Monosomal and complex karyotypes as prognostic parameters in patients with International Prognostic Scoring System higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome treated with azacitidine

Real-World Outcome and Prognostic Factors in MDS Patients Treated with Azacitidine-A Retrospective Analysis

Azacitidine (AZA) is recognized as a vital drug used in the therapy of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) due to its beneficial effect on survival and quality of life. Nevertheless, many patients fail to respond to AZA treatment, as prognostic factors still are not identified. The present retrospective analysis included 79 patients with MDS treated with AZA as first-line therapy in a real-life setting. The percentage of patients with good, intermediate, and poor cytogenetics was 46.8%, 11.4%, and 34.2%, respectively. The overall response rate (complete remission [CR], partial remission [PR], and hematological improvement [HI]) was 24%. The CR, PR, and HI rates were 13.9%, 2.5%, and 7.6%, respectively. Stable disease (SD) was documented in 40.5% of patients. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 17.6 and 14.96 months, respectively. Patients with ORR and SD had a significantly longer median OS (23.8 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.0005) and PFS (19.8 vs. 3.5 months, p < 0.001) compared to patients who did not respond to AZA. In univariate analysis, only an unfavorable cytogenetic group was a prognostic factor of a lower response rate (p = 0.03). In a multivariate model, older age (p = 0.047), higher IPSS (International Prognostic Scoring System) risk (p = 0.014), and higher IPSS-R cytogenetic risk (p = 0.004) were independent factors of shorter OS. Independent prognostic factors for shorter PFS were age (p = 0.001), IPSS risk (p = 0.02), IPSS cytogenetic risk (p = 0.002), and serum ferritin level (p = 0.008). The safety profile of AZA was predictable and consistent with previous studies. In conclusion, our study confirms the efficacy and safety of AZA in a real-world population and identifies potential biomarkers for response and survival.

Real-world practice-based prognostic model for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated with azacitidine monotherapy: The Kyoto prognostic scoring system

The prognostic impact of patient-related factors, including age, nutritional parameters, and inflammation status, in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) has been largely unexplored. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to establish a real-world practice-based prognostic model for HR-MDS by considering both disease- and patient-related parameters in 233 patients treated with AZA monotherapy at seven institutions. We found that anemia, presence of circulating blasts in peripheral blood, low absolute lymphocyte count, low total cholesterol (T-cho) and albumin serum levels, complex karyotype, and del(7q) or  - 7 were poor prognostic factors. Therefore, we developed a new prognostic model called the Kyoto Prognostic Scoring System (KPSS) by incorporating the two variables with the highest C-indexes (complex karyotype and serum T-cho level). The KPSS classified patients into the following three groups: good (0 risk factors), intermediate (1), and poor (2). Median overall survival for these groups was 24.4, 11.3, and 6.9, respectively (p < 0.001). The discriminatory power of the KPSS was higher than that of the traditional International Prognostic Scoring System. In conclusion, we identified several nutritional parameters with prognostic relevance in patients with HR-MDS and generated a prognostic model consisting of complex karyotype and serum T-cho level that enabled excellent risk stratification.

Predicting outcome in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients treated with azacitidine

5-Azacitidine (5-AZA) is widely used for the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. However, response and survival rates vary considerably, while indicated treatment duration remains undefined. For these reasons, factors determining response and survival are of major importance. Clinical, morphological, flow cytometry, cytogenetic and molecular factors are discussed in this review. Biomarkers predictive of response and prognosis, as well as their link to the mode of action of 5-AZA are also addressed, shifting the focus from clinical practice to investigational research. Their use could further improve prognostic classification of 5-AZA treated higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in the near future.

Factors affecting response to 5-azacytidine and prognosis of myelodysplastic syndrome. Is long-term survival a realistic goal?

The introduction of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) 5-azacytidine and decitabine has altered the prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Over the past few years, the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and the revised IPSS (IPSS-R) have been used both to define the prognosis of patients with MDS and to select patients to be treated with HMAs. Nevertheless, the prognosis of individual patients with MDS can differ considerably from the one calculated with the use of the above-mentioned prognostic systems. Thus, some patients may achieve long-term survival irrespective of their initial prognostic score. Several factors besides those used to define the IPSS/IPSS-R are analyzed in this review article; these include age and gender, the baseline hematologic characteristics, the comorbidities, the cytogenetic and molecular profile of the patients, as well as their response to treatment with 5-azacytidine. Thus, insight into a more personalized way of managing patients with MDS is given and long-term survival is set as a more realistic goal of treatment with 5-azacytidine.

Myelodysplastic syndromes: moving towards personalized management

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) share their origin in the hematopoietic stem cell but have otherwise very heterogeneous biological and genetic characteristics. Clinical features are dominated by cytopenia and a substantial risk for progression to acute myeloid leukemia. According to the World Health Organization, MDS is defined by cytopenia, bone marrow dysplasia and certain karyotypic abnormalities. The understanding of disease pathogenesis has undergone major development with the implementation of next-generation sequencing and a closer integration of morphology, cytogenetics and molecular genetics is currently paving the way for improved classification and prognostication. True precision medicine is still in the future for MDS and the development of novel therapeutic compounds with a propensity to markedly change patients' outcome lags behind that for many other blood cancers. Treatment of higher-risk MDS is dominated by monotherapy with hypomethylating agents but novel combinations are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Agents that stimulate erythropoiesis continue to be first-line treatment for the anemia of lower-risk MDS but luspatercept has shown promise as second-line therapy for sideroblastic MDS and lenalidomide is an established second-line treatment for del(5q) lower-risk MDS. The only potentially curative option for MDS is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, until recently associated with a relatively high risk of transplant-related mortality and relapse. However, recent studies show increased cure rates due to better tools to target the malignant clone with less toxicity. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status of the clinical evaluation, biology and therapeutic interventions for this spectrum of disorders.

Treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome in the era of next-generation sequencing

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is rapidly changing the clinical care of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). NGS can be used for various applications: (i) in the diagnostic process to discriminate between MDS and other diseases such as aplastic anaemia, myeloproliferative disorders and idiopathic cytopenias; (ii) for classification, for example, where the presence of SF3B1 mutation is one criterion for the ring sideroblast anaemia subgroups in the World Health Organization 2016 classification; (iii) for identification of patients suitable for targeted therapy (e.g. IDH1/2 inhibitors); (iv) for prognostication, for example, where specific mutations (e.g. TP53 and RUNX1) are associated with inferior prognosis, whereas others (e.g. SF3B1) are associated with superior prognosis; and (v) to monitor patients for progression or treatment failure. Most commonly, targeted sequencing for genes (normally 50-100 genes) reported to be recurrently mutated in myeloid disease is used. At present, NGS is rarely incorporated into clinical guidelines although an increasing number of studies have demonstrated the benefit of using NGS in the clinical management of MDS patients.

Analysis of clinical and molecular features of MDS patients with complex karyotype in China

We retrospectively analyzed 101 primary MDS patients with complex karyotype during January 2010 and April 2017.The median overall survival (OS) time was 13 (95% CI 9.98-16.02) months, and there was no significant difference in OS for different treatment. Chromosome 5/7 involvement was common (78.22%, 79/101) and associated with shorter OS (12 months vs. 28 months, P < 0.01) Monosomal karyotype (MK) is overlapped with CK in 79 patients, but was not statistically associated with shorter OS. While in 59 cases with genes sequenced, 57 (96.61%) patients were found to have at least one mutation of known significance, and TP53 was the most frequent (74.58%, 44/59), the median OS of patients with TP53 mutation was shorter than those without (10 vs. 27 months, P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only TP53 mutation was the strongest independent prognostic factor for OS. Moreover, high variant allele frequency (VAF) of TP53 mutation (median VAF was 70.00%) was seen and associated with adverse survival (9 months vs. 13 months, p = 0.04). In conclusion, MDS patients with CK implied an unfavorable outcome regardless of any treatment, TP53 mutation occurs at a high frequency and has a higher VAF, both were associated with worse survival.

Prognostic significance of monosomal karyotype in myelodysplastic syndrome: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

In myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), the prognostic role of monosomal karyotype (MK), defined as at least two autosomal monosomies or a single monosomy associated with at least one additional structural abnormality, remained controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to address this issue.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Medline, and the Cochrane Library were retrieved. We extracted hazard ratios (HRs) and the corresponding 95% confidential intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) on patients with MK versus those without, as well as on MK patients with monosomies of chromosome 7 and/or 5 versus those without from the available studies.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies covering 7500 patients were included this meta-analysis. The pooled HRs indicated MK had a negative impact on OS in MDS (pooled HR: 2.484, 95%CI: 2.033-3.036, P < .001), in MDS patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) (pooled HR: 2.150, 95%CI: 1.861-2.48, P < .001), and in MDS with complex karyotype (CK) (pooled HR: 2.56, 95%CI: 2.032-3.036, P = .01). However, monosomies of chromosome 5 and/or 7 had no impact on OS in MDS with MK (pooled HR: 1.330, 95%CI: 0.827-2.139, P = .240). Meta-regression indicated that therapy was the origin of the heterogeneity (P = .012).

DISCUSSION

Our meta-analysis indicated that MK has a negative impact on OS in MDS, in MDS patients undergoing allo-HSCT, and MDS with CK, but monosomies of chromosome 5 and/or 7 have no impact on OS in MDS with MK. The heterogeneity reflected the biologic and therapeutic heterogeneity of MDS.

CONCLUSION

MK is associated with poor prognosis in MDS, the underlying mechanism needs further exploring.

The prognostic value of monosomal karyotype (MK) in higher-risk patients with myelodysplastic syndromes treated with 5-Azacitidine: A retrospective analysis of the Hellenic (Greek) Myelodysplastic syndromes Study Group

In this study, we investigated the incidence and prognostic impact of monosomal karyotype (MK) in 405 higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) patients treated with 5-AZA. The MK was present in 66 out of 405 (16.3%) patients, most of whom had complex karyotype (CK). MK was strongly associated with CK and the cytogenetic risk defined according to IPSS-R, as well as with high-risk disease, according to IPSS (P = .029), IPSS-R (P < .001), and WPSS (P < .001) classification systems. The overall response rate (ORR) was not different between MK+ and MK- patients (46.6% vs. 46.2%). At 28 months median follow-up, the median duration of response was 11 months in the entire cohort, 9.5 months in MK+ patients and 11 months in MK-patients (P = .024). The estimated median time to transformation to acute myeloid leukemia for MK+ patients was 17 months vs. 23 months for MK- patients (P = .025). The estimated median OS for MK+ patients was 12 months vs. 18 months for MK- patients (P < .001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that performance status (P < .001), IPSS-R (P < .001), and MK (P = .002) were independently associated with overall survival (OS). In a subgroup consisting of high and very-high risk patients according to IPSS-R, MK- patients showed better OS rates compared to MK+ patients (estimated median OS: 17 months vs. 12 months, P = .002). In conclusion, we found that MK is associated with reduced OS in patients with higher-risk MDS treated with 5-AZA. Furthermore, we showed that in MDS with high or very-high IPSS-R risk score, MK can further distinguish patients with worse outcome.

Mutations in histone modulators are associated with prolonged survival during azacitidine therapy

Early therapeutic decision-making is crucial in patients with higher-risk MDS. We evaluated the impact of clinical parameters and mutational profiles in 134 consecutive patients treated with azacitidine using a combined cohort from Karolinska University Hospital (n=89) and from King's College Hospital, London (n=45). While neither clinical parameters nor mutations had a significant impact on response rate, both karyotype and mutational profile were strongly associated with survival from the start of treatment. IPSS high-risk cytogenetics negatively impacted overall survival (median 20 vs 10 months; p<0.001), whereas mutations in histone modulators (ASXL1, EZH2) were associated with prolonged survival (22 vs 12 months, p=0.01). This positive association was present in both cohorts and remained highly significant in the multivariate cox model. Importantly, patients with mutations in histone modulators lacking high-risk cytogenetics showed a survival of 29 months compared to only 10 months in patients with the opposite pattern. While TP53 was negatively associated with survival, neither RUNX1-mutations nor the number of mutations appeared to influence survival in this cohort. We propose a model combining histone modulator mutational screening with cytogenetics in the clinical decision-making process for higher-risk MDS patients eligible for treatment with azacitidine.

Epigenetic therapy of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will discuss issues arising along with the expanding use of hypomethylating treatment (HMT) in the management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

RECENT FINDINGS

HMT has been shown to induce responses in MDS and AML, and azacitidine (Vidaza, Celgene) has been shown to prolong survival in higher-risk MDS. Recent studies have supported the idea that disease stability may also be a treatment goal, whereas treatment interruption in responding patients is associated with rapid disease relapse and death. In AML, a modest but significant survival advantage has been shown for HMT by censoring patients at the time of subsequent AML therapy, but the major limitation remains the short duration of responses. Unfortunately, some of the strategies to overcome these limitations have failed, including the combination of HMT to histone-deacetylase inhibitors, which has not definitively shown to significantly prolong survival. Molecules interfering with other pathways impacting the survival and proliferation of blasts, used alone or in combination, including guadecitabine, selinexor, or inhibitors of IDH2 mutations, are more promising approaches.

SUMMARY

Hypomethylating drugs are the first successful treatment for elderly patients with higher-risk MDS and are effective for some AML subtypes. Translational studies will hopefully identify patients with a favorable profile of response to these drugs, and help to identify newer targets for combination treatments.

Scoring System Prognostic of Outcome in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome

PURPOSE

To develop a system prognostic of outcome in those undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo HCT) for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined 2,133 patients with MDS undergoing HLA-matched (n = 1,728) or -mismatched (n = 405) allo HCT from 2000 to 2012. We used a Cox multivariable model to identify factors prognostic of mortality in a training subset (n = 1,151) of the HLA-matched cohort. A weighted score using these factors was assigned to the remaining patients undergoing HLA-matched allo HCT (validation cohort; n = 577) as well as to patients undergoing HLA-mismatched allo HCT.

RESULTS

Blood blasts greater than 3% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.85), platelets 50 × 10(9)/L or less at transplantation (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.61), Karnofsky performance status less than 90% (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.28), comprehensive cytogenetic risk score of poor or very poor (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.80), and age 30 to 49 years (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.35) were associated with increased hazard of death and assigned 1 point in the scoring system. Monosomal karyotype (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.65 to 2.45) and age 50 years or older (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.36 to 2.83) were assigned 2 points. The 3-year overall survival after transplantation in patients with low (0 to 1 points), intermediate (2 to 3), high (4 to 5) and very high (≥ 6) scores was 71% (95% CI, 58% to 85%), 49% (95% CI, 42% to 56%), 41% (95% CI, 31% to 51%), and 25% (95% CI, 4% to 46%), respectively (P < .001). Increasing score was predictive of increased relapse (P < .001) and treatment-related mortality (P < .001) in the HLA-matched set and relapse (P < .001) in the HLA-mismatched cohort.

CONCLUSION

The proposed system is prognostic of outcome in patients undergoing HLA-matched and -mismatched allo HCT for MDS.