Long-term efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with surgery for early gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on endoscopic submucosal dissection for the management of early esophageal and gastric cancers: methodology and review of evidence

This document from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) provides a full description of the methodology used in the review of the evidence used to inform the final guidance outlined in the accompanying Summary and Recommendations document regarding the role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the management of early esophageal and gastric cancers. This guideline used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework and specifically addresses the role of ESD versus EMR and/or surgery, where applicable, for the management of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and their corresponding precursor lesions. For ESCC, the ASGE suggests ESD over EMR for patients with early-stage, well-differentiated, nonulcerated cancer >15 mm, whereas in patients with similar lesions ≤15 mm, the ASGE suggests either ESD or EMR. The ASGE suggests against surgery for such patients with ESCC, whenever possible. For EAC, the ASGE suggests ESD over EMR for patients with early-stage, well-differentiated, nonulcerated cancer >20 mm, whereas in patients with similar lesions measuring ≤20 mm, the ASGE suggests either ESD or EMR. For GAC, the ASGE suggests ESD over EMR for patients with early-stage, well or moderately differentiated, nonulcerated intestinal type cancer measuring 20 to 30 mm, whereas for patients with similar lesions <20 mm, the ASGE suggests either ESD or EMR. The ASGE suggests against surgery for patients with such lesions measuring ≤30 mm, whereas for lesions that are poorly differentiated, regardless of size, the ASGE suggests surgical evaluation over endosic approaches.

Treatment and Prevention of Postoperative Leakage after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Anastomotic leakage is one of the common causes of serious morbidity and death after gastrectomy. The use of surgical treatment for leakage decreased due to the development of nonsurgical management. However, if nonsurgical management fails to control the spread of intra-abdominal infection, emergency surgical treatment is required. The authors wished to determine in which cases surgical treatment is needed for postoperative leakage and to identify treatment and prevention strategies. If a patient's vital signs are stable, local abscesses can be cured by conservative treatment after percutaneous drain insertion; if there is no improvement in anastomotic leakage, endoscopic treatment such as clipping, vacuum, and stent placement can be performed. If a patient's vital signs are unstable or patient shows diffuse peritonitis, surgical treatment should be performed. A surgical plan can be established according to leakage location. The duodenal stump may first require conservative treatment. It is recommended that surgical treatment be attempted first for anastomotic leakage of gastrojejunostomy site and gastric stump in remnant stomach. In conclusion, the need for surgical treatment is determined depending on vital signs and presence of diffuse peritonitis. During surgical treatment, a strategic approach is required according to the patient's condition and the anatomical location of leakage.

A meta-analysis of the effect of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with gastrectomy on the wound infection in early stomach cancer subjects

We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effect of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with gastrectomy on the wound infection in early stomach cancer subjects. A systematic literature search up to November 2022 was performed and 2765 related studies were evaluated. The chosen studies comprised 7842 early stomach cancer subjects participated in the selected studies' baseline trials; 3308 of them used the endoscopic submucosal dissection, while 4534 used gastrectomy. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the wound infection in endoscopic submucosal dissection versus gastrectomy for early stomach cancer by the dichotomous methods with a random or fixed effect model. The use of endoscopic submucosal dissection resulted in significantly lower wound infection (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34-0.60, P < .001) with no heterogeneity (I²  = 8%) compared with the gastrectomy for early stomach cancer. The use of endoscopic submucosal dissection resulted in significantly lower wound infection compared with the gastrectomy for early stomach cancer. The small sample size of some studies in the comparison calls for care when analysing the results.

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.

Feasibility of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols Implemented Perioperatively in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) has advantages over traditional radical gastrectomy. We investigated whether enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are appropriate in the ESD perioperative period. Materials and Methods: We screened 129 consecutive patients, and 12 were excluded. All study patients underwent ESD for EGC. Of the 117 included patients, 57 received traditional perioperative care between January 2017 and December 2018, and 60 patients received perioperative care according to ERAS protocols between January 2019 and September 2020. The primary study endpoint was ESD-related complications. Secondary endpoints included the following postoperative parameters: anal exhaust time, incidence of nausea or vomiting, length of hospitalization, fever rate, abdominal pain on the visual analog scale (VAS), and reported perioperative satisfaction. Results: Complications were comparable between the 2 groups. In the ERAS group, no patients experienced delayed bleeding or perforation. One traditional group patient bled, and one perforated. Postoperative anal exhaust time, nausea or vomiting incidence, hospitalization, fever rate, and VAS pain scores were significantly lower, and perioperative satisfaction rate was significantly higher in the ERAS group. Conclusions: ERAS protocols are both feasible and safe for patients undergoing ESD. ERAS protocols enhance the advantages of ESD for EGC without increasing complications.

Long-term outcomes and clinical safety of expanded indication early gastric cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgical resection: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) remains an investigational issue for early gastric cancer (EGC) with expanded indications owing to the risk of lymph node metastasis. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and safety of ESD versus surgical resection (SR) for EGC with expanded indications.

METHODS

The systematic review selected studies from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases from 2010 to 2020, and compared survival and clinical safety data of ESD with those of surgical resection for EGC with expanded indications. The fixed-effects or random-effects model was used to calculate the differences between the two groups. To assess the validity of the eligible studies, risk of bias was measured using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.

RESULTS

Nine retrospective studies were used to calculate the differences in survival and clinical safety data between the two groups for EGC with expanded indications. Differences were not significant between the groups in terms of age, sex, tumour size, tumour histology or lesion morphology. Regarding tumour site, tumours located in the L area (the lower third of the stomach) were more likely to be found in the ESD group. With regard to metachronous and synchronous carcinomas, there was a significant difference favouring SR treatment (metachronous: OR=0.12, 95% CI=0.05 to 0.25, p<0.00001; synchronous: OR=0.11, 95% CI=0.02 to 0.46, p=0.003). Adverse event data were identified in six studies showing a significant difference favouring ESD treatment (ESD vs SR, OR=0.49, 95% CI=0.34 to 0.72. p=0.002). Additionally, six studies evaluating 5-year overall survival showed no significant differences between the two groups (HR=1.22, 95% CI=0.66 to 2.25, p=0.53). With regard to 5-year disease-free survival, patients with expanded indication EGC undergoing SR showed better survival (ESD vs SR, HR=3.29, 95% CI=1.60 to 6.76, p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

ESD provided favourable results for patients with EGC with expanded indications regarding clinical outcomes and safety in retrospective studies. Further, to detect synchronous or metachronous lesions, endoscopic surveillance should be performed following ESD. However, the included studies were observational, some did not have adequate adjustment for confounding factors and their results lacked generalisability due to their origin. Thus, further related randomised controlled trials are urgently encouraged.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021251068.

Endoscopic or Follow-up Treatment for Gastric Indeterminate Tumors Is the Preferred Method of Management

Background

Endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) lacks precision in diagnosing indeterminate tumors. When the presence of early gastric cancer (EGC) is macroscopically suspected, but biopsy pathology fails to give a diagnosis of neoplasia, it causes problems in clinical management. The purpose of this study was to discuss the outcome of gastric indeterminate tumors and the clinical factors associated with predicting EGC.

Methods

The medical records of 209 patients diagnosed with gastric indeterminate neoplasia by biopsy forceps were retrospectively studied. Initial endoscopic findings were analyzed and predictors of EGC were evaluated.

Results

The final pathological diagnosis in 209 patients included adenocarcinoma (n = 7), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 11), low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 21), and non-neoplastic lesion (n = 170). Multivariate analysis showed that older age (OR = 1.78; 95% CI = 1.17–2.71; p = 0.008), patients undergoing narrow band imaging (NBI) (OR = 3.40; 95% CI = 1.37–8.43; p = 0.008), and surface erosion (OR = 3.53; 95% CI = 1.41–8.84; p = 0.007) were associated with the upgraded group, and were significantly associated with risk. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that among patients with NBI, the presence of demarcation line (DL) (OR = 24.00; 95% CI = 4.99–115.36; p < 0.0001), microvascular (MV) pattern irregularity (OR = 9.129; 95% CI = 2.36–35.34; p = 0.001), and the presence of white opaque substance (WOS) (OR = 10.77; 95% CI = 1.14–101.72; p = 0.038) were significant risk factors.

Conclusions

For gastric indeterminate tumors, older patient age, lesion surface with erosion, clear DL visible under NBI observation, presence of WOS, and irregular MV pattern are suggestive of the high possibility of neoplasia and need to be focused on and may benefit more from endoscopic resection treatment as opposed to simple endoscopic follow-up.

Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgery in the Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Aim

Endoscopic resection (ER) is the preferred approach to treat early gastric cancer (EGC) in patients without suspected lymph node involvement and that meet the criteria for ER. Surgery is a more aggressive treatment, but it may be associated with less recurrence and the need for reintervention. Previous meta-analyses comparing ER with surgery for EGC did not incorporate the most recent studies, making accurate conclusions not possible.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine complete resection, length of hospital stay (LOHS), adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, recurrence, 5-year overall survival (OS), and 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with EGC.

Results

A total of 29 cohorts studies involving 20559 patients were included. The ER (n = 7709) group was associated with a lower incidence of AEs (RD = -0.07, 95%CI = -0.1, -0.04, p < 0.0001) and shorter LOHS (95% CI -5.89, -5.32; p < 0,00001) compared to surgery (n = 12850). However, ER was associated with lower complete resection rates (RD = -0.1, 95%CI = -0.15, -0.06; p < 0.00001) and higher rates of recurrence (RD = 0.07, 95%CI = 0.06; p < 0.00001). There were no significant differences between surgery and ER in 5-year OS (RD = -0.01, 95%CI = -0.04, 0.02; p = 0.38), 5-year CSS (RD = 0.01, 95%CI = 0.00, 0.02; p < 0.17), and incidence of serious AEs (RD = -0.03, 95%CI = -0.08, 0.01; p = 0.13).

Conclusions

ER and surgery are safe and effective treatments for EGC. ER provides lower rates of AEs and shorter LOHS compared to surgery. Although ER is associated with lower complete resection rates and a higher risk of recurrence, the OS and CSS were similar between both approaches.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42021255328.

Improving the Diagnosis and Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer in the West

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death. In Western countries, its lower prevalence and the absence of mass screening programmes contribute to late diagnosis and a slower implementation of minimally invasive treatments. A secondary prevention strategy through endoscopic surveillance of patients at high risk of intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma or by screening gastric cancer within colorectal screening programmes is cost-effective in intermediate-risk countries, though the identification of these patients remains challenging. Virtual chromoendoscopy with narrow-band imaging improves the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis, significantly increasing the sensitivity for intestinal metaplasia while preserving specificity. Endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia is feasible, correlates well with histological staging systems and also with gastric neoplasia risk and can be used to stratify risk. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the West achieves efficacy and safety outcomes similar to those reported for Eastern countries, and the long-term disease-specific survival is higher than 95%. A prospective comparative study with gastrectomy confirms its higher safety and its benefits concerning health-related quality of life. However, ESD is associated with a 5% risk of postprocedural bleeding and a 20% risk of non-curative resection. The knowledge of risk factors for adverse events and non-curative resection can improve patient selection. The risk of metachronous lesions after ESD is high (3–5% per year), and endoscopic surveillance is needed. The management of patients with non-curative resection can be optimized using risk scoring systems for lymph node metastasis.

Local Endoscopic Resection is Inferior to Gastrectomy for Early Clinical Stage T1a and T1b Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Study

BACKGROUND

The role of endoscopic resection (ER) in the management of subsets of clinical T1N0 gastric adenocarcinoma remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of ER versus gastrectomy in node-negative cT1a and cT1b gastric adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Data from the National Cancer Database (2010-2015) were used to identify patients with clinical T1aN0 (n = 2927; ER: n = 1157, gastrectomy: n = 1770) and T1bN0 (n = 2915; ER: n = 474, gastrectomy: n = 2441) gastric adenocarcinoma. Propensity score matching and Cox multivariable analyses were used to account for treatment selection bias.

RESULTS

ER for cT1a and cT1b cancers was performed more frequently over time. The rates of node-positive disease in patients with cT1a and cT1b gastric adenocarcinoma were 5% and 18%, respectively. In the matched cohort, gastrectomy was associated with increased survival compared with ER for cT1a cancers (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.95; p = 0.013), and corresponding 5-year survival for gastrectomy and ER was 72% and 66%, respectively (p = 0.013). For cT1b cancers, gastrectomy had a significantly longer survival compared with ER (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.93; p = 0.008), and the corresponding 5-year survival for gastrectomy and ER was 60% and 50%, respectively (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates ER is inferior in terms of long-term survival for clinical T1aN0 and T1bN0 gastric adenocarcinoma, despite current recommendations for ER in cT1 gastric cancers. Future research should seek to identify the subset of T1a and T1b cancers at low risk of nodal metastasis, and would thus maximally benefit from ER.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection comparing with surgical resection in patients with early gastric cancer - A single center experience in Taiwan

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The choice of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as first line treatment for selected early gastric cancer (EGC) patients was proved as effective as surgical treatment in studies over many countries. Yet there is no such cohort comparison in Taiwan. This study is aimed to describe our experience in ESD treated EGC and to compare the outcomes with those underwent surgical treatment.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study reviewing the patients with EGC underwent ESD and surgical treatments in a single tertiary referral center in Taiwan. The primary endpoint was disease specific survival. Recurrence free survival and length of hospital stay were also compared.

RESULTS

The disease specific survival between indicated ESD and surgery showed no significant difference (cumulative survival 100% vs. 97.03%, p = 0.39), so as the recurrence free survival (cumulative survival 92.31% vs. 94.06%, p = 0.60). In subgroup analyses of ESD treated patients, a non-significant recurrence rate difference between indicated and non-indicated ESD was found (cumulative recurrence 7.69% vs. 20%, p = 0.39) and a higher recurrence rate in patients with non-R0 resection compared with R0 resection (cumulative recurrence 0% vs. 40%, p < 0.01). However, the shorter duration of hospital stay in ESD group was noted in comparison to surgery (mean 5.67 days vs. 15.75 days, p < 0.01). The ESD patients have minor complications including bleeding, perforation and fever than surgery.

CONCLUSION

ESD is a reasonable first line treatment in selected early gastric cancer in additional to surgery. Pre-treatment evaluation and post-ESD review of curability is crucial to further surveillance program or definite therapy including surgery.

Propensity score-matched comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for intestinal type early gastric cancer (EGC) of the middle and lower third of the stomach: a European tertiary referral center experience

BACKGROUND

Despite the comparable results between ESD and gastrectomy reported in multiple Asiatic studies, limited data are currently present on the long-term efficacy of ESD for EGC in Western countries. The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of the endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for non-diffuse early gastric cancer treatment in a Western cohort of patients.

METHODS

All patients with a diagnosis of intestinal type EGC located in the middle and lower third of the stomach from 2005 to 2015 were enrolled in the study. All patients completed a 5-year follow-up. Patients were divided according to the procedure performed (ESD/subtotal gastrectomy). The two groups were matched for age, gender, ASA score, tumor dimension, and grade of infiltration (mucosa/submucosa).

RESULTS

After matching, 84 patients (42 per group) were included in the analysis. Peri-procedural morbidity rate was 7.1% and no difference was observed between the two groups (4.8% vs 9.5% for ESD and STG groups, respectively; p = 0.3). Similar results in terms of 5-year OS and DFS were observed for ESD and STG (77.7% vs 71.8% ; p = 0.78 and 74.9% vs 72% ; p = 0.7, respectively). At the multivariate analysis, ASA3 score was recognized as the only negative predictor factor for the 5-year OS (OR 6.2; 95% CI 2.2-16.8; p < 0.001). Regarding the DFS, both ASA3 score (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.7-10.9; p < 0.001) and submucosal infiltration(OR 5.1; 95% CI 1.2-22.4 ; p = 0.02) were identified as independent risk factors for a worse outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm the safety and feasibility ESD for EGC treatment in a Western setting. In addition, this is one of the few reports showing comparable results both in terms of short- and long-term outcomes between ESD and surgery for intestinal type ECG treatment in Western countries.

Updated evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery for early gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic resection (ER) has been a standard treatment modality for early gastric cancer with ignorable risks of lymph node metastasis. As for EGCs within expanded indications, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has considerable advantages over endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) regarding higher rate of en bloc resection, complete resection, but lower risk of local recurrence. Previous meta-analyses comparing ESD with surgery for EGC are scarce and not robust to reach definitive conclusions.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library Databases and Google Scholar through July 2019 to identify studies evaluating ESD vs surgery for EGC. Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess the quality of enrolled studies. Patient baseline characteristics, procedure-related and prognosis outcomes, and adverse event data were extracted and pooled for analyses by the Review Manager 5.3 software. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines (GRADE) were used to assess the quality of evidence. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was conducted to weaken random error and enhance the reliability of evidence.

RESULTS

Totally 18 retrospective studies, involving 5993 patients, were included. ESD benefits were 128.38 min shorter operation duration [95%CI: (-204.68, -52.09), P = 0.001], 7.13 days shorter hospital stay [95%CI: (-7.98, -6.28), P < 0.00001], lower risk of procedure-related death [OR = 0.21, 95%CI: (0.07, 0.68), P = 0.009], lower risk of overall complication [OR = 0.47, 95%CI: (0.34, 0.63), P < 0.00001]. ESD was also associated with lower costs and better quality of life. However, ESD had lower rate of en bloc resection [OR = 0.07, 95%CI: (0.03, 0.21), P < 0.00001], histologically complete resection [OR = 0.07, 95%CI: (0.03, 0.14), P < 0.00001], curative resection [OR = 0.06, 95%CI: (0.01, 0.27), P = 0.002], and higher rate of local recurrence [OR = 5.42, 95%CI: (2.91, 10.11), P < 0.00001], metachronous cancer [OR = 10.84, 95%CI: (6.43, 18.26), P < 0.00001], synchronous cancer [OR = 6.59, 95%CI: (1.96, 22.1), P = 0.002]. ESD also led to lower disease-free survival [HR = 4.58, 95%CI: (2.79, 7.52), P < 0.00001] and recurrence-free survival [HR = 1.99, 95%CI: (1.38, 2.87), P = 0.0002]. No significant differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) between ESD and surgery were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD offers a method of less expensive, less trauma, faster recovery and better quality of life compared to surgery for EGC. However, ESD is associated with higher risk of recurrence without compromising OS and DSS. Strict and careful surveillance after ESD is needed. Recurrent EGCs following ESD can usually be detected in early stage and successfully managed by repeated ESD. Accordingly, ESD technique provides an alternative to surgical resection for highly selected EGC patients.

Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis on risk factors for poor short-term outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now established as the first option to manage early gastric neoplasms, but its efficacy may vary according to diverse factors. We aimed to systematically identify risk factors for poor short-term outcomes of gastric ESD with the purpose to improve patients' selection and management.

METHODS

Three online databases (MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge and Scopus) were searched (last search on June 2018) for poor outcomes of gastric ESD (deep submucosal invasion, piecemeal/incomplete resection, noncurative resection and local recurrence).

RESULTS

One hundred five studies were included referring to 52.126 ESDs. Undifferentiated histology and upper location (vs lower) were associated with submucosal invasion [odds ratio (OR) = 2.42 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.62-3.61] and OR = 3.20 (1.04-9.86), respectively] and deep submucosal invasion [OR = 2.98 (2.02-4.39) and OR = 2.35 (1.45-3.81), respectively]. Lesion size greater than 30 mm and ulceration were associated with piecemeal resection [OR = 2.78 (1.17-6.60) and OR = 2.76 (1.23, 6.20), respectively]. Lesion size greater than 30 mm, ulceration, upper location and fibrosis were risk factors for incomplete resection [OR = 3.83 (2.68-5.49), OR = 4.06 (1.62-10.16), OR = 3.71 (2.49-5.54) and OR = 4.46 (1.66-11.96), respectively]. A noncurative resection was more often observed for lesions located in the upper third of the stomach [OR = 1.49 (1.24-1.79)], depressed morphology [OR = 1.49 (1.04-2.12)] and those outside standard criteria [OR = 3.56 (2.31-5.48)]. Older age was significantly linked with local recurrence rates [OR = 3.08 (1.13-5.02)].

CONCLUSION

Several risk factors influence poor efficacy short-term outcomes of gastric ESD that may be used to inform both patients and health providers about the expected efficacy.

Long-Term Outcomes Comparison of Endoscopic Resection With Gastrectomy for Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Endoscopic resection (ER) and gastrectomy have been both accepted as curative treatments for early gastric cancer. We intended to compare ER with gastrectomy treatments on safety of patients, disease-free survival and overall survival for early gastric cancer through this systematic review. Methods: A literature search was performed in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies that have compared ER with gastrectomy for early gastric cancer were included in this meta-analysis. We searched for clinical studies published before March 2019. Stata 12.0 software was used for systematic analysis. Results: Nine studies were included in this systematic review, ER treatment was associated with a shorter length of stay (WMD = -8.53, 95% CI -11.56 to -5.49), fewer postoperative complications (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.34-0.65). ER can be performed safely with shorter hospital stay and fewer postoperative complications than gastrectomy. Recurrence rate was higher for ER than for gastrectomy treatment (HR = 3.56, 95% CI 1.86-6.84), mainly because metachronous gastric cancers developed only in the ER treatment. However, most of the metachronous gastric cancers could be curatively treated with ER again, and it didn't affect overall survival of patients with early gastric cancer. There was no difference in overall survival rate between ER and gastrectomy (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.63-1.13). Conclusions: ER and gastrectomy are both acceptable for curative treatment of early gastric cancer. However, due to the comparable overall survival and lower postoperative complications and shorter length of stay, ER is better than gastrectomy for early gastric cancer, who met the indication for ER treatment.

A prediction model for lymph node metastasis in early-stage gastric cancer: Toward tailored lymphadenectomy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model for the presence and location of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in early gastric cancer.

METHOD

We reviewed medical records of 4 929 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Variables of age, sex, lymphatic invasion, depth of invasion, location, gross type, differentiation, and tumor size were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of LNM at each LN station.

RESULT

Overall incidence of LNM was 9.1% (448/4 929 patients). For the presence of LNM, risk factors of age, sex, lymphatic invasion, depth of invasion, anatomical part, gross ulceration, size, and tumor differentiation were significantly associated with LNM. The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting LNM after validation was 0.834 for the test set. For the location of LNM, age, sex, lymphatic invasion, depth of invasion, anatomical part, circumferential portion, gross type, differentiation, and tumor size were significantly associated with LNM. The AUC of each LN station was favorable with the test set.

CONCLUSION

Predicting the location of metastatic LNs appeared to be possible in patients with early gastric cancer.

Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery for Early Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an endoscopic alternative to surgical resection of early gastric cancer (EGC). Besides offering both diagnostic and therapeutic capability, it has the benefits of reducing post-operative complications and provides fast recovery and better quality of life compared to surgical resection of neoplastic lesions. However, due to limitations of the procedure, its long-term outcomes are rather controversial.

METHODS

This study has been carried out to investigate the long-term outcomes of ESD which includes the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence rate. The following databases were used to search for articles published until February 2018: Medline, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO.

RESULTS

A total of 13 eligible studies covering 4986 patients were selected for a meta-analysis based on specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. The difference of OS and disease-specific survival (DSS) between ESD and surgical treatment was not statistically significant (RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.68-1.19, p = 0.46; RR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.15-1.03, p = 0.06, respectively). However, DFS in the ESD group was much lower than that in the surgery group (RR = 3.40, 95% CI = 2.39-4.84, p < 0.001). In terms of the treatment after recurrence, the proportion of patients who could receive radical treatment was significantly higher in the ESD than that in the gastrectomy (OR = 5.27, 95% CI = 2.35-11.79, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that ESD might be an alternative treatment option to surgery for patients with EGC in Asian countries. But a close surveillance program after ESD is of necessity, considering the higher possibility of tumor recurrence after ESD.

More Frequent Follow-up CT Scans in Postsurgical Resection Patients Than in Postendoscopic Resection Patients of Early Gastric Cancers: Impracticality of CTs for Mucosal Cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the utility and timing of computed tomography (CT) in the detection of recurrent tumors between patients after surgical and endoscopic resections for early gastric cancer (EGC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 670 patients after surgical (n = 535) and endoscopic (n = 135) resections for EGC between 2007 and 2009 were enrolled. The mean numbers of CT and endoscopy between both treatment groups were compared. The mean and cumulative dose length products of CT examinations were calculated. The modality that detected recurrence was compared between the two groups using the Pearson chi-square test.

RESULTS

The mean interval of CT was significantly shorter and the mean number of CTs was significantly larger in the surgical resection group than in the endoscopic resection group. All 34 gastric recurrences were diagnosed by endoscopy. All seven extragastric recurrences occurred in patients treated for EGC with submucosal invasion. Six extragastric recurrences were detected by CT out of a total of 5417 CT scans. The average cumulative dose length product was significantly higher in the surgical group than in the endoscopic resection group (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Follow-up CTs were performed more frequently in patients after surgical resection than in patients after endoscopic resection of EGCs. However, CT scans were not effective in detecting recurrent tumors after either treatment methods, especially for patients treated for mucosal gastric cancer.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery in early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and gastrectomy with lymph node dissection are considered acceptable treatment modalities for early gastric cancer (EGC). In the last decade, ESD has become more favorable than surgery as it offers faster recovery, lower costs, and a superior quality of life when compared to gastrectomy. The aim of this study is to compare the long-term outcome of ESD versus surgery in EGC. We performed a systematic and comprehensive search of major reference databases (Medline, Embase, CINHAL) for all studies that compared the outcome of EGC for patients underwent ESD or surgery in the same cohort. A systematic review was conducted through November 2017, using pooled analysis to calculate 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, disease-specific survival (DSS) rate, disease-free survival (DFS) rate, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate of ESD versus gastrectomy. Five-year OS and DSS were similar between ESD and gastrectomy groups 96 versus 96% and 99.4 versus 99.2%, respectively. Likewise, DFS was similar in both groups 95.9 versus 98.5% odds ratio 1.86 (0.57-6.0) P=0.3. However, ESD had a lower RFS compared to surgery 92.4 versus 98.3% odds ratio 0.17 (0.1-4.9) P=0.001. Overall, there was a higher recurrence rate in patients who underwent ESD compared to surgery [40/2943 (1.4%) vs. 12/3116 (0.4) risk ratio (RR) 2.5 (1.3-4.8) P=0.005]. Moreover, synchronous and metachronous cancers were more prevalent in the ESD group compared to the surgery group [1.5 vs. 0.1% RR 5.7 (1.5-21.9) P=0.01] [16/1082 (1.5%) vs. 1/1485 (0.1%) RR 10.1 (5.9-17.1) P=0.0001]. Five-year OS, DSS and DFS were similar between ESD and surgery groups. However, recurrent, synchronous and metachronous cancers were more prevalent in patients treated by ESD compared to patients treated by surgery, resulting in a lower RFS. Adequate surveillance with upper endoscopy is crucial after ESD to detect early recurrence and metachronous lesions.

Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection with surgical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: An updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There are several surgical options for treating early gastric cancers (EGCs), such as endoscopic resection, laparoscopic or open gastrectomy with D1 or D2 lymphadenectomy. Endoscopic resection for EGC with low risk of lymph node metastasis has been widely accepted as a therapeutic alternative. The role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in treating EGC is not well established, especially when compared with resection surgery cases in a long-term follow-up scope.

AIM

To compare the safety and efficacy of the short- and long-term outcomes between ESD and resection surgery.

METHODS

We searched the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from January 1990 to June 2018, enrolling studies reporting short- or long-term outcomes of ESD in comparison with resection surgery for EGC. The quality of the studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Stata software (version 12.0) was used for the analysis. Pooling analysis was conducted using either fixed- or random-effects models depending on heterogeneity across studies.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies comprising 5112 patients were eligible for analysis (2402 for EGC and 2710 for radical surgery). Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the ESD approach showed advantages through decreased operation time [weighted mean difference (WMD): -140.02 min, 95%CI: -254.23 to -34.82 min, P = 0.009], shorter hospital stay (WMD: -5.41 d, 95% CI: -5.93 to -4.89 d, P < 0.001), and lower postoperative complication rate [Odds ratio (OR) = 0.39, 95%CI: 0.28-0.55, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, EGC patients who underwent ESD had higher recurrence rate (OR = 9.24, 95%CI: 5.94-14.36, P < 0.001) than resection surgery patients. However, the long-term survival including overall survival [Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.26-1.00, P = 0.05] and event-free survival (HR = 1.59, 95%CI: 0.66-9.81, P = 0.300) showed no significant differences between these two groups.

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of EGC, ESD was safe and feasible in comparison with resection surgery, with advantages in several surgical and post-operative recovery parameters. Although the recurrence rate was higher in ESD group, the long-term survival was still comparable in these two groups, suggesting ESD could be recommended as standard treatment for EGC with indications.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis: a propensity score-matched case-control study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasms in liver cirrhosis patients have not been adequately reported, leading to clinician concerns about adverse events, including bleeding and the deterioration of liver function. We compared the efficacy and safety of ESD between cirrhosis and noncirrhosis patients.

METHODS

Between January 2005 and December 2014, 158 cirrhosis patients underwent ESD for gastric neoplasms at a tertiary medical institution. Their clinical outcomes were compared with those of a propensity score-matched control group (158 patients) selected from noncirrhosis patients, using age, sex, histology, tumor location, and lesion size as variables.

RESULTS

En bloc resection (96.8%), curative resection (89.9%), and adverse event (bleeding [10.1%] and perforation [1.9%]) rates in the cirrhosis group did not differ significantly from those in the noncirrhosis group. The median procedure time (25.0 vs 23.0 minutes) was also comparable between the groups. In a survival analysis cirrhosis patients exhibited a significantly higher mortality risk than noncirrhosis patients (hazard ratio [HR], 3.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-9.23; P = .01). Cirrhosis patients without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) showed no statistically significant difference in mortality compared with the noncirrhosis group (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, .72-6.39; P = .171). Three of 153 patients (2%) exhibited a deterioration of prognosis from Child-Pugh class A to B.

CONCLUSIONS

In compensated cirrhosis patients, especially those without HCC, ESD for gastric epithelial neoplasms can be performed with safety and efficacy comparable with that in noncirrhosis patients, without deterioration in liver function.

Early detection of gastric cancer using global, genome-wide and IRF4, ELMO1, CLIP4 and MSC DNA methylation in endoscopic biopsies

Clinically useful molecular tools to triage gastric cancer patients are not currently available. We aimed to develop a molecular tool to predict gastric cancer risk in endoscopy-driven biopsies obtained from high-risk gastric cancer clinics in low resource settings.

