1
|
de Oliveira CSF, Tavaria FK. Therapeutic textiles: A promising approach for human skin dysbiosis? Exp Dermatol 2024; 33:e15081. [PMID: 38628046 DOI: 10.1111/exd.15081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
The close interaction between skin and clothing has become an attractive cornerstone for the development of therapeutic textiles able to alleviate skin disorders, namely those correlated to microbiota dysregulation. Skin microbiota imbalance is known in several skin diseases, including atopic dermatitis (AD), psoriasis, seborrheic dermatitis, rosacea, acne and hidradenitis suppurative (HS). Such microbiota dysregulation is usually correlated with inflammation, discomfort and pruritus. Although conventional treatments, that is, the administration of steroids and antibiotics, have shown some efficacy in treating and alleviating these symptoms, there are still disadvantages that need to be overcome. These include their long-term usage with side effects negatively impacting resident microbiota members, antibiotic resistance and the elevated rate of recurrence. Remarkably, therapeutic textiles as a non-pharmacological measure have emerged as a promising strategy to treat, alleviate the symptoms and control the severity of many skin diseases. This systematic review showcases for the first time the effects of therapeutic textiles on patients with skin dysbiosis, focusing on efficacy, safety, adverse effects and antimicrobial, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. The main inclusion criteria were clinical trials performed in patients with skin dysbiosis who received treatment involving the use of therapeutic textiles. Although there are promising outcomes regarding clinical parameters, safety and adverse effects, there is still a lack of information about the impact of therapeutic textiles on the skin microbiota of such patients. Intensive investigation and corroboration with clinical trials are needed to strengthen, define and drive the real benefit and the ideal biomedical application of therapeutic textiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cláudia Suellen Ferro de Oliveira
- CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina - Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal
| | - Freni Kekhasharú Tavaria
- CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina - Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fenton C, Al-Salama ZT. Fabrics can greatly improve or exacerbate atopic dermatitis. DRUGS & THERAPY PERSPECTIVES 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40267-021-00822-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
3
|
Zhang Y, Hu J. Robust Effects of Graphene Oxide on Polyurethane/Tourmaline Nanocomposite Fiber. Polymers (Basel) 2020; 13:E16. [PMID: 33374588 PMCID: PMC7793061 DOI: 10.3390/polym13010016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of energy therapy including tourmaline/negative ions has gained huge popularity due to their long-standing historical evidence in improving human health and the technology development. However, the limitations of tourmaline based polyurethane fibers including the unsatisfied mechanical properties and negative ions releasing performances hind their further applications for wearable energy therapy. In this study, graphene oxide was modified within the polyurethane/tourmaline nanocomposite and then the wet-spinning method was used to prepare the fibers. As expected, the results proved that polyurethane/tourmaline/graphene oxide fiber had enhanced Young's modulus (8.4 MPa) and tensile stain at break (335%). In addition, the number of released negative ions from polyurethane/tourmaline/graphene oxide fiber was significantly improved 17 times and 1.6 times more than that of neat polyurethane fiber and polyurethane/tourmaline fiber, respectively. Moreover, the releasing number of negative ions was significantly decreased after being applying voltage. We envision that the proposed polyurethane/tourmaline/graphene oxide fiber will provide valuable insights into the development of the wearable energy products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanchi Zhang
- Centre for Translational Medicine Research & Development, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China;
| | - Jinlian Hu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jaros J, Wilson C, Shi VY. Fabric Selection in Atopic Dermatitis: An Evidence-Based Review. Am J Clin Dermatol 2020; 21:467-482. [PMID: 32440827 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-020-00516-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clothing fabrics interact closely with the skin to shape our cutaneous microenvironment. Cotton and silk have been traditionally recommended for patients with atopic dermatitis because of reported patient comfort. New synthetic fabrics combine anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory, moisture-wicking, and soothing properties that may augment conventional management strategies in atopic patients. OBJECTIVE We review existing and emerging evidence for fabric selection in patients with atopic dermatitis including cotton, wool, lyocell, silk, anionic, cellulosic/cellulose based, zinc oxide coated, citric acid coated, chitosan coated, silver coated, borage seed oil coated, ethylene vinyl, and polyurethane and offer practical suggestions for clothing and bedding choices. METHODS A systematic search was conducted on PubMed and EMBASE electronic databases for articles from 1 January, 1994 to 1 January, 2020. Studies were included based on the following inclusion criteria: clinical trial, published in English, and fabric as the main agent being evaluated. Case reports, case series, conference abstracts, reviews, animal studies, and duplicates were excluded. Studies were then manually screened by title, abstract, and full-text articles and selected to specifically describe the effects of fabrics in patients with atopic dermatitis. Both adult and pediatric patient studies were included. RESULTS There appears to be an advantage to modern fabric manufacturing and processing techniques that have created smaller diameter, smoother fibers such as super- and ultrafine merino wool and anti-microbial finishes. Traditional cotton and silk fabrics have mixed evidence in improving atopic dermatitis symptoms and severity but have shown to be generally safe. Large-diameter wool has been shown to induce itching and irritation; ultra- or superfine merino wool is non-pruritic and may be recommended as an alternative. Emerging fabrics with potential efficacy in reducing atopic dermatitis severity and Staphylococcus aureus burden include silver-coated, chitosan-coated, and cellulose-based fabrics. Zinc oxide-coated, acid-coated, polyurethane-coated, borage seed oil-coated, anionic, lyocell, and ethylene vinyl fabrics have sparse evidence and require further study before conclusions can be made. CONCLUSIONS Appropriate fabric selection can reduce the symptom severity and exacerbations of atopic dermatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Jaros
- University of Illinois College of Medicine, 808 S. Wood St. - 380 CME, Chicago, IL, 60612-7307, USA
| | - Claire Wilson
- University of Illinois College of Medicine, 808 S. Wood St. - 380 CME, Chicago, IL, 60612-7307, USA
| | - Vivian Y Shi
- Eczema and Skin Barrier Research Program, Dermatology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, 7165 N Pima Canyon Drive, Tucson, AZ, 85718, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thomas KS, Bradshaw LE, Sach TH, Cowdell F, Batchelor JM, Lawton S, Harrison EF, Haines RH, Ahmed A, Dean T, Burrows NP, Pollock I, Buckley HK, Williams HC, Llewellyn J, Crang C, Grundy JD, Guiness J, Gribbin A, Wake EV, Mitchell EJ, Brown SJ, Montgomery AA. Randomised controlled trial of silk therapeutic garments for the management of atopic eczema in children: the CLOTHES trial. Health Technol Assess 2017; 21:1-260. [PMID: 28409557 DOI: 10.3310/hta21160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atopic eczema (AE) is a chronic, itchy, inflammatory skin condition that affects the quality of life of children and their families. The role of specialist clothing in the management of AE is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of silk garments for the management of AE in children with moderate to severe disease. DESIGN Parallel-group, observer-blind, randomised controlled trial of 6 months' duration, followed by a 2-month observational period. A nested qualitative study evaluated the beliefs of trial participants, health-care professionals and health-care commissioners about the use of silk garments for AE. SETTING Secondary care and the community in five UK centres. PARTICIPANTS Children aged 1-15 years with moderate or severe AE. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomised (1 : 1 using online randomisation) to standard care or standard care plus 100% silk garments made from antimicrobially protected knitted sericin-free silk [DermaSilkTM (AlPreTec Srl, San Donà di Piave, Italy) or DreamSkinTM (DreamSkin Health Ltd, Hatfield, UK)]. Three sets of garments were supplied per participant, to be worn for up to 6 months (day and night). At 6 months the standard care group received the garments to use for the remaining 2-month observational period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome - AE severity using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) assessed at 2, 4 and 6 months, by nurses blinded to treatment allocation. EASI scores were log-transformed for analysis. Secondary outcomes - patient-reported eczema symptoms (Patient Oriented Eczema Measure); global assessment of severity (Investigator Global Assessment); quality of life of the child (Atopic Dermatitis Quality of Life, Child Health Utility - 9 Dimensions), family (Dermatitis Family Impact Questionnaire) and main carer (EuroQoL-5 Dimensions-3 Levels); use of standard eczema treatments (e.g. emollients, topical corticosteroids); and cost-effectiveness. The acceptability and durability of the clothing, and adherence to wearing the garments, were assessed by parental/carer self-report. Safety outcomes - number of skin infections and hospitalisations for AE. RESULTS A total of 300 children were randomised (26 November 2013 to 5 May 2015): 42% female, 79% white, mean age 5 years. The primary analysis included 282 out of 300 (94%) children (n = 141 in each group). Garments were worn for at least 50% of the time by 82% of participants. Geometric mean EASI scores at baseline, 2, 4 and 6 months were 8.4, 6.6, 6.0, 5.4 for standard care and 9.2, 6.4, 5.8, 5.4 for silk clothing, respectively. There was no evidence of difference between the groups in EASI score averaged over all follow-up visits adjusted for baseline EASI score, age and centre (ratio of geometric means 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.07; p = 0.43). This confidence interval is equivalent to a difference of -1.5 to 0.5 in the original EASI scale units. Skin infections occurred in 39 out of 141 (28%) and 36 out of 142 (25%) participants for standard care and silk clothing groups, respectively. The incremental cost per QALY of silk garments for children with moderate to severe eczema was £56,811 from a NHS perspective in the base case. Sensitivity analyses supported the finding that silk garments do not appear to be cost-effective within currently accepted thresholds. LIMITATIONS Knowledge of treatment allocation may have affected behaviour and outcome reporting for some of the patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The addition of silk garments to standard AE care is unlikely to improve AE severity, or to be cost-effective compared with standard care alone, for children with moderate or severe AE. This trial adds to the evidence base to guide clinical decision-making. FUTURE WORK Non-pharmacological interventions for the management of AE remain a research priority among patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN77261365. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 16. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Lucy E Bradshaw
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tracey H Sach
- Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Fiona Cowdell
- Faculty of Health Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Sandra Lawton
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Eleanor F Harrison
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rachel H Haines
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Amina Ahmed
- Patient and public involvement representative, Nottingham, UK
| | - Taraneh Dean
- Faculty of Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.,Research and Enterprise, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK
| | - Nigel P Burrows
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ian Pollock
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Barnet Hospital, Barnet, UK
| | - Hannah K Buckley
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Cosham, UK
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Joanne Llewellyn
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Clare Crang
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jane D Grundy
- Isle of Wight NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital, Newport, UK
| | - Juliet Guiness
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Barnet Hospital, Barnet, UK
| | - Andrew Gribbin
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Cosham, UK
| | - Eileen V Wake
- Faculty of Health Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Eleanor J Mitchell
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sara J Brown
- Skin Research Group, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.,Department of Dermatology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - Alan A Montgomery
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by intense puritus and skin dryness. The pathogenesis for AD has not been fully understood to date. Complementary therapies are very popular as effective treatment for AD among clinical practitioners. This study presents a comprehensive review of published works associated with textiles-based complementary therapies for AD treatment such as wet-wrap dressing, functionalized textiles, and the application of hydrogel techniques in the textile industry to provide a better understanding of the development and design of new textiles-based transdermal therapies.
Collapse
|
7
|
Nankervis H, Thomas K, Delamere F, Barbarot S, Smith S, Rogers N, Williams H. What is the evidence base for atopic eczema treatments? A summary of published randomized controlled trials. Br J Dermatol 2017; 176:910-927. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H. Nankervis
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology; University of Nottingham; King's Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane Nottingham NG7 2NR U.K
| | - K.S. Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology; University of Nottingham; King's Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane Nottingham NG7 2NR U.K
| | - F.M. Delamere
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology; University of Nottingham; King's Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane Nottingham NG7 2NR U.K
| | - S. Barbarot
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology; University of Nottingham; King's Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane Nottingham NG7 2NR U.K
| | - S. Smith
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology; University of Nottingham; King's Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane Nottingham NG7 2NR U.K
| | - N.K. Rogers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology; University of Nottingham; King's Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane Nottingham NG7 2NR U.K
| | - H.C. Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology; University of Nottingham; King's Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane Nottingham NG7 2NR U.K
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nankervis H, Thomas KS, Delamere FM, Barbarot S, Rogers NK, Williams HC. Scoping systematic review of treatments for eczema. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar04070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BackgroundEczema is a very common chronic inflammatory skin condition.ObjectivesTo update the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) systematic review of treatments for atopic eczema, published in 2000, and to inform health-care professionals, commissioners and patients about key treatment developments and research gaps.Data sourcesElectronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED) and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were searched from the end of 2000 to 31 August 2013. Retrieved articles were used to identify further randomised controlled trials (RCTs).Review methodsStudies were filtered according to inclusion criteria and agreed by consensus in cases of uncertainty. Abstracts were excluded and non-English-language papers were screened by international colleagues and data were extracted. Only RCTs of treatments for eczema were included, as other forms of evidence are associated with higher risks of bias. Inclusion criteria for studies included availability of data relevant to the therapeutic management of eczema; mention of randomisation; comparison of two or more treatments; and prospective data collection. Participants of all ages were included. Eczema diagnosis was determined by a clinician or according to published diagnostic criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool. We used a standardised approach to summarising the data and the assessment of risk of bias and we made a clear distinction between what the studies found and our own interpretation of study findings.ResultsOf 7198 references screened, 287 new trials were identified spanning 92 treatments. Trial reporting was generally poor (randomisation method: 2% high, 36% low, 62% unclear risk of bias; allocation concealment: 3% high, 15% low, 82% unclear risk of bias; blinding of the intervention: 15% high, 28% low, 57% unclear risk of bias). Only 22 (8%) trials were considered to be at low risk of bias for all three criteria. There was reasonable evidence of benefit for the topical medications tacrolimus, pimecrolimus and various corticosteroids (with tacrolimus superior to pimecrolimus and corticosteroids) for both treatment and flare prevention; oral ciclosporin; oral azathioprine; narrow band ultraviolet B (UVB) light; Atopiclair™ and education. There was reasonable evidence to suggest no clinically useful benefit for twice-daily compared with once-daily topical corticosteroids; corticosteroids containing antibiotics for non-infected eczema; probiotics; evening primrose and borage oil; ion-exchange water softeners; protease inhibitor SRD441 (Serentis Ltd); furfuryl palmitate in emollient; cipamfylline cream; andMycobacterium vaccaevaccine. Additional research evidence is needed for emollients, bath additives, antibacterials, specialist clothing and complementary and alternative therapies. There was no RCT evidence for topical corticosteroid dilution, impregnated bandages, soap avoidance, bathing frequency or allergy testing.LimitationsThe large scope of the review coupled with the heterogeneity of outcomes precluded formal meta-analyses. Our conclusions are still limited by a profusion of small, poorly reported studies.ConclusionsAlthough the evidence base of RCTs has increased considerably since the last NIHR HTA systematic review, the field is still severely hampered by poor design and reporting problems including failure to register trials and declare primary outcomes, small sample size, short follow-up duration and poor reporting of risk of bias. Key areas for further research identified by the review include the optimum use of emollients, bathing frequency, wash products, allergy testing and antiseptic treatments. Perhaps the greatest benefit identified is the use of twice weekly anti-inflammatory treatment to maintain disease remission. More studies need to be conducted in a primary care setting where most people with eczema are seen in the UK. Future studies need to use the same core set of outcomes that capture patient symptoms, clinical signs, quality of life and the chronic nature of the disease.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Nankervis
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kim S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Finola M Delamere
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sébastien Barbarot
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Natasha K Rogers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Harrison EF, Haines RH, Cowdell F, Sach TH, Dean T, Pollock I, Burrows NP, Buckley H, Batchelor J, Williams HC, Lawton S, Brown SJ, Bradshaw LE, Ahmed A, Montgomery AA, Mitchell EJ, Thomas KS. A multi-centre, parallel group superiority trial of silk therapeutic clothing compared to standard care for the management of eczema in children (CLOTHES Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2015; 16:390. [PMID: 26329718 PMCID: PMC4557840 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0921-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2015] [Accepted: 08/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Eczema is a chronic, itchy skin condition that can have a large impact on the quality of life of patients and their families. People with eczema are often keen to try out non-pharmacological therapies like silk therapeutic garments that could reduce itching or the damage caused by scratching. However, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these garments in the management of eczema has yet to be proven. The CLOTHES Trial will test the hypothesis that ‘silk therapeutic garments plus standard eczema care’ is superior to ‘standard care alone’ for children with moderate to severe eczema. Methods/Design Parallel group, observer-blind, pragmatic, multi-centre randomised controlled trial of 6 months’ duration. Three hundred children aged 1 to 15 years with moderate to severe eczema will be randomised (1:1) to receive silk therapeutic garments plus standard eczema care, or standard eczema care alone. Primary outcome is eczema severity, as assessed by trained and blinded investigators at 2, 4 and 6 months (using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)). Secondary outcomes include: patient-reported eczema symptoms (collected weekly for 6 months to capture long-term control); global assessment of severity; quality of life of the child, family and main carer; use of standard eczema treatments (emollients, corticosteroids applied topically, calcineurin inhibitors applied topically and wet wraps); frequency of infections; and cost-effectiveness. The acceptability and durability of the clothing will also be assessed, as will adherence to wearing the garments. A nested qualitative study will assess the views of a subset of children wearing the garments and their parents, and those of healthcare providers and commissioners. Randomisation uses a computer-generated sequence of permuted blocks of randomly varying size, stratified by recruiting hospital and child’s age (< 2 years; 2 to 5 years; > 5 years), and concealed using a secure web-based system. The sequence of treatment allocations will remain concealed until randomisation and data collection are complete. Recruitment is taking place from November 2013 to May 2015, and the trial will be completed in 2016. Full details of results will be published in the National Institute for Health Research Journal series. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN77261365 (registered 11 November 2013).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor F Harrison
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Health Science Partners, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| | - Rachel H Haines
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Health Science Partners, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| | - Fiona Cowdell
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of Hull, Room 204, Dearne Building, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
| | - Tracey H Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - Taraneh Dean
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, University of Portsmouth, James Watson Building, 2 King Richard Road, Portsmouth, PO1 2FR, UK.
| | - Ian Pollock
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Barnet Hospital, Wellhouse Lane, Barnet, Hertfordshire, EN5 3DJ, UK.
| | - Nigel P Burrows
- Department of Dermatology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Hannah Buckley
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, PO6 3LY, UK.
| | - Jonathan Batchelor
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| | - Sandra Lawton
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| | - Sara J Brown
- Dermatology and Genetic Medicine, Division of Cancer Research (JWCC level 7), Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
| | - Lucy E Bradshaw
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Health Science Partners, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| | - Amina Ahmed
- Patient and Public Involvement representative, Nottingham, UK.
| | - Alan A Montgomery
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Health Science Partners, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| | - Eleanor J Mitchell
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Health Science Partners, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| | - Kim S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alternative, Complementary, and Forgotten Remedies for Atopic Dermatitis. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE : ECAM 2015. [PMID: 26257817 DOI: 10.1155/2015/676897.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis, perhaps more than other dermatologic diseases, has garnered much attention in the realm of alternative medicine. This may be because its etiopathogenesis is incompletely understood, it is increasingly common, and it waxes and wanes often without clear precipitants, opening up many opportunities for misinterpretation. Herein we explore the evidence for a number of different alternative and complementary therapies, from textiles to vitamin supplements. By definition, none have enough data to be deemed "effective" in a conventional sense, but it is hopeful that some show promising evidence that may one day lead to mainstream acceptance with further research.
Collapse
|
11
|
Alternative, Complementary, and Forgotten Remedies for Atopic Dermatitis. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2015; 2015:676897. [PMID: 26257817 PMCID: PMC4518179 DOI: 10.1155/2015/676897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2014] [Accepted: 06/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis, perhaps more than other dermatologic diseases, has garnered much attention in the realm of alternative medicine. This may be because its etiopathogenesis is incompletely understood, it is increasingly common, and it waxes and wanes often without clear precipitants, opening up many opportunities for misinterpretation. Herein we explore the evidence for a number of different alternative and complementary therapies, from textiles to vitamin supplements. By definition, none have enough data to be deemed “effective” in a conventional sense, but it is hopeful that some show promising evidence that may one day lead to mainstream acceptance with further research.
Collapse
|