The α-effect exhibited in gas-phase S(N)2@N and S(N)2@C reactions

In order to explore the existence of α-effect in gas-phase S(N)2@N reactions, and to compare its similarity and difference with its counterpart in S(N)2@C reactions, we have carried out a theoretical study on the reactivity of six α-oxy-Nus (FO(-), ClO(-), BrO(-), HOO(-), HSO(-), H2NO(-)) in the S(N)2 reactions toward NR2Cl (R = H, Me) and RCl (R = Me, i-Pr) using the G2(+)M theory. An enhanced reactivity induced by the α-atom is found in all examined systems. The magnitude of the α-effect in the reactions of NR2Cl (R = H, Me) is generally smaller than that in the corresponding S(N)2 reaction, but their variation trend with the identity of α-atom is very similar. The origin of the α-effect of the S(N)2@N reactions is discussed in terms of activation strain analysis and thermodynamic analysis, indicating that the α-effect in the S(N)2@N reactions largely arises from transition state stabilization, and the "hyper-reactivity" of these α-Nus is also accompanied by an enhanced thermodynamic stability of products from the n(N) → σ*(O-Y) negative hyperconjugation. Meanwhile, it is found that the reactivity of oxy-Nus in the S(N)2 reactions toward NMe2Cl is lower than toward i-PrCl, which is different from previous experiments, that is, the S(N)2 reactions of NH2Cl is more facile than MeCl.

Pitfalls in assessing the α-effect: reactions of substituted phenyl methanesulfonates with HOO(-), OH(-), and substituted phenoxides in H(2)O

Toward resolving the current controversy regarding the validity of the α-effect, we have examined the reactions of Y-substituted phenyl methanesulfonates 1a-1l with HOO(-), OH(-), and Z-substituted phenoxides in the gas phase versus solution (H(2)O). Criteria examined in this work are the following: (1) Brønsted-type and Hammett plots for reactions with HOO(-)and OH(-), (2) comparison of β(lg) values reported previously for the reactions of Y-substituted phenyl benzenesulfonates 2a-2k with HOO(-) (β(lg) = -0.73) and OH(-) (β(lg) = -0.55), and for those of 1a-1l with HOO(-) (β(lg) = -0.69) and OH(-) (β(lg) = -1.35), and (3) Brønsted-type plot showing extreme deviation of OH(-) for reactions of 2,4-dintrophenyl methanesulfonate 1a with aryloxides, HOO(-), and OH(-), signifying extreme solvation vs different mechanisms. The results reveal significant pitfalls in assessing the validity of current interpretations of the α-effect. The extreme negative deviation by OH(-) must be due, in part, to the difference in their reaction mechanisms. Thus, the apparent dependence of the α-effect on leaving-group basicity found in this study has no significant meaning due to the difference in operating mechanisms. The current results argue in favor of a further criterion, i.e., a consistency in mechanism for the α-nucleophiles and normal nucleophiles.

Enhanced reactivity of RC[triple bond]CZ- (R = H and Cl; Z = O, S, and Se) and the influence of leaving group on the alpha-effect in the E2 reactions

The enhanced reactivity exhibited by six pseudo-alpha-bases, RC[triple bond]CZ(-) (R = H and Cl; Z = O, S, and Se) in gas-phase E2 reactions with ethyl chloride was examined at the G2(+) level. It is found that anomalous reactivity is observed despite the fact that these chalcogen bases do not possess adjacent lone-pair electrons. The influence of the halide leaving groups on the alpha-effect and the origin of the alpha-effect in the E2 reactions of ethyl halides are investigated and discussed.