We discovered and validated a DNA methylation biomarker panel in endoscopic samples obtained from 362 patients seen between 2004 and 2009 in three high-risk gastric cancer clinics in Lima, Perú, and validated it in 306 samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas project (“TCGA”). Global, epigenome wide and gene-specific DNA methylation analyses were used in a Phase I Biomarker Development Trial to identify a continuous biomarker panel that combines a Global DNA Methylation Index (GDMI) and promoter DNA methylation levels of IRF4, ELMO1, CLIP4 and MSC.

We observed an inverse association between the GDMI and histological progression to gastric cancer, when comparing gastritis patients without metaplasia (mean = 5.74, 95% CI, 4.97−6.50), gastritis patients with metaplasia (mean = 4.81, 95% CI, 3.77−5.84), and gastric cancer cases (mean = 3.38, 95% CI, 2.82−3.94), respectively (p < 0.0001). Promoter methylation of IRF4 (p < 0.0001), ELMO1 (p < 0.0001), CLIP4 (p < 0.0001), and MSC (p < 0.0001), is also associated with increasing severity from gastritis with no metaplasia to gastritis with metaplasia and gastric cancer.

Our findings suggest that IRF4, ELMO1, CLIP4 and MSC promoter methylation coupled with a GDMI>4 are useful molecular tools for gastric cancer risk stratification in endoscopic biopsies.

The Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIMS

There are two treatment modalities for early gastric cancer (EGC)-surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of ESD with surgery.

METHOD

The article was performed by searching PubMed databases. Data were extracted using predefined form and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated and P value.

RESULTS

13 studies were identified. The incidence of perforation in two groups was different [OR = 6.18 (95% CI: 1.37-27.98), P = 0.02]. The prevalences of synchronous and metachronous cancer in the ESD group were higher than those in the surgery group [OR = 8.52 (95% CI: 1.99-36.56), P = 0.004 and OR = 7.15 (95% CI: 2.95-17.32), P < 0.0001]. The recurrence and complete resection rates were different [OR = 6.93 (95% CI: 2.83-16.96), P < 0.0001 and OR = 0.32 (95% CI: 0.20-0.52), P < 0.00001]. Compared with the surgery group, the hospital stay was shorter [IV = -7.15 (95% CI: -9.08-5.22), P < 0.00001], the adverse event rate was lower, and the quality of life (QOL) was better in the ESD group. The difference of bleeding was not found.

CONCLUSION

ESD appears to be preferable for EGC, due to a lower rate of adverse events, shorter hospital stay, cheaper cost, and higher QOL.

Endoscopic resection versus radical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in Asia: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection (ER) and radical gastrectomy (RG) for early gastric cancer (EGC) in Asia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched relevant articles published before September 1, 2017. We evaluated the quality of the included non-randomized studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Meta-analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.3 software. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for the dichotomous data.

RESULTS

Fifteen retrospective studies were included in this analysis (3737 patients in the ER group and 4246 patients in RG group). No significant differences in the three-year survival rate (OR, 0.87; 95%CI, 0.50-1.53) and five-year survival rate (OR, 0.81; 95%CI, 0.58-1.13) between the ER and RG groups were observed. Although patients undergoing ER had a higher risk of recurrence (OR, 6.07; 95%CI 4.17-8.84) and the occurrence of metachronous cancer (OR, 8.35; 95%CI, 5.48-12.75), recurrent or metachronous gastric cancers following ER were successfully detected and removed using the endoscopic technique. Higher recurrence in the ER group may be associated with its lower en bloc resection rate (OR, 0.05; 95%CI, 0.02-0.14) and complete resection rate (OR, 0.03; 95%CI, 0.01-0.08). Importantly, although the three-year survival and five-year survival were similar in the two groups, the complication rate in the ER group was significantly lower than that in the RG group.

CONCLUSION

ER is a good choice for patients with small EGC lesions (≤2 cm) without lymph node metastasis, especially in elderly patients with various medical comorbidities and in patients who cannot tolerate abdominal surgery or who meet the criteria but decline surgery. In contrast, RG is recommended when the diameter of the tumor is large (>2 cm) and preoperative examination suggests the possible presence of lymph node metastasis.

Gastric cancer treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection or endoscopic mucosal resection in Japan from 2004 through 2006: JGCA nationwide registry conducted in 2013

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) initiated a new nationwide gastric cancer registry in 2008 and reported the treatment outcomes of patients with primary gastric cancer who underwent surgical therapy in 2001 and 2003. However, the outcomes of endoscopic therapy have not been reported yet.

METHODS

The JGCA conducted a retrospective nationwide registry in 2013 to investigate the short-term and long-term outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with gastric cancer treated from January 2004 through December 2006. This registry used a computerized database with terminology in accordance with the JGCA classification (13th and 14th editions) and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines from 2010.

RESULTS

Accurate data on 12,647 patients were collected from 126 participating hospitals and analyzed. The treatment procedure was endoscopic submucosal dissection in 81% of the patients and endoscopic mucosal resection in 19%. En bloc and R0 resections were achieved in 89% and 79% of the patients respectively. The total proportion of patients who underwent curative resection was 69.2%; 43.8% of patients underwent curative resection for absolute indication lesions, and 25.4% underwent curative resection for expanded indication lesions. Emergency surgery was performed to treat bleeding or perforation in very few patients (0.3% and 0.4% respectively). The 5-year follow-up rate after endoscopic resection was 70%. The 5-year overall survival rate was 91.6% in patients with absolute indications and 90.3% in patients with expanded indications after curative resection and 86.5% in patients who underwent noncurative resection. The 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 99.9%, 99.7%, and 98.7% in patients with absolute indications who underwent curative resection, patients with expanded indications who underwent curative resection, and patients who underwent noncurative resection respectively.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic resection of gastric cancer resulted in favorable short-term and long-term outcomes nationwide in Japan. Further efforts to increase the follow-up rate are needed.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophagogastric junction tumors: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) tumors is more aggressive and worsens the quality of life of the patients and leads to poor prognosis even after surgery compared with tumors in other sites of the stomach. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted treatment modality for premalignant lesions and early cancers in the stomach. However, EGJ tumor is one of the most technically difficult lesions to resect by ESD. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of ESD for EGJ epithelial neoplasms and to assess the predictive factors for incomplete resection.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study of 48 patients who underwent ESD for adenomas and early cancers of the EGJ between March 2006 and November 2015 at the Pusan National University Hospital. Therapeutic outcomes of ESD and procedure-related adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

En bloc resection, complete resection, and curative resection rates were 96, 77, and 71%, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that the presence of ulceration was an independent predictive factor for incomplete resection (odds ratio 21.3, 95% confidence interval 1.51-298.49; p = 0.023). The procedure-related bleeding, perforation, and stenosis rates were 8, 4, and 0%, respectively; none of the adverse events required surgical intervention. During a median follow-up period of 25 months (range 6-72 months), local recurrence occurred in four patients with incomplete resection.

CONCLUSION

ESD is an effective, safe, and feasible treatment for EGJ epithelial neoplasms. However, the complete resection rate decreases for tumors with ulceration.

Efficacy, Safety, and Overall Quality of Life of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Colorectal Cancer in Elderly Patients

Purpose

Studies reporting the treatment of early colorectal cancer (ECC) by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in elderly patients are lacking in China. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and overall quality of life of elderly patients with ECC who undergoing ESD.

Methods

Three hundred and seventy-nine patients with 401 colorectal lesions entered into our study from March 2013 to March 2016 (Patients with an age 70 years old or older were divided into the elderly group and those who were less than 70-year-old entered the non-elderly group).

Results

No significant differences were found in sex ratio, body mass index, location, endoscopic classification, pathological pattern, lesion size, mean procedure time, hospitalization days, complete excision, and en bloc resection rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of complications during and after ESD procedure (P > 0.05). There were no statistical differences between two groups in Quality of life index (QL-Index) and European Organization for Research and Treatment quality of life version 3.0 questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) scores (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

ESD was relatively safe and effective for elderly patients with ECC, and it may be an recommended first-line treatment.

Concomitant stromal tumor and early cancer of the stomach: What should be done?

Concomitant gastric stromal tumor (GST) and gastric cancer (GC) is uncommon; even more uncommon is a concomitant GST and early stage GC (EGC). Tumor resection by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for concomitant GST and EGC has not been reported. We sought to define the clinical importance of detection of concomitant GST and EGC during the first esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and compare the clinical outcomes of ESD versus radical surgery for the treatment of concomitant GST and EGC. Our investigation was a retrospective cohort study. Patients with concomitant GST and EGC who underwent ESD or radical surgery were enrolled at the university-affiliated hospital from January 2005 to January 2015. The detection rate of concomitant GST and EGC during the first EGD was 3/25 (12%). Among 25 patients, 14 underwent ESD and 11 underwent surgery. Mean operation time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the ESD group than the surgery group. There were no significant differences in terms of rates of en bloc resection, complete resection, and early complications. Late complications were more common in the surgery group than in the ESD group. The median follow-up duration was 58.9 months. Three- or 5-year overall survival rates were 100% for both groups and no patient died of EGC and GST. There was no local recurrence in the 2 groups; however, 3 metachronous EGC lesions were found during the follow-up period in the ESD group as follows: the simultaneous occurrence of GST and EGC was uncommon; the detection rate of concomitant GST and EGC was very low at the first EGD; and ESD appeared to be a safe, efficient, and popular treatment option for concomitant GST and EGC, that met the ESD absolute indication, and the outcomes were comparable to those achieved with surgery.

Comparative study between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery in patients with early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is accepted as a standard treatment in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) who have a negligible risk of lymph node metastasis. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes between ESD and surgery in patients with EGC that fulfilled the expanded indication of ESD on their final pathologic report.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical data of patients who underwent gastric ESD and surgery between January 2007 and December 2012. Patients with pathologically confirmed EGC that fulfilled the expanded indication of ESD on their final pathologic report were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 2023 patients, 817 (40.4%) underwent ESD and 1206 (59.6%) underwent surgery. The proportion of cases meeting the absolute indication was significantly higher in the ESD group than in the surgery group (66.0 vs. 26.2%). Lesions on the middle third, >3 cm in size, flat or depressed, and of undifferentiated histology were significantly more common in the surgery group than in the ESD group. The ESD group showed lower acute complication rates [8.1% (66 of 817) vs. 18.1% (218 of 1206), P ≤ 0.001] and procedure-related mortality [0 vs. 0.3% (4 of 1206), P = 0.153] than the surgical group. The annual incidence of recurrent gastric cancer was 2.18% in the ESD group and 0.19% in the surgery group. The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were not significantly different between the ESD group and the surgery group (overall survival: 96.4 vs. 97.2%, P = 0.423; disease-specific survival: 99.6 vs. 99.2%, P = 0.203).

CONCLUSIONS

Although EGC lesions had poorer features in the surgery group than in the ESD group, ESD was comparable to surgery for EGCs that fulfilled the expanded indication of ESD, with lower rates of acute complication and comparable overall survival.

Can Endoscopic Ulcerations in Early Gastric Cancer Be Clearly Defined before Endoscopic Resection? A Survey among Endoscopists

Background/Aims

Early gastric cancer (EGC) with ulcerations can be treated via endoscopic resection (ER) when it is differentiated pathologically, limited to the mucosa, and <3 cm in diameter. The presence of ulceration is a key factor in deciding treatment strategies and is usually diagnosed during endoscopic examination. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether ulcerations in EGC can be clearly defined among endoscopists and which factors are related to the differences.

Methods

A survey questionnaire, composed of demographic features and endoscopic images of seven patients with EGC, was presented to the endoscopists via e-mail. The endoscopists were asked whether such patients have ulcerations in the lesions.

Results

The questionnaires were e-mailed to 197 endoscopists, and 103 doctors replied. The presence of an endoscopic ulceration was defined differently among the endoscopists, depending on the duration of endoscopic practice and the experience of endoscopic submucosal dissection. The differences were especially high in the lesions without mucosal breaks and converging folds, which were expected to be viewed as non-ulcerative.

Conclusions

Before ER, endoscopic ulcerations in EGC must be reviewed by experienced endoscopists to reduce overestimations, and adequate educational programs for trainees should be established.

Long-term prognosis of expanded-indication differentiated-type early gastric cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection or surgery using propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for expanded-indication lesions of differentiated-type early gastric cancer (EGC) has been widely accepted, no prospective randomized study has been conducted on this subject. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of ESD and surgery for expanded-indication lesions of differentiated-type EGC.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2012, 1500 consecutive patients with EGC were treated in Osaka City University Hospital. Using propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), we retrospectively evaluated the long-term outcomes, risk factors for mortality, and adverse events for patients with expanded-indication lesions of differentiated-type EGC who underwent ESD or surgical treatments.

RESULTS

A total of 308 patients with expanded-indication lesions of differentiated-type EGC confirmed by pathologic examination after ESD or surgery met the eligibility criteria. After matching, the 5-year overall survival rate was higher in the ESD group than in the surgery group (97.1% vs 85.8%; P = .01). We also found that surgery was significantly associated with mortality using both the IPTW method (hazard ratio [HR], 10.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-86.6; P < .01), and Cox analysis (HR, 8.60; 95% CI, 1.11-66.52; P = .04) after matching. Significantly fewer adverse events were associated with ESD than with surgery (6.8% vs 28.4%; P < .01). No cause-specific mortality was observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that ESD might be an alternative treatment modality for expanded-indication lesions of differentiated-type EGC.

Long-Term Outcomes of Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Focus on Metachronous and Non-Curative Resection Management

Introduction

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for gastric superficial neoplasms and curative in 80-85% of the patients. The aims of this study were to identify risk factors for non-curative resection and metachronous development, and to evaluate patient management and outcome after non-curative resection.

Methods

In this single-centre study, the outcome of consecutive patients submitted to gastric ESD was assessed during a minimum follow-up of 18 months. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify risk factors.

Results

ESD was performed in 194 lesions (164 patients) between 2005 and 2014. The median follow-up was 40 months. En bloc and complete resection rates were 95.3 and 93.8%, respectively. Male sex, larger tumor size, longer procedural time, and more advanced histology were associated with a non-curative resection (p < 0.05), but only carcinoma detected in biopsies before resection was identified as a significant risk factor on multivariate analysis. Metachronous lesions occurred in 18.4%, and the incidence rate was 4.7 lesions/100 person-years. Older age at diagnosis was identified as the only predictor of metachronous development in logistic regression. In the non-curative resection group, survival did not differ between patients allocated to surveillance and those submitted to gastrectomy; 75% of gastrectomy specimens showed no residual lesion.

Conclusions

The risk factors identified for non-curative resection help to improve patient selection and patient information. Older patients had an increased risk for the development of metachronous lesions. In patients with non-curative resections, individualized patient management and surveillance seems to be an adequate option in selected cases.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: To systematically review the medical literature in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Ovid, CINAHL, and Cochrane for studies reporting on the clinical efficacy and safety profile of gastric ESD.

RESULTS: Twenty-nine thousand five hundred and six tumors in 27155 patients (31% female) who underwent gastric ESD between 1999 and 2014 were included in this study. R0 resection rate was 90% (95%CI: 87%-92%) with significant between-study heterogeneity (P < 0.001) which was partly explained by difference in region (P = 0.02) and sample size (P = 0.04). Endoscopic en bloc and curative resection rates were 94% (95%CI: 93%-96%) and 86% (95%CI: 83%-89%) respectively. The rate of immediate and delayed perforation rates were 2.7% (95%CI: 2.1%-3.3%) and 0.39% (95%CI: 0.06%-2.4%) respectively while rates of immediate and delayed major bleeding were 2.9% (95%CI: 1.3-6.6) and 3.6% (95%CI: 3.1%-4.3%). After an average follow-up of about 30 mo post-operative, the rate of tumor recurrence was 0.02% (95%CI: 0.001-1.4) among those with R0 resection and 7.7% (95%CI: 3.6%-16%) among those without R0 resection. Overall, irrespective of the resection status, recurrence rate was 0.75% (95%CI: 0.42%-1.3%).

CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis, the largest and most comprehensive assessment of gastric ESD till date, showed that gastric ESD is safe and effective for gastric tumors and warrants consideration as first line therapy when an expert operator is available.

Endoscopic resection versus surgery for early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions: a meta-analysis

Aim

To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection (ER) and surgery for the treatment of early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions.

Methods

Databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Science Citation Index, from 2000 to 2016, were searched for eligible articles. In this meta-analysis, the main outcome measurements were local recurrence, complications, metachronous lesions, hospital stay, and 5-year overall survival.

Results

Nine trials were identified and a total of 2748 patients were included. The rate of complication was higher in the surgery group compared with the ER group (OR 0.41; 95 % CI 0.30–0.55). The rates of local recurrence and metachronous lesions were lower in the surgery group (OR 0.03; 95 % CI 0.00–0.06; OR 8.76; 95 % CI 4.17–18.41). The hospital stay was shorter in the ER group (mean difference −6.96; 95 % CI −7.94 to −5.99). The 5-year overall survival rate did not significantly differ between the two groups (OR 1.23; 95 % CI 1.03–1.47).

Conclusions

We provided evidence that, ER was comparable to surgery in terms of the 5-year overall survival. In addition, ER had a lower rate of complications and shorter hospital stay, but a higher rate of local recurrence and metachronous lesions for the treatment of early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions.

Comparison of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery for Differentiated Type Early Gastric Cancer within the Expanded Criteria

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a novel alternative treatment for differentiated early gastric cancer (EGC) without lymph node metastasis. We conducted this study to verify the therapeutic usefulness of ESD for treating differentiated EGC compared to that of surgery.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 382 patients treated with differentiated EGC from March 2006 to May 2010. The propensity score yielded 275 matched patients. They were divided into an ESD group of 175 people and a gastrectomy group of 100 people. The patient demographics, pathologic characteristics, length of hospital stay, complication rate and survival rate were compared.

RESULTS

The complication rate was higher for the gastrectomy group than for the ESD group (15.0% vs. 5.1%, p=0.007). The average length of patient hospitalization was longer after gastrectomy than after ESD (8.6 days vs. 2.4 days, p<0.001). There were two cases of mortality in the surgery group within 30 days of procedure. The 5-year survival rates of the two groups did not show a statistically significant difference (92.0% vs. 93.3%, p=0.496).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term survival rates of ESD and gastrectomy were not significantly different. The complication rate was lower for ESD than for gastrectomy, and the length of hospital stay was shorter after ESD than after gastrectomy.

Effect of additional surgery after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) without lymph node metastasis. However, some patients undergo noncurative ESD. The aim of the present study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of noncurative ESD with or without additional surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated the chart data from all patients who had undergone ESD for EGC at Saga Medical School Hospital and Saga Prefectural Medical Centre Koseikan between 2001 and 2012. A total of 957 cases (1047 lesions) of EGC underwent ESD, and 99 had noncurative ESD. In total, 20 cases were excluded because their follow-up period was < 3 years. We divided the patients into observation and additional surgery groups, and we compared the survival rate and related factors between the groups.

RESULTS

After noncurative ESD, 28 /79 patients (35.4 %) underwent additional surgery and 51/79 (64.6 %) were followed up without surgery. The average age of patients in the observation group was higher than that of the additional surgery group (75.9 vs. 71.6 years; P = 0.03). The incidence of hypertension was significantly higher in the observation group compared with the additional surgery group (51.0 vs. 25.9 %; P = 0.03). The overall survival rate of the additional surgery group was longer than that of the observation group. However, only one patient died from gastric cancer in the observation group. The disease-specific survival rate did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

It might be acceptable to follow up without additional surgery for some patients with comorbidity and who were elderly after noncurative ESD for EGC.

Endoscopic options for treatment of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus

Recent advances in the endoscopic treatment of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus (BE) have allowed endoscopists to provide effective and durable eradication therapies. This review summarizes the available endoscopic eradication techniques for dysplasia in patients with BE including endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, photodynamic therapy, argon plasma coagulation, radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy.

Endoscopy vs surgery in the treatment of early gastric cancer: Systematic review

AIM: To report a systematic review, establishing the available data to an unpublished 2a strength of evidence, better handling clinical practice.

METHODS: A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, LILACS, Scopus and CINAHL databases. Information of the selected studies was extracted on characteristics of trial participants, inclusion and exclusion criteria, interventions (mainly, mucosal resection and submucosal dissection vs surgical approach) and outcomes (adverse events, different survival rates, mortality, recurrence and complete resection rates). To ascertain the validity of eligible studies, the risk of bias was measured using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The analysis of the absolute risk of the outcomes was performed using the software RevMan, by computing risk differences (RD) of dichotomous variables. Data on RD and 95%CIs for each outcome were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel test and inconsistency was qualified and reported in χ² and the Higgins method (I²). Sensitivity analysis was performed when heterogeneity was higher than 50%, a subsequent assay was done and other findings were compiled.

RESULTS: Eleven retrospective cohort studies were selected. The included records involved 2654 patients with early gastric cancer that filled the absolute or expanded indications for endoscopic resection. Three-year survival data were available for six studies (n = 1197). There were no risk differences (RD) after endoscopic and surgical treatment (RD = 0.01, 95%CI: -0.02-0.05, P = 0.51). Five-year survival data (n = 2310) showed no difference between the two groups (RD = 0.01, 95%CI: -0.01-0.03, P = 0.46). Recurrence data were analized in five studies (1331 patients) and there was no difference between the approaches (RD = 0.01, 95%CI: -0.00-0.02, P = 0.09). Adverse event data were identified in eight studies (n = 2439). A significant difference was detected (RD = -0.08, 95%CI: -0.10--0.05, P < 0.05), demonstrating better results with endoscopy. Mortality data were obtained in four studies (n = 1107). There was no difference between the groups (RD = -0.01, 95%CI: -0.02-0.00, P = 0.22).

CONCLUSION: Three-, 5-year survival, recurrence and mortality are similar for both groups. Considering complication, endoscopy is better and, analyzing complete resection data, it is worse than surgery.

Endoscopic Resection Compared with Gastrectomy to Treat Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection and gastrectomy are treatment modalities for early gastric cancer, but their relative benefits and risks are unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare endoscopic resection and gastrectomy for treating early gastric cancer.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until April 2015 for studies comparing endoscopic resection with gastrectomy for treatment of early gastric cancer. Outcome measures were five-year overall survival (OS), length of hospital stay and postoperative morbidity. We calculated pooled hazard ratio (HR), weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) using random effects models.

