Efficacy and Safety Results of a Drug-Free Cosmetic Fluid for Perioral Dermatitis: The Toleriane Fluide Efficacy in Perioral Dermatitis (TOLPOD) Study

A Dermocosmetic Significantly Reduces the Frequency and Intensity of Facial Skin Intolerability and Sensitivity in Subjects with Skin Intolerant to Skin Care Products and Sensitive Skin

Introduction

Intolerance to dermocosmetics is frequent in subjects with allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). A dermocosmetic (DC) was developed to restore the natural skin barrier, to reduce skin inflammation and to improve sensitive skin in ACD.

Objective

To assess the benefit of a DC in subjects with an allergic background and intolerance to cosmetic care, or with sensitive skin.

Materials and Methods

In this open-label study, 107 subjects above 16 years of age applied DC on the face twice a day for 28 days. Assessments at Days 0, 14 and 28, included skin sensitivity, stinging test, local tolerance, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin hydration, inflammatory biomarkers (IL-1α, IL-1RA, PGE2) using tape stripping and subject satisfaction.

Results

88% were women and mean age was 42.0±15.0 years. Skin sensitivity at inclusion scored 5.9±0.35; 46% had ACD, 95% skin irritation, 92% sensitive skin and 88% intolerance to cosmetics. A significant (p<0.0001) 85% decrease of frequency and intensity of the composite score was observed at both endpoints. Stinging scores significantly (p<0.0001) decreased from 3.9 at baseline to 2.4 at Day 14 and 1.4 at Day 28; 77% and 81% of subjects reported improved skin reactivity at Day 14 and Day 28, respectively. Similar improvements were noted in the frequency and intensity of irritation, erythema, stinging, burning and discomfort. TEWL, skin hydration and inflammatory biomarker levels significantly (p<0.0001) improved. Overall subject satisfaction (85%) and tolerance (investigators: 99%, subjects: 97%) were high.

Conclusion

DC significantly reduced the frequency and intensity of facial skin intolerability and sensitivity in subjects with skin intolerant to skin care products.

Clinicaltrialsgov Identifier

NCT05487937.

Pharmacological interventions for periorificial (perioral) dermatitis in children and adults: a systematic review

The plethora of pharmacologic treatments used for periorificial dermatitis (POD) makes clinical decision-making challenging. The objectives of this review were to assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for POD in children and adults. The search was performed on 2 February 2021 and included seven databases and trial registries, with no date or language restrictions Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed independently and in duplicate by two authors, in accordance with a prespecified protocol. Meta-analyses were performed and reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Where meta-analysis was not possible, a narrative synthesis was performed and reported in accordance with SWiM guidelines. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Eleven studies representing 733 participants were included. Oral tetracycline may improve physician-reported severity of POD from day 20 onwards (low certainty evidence). Adverse effects may include abdominal discomfort, facial dryness and pruritus. Pimecrolimus cream may improve physician-reported severity slightly after 4 weeks of treatment (MD -0.49, 95% CI -1.02 to 0.04, n = 164, low certainty evidence). Adverse effects may include erythema, herpes simplex virus infection, burning and pruritus. Azelaic acid gel may result in no change in either physician- or patient-reported severity after 6 weeks of treatment. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of praziquantel ointment on physician-reported severity and skin-related quality of life after 4 weeks of treatment. The evidence is also very uncertain about the effect of topical clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide on physician-reported severity. The body of evidence to inform treatment of POD currently consists of low and very low certainty evidence for important outcomes. Well-designed trials are needed to further investigate treatment options. Data are required for children and from low-middle income countries to improve external validity. Future trials should also include adequate post-treatment follow-up and standardized outcome measures.

Perioral dermatitis: diagnosis, proposed etiologies and management

Perioral dermatitis is a common cutaneous condition characterized by acneiform facial eruptions often with an eczematous appearance. A granulomatous subtype exists in addition to the classic variant. Whilst topical corticosteroids have been largely implicated in this condition, its etiology is not completely understood. Using the keywords "corticosteroids," "dermatology," "fusobacteria," "perioral dermatitis", and "periorificial dermatitis" we searched the databases PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE to find the relevant literature. Only articles in English were chosen. The level of evidence was evaluated and selected according to the highest level working our way downwards using the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 guidance. This systematic review found the strongest evidence to support topical corticosteroid misuse as the principal causative factor in the pathogenesis of perioral dermatitis. In terms of treatment, further research is required to robustly investigate promising treatment options including tetracyclines, topical metronidazole, topical azelaic acid, adapalene gel and oral isotretinoin.