Activation Markers CD63 and CD203c Are Upregulated in Chronic Urticaria

Risk of comorbidities in patients diagnosed with chronic urticaria: A nationwide registry-study

Background

The autoimmune profile of Chronic Urticaria (CU) patients is an increasing topic of interest. Associated diseases suggest shared pathogenic pathways, and they may provide important knowledge on specific targets for future treatment models. In this study we examined the prevalence and risk of comorbidities in CU.

Methods

The Danish National Patient Registry was used to identify all CU patients from 1994 to 2015. Five of 5 specialized dermatological units in Denmark were covered. Analyses were conducted as a nested case control study and a matched cohort study. CSU patients were matched 1:10 on age and sex to an otherwise random group of people from the background population.

Results

A total of 12,185 CU patients were identified, with an overweight of female cases (69% versus 32%). There was an overrepresentation of mast cell mediated diseases including mastocytosis and anaphylaxis, as well as atopic diseases including type 1 allergies and atopic dermatitis. The prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, thyroiditis and vitiligo was also increased, as was the prevalence of depression. CU patients who did not have any of the co-morbidities at the time of their CU diagnosis had an increased risk of developing both mast cell mediated diseases, atopic diseases, and autoimmune diseases excluding thyroiditis and diabetes.

Conclusion

The autoimmune profile of the comorbidities of CU was demonstrated with an evident risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis. CU patients were also at increased risk of either having or achieving depression. Mast cell related diseases seemed to be overrepresented, although registry data within this disease category are questionable and similar to symptoms of CU to the untrained eye. Thus, CU patients constitute a multimorbid group of patients, which must be recognized among treating physicians.

Basophil Activation Test identifies the patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria suffering the most active disease

Introduction

The basophil activation test showing CD63 up regulation could be a specific and sensitive in vitro complementary text to the in vivo autologous serum skin test for the activity assessment of the patients suffering autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria. The aim of this study is to define the basophil activation test as a useful tool in clinical practice in order to identify those patients with more active disease.

Methods

We screened 139 patients (96 women) diagnosed of chronic spontaneous urticaria using simultaneously autologous serum skin test and basophil activation test and their relationship with disease activity.

Results

Positive autologous serum skin test was found in 56.8%; from them, 31.6% were basophil activation test positive. Negative autologous serum skin test result was found in the 43.2% of the sample that showed negative CD63 expression results in all cases, except one. Patients with positive autologous serum skin test and positive CD63 by basophil activation test showed significant higher Urticaria Activity Score of 7 days (P = 0.004) and of 3 weeks (P = 0.001) than patients with positive autologous serum skin test and negative CD63 (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 26.57 ± 10.56 versus 18.40 ± 12.05 for the Urticaria Activity Score of 7 days and 56.47 ± 23.78 versus 39.88 ± 25.44 for the Urticaria Activity Score of 3 weeks).

Conclusions

The CD63 expression on basophils appears as a reliable in vitro marker, useful in clinical practice in combination with autologous serum skin test to define chronic spontaneous urticaria patients with the highest urticaria activity that impairs a normal life.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria: latest developments in aetiology, diagnosis and therapy

Chronic urticaria is a debilitating disease characterized by itching and hives with or without angioedema lasting for more than 6 weeks. The disease carries a significant emotional and economic burden for the patient and often results in an odyssey between doctors of different specialities. Patients suffering from chronic urticaria are considered more difficult to satisfy, treat and to have a bigger emotional burden than the average patient in dermatology, paediatric and general practice settings. A joint initiative under the Dermatology section of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical immunology (EAACI), the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2)LEN), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) and the World Allergy Organization (WAO) has resulted in recently published guidelines for the diagnosis, classification and treatment of chronic urticarial: these guidelines are clinically useful and have a high success rate when followed in daily clinical practice. The treatment of choice for chronic urticaria is still nonsedating antihistamines although other treatments are available, with omalizumab (humanized IgG anti IgE antibodies) as the newest therapy. The pathogenesis of urticaria is poorly understood but autoimmunity is considered as one of the major underlying causes for this disease, although other theories exist.