RESULTS

Six studies comprising 1,466 patients (618 endoscopic resection and 848 gastrectomy) met inclusion criteria. Five-year OS was similar between endoscopic resection and gastrectomy (HR, 1.06; 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.83). Endoscopic resection was associated with shorter hospital stays (WMD, -6.94; 95% CI: -7.59 to -6.29) and reduced overall postoperative morbidity (OR, 0.36; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

While five-year OS is similar between endoscopic resection and gastrectomy, endoscopic resection offers a shorter hospital stay and fewer complications than gastrectomy for treating early gastric cancer. Endoscopic resection is a reasonable treatment for early gastric cancer with a negligible risk of lymph node metastasis.

Comparison of endoscopic resection and gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection methods, including endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection, have become standard treatment modalities for patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) and absolute indications, with en bloc resection being more frequent with the latter. Endoscopic resection, however, has been associated with higher recurrence and metachronous cancer rates than gastrectomy. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection and gastrectomy for EGC.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were electronically searched for relevant studies comparing endoscopic resection and gastrectomy for EGC from 1976 through March 2015. The primary endpoints were en bloc resection and histologically complete resection rates. The secondary endpoints were duration of hospital stay and rates of complications, recurrence, metachronous cancer and overall survival.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis enrolled 10 studies with 2070 patients: 993 patients who underwent endoscopic resection and 1077 who underwent gastrectomy. Endoscopic resection was associated with shorter hospital stay (standardized mean difference -2.02; 95 % confidence interval [CI] -2.64 to -1.39) and lower complication rate (relative risk [RR] 0.41; 95 % CI 0.22-0.76) than gastrectomy. However, endoscopic resection was associated with lower rates of en bloc resection (odds ratio [OR] 0.05; 95 % CI 0.02-0.16) and histologically complete resection (OR 0.04; 95 % CI 0.01-0.11) and higher rates of recurrence (RR 5.23; 95 % CI 2.43-11.27) and metachronous cancer (RR 5.22; 95 % CI 2.40-11.34) than gastrectomy. Overall survival rate (OR 1.18; 95 % CI 0.76-1.82) was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic resection is minimally invasive and as effective as surgery, suggesting that the former be considered standard treatment for EGC. It should be recommended as standard treatment for EGC with indications. Additional randomized controlled trials from more countries are required.

Clinical outcomes of the endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer are comparable between absolute and new expanded criteria

Background/Aims

Advances in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) techniques have led to the development of expanded criteria for endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer (EGC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes for ESD using indication criteria.

Methods

A total of 1,105 patients underwent ESD for EGC at six medical centers. The patients were classified into the following two groups based on the lesion size, presence of ulceration and pathological review: an absolute criteria group (n=517) and an expanded criteria group (n=588).

Results

The curative resection rates (91.1% vs 91.3%, p=0.896) were similar in the absolute criteria group and the expanded criteria group. The en bloc resection rates (93.4% and 92.3%, respectively; p=0.488) and complete resection rates (98.3% and 97.4%, respectively; p=0.357) did not differ between the groups. The cumulative disease-free survival rates and the overall survival rates were similar between the groups (p=0.778 and p=0.654, respectively). Independent factors for the curative resection of EGC included tumor location (upper vs middle and lower, 2.632 [1.128–6.144] vs 3.497 [1.560–7.842], respectively) and en bloc resection rate 12.576 [7.442–21.250].

Conclusions

The expanded criteria for ESD in cases of EGC is comparable with the widely accepted pre-existing criteria.

Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Gastric Neoplasms in the Elderly

The number of elderly people with superficial gastric neoplasms is increasing, but the clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for treating elderly people with superficial gastric neoplasms remains unclear. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ESD for patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) and precancerous lesions in elderly (≥75 years of age) and nonelderly (<75 years of age) patients.From October 2005 to December 2014, 83 consecutive patients with EGC and precancerous lesions (86 lesions) who were treated using ESD in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. There were 44 lesions in 42 elderly patients who were at least 75-years old. The following parameters were compared between the 2 groups: preexisting comorbidities, performance status (PS), lesion inclusion criteria, lesion characteristics, treatment outcomes, surgery time, duration of hospitalization, complications, and intraoperative hemodynamic changes.Elderly patients had significantly higher preexisting comorbidity rates (90.9% vs 59.5%, P = 0.001), expanded lesion criteria rates (43.2% vs 19.0%, P = 0.016), and lower best PS rates (38.6% vs 81.0%, P < 0.001) than nonelderly patients. Lesion characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. The elderly had higher intraoperative hypotension rates (47.7% vs 21.4%, P = 0.011) and oxygen desaturation rates (9.1% vs 0.0%, P = 0.045) than nonelderly patients. In addition, the elderly also had a longer surgery time (107.0 ± 51.4 vs 91.5 ± 66.2 minutes, P = 0.049) and duration of hospitalization (7.5 ± 3.8 vs 5.9 ± 2.0 days, P = 0.016) than nonelderly patients. There were no differences in the prevalence rates of en-bloc resection, complete resection, bleeding, perforation, pneumonia, or intraabdominal free air between the 2 groups.Although elderly patients who underwent ESD for superficial gastric neoplasms had an increasing risk of intraoperative hypotension and oxygen desaturation, all patients were treated appropriately without postoperative sequelae. ESD is a safe and feasible intervention for elderly patients who have more comorbidity, a worse PS and more expanded lesions.

Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgical Resection for Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Endoscopic resection (ER) has been widely accepted to treat early gastric cancer (EGC) in place of surgical resection (SR). The aim of this meta-analysis was to conduct a comprehensive comparison between the two methods.Four literature databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE, were searched for studies that compared ER with SR to treat EGC. In this meta-analysis, primary and secondary endpoints were compared between the two groups. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints included operation-related death, local recurrence, metachronous lesions, procedure-related complication, bleeding, hospital stay, operation time, and cost.Nineteen studies consisting of a total of 6118 patients were identified and selected for evaluation. Meta-analysis showed that long-term outcomes of ER versus SR for EGC were comparable in terms of 5-year OS (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-1.02), DSS (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.89-1.08), DFS (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86-1.05), and RFS (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.94-1.01). However, ER had shorter operation time (standardized mean difference [SMD] -3.39, 95% CI -3.58 to 3.20), hospital stay (SMD -2.86, 95% CI -4.02 to -1.69), lower costs (SMD -5.30, 95% CI -10.37 to -0.22), and fewer procedure-related complications (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.28-0.65) compared to SR. Nevertheless, ER had higher incidences of local recurrence (risk difference 0.01, 95% CI 0.00-0.02) and metachronous lesions (RR 6.81, 95% CI 3.80-12.19).Endoscopic resection was associated with similar long-term outcomes and considerable advantages concerning operation time, hospital stay, costs, and complications, compared with SR, and was also associated with disadvantages such as higher incidence of local recurrence and metachronous lesions. Further high-quality studies from more countries are required to confirm these results.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early stage esophagogastric junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although endoscopic submucosal dissection has become widely used for the management of selected cases of early gastric cancer, the effects of endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophagogastric junction cancer have not been fully evaluated.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched using the primary keywords "endoscopic submucosal dissection," "ESD," "endoscopic resection," "esophagogastric junction," "gastroesophageal junction," and "Barrett." Six short-term clinical outcomes and three long-term oncologic outcomes were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of six studies provided data on 359 early stage esophagogastric junction cancers treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection. The pooled estimate of en bloc resection and complete resection was 98.6% (95% confidence interval 95.9-99.6%) and 87.0% (95% confidence interval 79.7-92.0%), respectively. The pooled estimate of stenosis was 6.9% (95% confidence interval 3.2-14.0%). In 269 lesions with curative resection, there was no local recurrence or distant metastasis. In contrast, three local recurrences and two distant metastases occurred in 90 lesions with non-curative resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early stage esophagogastric junction cancer is a feasible treatment option with high en bloc resection, complete resection rates and an acceptable range of complications. When curative resections are achieved, good oncologic outcomes are likely in the management of early stage esophagogastric junction cancer by endoscopic submucosal dissection.