Trends in Healthcare Costs for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in South Korea

Comparative risk of serious infections and tuberculosis in Korean patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with non-anti-TNF biologics or anti-TNF-α agents: a nationwide population-based cohort study

Background

The risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been concurrently evaluated based on the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents versus non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) in the Korean population.

Objectives

We compared the risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in Korean patients with IBD treated with non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) or anti-TNF-α agents.

Design

This study was a population-based cohort analysis of nationwide administrative claims data.

Methods

Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims data (representing 97% of the South Korean population) from between January 2007 and February 2021 were reviewed, and adults with IBD who initiated vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment (n = 6123) between 2017 and 2020 were enrolled. Intergroup differences in the risk of serious infection requiring hospitalization/emergency department visits or active tuberculosis during the follow-up period were analyzed.

Results

In the patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents or vedolizumab/ustekinumab during a mean follow-up of 1.55 ± 1.05 and 0.84 ± 0.69 years, the incidence rates of serious infection were 9.43/100 and 6.87/100 person-years, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed no significant intergroup difference in the risk of serious infection with vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment; the adjusted relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.46-1.44, p = 0.478). Among patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents and vedolizumab/ustekinumab, the incidence rates of active tuberculosis were 0.87 and 0.37 per 100 person-years, respectively. The relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.31 (95% confidence interval 0.07-1.26, p = 0.101). In a subset analysis comparing vedolizumab and ustekinumab with anti-TNF-α agents, similar results were observed.

Conclusion

In Korean patients with IBD, non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) tended to be associated with a lower risk of serious infection or active tuberculosis than anti-TNF-α agents.

Clinical features and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in a low-incidence area: A hospital-based retrospective cohort study in Taiwan

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has emerged in the Asia-Pacific area over the past 2 decades. There is a paucity of clinical data regarding real-world experience of patients with IBD from low endemic area such as Taiwan. Therefore, the present study aimed to review the clinical features of patients with IBD form a tertiary center from Taiwan.A total of 163 patients with IBD were identified from the electronic clinical database of Changhua Christian Hospital. Demographic data of the patients and clinical features of the disease pattern were retrospectively reviewed.There was a higher proportion (62.6%) of patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC). Patients with Crohn disease (CD) and UC had male predominance. The median age of diagnosis was younger in patients with CD than in patients with UC (CD vs UC: 31 vs 40 years, P = .0423). The disease distribution of UC was as follows: E1 (15.7%), E2 (47.1%), and E3 (37.3%). The disease distribution of CD was as follows: L1 (36.1%), L2 (14.8%), L3 (42.6%), and L4 (6.5%). The majority of patients with CD had a complicated presentation with B2 (32.8%) and B3 (32.8%). Patients with CD had a higher bowel resection rate than patients with UC. Patients with CD were more likely to be treated with immunomodulator and biologics and those with UC were more likely to be treated with 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA). A trend of decreased bowel resection for patients with IBD and less severe phenotype of patients with CD were observed after 2015.UC with male predominance was the predominant type of IBD in the study. Patients with CD are likely to have a complicated disease course, requiring a higher demand of biologic therapy than patients with UC.

Predictive values of stool-based tests for mucosal healing among Taiwanese patients with ulcerative colitis: a retrospective cohort analysis

Background/Purpose

Over the past two decades, ulcerative colitis (UC) has emerged in the Asia Pacific area, and its treatment goal has shifted from symptom relief to endoscopic remission. Endoscopy is the gold standard for the assessment of mucosal healing; however, it is an invasive method. Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a non-invasive stool-based inflammatory marker which has been used to monitor mucosal healing status, but it is expensive. By contrast, the immune fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) is a widely utilized stool-based screening tool for colorectal cancer. In this study, we compared the predictive values of iFOBT and FC for mucosal healing in Taiwanese patients with UC.

Methods

A total of 50 patients with UC identified via the electronic clinical database of Changhua Christian Hospital, Taiwan, were retrospectively enrolled from January 2018 to July 2019. Results of iFOBT, FC level, and blood tests as well as Mayo scores were reviewed and analyzed. Colonic mucosa was evaluated using the endoscopic Mayo subscore.

Results

The average age of the patients was 46 years, and 62% of the patients were men. Disease distribution was as follows: E1 (26%), E2 (40%), and E3 (34%). Complete mucosal healing (Mayo score = 0) was observed in 30% of patients. Endoscopic mucosal healing with a Mayo score of 0 or 1 was observed in 62% of the patients. Results of FC and iFOBT were compared among patients with and without mucosal healing. Predictive cutoff values were analyzed using receiver operating characteristics curves. iFOBT and FC had similar area under the curve for both complete mucosal healing (0.813 vs. 0.769, respectively, p = 0.5581) and endoscopic mucosal healing (0.906 vs. 0.812, respectively, p = 0.1207).

Conclusion

In daily clinical practice, FC and iFOBT do not differ in terms of predictive values for mucosal healing among Taiwanese patients with UC.