Outcomes of upper-extremity tendon transfers and functional electrical stimulation in an adolescent with C-5 tetraplegia

A Systematic Review of the Scientific Literature for Rehabilitation/Habilitation Among Individuals With Pediatric-Onset Spinal Cord Injury

Objectives

To conduct a systematic review to examine the scientific literature for rehabilitation/habilitation among individuals with pediatric-onset spinal cord injury (SCI).

Methods

A literature search of multiple databases (i.e., PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychINFO) was conducted and was filtered to include studies involving humans, published as full-length articles up to December 2020, and in English. Included studies met the following inclusion criteria: (1) ≥50% of the study sample had experienced a traumatic, acquired, nonprogressive spinal cord injury (SCI) or a nontraumatic, acquired, noncongenital SCI; (2) SCI onset occurred at ≤21 years of age; and (3) sample was assessed for a rehabilitation/habilitation-related topic. Studies were assigned a level of evidence using an adapted Sackett scale modified down to five levels. Data extracted from each study included author(s), year of publication, country of origin, study design, subject characteristics, rehabilitation/habilitation topic area, intervention (if applicable), and outcome measures.

Results

One hundred seventy-six studies were included for review (1974-2020) with the majority originating from the United States (81.3%). Most studies were noninterventional observational studies (n = 100; 56.8%) or noninterventional case report studies (n = 5; 2.8%). Sample sizes ranged from 1 to 3172 with a median of 26 (interquartile range [IQR], 116.5). Rehabilitation/habilitation topics were categorized by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF); most studies evaluated ICF Body Function. There were 69 unique clinical health outcome measures reported.

Conclusion

The evidence for rehabilitation/habilitation of pediatric-onset SCI is extremely limited; nearly all studies (98%) are level 4-5 evidence. Future studies across several domains should be conducted with novel approaches to research design to alleviate issues related to sample sizes and heterogeneity.

An implanted upper-extremity neuroprosthesis using myoelectric control

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of a second-generation implantable neuroprosthesis that provides improved control of hand grasp and elbow extension for individuals with cervical level spinal cord injury. The key feature of this system is that users control their stimulated function through electromyographic (EMG) signals.

METHODS

The second-generation neuroprosthesis consists of 12 stimulating electrodes, 2 EMG signal recording electrodes, an implanted stimulator-telemeter device, an external control unit, and a transmit/receive coil. The system was implanted in a single surgical procedure. Functional outcomes for each subject were evaluated in the domains of body functions and structures, activity performance, and societal participation.

RESULTS

Three individuals with C5/C6 spinal cord injury received system implantation with subsequent prospective evaluation for a minimum of 2 years. All 3 subjects demonstrated that EMG signals can be recorded from voluntary muscles in the presence of electrical stimulation of nearby muscles. Significantly increased pinch force and grasp function was achieved for each subject. Functional evaluation demonstrated improvement in at least 5 activities of daily living using the Activities of Daily Living Abilities Test. Each subject was able to use the device at home. There were no system failures. Two of 6 EMG electrodes required surgical revision because of suboptimal location of the recording electrodes.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that a neuroprosthesis with implanted myoelectric control is an effective method for restoring hand function in midcervical level spinal cord injury.

An implanted myoelectrically-controlled neuroprosthesis for upper extremity function in spinal cord injury

A second generation implantable neuroprosthesis has been developed which provides improved control of grasp-release, forearm pronation, and elbow extension for individuals with cervical level spinal cord injury. In addition to the capacity to stimulate twelve muscles, the key technological feature of the advanced system is the capability to transmit data out of the body. This allows the use of myoelectric signal recording via implanted electrodes, thus minimizing the required external components. Clinical studies have been initiated with a second generation neuroprosthesis that consists of twelve stimulating electrodes, two myoelectric signal recording electrodes, an implanted stimulator-telemeter device and an external control unit and transmit/receive coil. This system has now been implemented in nine arms in seven C5/C6 spinal cord injured individuals. The results from these subjects demonstrate that myoelectric signals can be recorded from voluntary muscles in the presence of electrical stimulation of nearby muscles. The functional results show that the neuroprosthesis provides significantly increased pinch force and grasp function for each subject. All subjects have demonstrated increased independence and improved function in activities of daily living. We believe that these results indicate that implanted myoelectric control is a desirable option for neuroprostheses.

[Assessment of functional abilities, handicap and quality of life in patients with spinal cord injuries]

OBJECTIVES

A literature review of the methods of evaluating function, handicap and quality of life in patients with spinal cord injuries.

METHODS

The literature review was based on the available French and English articles published since 1990 in 3 databases: MEDLINE, Pascal and Embase.

RESULTS

The literature is dominated by descriptions of tools for evaluating functional limitations in motor deficiencies. Such descriptions involve the validation of generic tools for patients with spinal cord injuries or of specific tools during the evaluation of a particular intervention such as surgery of the tetraplegic hand or adaptation of technical help.

CONCLUSION

The tools to assess patients with spinal-cord injuries are sufficiently numerous and varied to allow us to evaluate physical, functional and psychosocial dimensions. Rigorous methodological validation is continuously at the base of those proposed tools and thus reinforces our choice to use them. Unfortunately, few evaluation tools for patients with spinal cord injuries have been published, translated into French and validated.

Analyse critique des modalités d’évaluation des résultats de la chirurgie fonctionnelle du membre supérieur tétraplégique. Revue de la littérature sur les 50 dernières années

OBJECTIVE

To study the methods of assessment of upper limb functional surgery in the literature.

METHODS

The literature review relating to the years 1950-2002 was carried out with three data bases: Medline, Pascal, Embase. This review also involved a thorough study of non-indexed references.

RESULTS

Although many instruments or tests are used to assess outcome after surgery, their reliability, validity and responsiveness have not been adequately proven. Methodology appears to be the major failing of the various scales used to assess these patients. The conceptual models underlying the evaluation are all too often unspecified. There is a lack of pertinence of the selected tasks for tetraplegics. There is limited documentation of the guiding framework or conceptualisation. Furthermore, the process of item selection is often unknown. Scales or instruments are also deemed to be too insensitive to document the small but meaningful functional gains made by tetraplegics after functional surgery.

CONCLUSION

To answer the need for a specific assessment tool for tetraplegics who undergo functional surgery, we have developed a national, multicenter, prospective and longitudinal study based on two concepts: the first concept is related to Life Habits that are the activities of daily living and social roles recognised by the socio-cultural context of a person according to age, sex and social and personal identity. They include activities that should be accomplished on a daily basis (nutrition, fitness, personal care, communication, mobility, etc.). Life Habits presenting a significant level of disruption can create handicap situations. The second concept is in relation with Motor Capacities that correspond to the abilities of a patient to perform basic and functional tasks regardless of contextual factors (environmental and personal factors).

Reconstruction of the upper extremity in the child with tetraplegia

According to Howard H. Steel, the orthopedic surgeon who first recognized the need for special care for children with spinal cord injury (SCI), and who persuaded Shriners Hospitals to establish specialized programs for these children over 20 years ago, no field of the health sciences is the statement "a child is not a small adult" more apropos than in the arena of trauma to the spinal cord. Children and adolescents with tetraplegia differ in many ways from adults with the disease. The dissimilarities that influence the outcome of surgical reconstruction of the upper extremity are the focus of this article.