2019 Consensus Korean Diagnostic Guidelines to Define Severity Classification and Treatment Refractoriness for Atopic Dermatitis: Objective and Subjective Assessment of Severity

Systemic Inflammatory Proteomic Biomarkers in Atopic Dermatitis: Exploring Potential Indicators for Disease Severity

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory cutaneous disorder, that emerges from intricate interplays among genetic predisposition, immune dysregulation, environmental factors, and compromised skin barrier. Understanding the inflammatory pathway in AD is important due to its fundamental role in the pathogenesis of AD. This study aimed to explore the diverse spectrum of proteins linked to the inflammation of AD and the relationship between systemic biomarkers and clinical severity in AD.

METHODS

We examined the blood samples from 48 patients with AD and 48 healthy controls (HCs) using the Proximity Extension Assay (Olink). Differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified and Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to determine systemic proteomic biomarkers associated with severity of AD.

RESULTS

A total of 29 DEPs were significantly up-regulated and 2 DEPs were significantly down-regulated in AD compared with the HC. The MCP-4, IL-18, MCP-3, TNFRSF9, and IL-17C were the top 5 highest DEPs associated with the severity of AD.

CONCLUSION

Our study sheds light on the intricate network of inflammatory proteins in AD and their potential implications for disease severity. Our results indicate that these systemic inflammatory proteins could be valuable for assessing AD severity and enhancing our understanding of the disease's complexity and its potential management strategies.

Measuring Signs of Atopic Dermatitis in Clinical Practice: A HOME-CP Consensus Statement

Importance

Outcome measurement is an essential component of value-based health care and can aid patient care, quality improvement, and clinical effectiveness evidence generation. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema Clinical Practice initiative aims to identify a list of validated, feasible, outcome measurement instruments recommended to measure atopic dermatitis (AD) in the clinical practice setting. The clinical practice set is a list of instruments that clinicians can pick and choose from to suit their needs in the context of clinical care.

Objective

To recommend instruments to measure clinical signs of AD in clinical practice.

Evidence Review

Following the predefined roadmap, a mixed methods design was implemented and incorporated systematic reviews and qualitative consensus methods. Previous systematic reviews identified few clinical signs instruments with sufficient validation for recommendation. An updated systematic review evaluating the validity of clinical signs instruments informed an international meeting to reach consensus on recommended instruments to measure AD clinical signs in clinical practice. Consensus was defined as less than 30% disagreement. An in-person consensus exercise was held in Montreal, Canada, on October 16, 2022. The 34 attendees included patient and patient advocate research partners, health care professionals, researchers, methodologists, and industry representatives.

Findings

The updated systematic review found that the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Scoring Atopic Dermatitis, and objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis were the only instruments that demonstrated sufficient performance in all assessed measurement properties. The modified EASI and Signs Global Assessment × Body Surface Area instruments were also recommended. The EASI, Validated Investigator Global Assessment, and Investigator's Global Assessment multiplied by or measured concurrently with a body surface area measure achieved consensus in criteria and were adopted.

Conclusions and Relevance

This consensus statement by the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema initiative suggests that when assessing and documenting clinical signs of AD, there are several valid and feasible instruments that can best fit a clinician's specific practice needs. These instruments should improve and standardize the documentation of signs severity, help determine the effect of treatment, facilitate the generation of clinical effectiveness evidence, and enhance the implementation of value-based health care.

[Algoritmo de tratamiento de la dermatitis atópica en Perú. Consenso de expertos]

Objective

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic, systemic, relapsing disease with dermatological manifestations, which imposes a high burden on patients, families and the health care system and has a high psychological, social, and economic impact and on the quality of life of patients. It mainly affects the pediatric population and, to a lesser extent, the adult population. The clinical presentation varies according to the age and evolution of the disease, and currently there are multiple pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies available for the symptomatic management of patients.

Methods

To present an algorithm for the management of atopic dermatitis, proposed as a series of recommendations on the management, diagnosis, education, and follow-up of these patients.

Results

A consensus was reached using the nominal group technique. The methodology was developed in 7 phases, including: posing the research questions, literature search, an initial proposal of recommendations, elaboration of the final recommendations and the management algorithm with three voting cycles, consensus was established with 80% favorability.

Conclusions

The result of the consensus process is a management algorithm for patients with mild, moderate/severe atopic dermatitis derived from expert recommendations. The algorithm establishes diagnostic and treatment criteria and provides updated recommendations, including all therapeutic alternatives available in Peru for the management of patients with mild, moderate, and severe atopic dermatitis.

Basic Therapeutic Approach for Patients with Plaque Psoriasis: Korean Expert Consensus Using the Modified Delphi Method

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no consensus on the treatment of psoriasis in Korean patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to establish a consensus on the basic therapeutic principles for Korean patients with plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

Using the modified Delphi method, a steering committee proposed 53 statements for the first Delphi round, which covered five subjects: (1) the goal of treatment and evaluation of disease severity, (2) topical therapy, (3) phototherapy, (4) conventional systemic therapy, and (5) biologic therapy. The panel of dermatologists scored the level of agreement for each statement on a ten-point scale with scores ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree). After discussing the results of the first round, the committee reformulated 41 statements. Finally, consensus was defined as more than 70% of the second round scores being ≥7.

