Serotonin Expression in Lichen Planus Lesions and Its Relationship with Depression/Anxiety

Depressive Disorder and Dermatological Autoimmune Diseases

Depressive disorders are a growing problem worldwide. They are also characterized by high comorbidity, including from the circle of dermatological diseases. Autoimmune diseases seem to be particularly correlated with depressive comorbidity, raising the question of their possible common pathomechanism. The PubMed database was searched, focusing on results published after 2016. A particular reciprocal correlation of depressive disorders with psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, alopecia areata, impetigo, lupus and systemic scleroderma was found. One possible explanation for the co-occurrence of the above diseases is that the inflammatory theory may be applicable to depression, the various elements of which also apply to autoimmune diseases.

Anxiety and depression in keratotic oral lichen planus: a multicentric study from the SIPMO

OBJECTIVES

Oral lichen planus with exclusive keratotic reticular, papular, and/or plaque-like lesions (K-OLP) is a clinical pattern of OLP that may be associated with a complex symptomatology and psychological alteration. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of anxiety (A) and depression (D) in patients with K-OLP, analyzing the potential predictors which can affect mental health status.

METHODS

Three hundred K-OLP patients versus 300 healthy controls (HC) were recruited in 15 Italian universities. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Total Pain Rating Index (T-PRI), and Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression and for Anxiety (HAM-D and HAM-A) were administered.

RESULTS

The K-OLP patients showed statistically higher scores in the NRS, T-PRI, HAM-D, and HAM-A compared with the HC (p-value < 0.001**). A and D were found in 158 (52.7%) and 148 (49.3%) K-OLP patients. Strong linear correlations were identified between HAM-A, HAM-D, NRS, T-PRI, and employment status and between HAM-D, HAM-A, NRS, T-PRI, employment status, and female gender. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that HAM-D and HAM-A showed the greatest increase in the R2 value for A and D in the K-OLP patients, respectively (DR2 = 55.5% p-value < 0.001**; DR2 = 56.5% p-value < 0.001**).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of A and D is higher in the K-OLP patients compared with the HC, also found in K-OLP subjects without pain, suggesting that the processing of pain may be in a certain way independent of the processing of mood.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Mood disorders and pain assessment should be carefully performed in relation to K-OLP to obtain a complete analysis of the patients.

Risk of anxiety and depression in patients with lichen planus: A nationwide population-based study

BACKGROUND

This study aims to determine the risk of developing anxiety and/or depression among patients with lichen planus.

METHODS

Based on the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database of Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, a total of 4012 patients with lichen planus and 16,048 matched controls (1:4) were enrolled between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015. After controlling for the risk variables, multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression and the log-rank test with Kaplan-Meier method were performed to assess the influence of anxiety/depression among individuals with lichen planus under a maximum follow-up period of 16 years.

RESULTS

The subsequent anxiety or depression incidence of the lichen planus group and the comparisons was 19.67% (1962.70 per 10⁵ person-years) and 10.11% (982.23 per 10⁵person-years), respectively. Additionally, after adjustment of the risk variables, the hazard ratios for anxiety, depression, anxiety without depression, depression without anxiety, anxiety or depression, and both anxiety and depression combined were 1.779 (95%CI: 1.289-2.477, p < 0.001), 2.010 (95%CI: 1.454-2.790, p < 0.001), 2.015 (95%CI: 1.463-2.799, p < 0.001), 2.356 (95%CI: 1.705-3.286, p < 0.001), 2.011 (95%CI: 1.457-2.793, p < 0.001), and 1.515 (95%CI: 1.100-2.134, p < 0.001), respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Individuals with lichen planus were unable to be classified into oral subtype and cutaneous subtype based on the ICD-9-CM. Moreover, the results of our study could not demonstrate the mechanism between lichen planus and anxiety and/or depression.

CONCLUSION

Patients with lichen planus was positively associated with developing anxiety or depression. Physicians should to be aware of the signs of anxiety and/or depression while facing the patients with lichen planus during the clinical practices.