Patient Response to Endoscopic Therapy for Gastroesophageal Varices Based on Endoscopic Ultrasound Findings

Endoscopic ultrasound in portal hypertension: navigating venous hemodynamics and treatment efficacy

Portal hypertension-related complications increase mortality in patients, irrespective of its etiology. Classically, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was used to assess the portal venous system and collaterals, considering size and hemodynamic parameters, which correlate with portal hypertension (PH) and related complications. Furthermore, therapeutic EUS guides treatment interventions, such as embolization of the gastric varices through coil placement and tissue adhesive injection, yielding encouraging clinical results. Recently, the direct measurement of portal pressure, emerging as an alternative to hepatic venous pressure gradient, has shown promise, and further research in this area is anticipated. In this review, we aimed to provide a detailed description of various possibilities for diagnosing vascular anatomy and hemodynamics in PH and actual knowledge on the EUS usefulness for PH vessel-related complications. Also, future promises for this field of endo-hepatology are discussed.

EUS-guided thrombin injection and coil implantation for gastric varices: feasibility, safety, and outcomes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastric varices (GVs) are reported in up to 20% of patients with portal hypertension, and bleeding is often more severe and challenging than esophageal variceal bleeding. Data are limited on prophylaxis of GV bleeding or management in the acute setting, and different techniques are used. This study evaluated outcomes after EUS-guided placement of coils in combination with thrombin to manage GVs.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated with combination EUS-guided therapy with coils and thrombin between October 2015 and February 2020.

RESULTS

Twenty patients underwent 33 procedures for GV therapy; 16 of 20 (80%) had type 1 isolated GVs and 4 patients had type 2 gastroesophageal varices. The median follow-up was 842 days (interquartile range [IQR], 483-961). Seventeen patients (85%) had underlying cirrhosis, the most common etiologies being alcohol-related liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. The median Child-Pugh score was 6 (IQR, 5-7). In 11 patients (55%), the indication was secondary prophylaxis to prevent recurrent bleeding; in 2 of 20 patients (10%), the bleeding was acute. Technical success was achieved in 19 patients (95%). During follow-up, the obliteration of flow within the varices was achieved in 17 patients (85%). The 6-week survival rate was 100%, and 2 adverse events, recurrent bleeding at day 5 and at day 37, were reported; both recurrent bleeding events were successfully managed endoscopically.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-guided GV obliteration combining coil placement with thrombin, in our experience, was technically safe with good medium-term efficacy. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing different treatment strategies is desirable to understand options better.

Endoscopic Treatment as the Rescue Therapy for Recurrent Bleeding after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS)

Background

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is suggested as the salvage therapy for gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. However, rebleeding might occur in some patients after TIPS. Currently, there is a lack of evidence in the endoscopic management of recurrent bleeding in these patients.

Aims

To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic treatment in cirrhotic patients with recurrent bleeding after TIPS.

Methods

Cirrhotic patients with gastroesophageal varices who received endoscopic treatment for recurrent bleeding after TIPS were included.

Results

6 patients were enrolled in this study. The median age of the patients was 47 years (range 27 to 65 years), and the duration of follow-up time was 346 (17-773) days. Stent stenosis or occlusion was found in 5 out of 6 patients after TIPS. Salvage endoscopic treatment, including esophageal variceal ligation (EVL), gastric variceal cyanoacrylate injection, esophageal variceal sclerotherapy, and balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration- (BRTO-) assisted endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection. Among included patients, 2 died shortly after EVL (14 and 19 days) due to variceal bleeding. Among other 4 patients, 2 had rebleeding episodes at 422 and 789 days, respectively.

Conclusion

Endoscopic treatment may be an option for recurrent bleeding after TIPS in selected patients. Further studies are needed to carefully define the indication and efficacy of this option.

PTFE-covered TIPS is an effective treatment for secondary preventing variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with high risks

AIM

To compare the effectiveness and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with endoscopic therapy plus non-selective β-blockers (NSBBs) for secondary prevention of gasroesophageal variceal bleeding (GEVB) in cirrhotic patients with high-risk factors of treatment failure.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

A total of 122 cirrhotic patients with history of gasroesophageal variceal bleeding and high factors including hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥ 20 mmHg, portal vein thrombosis (PVT), gastrorenal shunt (GRS), or extraluminal para-gastric veins (ep-GVs) detected by endoscopic ultrasound, were analyzed retrospectively. Seventy-seven patients underwent TIPS with PTFE-covered stent (group A) and 102 patients received endoscopic therapy combined with nonselective β-blockers (NSBBs) (group B). According to above high-risk factors, both groups were stratified into four paired subgroups (A1-A4 and B1-B4). Two-year rebleeding rate, overt hepatic encephalopathy, overall survival, and procedure-related adverse events were compared between the two groups and paired subgroups.

RESULTS

The 2-year cumulative probability of free of variceal rebleeding was higher in group A than group B (93 vs. 62%, P < 0.001). Similarly, the 2-year cumulative probability of free of variceal rebleeding was also higher in the subgroups A1-A4 than the subgroups B1-B4 (91 vs. 67%, P = 0.022, 90 vs. 67%, P = 0.021, 94 vs. 59%, P = 0.029, and 90 vs. 58%, P = 0.016, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two groups and corresponding subgroups in overt hepatic encephalopathy and survival.

CONCLUSION

Compared to secondary prophylaxis with endoscopic therapy plus NSBBs, polytetrafluoroethylene-covered TIPS could significantly reduce the variceal rebleeding rate in cirrhotic patients with HVPG ≥ 20 mmHg, PVT, GRS, or ep-GVs, without increasing the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy.