Occupational Therapy Education Research: Results of a National Survey

Barriers to Scholarship Among Health Profession Faculty at a Public Institution of Higher Learning

Like any other career, pursuing a career in academia comes with positives and negatives. Faculty members teaching in higher education come from various backgrounds, with different skill sets and training. While barriers to scholarly production exist at many levels, and for various reasons, not much is known about faculty members teaching in clinical and health professions programs mainly due to the limited availability of data on this topic. This research aimed to explore the barriers to scholarly productivity faced by faculty members teaching in health professions programs at a public academic institution. A qualitative inductive approach using thematic analysis was used for this research. Participants from the Physician Assistant, Nursing, Clinical Laboratory Science, Occupational Therapy, and Social Work programs were recruited to share their experiences through an in-depth, one-on-one interview. Four main themes emerged from the data regarding barriers to scholarship among health profession faculty members. These are the need for mentorship, resource availability, time constraints, and the lack of discipline-specific guidance. Navigating the reappointment, tenure, and promotion grid can be challenging for many in academia, particularly those new to the profession. It is important for academic institutions to provide faculty members with the flexibility, tools, resources, and appropriate mentorship to boost their buy-in, morale, productivity, and self-esteem, all of which are expected to create a positive environment within the institution.

Enhancing evidence-based practice into healthcare: Exploring the role of scientific skills in occupational therapists

BACKGROUND

Research utilization and evidence-based practice (EBP) in occupational therapy rely on essential scientific skills. Despite prior research exploring factors influencing EBP, a gap remains in understanding the specific scientific competencies crucial for effective EBP application.

OBJECTIVES

To (1) describe the level of scientific skills for EBP and research application, and (2) investigate the factors influencing higher scientific competence among 1159 Spanish-speaking occupational therapists.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We assessed the scientific skills using the HACTO-Screen online survey. Recruitment was conducted through a non-probability convenience sampling method between April to June 2020, using social networks and email dissemination to education and professional organizations in Spain and Spanish-speaking Latin American countries.

RESULTS

Out of a total score of 115 points, participants showed a moderate level of scientific skills (mean: 62.7, SD: 21.6), with literature searching skills ranking the highest and scientific writing skills ranking the lowest. Associations were found between greater scientific competence and advanced degrees, ongoing research training, and on-the-job research.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous research training, higher academic degrees, and active research engagement are essential for enhancing scientific competence among occupational therapists.

SIGNIFICANCE

Targeted training to enhance scientific skills and promote research utilization are crucial in advancing EBP in occupational therapy.

Teaching orthotic design and fabrication content in occupational therapy curricula: Faculty perspectives

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey study.

INTRODUCTION

Occupational therapy (OT) programs must provide students with the skills necessary to fabricate orthoses. Input from OT educators can provide valuable insight into how these skills are taught and the resources used.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Explore how instruction in orthotic fabrication is addressed in OT education programs.

METHODS

Surveys were distributed to all accredited OT programs in the United States. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and content analysis was done on qualitative data to identify themes.

RESULTS

Overall response rate was 25%. Most programs teach orthotic fabrication with demonstration and hands-on laboratory time. Almost half add digital videos in their orthotic course content. The average number of orthoses made ranged from 2 to 5, and the resting hand, wrist, and short opponens immobilization orthoses are the most commonly taught.

DISCUSSION

This study examined the orthotic fabrication curricula in OT programs in the United States, including the time devoted to this topic, types of orthoses covered, course structure and pedagogical strategies used, and whether faculty anticipated changes in their orthotic content. The majority of programs offer this content within other existing courses within the curriculum, including coursework in physical dysfunction, OT interventions, orthopedics, and biomechanics. Only 15% of participants in the current study reported teaching orthotic content as a separate course in their curricula. Interestingly, some participants reported that they plan to offer a full separate orthotics course in their future curricula, whereas others reported combining orthotics content with other coursework or reducing the time spent making custom orthoses in the classroom. It would appear that there is still considerable variability in course structure and content in current OT programs.

CONCLUSION

Participants feel that orthotic fabrication is an essential and integral component of their curricula and that the importance of hands-on learning experiences contributes to students' preparedness and ability to use this knowledge. Student feedback indicated that more time and instruction is desired. Sharing teaching experiences can enhance emerging OT curricula and can impact future practice. Educators must strive to improve and refine curricular content to ensure that graduates have the skills necessary to meet the orthotic needs of their clients.