Limitations in Activities of Daily Living Among Spanish Women Diagnosed With Endometriosis

The Burden of Pelvic Pain Associated with Endometriosis among Women in Selected European Countries and the United States: A Restricted Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the burden of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain (EAPP) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among women living in similar socio-economic conditions.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were performed in PubMed and Embase on September 26, 2022. The review was performed in conformity with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis protocol (PRISMA-P) and was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023370363).

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Due to the high volume of eligible publications following initial review, inclusion criteria were restricted to studies undertaken in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. This restriction was applied before screening as these countries have broad social and economic similarities, and previous studies in the literature suggest pain reporting and experience are influenced by numerous socio-cultural factors. Eligible studies were those published between 2013 and 2022 and include a sample size of ≥50 participants. The search strategy identified all relevant publications relating to the burden of illness due to EAPP. A variety of terms are used in the literature to describe pain associated with endometriosis, and this was considered in the design of the search strategy and screening procedure.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The database searches resulted in a total of 6139 records. After removal of duplicates, 3855 records were assessed further. A total of 27 publications were identified as eligible. Fourteen (52%) were from Italy, 5 (19%) were multinational studies, 4 (15%) were from the United States, 3 (11%) were from Spain, and 1 (4%) was from Germany. Most studies were cross-sectional (n = 15; 56%); 7 (26%) were case-control studies; 3 (11%) were cohort studies; and 2 (7%) were longitudinal studies. These publications collectively highlighted an association between EAPP and reduced HRQoL. Several studies showed that EAPP was associated with lower HRQoL when compared with endometriosis without pain and potentially with chronic pelvic pain caused by other conditions, although the evidence is limited in this case. Moreover, the studies reported detrimental effects on general HRQoL, mental health functioning, and sexual functioning, culminating in reduced work productivity and difficulties in performing everyday activities. The associations were generally similar across study populations, including adolescents, as well as younger and older women. Results were consistent across the range of different patient-reported outcome tools used to assess HRQoL.

CONCLUSION

The existing literature suggests that, among women in selected European countries and the United States, EAPP is associated with reduced HRQoL, including impaired mental and sexual functioning, as well as reduced work performance and productivity; each of which may contribute to the societal burden of endometriosis.

Effect of a Multimodal Supervised Therapeutic Exercise Program on Quality of Life, Pain, and Lumbopelvic Impairments in Women With Endometriosis Unresponsive to Conventional Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of "Physio-EndEA", a multimodal nine-week supervised exercise intervention, on quality of life, pain, and lumbopelvic impairments in women with endometriosis unresponsive to conventional therapy.

DESIGN

Parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Outcomes were measured at baseline, post-intervention, and at 1 year.

SETTING

Two Public University Hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

This trial included 31 women with endometriosis (N=31) randomly allocated to "Physio-EndEA" group (n=16) or control group (n=15). Four participants dropped out of the study for causes unrelated to the intervention.

INTERVENTIONS

The "Physio-EndEA" program consisted of a 1-week lumbopelvic stabilization learning phase followed by an 8-week phase of stretching, aerobic, and resistance exercises focused on the lumbopelvic area. It was sequentially instructed and supervised by a trained physiotherapist (with volume and intensity progression) and adapted daily to the potential of each participant. Control group received the usual treatment stipulated by their gynecologist.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was quality of life. Secondary outcomes were pain intensity, pressure pain thresholds, pain-related catastrophic thoughts, abdominal and back strength, lumbopelvic stability, and muscle architecture.

RESULTS

Adherence rate was 90.6% and mean (±standard deviation) satisfaction was 9.44±0.73 out of 10. No remarkable health problems were reported during the trial. In comparison with controls, the quality of life was improved post-intervention and at 1 year in the Physio-EndEA group with large effect sizes (d>0.80). This group also evidenced: a reduced intensity of dyspareunia, catastrophic thoughts; an increase in pelvic, lumbar, and distal pressure pain thresholds; increases in abdominal and back strength and lumbopelvic stability; and increased thickness of transversus abdominis (right side) and width of lumbar multifidus (left side).

CONCLUSION

A 9-week program of multimodal supervised therapeutic exercise is a feasible and effective intervention to improve QoL in women with endometriosis. This program also offers benefits in terms of pain/sensitization and lumbopelvic impairments.

Effectiveness of a Manual Therapy Protocol in Women with Pelvic Pain Due to Endometriosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

A randomized controlled trial was carried out to assess the effectiveness of a manual therapy protocol in terms of the clinical characteristics, quality of life, and emotional condition of the women with endometriosis-related pelvic pain. Forty-one women (mean age of 36.10 (6.97) years) with pelvic pain due to endometriosis were randomly divided into (i) a manual therapy group (MTG) (n = 21) and (ii) a placebo group (PG) (n = 20). Both groups received an 8-week intervention. Pain, lumbar mobility, endometriosis health profile, quality of life, depression and anxiety levels, and the patient's perception of change were assessed before (T0) and after (T1) the intervention, as well as at a one-month follow-up (T2) and a six-month follow-up (T3). The MTG significantly improved pain intensity, powerlessness, lumbar mobility, and physical quality of life at T1 (p < 0.05). The results were maintained for pain intensity at T2 and T3. In addition, both the MTG and PG improved emotional wellbeing at T1 (p < 0.05). Neither group improved in terms of social support, self-image, and depression and anxiety levels after the intervention (p > 0.05). In conclusion, manual therapy may be an excellent complement to the gynecological treatment of endometriosis-related pelvic pain by alleviating pain and improving women's endometriosis health profile and physical quality of life.

'Physio-EndEA' Study: A Randomized, Parallel-Group Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of a Supervised and Adapted Therapeutic Exercise Program to Improve Quality of Life in Symptomatic Women Diagnosed with Endometriosis

Aim: The ‘Physio-EndEA’ study aims to explore the potential benefits of a therapeutic exercise program (focused on lumbopelvic stabilization and tolerance to exertion) on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of symptomatic endometriosis women. Design: The present study will use a parallel-group randomized controlled trial design. Methods: A total of 22 symptomatic endometriosis women will be randomized 1:1 to the Physio-EndEA or usual care groups. The ‘Physio-EndEA’ program will consist of a one-week lumbopelvic stabilization learning phase followed by an eight-week phase of stretching, aerobic and resistance exercises focused on the lumbopelvic area that will be sequentially instructed and supervised by a trained physiotherapist (with volume and intensity progression) and adapted daily to the potential of each participant. The primary outcome measure is HRQoL. The secondary outcome measures included clinician-reported outcomes (pressure pain thresholds, muscle thickness and strength, flexibility, body balance and cardiorespiratory fitness) and patient-reported outcomes (pain intensity, physical fitness, chronic fatigue, sexual function, gastrointestinal function and sleep quality). Discussion: Findings of this study will help to identify cost-effective non-pharmacological options (such as this exercise-based intervention) that may contribute to the improvement of HRQoL in symptomatic endometriosis women.