Expression of Hepatocyte Hepatitis B Core Antigen and Hepatitis B Surface Antigen as a Marker in the Management of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Distinct histological patterns in chronic hepatitis D with nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy

Background

Chronic hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection leads to a more severe hepatitis than hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection alone. Specific histological staining patterns have been described in HBV mono-infection, however this has not been extensively investigated in HDV co-infection. This study evaluated whether the use of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) for concurrent HBV infection has an impact on the histological appearance of chronic HDV.

Methods

Liver biopsies of all patients referred for management of HDV infection were reviewed and hepatitis-specific stains for HBV antigens were evaluated. Clinical and histological characteristics were compared between patients on and off-NA therapy.

Results

50 patients were included in our analysis, of which 26 (52%) were on NA therapy at the time of the biopsy. Overall, 8% stained for HBV core antigen and 86% stained for HBV surface antigen. On and off-NA groups had similar degrees of fibrosis and inflammation, however NA patients had an odds ratio of 7.15 for membranous staining and 0.13 for scattered granular staining (p = 0.001). No association was found with markers of disease severity or viral activity, with nonetheless a lower score of total inflammation noted in biopsies with a positive membranous stain (8.5 vs. 10.3 p = 0.04).

Conclusion

In chronic HDV infection, patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogs demonstrate a unique membranous staining pattern for hepatitis B surface antigen, which is not associated with HBV or HDV replicative activity. These findings may help improve the understanding of the role of HBV directed therapy in HDV pathophysiology.

Highlights

Histological staining is associated with viral activity in chronic HBV, however this has been infrequently explored in HDV. In HDV, staining patterns differ based on HBV treatment status and do not appear to be associated with markers of viral activity.

Presence of entry receptors and viral markers suggest a low level of placental replication of hepatitis B virus in a proportion of pregnant women infected with chronic hepatitis B

The transplacental route of vertical transmission of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) has been known for over a decade. Here we present evidence which suggest HBV can replicate in placenta. Forty-one HBsAg positive and 10 control pregnant women were enrolled in the study after obtaining informed consent. HBV positives were further divided in the High Viral Load (HVL) Group and Low Viral Load (LVL) Group according to INASL guidelines 2018. The Presence of the HBV DNA and expression of NTCP in the placenta was analyzed by qPCR/RT-qPCR and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC). The presence of cccDNA was assessed using Digital Droplet PCR while the presence of pre-genomic (pg) RNA was assessed through qRT-PCR and sequencing. The presence of HBeAg and HBcAg in the placenta was assessed by IHC. Immunostaining of NTCP, HBeAg and HBcAg on trophoblasts along with the presence of total HBV DNA, cccDNA and pgRNA indicated, that these cells are not only susceptible to HBV infection but may also support viral replication. This is further supported by the finding that trophoblasts of the several HBeAg seronegative samples harbored the HBeAg. Although, we did not find any correlation in NTCP expression and viral markers with viral load indicates placental replication may not aping hepatocytes. The presence of the HBV receptor, NTCP along with the presence of cccDNA, pgRNA, and HBeAg in placenta of HBV infected females without circulating HBeAg suggest that placenta act as a replication host.

Liver Fibrosis in the Natural Course of Chronic Hepatitis B Viral Infection: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Quantitative data are limited on the natural course of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic HBV infection (CHB).

AIMS

To estimate the prevalence of fibrosis status including non-fibrosis, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis throughout the natural course of CHB.

