Tattoo Granuloma Restricted to Red Dyes

Surgical Excision and Reconstruction of Tattoo Following Hypersensitivity

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity reaction in a tattoo secondary to red ink is a relatively rare complication, particularly as the biochemical composition of tattoo dye has been refined. Most hypersensitivity reactions are amenable to conservative management, but less common is the necessity for full surgical excision and reconstruction.

METHODS

A 50-year-old female patient with a chronic tattoo granuloma causing excessive pruritus, erythema, and ulceration, refractory to conservative and minimally invasive techniques, underwent full surgical excision and skin-graft reconstruction of the areas affected by the red dye. Additionally, literature was reviewed for similar reports requiring excision.

RESULTS

The patient reports complete symptomatic resolution and satisfaction with the result. The literature reveals a small set of cases reporting a necessity for surgical excision following red-ink hypersensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Tattoo hypersensitivity secondary to a red ink-induced allergic reaction is relatively rare. Most cases are amenable to conservative treatment; however, surgical excision and reconstruction provides a viable option in cases refractory to traditional and less invasive management.

Unusual mercury poisoning from tattoo dye

BACKGROUND

Tattoos have become very popular in modern societies due to the gradual change in aesthetics and psychosocial acceptability. Consequently, tattoo reactions are seen more commonly than in the past. Cutaneous lesions associated with tattoos can be divided into three major groups: allergic/granulomatous/lichenoid, infectious, and coincidental lesions. Early identification and proper treatment of these skin lesions is challenging and necessitates close coοperation of different medical specialties.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We report an unusual case of mercury poisoning in a young person manifested with local skin reactions following amateur tattooing. The tattoo induced inflammatory foreign body reactions and required multiple surgical excisions to be removed. The unique feature of this case is the use of the elemental form of mercury in the tattoo dye and the resulting mercury poisoning. The poisoning was confirmed by detection of mercury in blood, urine, and hair samples.

CONCLUSION

This is a rare case of tattoo-associated skin reaction and mercury poisoning by the elemental form of mercury contained in the tattoo dye. In the literature, many conditions have been documented in association with tattoos and the process of tattoo application, especially when red dyes are used, but no similar cases of elemental mercury poisoning from the tattoo dye exist. HIPPOKRATIA 2017, 21(4): 197-200.