Clinical and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Distal Tibial Fracture Treated by Circular External Fixation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Circular external fixation for revision of failed tibia internal fixation

BACKGROUND

The management of failed tibial fracture fixation remains a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. This study investigate the utility and outcomes of circular external fixation in the management of failed internal fixation of tibial fractures.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of a complex limb reconstruction unit at a major trauma centre was done during December 2022. Patients with failed internal fixation of tibial fracture who underwent revision surgery with circular external fixation frame were included.

RESULTS

20 patients with a mean age of 47.8 ± 16.5 years (range: 15-69) were included. Fourteen (70.0%) patients had failed plate and screws fixations, and the remaining six (30.0%) failed intramedullary nail fixation. The most common indication for revision surgery was development of early postoperative surgical site infection (5 patients; 25.0%). The mean duration of frame treatment was 199.5 ± 80.1 days (range = 49-364), while the mean follow-up duration following frame removal was 3.2 ± 1.8 years (range = 2-8). The overall union rate in this series was 100%; and all infected cases had complete resolution from infection. The total number of complications was 11, however, only two complications required surgical intervention. The most common complications reported were pin site infection (6; 30.0%) and limb length discrepancy of 2 cm (2; 10.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Circular external fixation is a reliable surgical option in the treatment of failed internal fixation of tibia fractures. This technique can provide limb salvage in complex infected and noninfected cases with a high union rate and minimal major complications.

Comparison of complications and reoperations in AO/OTA 43.C3 pilon fractures treated with conventional ORIF versus minimally invasive hexapod ring fixation

INTRODUCTION

Controversy exists regarding the optimal management of AO/OTA 43. C3 pilon fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is the gold standard treatment, but serious soft tissue and infectious complications have been previously reported. Minimally invasive strategies using hexapod ring fixation (HRF) with supplemental limited internal fixation have been used to reduce the incidence of complications. Previous studies have included heterogeneous types of pilon fractures, with non-comminuted injuries being more likely to be treated with ORIF and complex fractures receiving HRF treatment. To our knowledge, no studies have compared the complications and reoperation rates between ORIF and HRF exclusively for C3 fractures.

METHODS

Retrospective study comparing 53 patients treated for AO/OTA 43.C3 pilon fracture with ORIF or HRF in a trauma level I center with at least a two-year follow-up. Patients treated between January 2015 and January 2019 received ORIF and those treated between January 2019 and January 2021 received HRF. Complications were divided into two groups: minor (superficial infection and malalignment) and major (non-union, deep infection, and amputation). Reoperations, prevalence of ankle osteoarthritis, and requirement for ankle arthrodesis/total ankle replacement were registered.

RESULTS

We included 30 and 23 patients in the ORIF and HRF groups, respectively. The overall complication rate was similar in both groups, with 50% and 56,5% of the patients having complications in the ORIF and HRF groups, respectively (p:0,63). Minor complications were significantly more prevalent in the HRF group (p<0,001) whilst the ORIF group had a significantly higher rate of major complications (p<0,01). Superficial infections were highly prevalent in the HRF group (47,8%), as they were related to half-pin or K-wire infections. Deep infection was present only in the ORIF group, with 20% of the patients developing this major complication (p:0,03). Non-union rate, reoperations, ankle osteoarthritis, and the need for arthrodesis or ankle replacement showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

In AO/OTA 43.C3 fractures, HRF is safe and effective, achieving high union rates with a significantly lower rate of major complications compared to ORIF. According to our results, ORIF should be used cautiously for these types of fractures, considering the increased risk of deep infection.

Ilizarov Ring Fixator in the Lower Limb for 2000 Days: A Case Report

Ring external fixators developed by Gavriil Abramovich Ilizarov from Russia are used to treat the difficult cases of infected non-union, shortening of limbs by bone lengthening, and deformity correction in joints and bones in isolation or in combination. Fixation of the involved bone with the ring is commonly achieved using four rings, each having two Ilizarov wires that are passed along the superior surface of the ring, then across the bone, and exiting out on the opposite side touching the surface of the ring. The case report herein reports a patient who kept the ring fixator on his thigh without any problem for a long period of five and a half years. The case is being reported due to the abnormally long period of ring fixator application without any complications and the excellent result achieved in terms of union and infection control.