METHODS

We searched Cochrane library, EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect from January 1993 to November 2019 for studies with histologic data on liver fibrosis in CHB natural course. CHB course was defined based on current criteria for identifying infection phases as recommended by international clinical practice guidelines, including the HBeAg-positive immune-tolerant, HBeAg-positive immune-active, HBeAg-negative immune-inactive, HBeAg-negative immune-reactive, and HBsAg-negative phases. Pooled prevalence rate of fibrosis status at each phase was obtained from random-effect meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies with 9,377 adult participants (23.8-49.0 age years; 45.5-88.6% males) were eligible and finally included. The estimated prevalence of non-fibrosis, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis was, for HBeAg-positive immune-tolerant phase: 31.2% (95%CI 15.6-46.7), 16.9% (95%CI 7.8-26.1), 5.4% (95%CI 0.0-11.2), and 0.0% (95%CI 0.0-1.5); HBeAg-positive immune-active phase: 6.9% (95%CI 3.6-10.2), 50.6% (95%CI 39.2-61.9), 32.1% (95%CI 24.2-40.0), and 12.8% (95%CI 8.6-17.0); HBeAg-negative immune-inactive phase: 32.4% (95%CI 0.0-100.0), 24.8% (95%CI 4.5-45.1), 3.0% (95%CI 0.0-8.3), and 0.0% (95%CI 0.0-1.0); and HBeAg-negative immune-reactive phase: 6.3% (95%CI 3.5-9.2), 50.3% (95%CI 38.9-61.7), 30.3% (95%CI 20.9-39.6), and 10.0% (95%CI 6.6-13.5), respectively. There was only one study for HBsAg-negative phase, thus not allowing further meta-analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Fibrosis risk persists through CHB natural course. These data can support risk estimation in clinical practice and provide reference for noninvasive investigation.

Correlation of hepatitis B surface antigen expression with clinicopathological and biochemical parameters in liver biopsies: A comprehensive study

BACKGROUND

Chronic viral B hepatitis (CHB) is a potentially life-threatening liver disease that may progress to liver failure and cirrhosis. Currently, although combinations of different laboratory methods are used in the follow-up and treatment of CHB, the failure of these procedures in some cases has led to the necessity of developing new approaches. In CHB, the intrahepatic expression pattern of viral antigens, including hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), is related to different phases of inflammation. However, many studies have focused on the intracytoplasmic properties of HBsAg staining, and HBsAg positivity in liver tissue has not been evaluated by objective quantitative methods.

AIM

To investigate the relationship of image analysis-based quantitative HBsAg expression and its staining patterns with clinicopathological factors and treatment in CHB.

METHODS

A total of 140 liver biopsies from treatment-naïve cases with CHB infection were included in this study. Following diagnosis, all patients were treated with entecavir (0.5 mg) and followed up at three-month intervals. The percentage of immunohistochemical HBsAg (p-HBsAg) expression in the liver was determined in whole tissue sections of biopsies from each case by image analysis. The immunohistochemical staining pattern was also evaluated separately according to 3 different previously defined classifications.

RESULTS

A positive correlation between p-HBsAg and serum levels of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and HBsAg was observed (P < 0.001). The p-HBsAg value was significantly higher in younger patients than in older patients. When the groups were categorized according to the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status in HBeAg-positive cases, p-HBsAg was correlated with HBV DNA, hepatitis activity index (HAI) and fibrosis scores (P < 0.001). In this group, p-HBsAg and HBsAg expression patterns were also correlated with the viral response (VR) and the serological response (SR) (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that p-HBsAg was an independent predictor of either VR or SR (P < 0.001). In HBeAg-negative patients, although HBsAg expression patterns were correlated with both HAI and fibrosis, no relationship was observed among p-HBsAg, clinicopathological factors and VR.

CONCLUSION

In pretreatment liver biopsies, the immunohistochemical determination of HBsAg expression by quantitative methods, beyond its distribution within the cell, may be a good predictor of the treatment response, especially in HBeAg-positive cases.

Evaluation of the in situ assay for HBV DNA: An observational real-world study in chronic hepatitis B

The visualization of intrahepatic hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA by in situ hybridization (ISH) has uncovered some interesting aspects of HBV life cycle at the single-cell level. In the current study, we intend to evaluate the reliability and robustness of this assay in the real-world clinical scenario and its relationship with currently available clinical biomarkers in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.In this cross-sectional study, 94 CHB patients and 10 patients with non-HBV related liver diseases were enrolled. Liver biopsies and routine histopathology analysis were performed. Intrahepatic HBV DNA and viral antigens (HBsAg and HBcAg) were detected by ISH and immunohistochemistry (IHC), respectively. The basic biochemical and virological parameters such as alanine transaminase, serum HBV DNA, and serum HBsAg were measured.The HBV DNA-ISH assay showed 55.8% (53/94 cases) positive rate in CHB patients, no false positive was found in non-HBV related hepatitis. The IHC of HBsAg and HBcAg showed a positive rate of 94.7% (89/94 cases) and 19.5% (17/87 cases), respectively. Quantification of HBV DNA-ISH signal showed a significant correlation with serum HBV DNA (rs = 0.6223, P < .0001). In addition, the staining pattern of HBV DNA in situ in the context of collagen deposition informed the histopathological progression of chronic liver disease.The application of this ISH assay in evaluating intrahepatic viral replication in real-world CHB patients showed favorable performance. It can be a complementation to conventional liver histopathology examination and IHC detection of viral antigens. This methodology provides an intuitive assessment of virological and pathological state of CHB patients, and further supports clinical diagnosis and management.

