions were included. The methodological quality of the studies was moderate. Most parents have beliefs in signs and symptoms during dentition, the most reported symptom being the desire to bite. Oral rehydration was the most exposed attitude in the studies included. Only a small proportion of parents reported no attitude.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of parents believed in at least one sign or symptom associated with teething, and only few of them would do nothing or just wait for the signs or symptoms to pass, with no difference among countries (Protocol doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/S2KZ3).

New medical device coating mouth gel for temporary relief of teething symptoms: a pilot randomized, open-label, controlled study

BACKGROUND

This study verified the feasibility of the monthly recruitment rate, tested the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability Pain Assessment Tool (FLACC) for pain in infants and collected preliminary efficacy and safety data of a new proprietary oral gel formulation of high-molecular-weight hyaluronan (HMWHA) for the relief of teething. Results will support the design a future main trial vs. local anesthetic, that is currently the only clinically proven pain reliever.

METHODS

This was a pilot, randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label, and parallel-group trial. It was performed in two Romanian clinics recruiting infants from 3 to 36 months. Teething diagnosis was based on a minimum of three symptoms such as: local pain, swelling, erythema, hyper-salivation, and depth characteristics of unerupted tooth. Absence of subcutaneous mucosal laceration was also required. The children were assigned either to HMWHA (HABPX V 3.3, Bioplax Ltd, Wallington, UK), or to standard drug (Dentinox^®-Gel N; Dentinox, Berlin, Germany) and treated for 7 consecutive days. Investigators recorded the primary endpoints: swelling, redness and pain (by FLACC method), on days 0, 3 and 7. Changes in crying, mouth spasms, salivation, local pain, swelling, and redness were the secondary endpoints, recorded daily by the parents, on diary cards. Tolerability was assessed on day 14, too.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven Infants were allocated in HMWHA, and 30 in standard drug. Enrolment rate was 9 patients/month/site. A significant reduction for HMWHA group was evidenced in pain, swelling (from day 0 to 7, P=0.034 between groups), redness (from day 0 to 3, P=0.045 and from day 0 to 7, P<0.001 between groups) and confirmed by the parents' diary records. Pain measurements obtained by FLACC method are consistent with the data belonging to other parameters. Investigator's global assessment of performance was in favor of the HMWHA (P<0.005). Only two patients, both belonging to standard drug group, experienced adverse events (fever, not related to treatment) and dropped out of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The results solve the feasibility questions and clearly evidence the performance of HABPX V 3.3 in teething symptoms, exceeding the objectives of a simple pilot trial to some extent. Coating oral gels containing HMWHA could be a therapeutic solution for both parents and physicians in managing the irritation and pain resulting from tooth eruption in children.

Common parenting misconceptions regarding infant care: setting the record straight for parents (and some pediatricians)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

First-time parents often turn to friends and family for advice regarding feeding, sleeping, bathing, diapering and toilet training, and childhood illnesses. Unfortunately, parents may at times be given incorrect and potentially dangerous advice as several widely embraced parenting practices are no longer deemed appropriate. In addition, young children are cared for by family and friends - many of whom are older and may still subscribe to outdated parenting practices.Parents and grandparents are not the only ones who subscribe to child care myths and misconceptions. Pediatricians also believe in the effectiveness of some outdated child care practices. Although some of these parenting myths are relatively benign, others may indeed pose a significant health risk or safety hazard to a young child. The purpose of this article is to review 10 commonly held myths or misconceptions regarding infant care.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review article, we not only highlight many of the studies that document which outdated health beliefs are still endorsed by parents and/or pediatricians, but also review the specific health risks associated with these parenting myths or misconceptions.

SUMMARY

It is important that pediatricians educate parents and other primary caregivers about the potential risks of following outdated parenting practices.