RESULTS

The panel participants strongly agreed that the ideal treatment goals for Korean patients with plaque psoriasis should include complete skin clearance and high dermatological quality of life. A strong consensus was also reached on the use of topical agents for psoriasis of any severity, the consideration of phototherapy before biologics therapy, the conventional systemic agents for moderate-to-severe psoriasis, and the recommendation of biologic for retractable psoriasis to conventional systemic therapy and phototherapy.

CONCLUSION

This modified Delphi panel established an expert consensus on the therapeutic approach for Korean patients with plaque psoriasis. This consensus may improve the treatment outcomes for psoriasis in Korea.

Assessment of Disease Severity and Quality of Life in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis from South Korea

BACKGROUND

Data illustrating the impact of atopic dermatitis (AD) on lives of adults with AD in South Korea are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the AD disease severity and its impact on quality of life (QoL) in patients with AD from South Korea.

METHODS

Patients with AD utilizing the specialist dermatology services of major hospitals in South Korea were assessed for disease severity using Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, for QoL using Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (for QoL), and for comorbidities and treatment experience via retrospective review of 12-month medical records. Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were also measured.

RESULTS

Of the 1,163 patients, 695 (59.8%) were men (mean age [years]±standard deviation: 31.6±12.1). Overall, 52.9% (n=615) patients had moderate-to-severe disease (EASI>7). The QoL of 72.3% (n=840) patients was affected moderately-to-severely (DLQI score: 6~30). Systemic immunosuppressants were used ≥1 over past 12 months in 51.9% (n=603) patients, and the most commonly used were cyclosporines (45.7%, n=531) and systemic corticosteroids (40.5%, n=471). Approximately, 10.8% (n=126) patients consulted or received treatment for AD-related eye problem. Of these, 40% (n=50) patients reported poor, very poor, or completely blind status; approximately, 16.7% patients (n=192) reported having depression or anxiety; and 35.5% (n=410) reported suicidal ideation or suicidal attempt.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of patients had moderate-to-severe AD, a compromised QoL, and ocular or mental health comorbidities, indicating a high disease burden despite systemic treatment. These findings highlight the importance of a holistic approach for the evaluation and treatment of patients with AD.

Clinical Implication of Serum Adiponectin Levels in Adult Patients with Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is characterized by chronic, relapsing, pruritic inflammatory skin disease. Adiponectin has been reported to have anti-inflammatory effects not only on metabolic disorders but also on various inflammatory disorders. The study aimed to validate adiponectin as a potential biomarker for AD disease severity and treatment response. Seventy-five patients with AD and 28 healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. Patient information, including Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores and pruritus numeric rating scales (NRSs), were collected. An enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was conducted to measure levels of serum adiponectin. Additionally, sera of patients treated with dupilumab were collected and measured at 16 and 52 weeks from baseline. Serum adiponectin levels were significantly lower in moderate and severe AD patients than in the control and mild AD patients. Serum adiponectin level was negatively correlated with the EASI score and pruritus NRS. However, no significant changes were observed according to biologic treatment for AD. Low serum adiponectin levels are associated with moderate to severe AD, suggesting a potential role for adiponectin as a biomarker for severity assessment of AD.

Serum Ceruloplasmin as a Potential Clinical Biomarker in Atopic Dermatitis

Background

Although the discovery of new biomarkers in atopic dermatitis (AD) is challenging, it is valuable in diagnosis, assessment of severity, and evaluation of treatment response.

Objective

This study was designed to identify and validate new candidate protein biomarkers of AD via proteomic analysis.

Methods

Comparison of protein expression in the patients’ serum before- and after-treatment and in patients without AD was performed via two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE), followed by image analysis. Spots showing differential expression in 2-DE image analysis were identified subsequently via nanoscale liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) experiments. Blood tests were conducted to validate the results obtained by measuring the levels of candidate proteins.

Results

Based on LC-MS/MS analysis and database search, we identified ceruloplasmin (Cp) as a candidate protein. Serum Cp levels were significantly decreased in in pre-treated AD group than in control group. Additionally, the serum Cp level was higher in the mild group than in the moderate group of AD based on the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score.

Conclusion

Low serum Cp levels are associated with AD, suggesting the potential role of Cp as a biomarker for diagnosis and severity assessment of AD.

Consensus Update for Systemic Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

Background

In 2015, the Korean Atopic Dermatitis Association (KADA) working group published consensus guidelines for treating atopic dermatitis (AD).

Objective

We aimed to provide updated consensus recommendations for systemic treatment of AD in South Korea based on recent evidence and experience.

Methods

We compiled a database of references from relevant systematic reviews and guidelines on the systemic management of AD. Evidence for each statement was graded and classified based on thestrength of the recommendation. Forty-two council members from the KADA participated in three rounds of voting to establish a consensus on expert recommendations.

Results

We do not recommend long-term treatment with systemic steroids forpatients with moderate-to-severe AD due to the risk of adverse effects. We recommend treatment with cyclosporine or dupilumab and selective treatment with methotrexate or azathioprine for patients with moderate-to-severe AD. We suggest treatment with antihistamines as an option for alleviating clinical symptoms of AD. We recommend selective treatment with narrowband ultraviolet B for patients with chronic moderate-to-severe AD. We do not recommend treatment with oral antibiotics for patients with moderate-to-severe AD but who have no signs of infection. We did not reach a consensus on recommendations for treatment with allergen-specific immunotherapy, probiotics, evening primrose oil, orvitamin D for patients with moderate-to-severe AD. We also recommend educational interventions and counselling for patients with AD and caregivers to improve the treatment success rate.

Conclusion

We look forward to implementing a new and updated consensus of systemic therapy in controlling patients with moderate-to-severe AD.