Efficacy of Antiviral Treatment in Liver Biopsy-Proven Immune-Tolerant Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The optimal timing of initiating antiviral treatment for immune-tolerant (IT) patients remains unknown. We conducted this study in liver biopsy-proven IT patients to compare the long-term outcomes of untreated and treated patients suffering non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This retrospective cohort study recruited 171 consecutive treatment-naïve CHB patients who completed liver biopsy test. Patients were stratified into IT (n = 60), mildly-active (MA; n = 31), immune-active (IA; n = 80), according to alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and liver biopsy data. One hundred and nine patients receiving antiviral treatment constituted the treated set, and 62 patients under close follow-up comprised the untreated set. Primary outcomes were virological response, HBeAg seroconversion, HBsAg loss, ALT normalization, and liver stiffness measurement normalization (NCT03740789). The study population was predominantly male (62.6%) with a mean age of 31 years. The proportion of virological response in treated patients in the MA phase was 57.1%, and the proportion of HBeAg seroconversion was 28.6%, which showed no difference with the 43.8% virological response and 31.5% HBeAg seroconversion in IA patients. The proportions of virological response and seroconversion were 18.2 and 9.1%, respectively, in the IT phase, which were lower than the rates in the MA and IA phases. However, 95.5% of IT patients persisted normal ALT, and 100% of IT patients persisted normal liver stiffness measurement in the treated group. Therefore, antiviral treatment should be considered for CHB patients with high viral load regardless of phase to minimize further damage to hepatocytes.

Within-host mathematical models of hepatitis B virus infection: Past, present, and future

Mathematical modeling has been instrumental in enhancing our understanding of the viral dynamics of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. We give a primer on HBV infection in humans and a brief overview of the development of within-host mathematical models of HBV infection. In the last decade, models have advanced from considering chronic HBV infections under therapy to the pathogenesis of infection. We also summarize estimates of key viral dynamic parameters that have varied greatly among studies, and show that they impact model predictions. Future directions for mathematical modeling of HBV infection are proposed to better understand emerging therapies, the HBV life cycle, predicting cure, and the mechanisms involved in the immune response to HBV infection.

Chronic hepatitis B: The interplay between intrahepatic lymphocyte population and viral antigens in relation to liver damage

In Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection, virus and immune response interplay is thought to be responsible for pathogenesis. Yet, the impact of each immune cell population and viral protein expression in liver damage is still unknown. Our aim was to study the interplay between intrahepatic immune response and viral activity in relation to CHB liver damage. Immunostaining was performed in 29 liver biopsies from untreated CHB patients to characterize liver infiltrate [Th (CD4+), CTL (CD8+), Treg (FoxP3+), Th17 (IL-17A+) and Th1 (T-bet+)] and viral antigen expression (HBsAg and HBcAg). Inflammatory activity and fibrosis were assessed using the HAI and METAVIR scoring system. All studied populations were identified in the portal-periportal (P-P) areas with a CD4+ lymphocyte predominance, while only CD8+ and FoxP3+ cells were observed in the intralobular area. Both P-P CD4+ and intralobular CD8+ cell frequencies were increased among severe hepatitis cases. Concerning HBsAg and HBcAg expression, a mutually exclusive pattern was observed. HBcAg was mainly detected among HBeAg-positive patients and was associated with hepatitis severity and higher frequency of P-P FoxP3+, intralobular CD8+ and FoxP3+ cells. HBsAg was identified among HBeAg-negative cases with less severe hepatitis grade and lower frequency of P-P CD4+ and intralobular FoxP3+ lymphocytes. In conclusion, the HBV antigen profile expression seen during CHB infection may be reflecting different stages of viral replication which impacts the host immune response and liver damage process. While HBcAg might be an inducer of a regulatory microenvironment, the intralobular CTL population seemed to have a key role in hepatitis severity.